Chatgpt 对今天抓法官的分析 Yes, the arrest of Judge Hannah Dugan on federal obstruction charges is widely viewed as a significant escalation in the ongoing tension between the executive branch and the judiciary in the United States. Many legal experts and political leaders consider this event a potential step toward a constitutional crisis. Judge Dugan’s arrest marks the first known instance of a sitting judge being charged under the Trump administration’s 2025 directive encouraging the prosecution of local officials who obstruct federal immigration enforcement. The incident has intensified concerns about the balance of power among the branches of government and the independence of the judiciary. Prominent political figures, including Senators Tammy Baldwin, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren, have condemned the arrest as an attack on judicial independence and a breach of the separation of powers. Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers described the action as part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to undermine the judiciary. Legal experts have expressed alarm over the arrest, suggesting it could set a dangerous precedent for the criminalization of judicial discretion. Christopher Wellborn, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, stated that American democracy “rests upon the independence of the judiciary” and that any “retaliatory action from the executive branch that appears to undermine this foundation demands our unwavering scrutiny and a resounding response.” This event is part of a broader pattern of the Trump administration’s confrontations with the judiciary. In recent months, the administration has defied court orders, called for the impeachment of judges who ruled against it, and suggested restructuring or eliminating federal courts to counter unfavorable decisions. Given these developments, the arrest of Judge Dugan is not an isolated incident but rather a reflection of escalating tensions that many observers believe could lead to a constitutional crisis if the balance of power among the branches of government continues to erode.
还有就是大家对现在的局势如何看？
就事论事，不是法官违法在先吗？
至少德州佛州，最好卖了吧！
你哪儿的结论违法了？ 她被press charges 但是根本没有convictions press charges就是看你不爽安个罪名给你 这是赤裸裸的政治迫害懂吗？
投资策略也是慢慢变，哪有人动不动就all-in, all-out的.
全卖了这也是赌，万一其他地方突然变的更糟糕呢？
Judge Dugan’s arrest marks the first known instance of a sitting judge being charged under the Trump administration’s 2025 directive encouraging the prosecution of local officials who obstruct federal immigration enforcement. The incident has intensified concerns about the balance of power among the branches of government and the independence of the judiciary.
Prominent political figures, including Senators Tammy Baldwin, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren, have condemned the arrest as an attack on judicial independence and a breach of the separation of powers. Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers described the action as part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to undermine the judiciary.
Legal experts have expressed alarm over the arrest, suggesting it could set a dangerous precedent for the criminalization of judicial discretion. Christopher Wellborn, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, stated that American democracy “rests upon the independence of the judiciary” and that any “retaliatory action from the executive branch that appears to undermine this foundation demands our unwavering scrutiny and a resounding response.”
This event is part of a broader pattern of the Trump administration’s confrontations with the judiciary. In recent months, the administration has defied court orders, called for the impeachment of judges who ruled against it, and suggested restructuring or eliminating federal courts to counter unfavorable decisions.
Given these developments, the arrest of Judge Dugan is not an isolated incident but rather a reflection of escalating tensions that many observers believe could lead to a constitutional crisis if the balance of power among the branches of government continues to erode.
有一说一，新西兰挺歧视中国人的，程度远超美国，因为受澳洲长年的白澳政策影响，外加大批中国人炒房
论对华人歧视加拿大确实比澳大利亚 新西兰轻 但是架不住离川疯子近 新西兰起码山高皇帝远 当年因为加拿大靠近美国当优势来这里 没想到可能成了劣势 现在天天被川疯子threaten 当51州 起码川疯子没威胁新西兰澳大利亚 就这点新西兰澳大利亚就已经占优势了 川疯子再疯也鞭长莫及
那请问她干了什么被press charges
WHY ？
Why? 你们不是要去新加坡吗?
应该是需要liquidity 来安顿转移？ 这说得通。
是限制中国、朝鲜、俄罗斯和伊朗的外国人购买房产，不是华人
楼主，你如果在蓝州，不用着急，完全可以等红州川粉进集中营了再来规划。感谢红州川粉战术缓冲，你们一定要呆在红州。
看不懂你的逻辑是什么 不管资产多少都可以提前规划呀。
楼主是怕人走了再也回不来房子被没收。 解放后上海有大量遗留的私人房产。一百多万人走了房子带不走。 白先勇小说里那些跑到台湾的人一个皮箱带点细软很快坐吃山空。陈立夫在美国养鸡。
有大量不动产可以想办法减持。如果只有一个自住房可以先搞个HELOC随时可以拿一些钱。 损失肯定是难免的
那是否意味着已经拥有德州房产的华人赚着啦？或是那边的房市会进一步恶化，因为置产大军没有了。。。
准备买一个集中营的timeshare.
真逗了，真到了逃命的时候，break 一个lease才损失多点钱，总比一个房子陷在这里强吧
话放这
我没打算卖房啊。最多是置换。先买再卖。还是买在美国啊。只是不想交新泽西州税罢了
你是开玩笑吧
Hahahahahaha 🤣
跑路了竟然还管租房合约？ 拿着金银细软证件上飞机跑路。
不过大蓝州的暂时不急 ，我们这个地方要是也能沦陷了 那就意味着美国真的完了。
我还在考虑，另一层的人说我资产不多，我真呵呵了
因为资产多，所以需要提前准备。不过我还是会两边跑，我还是选择亚洲多一些
我都懒的反驳他/她
我的资产相对比较多，所以我需要提前规划，不过我只是卖了不容易变现的，容易变现的我还是留着
没有地址是无法开户的
谁的“法”？
红州的先挡着枪口，蓝州有缓冲期
换成黄金白银然后野地里挖个坑埋起来，反正天天在华人看到人挖坑都已经目视练成精了😄
不是说改到葡萄牙了吗？
都做了什么准备？
这不挺好的吗，天塌下来还有迟钝顶着，让别人先撤
在红州不是川粉的怎么办?.....
当年李嘉诚不就是老早就开始卖了😄
李嘉诚也没卖自住房去租房吧？
that wasn't my point 😄
别卖。照Trump这个政策，明年就会通货膨胀，等明年美联储换主席，一定降息。我觉得美国通货膨胀会飙升30%。
纯讨论啊 没有说以下一定会发生 就你说的情况 那美元也已经大幅度贬值了啊 如果现在卖了换成其他国家货币不是一样吗？而且以后即使资产涨也不一定有卖资产的可行性（资产冻结没收等等）
虽然，但是，如果美元体系被严重破坏，美元资产也不值钱了，而且，到时候抛售的多了，想脱手都难。
羡慕啥 拖家带口的人的投资房还等着租客呢
哈哈哈 网上的谁知道都是啥人
快申请马来西亚MM2H吧， 特别适合有美国身份的家庭。 我在版里推了很多次了。 总被一些别有用心的人攻击。马来西亚的人均GDP比美中国一线城市。 想想都知道不可能落后的.
有什么建议吗?
Re这个 。一般人哪经得起这一惊一乍的。还有焦虑百分之九十九都是杞人忧天，瞎折腾还不如好好享受当下
再怎么样川普也不能随便打🇨🇦 加拿大幅员辽阔 国际上一只不惹事不树敌 川普打嘴炮也就罢了，真要入侵得掂量掂量
问题是什么时候警察可以随便抓人了？他说你违法就违法了吗？这才是无法无天吧！