这个草台班子对美国教育的摧毁是全方位的 美国院士：我们正在见证美国科学的死亡 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/apr/09/science-destruction-america Simply put, the US is the best place in the world to be for smart, ambitious people to make discoveries, advance knowledge and improve people’s lives. Consequently, the US leads the world in science, by any measurable criterion. Twenty of the world’s top 30 universities are American, most Nobel prizes in science are won by Americans, half the world’s medicines are invented in the US. When “American exceptionalism” is spoken of, scientists, perhaps more so than any other profession, know exactly what is meant. The vast majority of fundamental scientific research in the US is funded by American taxpayers, through bodies such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Science Foundation, that make grants to universities and research institutes. These grants support scientific infrastructure, pay scientists’ salaries and fund specific research projects. While charities and individual donors also make contributions, these are dwarfed by federal support. Public funding for science is essential because most endeavors in science cannot be directly commercialized, and fundamental science is rarely done by the for-profit sector. Moreover, science, by definition, requires trial-and-error experimentation at the edge of knowledge – its outcomes are unpredictable. Therefore, science is, in a sense, inherently inefficient.
Nonetheless, science is the only way to generate the foundational knowledge that enables technology, medicine and an understanding of how the world works, that can be applied for the benefit of humanity. The knowledge uncovered by taxpayer-funded science underpins American innovation and exceptionalism. The extraordinary success that has been American science makes it especially distressing to now witness its destruction. The public investment that has made American science exceptional also makes it dependent on political support. For the most part, both sides of the political divide have recognized the obvious value of American science to society and have broadly supported public investment in it. But this no longer appears to be the case. As I write, American science is being throttled. Funds promised for ongoing research projects are being withheld by the new administration. Executive orders of dubious legal basis have been issued that will slash resources for science. Some colleagues have already been forced to terminate the employment and training of the next generation of scientists, as funds previously promised to them are denied. Many more colleagues will need to take similar steps in the coming weeks and months as their research grants are withheld. Many science graduate schools are not accepting new students, many are rescinding earlier offers, and others are dramatically reducing their intake. Make no mistake, the scientific workforce is being gutted. The withholding of scientific resources as a form of punishment for certain high-profile universities has been widely publicized, but it is actually happening in nearly every American biomedical research institution. The US’s capacity to do science, and its ability to draw and retain scientific talent is being discarded. In addition to the withholding of resources, American science is being further corroded by the installation of leadership that does not value or even understand science, and is clearly incapable of effectively leading it. In the past, American science was led by distinguished scientists and administrators who grasped its foundational role in a society whose lifeblood is innovation. Under the new administration, science leadership roles have been assigned to those without notable achievement, whose only real distinction is infamy. We would never have heard of these individuals were it not for their ludicrous pronouncements, poor science or outright quackery. These new leaders are targeting specific areas of great scientific importance for elimination. They have commanded that NIH grant applications be screened for particular scientific terms; for example, projects on vaccines using a particular exceptionally promising technology, that is disfavored based on a whim of the leadership, are being weeded out. Entire programs that are intended to better prepare the US and the world for future pandemics are being terminated.
qianqiuxue 发表于 2025-04-11 11:37 这个草台班子对美国教育的摧毁是全方位的 美国院士：我们正在见证美国科学的死亡 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/apr/09/science-destruction-america Simply put, the US is the best place in the world to be for smart, ambitious people to make discoveries, advance knowledge and improve people’s lives. Consequently, the US leads the world in science, by any measurable criterion. Twenty of the world’s top 30 universities are American, most Nobel prizes in science are won by Americans, half the world’s medicines are invented in the US. When “American exceptionalism” is spoken of, scientists, perhaps more so than any other profession, know exactly what is meant. The vast majority of fundamental scientific research in the US is funded by American taxpayers, through bodies such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Science Foundation, that make grants to universities and research institutes. These grants support scientific infrastructure, pay scientists’ salaries and fund specific research projects. While charities and individual donors also make contributions, these are dwarfed by federal support. Public funding for science is essential because most endeavors in science cannot be directly commercialized, and fundamental science is rarely done by the for-profit sector. Moreover, science, by definition, requires trial-and-error experimentation at the edge of knowledge – its outcomes are unpredictable. Therefore, science is, in a sense, inherently inefficient.
Nonetheless, science is the only way to generate the foundational knowledge that enables technology, medicine and an understanding of how the world works, that can be applied for the benefit of humanity. The knowledge uncovered by taxpayer-funded science underpins American innovation and exceptionalism. The extraordinary success that has been American science makes it especially distressing to now witness its destruction. The public investment that has made American science exceptional also makes it dependent on political support. For the most part, both sides of the political divide have recognized the obvious value of American science to society and have broadly supported public investment in it. But this no longer appears to be the case. As I write, American science is being throttled. Funds promised for ongoing research projects are being withheld by the new administration. Executive orders of dubious legal basis have been issued that will slash resources for science. Some colleagues have already been forced to terminate the employment and training of the next generation of scientists, as funds previously promised to them are denied. Many more colleagues will need to take similar steps in the coming weeks and months as their research grants are withheld. Many science graduate schools are not accepting new students, many are rescinding earlier offers, and others are dramatically reducing their intake. Make no mistake, the scientific workforce is being gutted. The withholding of scientific resources as a form of punishment for certain high-profile universities has been widely publicized, but it is actually happening in nearly every American biomedical research institution. The US’s capacity to do science, and its ability to draw and retain scientific talent is being discarded. In addition to the withholding of resources, American science is being further corroded by the installation of leadership that does not value or even understand science, and is clearly incapable of effectively leading it. In the past, American science was led by distinguished scientists and administrators who grasped its foundational role in a society whose lifeblood is innovation. Under the new administration, science leadership roles have been assigned to those without notable achievement, whose only real distinction is infamy. We would never have heard of these individuals were it not for their ludicrous pronouncements, poor science or outright quackery. These new leaders are targeting specific areas of great scientific importance for elimination. They have commanded that NIH grant applications be screened for particular scientific terms; for example, projects on vaccines using a particular exceptionally promising technology, that is disfavored based on a whim of the leadership, are being weeded out. Entire programs that are intended to better prepare the US and the world for future pandemics are being terminated.
qianqiuxue 发表于 2025-04-11 11:37 这个草台班子对美国教育的摧毁是全方位的 美国院士：我们正在见证美国科学的死亡 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/apr/09/science-destruction-america Simply put, the US is the best place in the world to be for smart, ambitious people to make discoveries, advance knowledge and improve people’s lives. Consequently, the US leads the world in science, by any measurable criterion. Twenty of the world’s top 30 universities are American, most Nobel prizes in science are won by Americans, half the world’s medicines are invented in the US. When “American exceptionalism” is spoken of, scientists, perhaps more so than any other profession, know exactly what is meant. The vast majority of fundamental scientific research in the US is funded by American taxpayers, through bodies such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Science Foundation, that make grants to universities and research institutes. These grants support scientific infrastructure, pay scientists’ salaries and fund specific research projects. While charities and individual donors also make contributions, these are dwarfed by federal support. Public funding for science is essential because most endeavors in science cannot be directly commercialized, and fundamental science is rarely done by the for-profit sector. Moreover, science, by definition, requires trial-and-error experimentation at the edge of knowledge – its outcomes are unpredictable. Therefore, science is, in a sense, inherently inefficient.
Nonetheless, science is the only way to generate the foundational knowledge that enables technology, medicine and an understanding of how the world works, that can be applied for the benefit of humanity. The knowledge uncovered by taxpayer-funded science underpins American innovation and exceptionalism. The extraordinary success that has been American science makes it especially distressing to now witness its destruction. The public investment that has made American science exceptional also makes it dependent on political support. For the most part, both sides of the political divide have recognized the obvious value of American science to society and have broadly supported public investment in it. But this no longer appears to be the case. As I write, American science is being throttled. Funds promised for ongoing research projects are being withheld by the new administration. Executive orders of dubious legal basis have been issued that will slash resources for science. Some colleagues have already been forced to terminate the employment and training of the next generation of scientists, as funds previously promised to them are denied. Many more colleagues will need to take similar steps in the coming weeks and months as their research grants are withheld. Many science graduate schools are not accepting new students, many are rescinding earlier offers, and others are dramatically reducing their intake. Make no mistake, the scientific workforce is being gutted. The withholding of scientific resources as a form of punishment for certain high-profile universities has been widely publicized, but it is actually happening in nearly every American biomedical research institution. The US’s capacity to do science, and its ability to draw and retain scientific talent is being discarded. In addition to the withholding of resources, American science is being further corroded by the installation of leadership that does not value or even understand science, and is clearly incapable of effectively leading it. In the past, American science was led by distinguished scientists and administrators who grasped its foundational role in a society whose lifeblood is innovation. Under the new administration, science leadership roles have been assigned to those without notable achievement, whose only real distinction is infamy. We would never have heard of these individuals were it not for their ludicrous pronouncements, poor science or outright quackery. These new leaders are targeting specific areas of great scientific importance for elimination. They have commanded that NIH grant applications be screened for particular scientific terms; for example, projects on vaccines using a particular exceptionally promising technology, that is disfavored based on a whim of the leadership, are being weeded out. Entire programs that are intended to better prepare the US and the world for future pandemics are being terminated.
根据这帖子第一页给的视频，她第一次提到A1的时候说的是 making sure that first graders or even pre-K have A1 teaching”. 你可以再仔细找一下A1作为elementary水平的那种含义的话，一般特指语言，英语的level。first graders或者pre-K本来应该就大概是这种A1水准，她特意提出来不觉得突兀？而且A1作为你说的elementary水平的话，那段话也应该说成have A1 level才符合正常说法或者逻辑，而不是A1 teaching（最差也是应该A1 level teaching）。A1 level这种词好像是欧洲/英国那边用的比较常（那边的评判语言/英语的level,类似于托福等级。https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%AD%90%E6%B4%B2%E5%85%B1%E5%90%8C%E8%AA%9E%E8%A8%80%E5%8F%83%E8%80%83%E6%A8%99%E6%BA%96?wprov=sfti1#），美国这边要是想要说类似的意思大部分直接说basic/elementary level/teaching就好了。 美国教育部长在一个应该/大概率是面向美国民众的演讲/谈话中用上一个欧洲那边审评语言能力的词汇，你觉得这和把AI误读成A1，哪个更没有道理，更不应该出现？
this is miracle.
Haha,就是说为什么这么眼熟。
不过我买了一瓶，没用几次觉得没意思。可以用来烧红烧牛肉。
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/6QL0c5BbCR4
参加AI pandel, 家里酱油吃多了，说成A1？
粉应该跟着叫A1， AI太woke了
看成了天天party, 一点不矛盾
美国的民主是对选民负责的！！！
负责选出来了这末一个货，哈哈。
川粉说A1 是America no.1 多好的MAGA系名字 你们这是嫉妒
不丢人，这就是美国教育的现状
下面的评论笑亖我了
真為美國教育前途堪忧
居然还说了两次！！
而且明显不是口误！！
啧啧啧，你们川粉spin的能力还是很不错的。
火箭直升当选大学党委书记，全国人大常委
第一次听到她说的时候， 震惊，以为自己听错了，不会吧！ 听她第二次说的时候， 真无语了。这是烤肉蘸酱吃多了么？
美国教育部长，牛X！
美国院士：我们正在见证美国科学的死亡 https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/apr/09/science-destruction-america
Simply put, the US is the best place in the world to be for smart, ambitious people to make discoveries, advance knowledge and improve people’s lives. Consequently, the US leads the world in science, by any measurable criterion. Twenty of the world’s top 30 universities are American, most Nobel prizes in science are won by Americans, half the world’s medicines are invented in the US. When “American exceptionalism” is spoken of, scientists, perhaps more so than any other profession, know exactly what is meant. The vast majority of fundamental scientific research in the US is funded by American taxpayers, through bodies such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Science Foundation, that make grants to universities and research institutes. These grants support scientific infrastructure, pay scientists’ salaries and fund specific research projects. While charities and individual donors also make contributions, these are dwarfed by federal support. Public funding for science is essential because most endeavors in science cannot be directly commercialized, and fundamental science is rarely done by the for-profit sector. Moreover, science, by definition, requires trial-and-error experimentation at the edge of knowledge – its outcomes are unpredictable. Therefore, science is, in a sense, inherently inefficient.
Nonetheless, science is the only way to generate the foundational knowledge that enables technology, medicine and an understanding of how the world works, that can be applied for the benefit of humanity. The knowledge uncovered by taxpayer-funded science underpins American innovation and exceptionalism. The extraordinary success that has been American science makes it especially distressing to now witness its destruction. The public investment that has made American science exceptional also makes it dependent on political support. For the most part, both sides of the political divide have recognized the obvious value of American science to society and have broadly supported public investment in it. But this no longer appears to be the case. As I write, American science is being throttled. Funds promised for ongoing research projects are being withheld by the new administration. Executive orders of dubious legal basis have been issued that will slash resources for science. Some colleagues have already been forced to terminate the employment and training of the next generation of scientists, as funds previously promised to them are denied. Many more colleagues will need to take similar steps in the coming weeks and months as their research grants are withheld. Many science graduate schools are not accepting new students, many are rescinding earlier offers, and others are dramatically reducing their intake. Make no mistake, the scientific workforce is being gutted. The withholding of scientific resources as a form of punishment for certain high-profile universities has been widely publicized, but it is actually happening in nearly every American biomedical research institution. The US’s capacity to do science, and its ability to draw and retain scientific talent is being discarded. In addition to the withholding of resources, American science is being further corroded by the installation of leadership that does not value or even understand science, and is clearly incapable of effectively leading it. In the past, American science was led by distinguished scientists and administrators who grasped its foundational role in a society whose lifeblood is innovation. Under the new administration, science leadership roles have been assigned to those without notable achievement, whose only real distinction is infamy. We would never have heard of these individuals were it not for their ludicrous pronouncements, poor science or outright quackery. These new leaders are targeting specific areas of great scientific importance for elimination. They have commanded that NIH grant applications be screened for particular scientific terms; for example, projects on vaccines using a particular exceptionally promising technology, that is disfavored based on a whim of the leadership, are being weeded out. Entire programs that are intended to better prepare the US and the world for future pandemics are being terminated.
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/lxrg28zBv94?t=7538 查一下A1，可代表 A1 Elementary 水平的课程 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7sO5-I0ezc
唉，这里受过教育的，还很多是自己有phd degree的也赞同cut funding。更不用说那些没受过教育的。
这个解释make sense…. 要不然太难以置信了
口误？😓 这要智商多低才会说出这种口误啊？估计和你的智商差不多。。。
她明明指的就是AI。是，她之前几秒还说对了AI。她可能觉得咋叫都行？lol
对trump的团队期望值太高就是你们的错！
没有上下文，没人知道她在说A1还是AI 就算说错了这么挑刺也够无聊的
她可能觉得之前说错了，赶紧随机应变说了个自以为对的。。。。
全撤了她哪里领工资，哪里可以上台发言秀智商
要严谨点，认为AI 说的是错的，纠正成A1，并不表明智商低。牛顿，爱因斯坦也不知道什么AI。只能说明她对当前技术发展一无所知。 对觉得这是口误，别人在挑刺的人，那就 no comment 了。
trump发文老写错别字
贻笑大方，她大概以为AI 是 one on one
笑出眼泪
A1 elementary 说的是语言水平，她在讨论技术，风马牛不相及。假设她说的是a1 elementary ，讨论技术的时候说，希望从小就教语言，那脑子还是不清楚。
美国教育彻底完蛋
+1 这里两三月美国层出不穷的加速变烂的新闻实在让人看得无语
留言里很多都特别搞笑
根据这帖子第一页给的视频，她第一次提到A1的时候说的是 making sure that first graders or even pre-K have A1 teaching”.
你可以再仔细找一下A1作为elementary水平的那种含义的话，一般特指语言，英语的level。first graders或者pre-K本来应该就大概是这种A1水准，她特意提出来不觉得突兀？而且A1作为你说的elementary水平的话，那段话也应该说成have A1 level才符合正常说法或者逻辑，而不是A1 teaching（最差也是应该A1 level teaching）。A1 level这种词好像是欧洲/英国那边用的比较常（那边的评判语言/英语的level,类似于托福等级。https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%AD%90%E6%B4%B2%E5%85%B1%E5%90%8C%E8%AA%9E%E8%A8%80%E5%8F%83%E8%80%83%E6%A8%99%E6%BA%96?wprov=sfti1#），美国这边要是想要说类似的意思大部分直接说basic/elementary level/teaching就好了。
美国教育部长在一个应该/大概率是面向美国民众的演讲/谈话中用上一个欧洲那边审评语言能力的词汇，你觉得这和把AI误读成A1，哪个更没有道理，更不应该出现？
我觉得她说了AI之后觉得自己说错了，应该是A1。于是马上纠正，并重复一次，以证明自己很专业非常专业。
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8jS2swn/
不是文盲级别的人搞不出来这笑话
她看的提词板，在她右下方，就是一念稿子的。还a1 elementary就是一狗屁不通。
洗衣机来了
她在憋笑，职业素养和身体本能疯狂斗争。
她说错了，同时又说小孩子是海绵疯狂吸取，能忍住笑很不容易。