全美高校遭史上最大规模裁员 科研圈的灭顶之灾

P
PLAZZZ1
这楼里支持的有几个自己做过postdoc或者子女打算去做的?
p
purplelavender
Stella 发表于 2025-03-16 00:22
f31是专门focus on diversity 的training grant. 只support underrepresented students. Trump不搞DEI,所以被砍了。

那就难怪了!这还要写进新闻里吗?DEI被砍不是人心所向吗?又不是所有相关的正常研究项目都被砍了
H
Hyacinth172
flower63 发表于 2025-03-15 19:48
这样一个小心眼,报复心极强,色狼居然这么多人选,真的难以理解

而且还去破产了那么多次。一个连公司都搞得多次破产的人,怎么能相信他不把国家搞破产?唉 虽然但是,民主党的确是不争气,烂泥扶不上墙,被钻了空子。
你信吗
f31是专门focus on diversity 的training grant. 只support underrepresented students. Trump不搞DEI,所以被砍了。
Stella 发表于 2025-03-16 00:22

Categories for cutting Although many NIH research grants run for longer, scientists generally receive their funding one year at a time and are required to submit a progress report to the agency annually. NIH staff members then review this report and can issue a continuation of funding. The agency, based in Bethesda, Maryland, has now asked its employees to review new and ongoing projects for any DEI-related activities and to place them in one of four categories: projects that solely support DEI-related activities (category one), projects that partially support these activities (category two), projects that do not support these activities but include some DEI-related language (category three) and projects that do not support any DEI-related activities (category four).
The NIH’s 27 institutes and centres should not issue awards for research in category one, according to a guidance document obtained by Nature and sent to some employees this week. Category-two research must be renegotiated with the lead researcher or institution on the grant to remove any DEI-related activities. If the work cannot be renegotiated, the institute must seek to terminate the project, the document says.  Category-three research can continue unimpeded as long as any DEI-related language is stripped from the application or progress report. Category-four research can proceed as usual.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00703-1

u
usmorning2
这些indirect又不只管教授。还有管几万学生的注册,体育馆,宿舍,各种场合安全运行
你信吗
这些indirect又不只管教授。还有管几万学生的注册,体育馆,宿舍,各种场合安全运行
usmorning2 发表于 2025-03-16 06:17

既然是科研经费,是不是可以和学校的教育经费分开?管学生的应该是学费出
既然是public service,应该公开,哪些是科研经费,哪些不是,省的都在猜
a
awen
yayapig 发表于 2025-03-15 19:30
我觉得那个层主最好说一下自己学校的情况,光在网上看别的大学的数字,就说大学admin 太多是不够客观的。 我们这公立现在也是平均一个秘书管十五个faculty, 她们的活真得很多。但我们学校管alumni relationship 就有五六个人,她们每天就很闲。其实随便那个学校/公司,都有闲人。 要说美国最浪费,最腐败, 最需要精简的是军队,看看他们每年花多少,看他们现在减了多少。川普他们就是在找软柿子捏, 让人鄙视。

Alumni relationship 管校友捐赠,是来钱部门啊。实验室是花钱部门。砍哪个不是显而易见的么
l
lavahx
我咋觉得你们都想偏了,众所周知美国大学和各个研究所是左派大本营,川普痛恨他们不是理所应当了吗?不砍他们砍谁?至于伤害了真正搞科研的人员,不好意思collateral damage!
t
transient
xiaohaot1 发表于 2025-03-16 00:27
每年美国老人因为医疗破产的太多了,不少人家旁边就有全球著名的医院和癌症中心,却因为无法支付费用,专程跑印度,墨西哥去做手术,看病,所以美国的医疗科技成果和他们没关系。我当然认为军费也确实应该砍的。但我也知道付不出医疗账单的普通老百姓很多是不支持NIH每年450亿的科研支出的

想多了,NIH每年砍几百亿也不会用来给普通老百姓支付医疗费用
花儿与少年
CatFatCat 发表于 2025-03-16 00:58
回复 187楼 europasole 的帖子
George Carlin有段独白: “现在,有一件事你们可能已经注意到了,我不会抱怨:政客。每个人都抱怨政客。每个人都说他们很差劲。那么,人们认为这些政客是从哪里来的呢?他们不是从天上掉下来的。他们不是从另一个现实中穿越而来的。他们来自美国父母和美国家庭,美国家园,美国学校,美国教堂,美国企业和美国大学,他们是由美国公民选举产生的。这是我们能做的最好的事情。这就是我们所能提供的。这就是我们的制度所产生的:垃圾进,垃圾出。如果你有自私、无知的公民,你就会得到自私、无知的领导人。任期限制不会带来任何好处;你只会得到一群全新的自私、无知的美国人。所以,也许,也许,也许,糟糕的不是政客。也许是这里其他东西很糟糕……比如,公众。是的,公众很糟糕。有人有一个很好的竞选口号:“公众糟透了。希望破灭了。”
“Now, there's one thing you might have noticed I don't complain about: politicians. Everybody complains about politicians. Everybody says they suck. Well, where do people think these politicians come from? They don't fall out of the sky. They don't pass through a membrane from another reality. They come from American parents and American families, American homes, American schools, American churches, American businesses and American universities, and they are elected by American citizens. This is the best we can do folks. This is what we have to offer. It's what our system produces: Garbage in, garbage out. If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're going to get selfish, ignorant leaders. Term limits ain't going to do any good; you're just going to end up with a brand new bunch of selfish, ignorant Americans. So, maybe, maybe, maybe, it's not the politicians who suck. Maybe something else sucks around here... like, the public. Yeah, the public sucks. There's a nice campaign slogan for somebody: 'The Public Sucks. F*ck Hope.”

Wow 层主贴的这段话,终极至郁啊!
p
ppnn
awen 发表于 2025-03-16 08:40
Alumni relationship 管校友捐赠,是来钱部门啊。实验室是花钱部门。砍哪个不是显而易见的么

还会和校友联系给学生们拉实习就业机会,很多的实习机会都是这么来的
q
qianqiuxue
本质就是疮总打击报复,他don't give a fuck 美国教育 长期的宣传高校就是左派的大本营,使得低智maga们也无脑支持他对教育的毁灭性打击
傻叉黄疮们非得要等到孩子上不了好学校毕业找不到好工作才能明白自己的罪孽