英文原文： America as Republic, not as Empire -- Europe’s ‘Sound and Fury’ after Jaw-dropping Pivots in US Policy The bits are falling into a distinct pattern – a pre-prepared pattern. Defence Secretary Hegseth at the Munich Security Conference gave us four ‘noes’: No to Ukraine in NATO; No to a return to pre-2014 borders; No to ‘Article 5’ peacekeeper backstops, and ‘No’ to U.S. troops in Ukraine. And in a final flourish, he added that U.S. troops in Europe are not ‘forever’ – and even placed a question mark over the continuity of NATO. Pretty plain speaking! The U.S. clearly is cutting away from Ukraine. And they intend to normalise relations with Russia. Then, Vice-President Vance threw his fire cracker amongst the gathered Euro-élites. He said that the élites had retreated from “shared” democratic values; they were overly reliant on repressing and censoring their peoples (prone to locking them up); and, above all, he excoriated the European Cordon Sanitaire (‘firewall’) by which European parties outside the Centre-Left are deemed non-grata politically: It’s a fake ‘threat’, he suggested. Of what are you really so frightened? Have you so little confidence in your ‘democracy’? The U.S., he implied, will no longer support Europe if it continues to suppresspolitical constituencies, arrest citizens for speech offenses, and particularly cancel elections as was done recently in Romania. “If you’re running in fear of your own voters”, Vance said, “there is nothing America can do for you”. Ouch! Vance had hit them where it hurts. It is difficult to say what specifically most triggered the catatonic European breakdown: Was it the fear of the U.S. and Russia joining together as a major power nexus – thus stripping Europe from ever again being able glide along on the back of American power, through the specious notion that any European state must have exceptional access to the Washington ‘ear’? Or was it the ending of the Ukraine/Zelensky cult which was so prized amongst the Euro-élite as the ‘glue’ around which a faux European unity and identity could be enforced? Both probably contributed to the fury. That the U.S. would in essence leave Europe to their own delusions would be a calamitous event for the Brussels technocracy. Many may lazily assume that the U.S. double act at Munich was just another example of the well-known Trumpian fondness for dropping ‘wacky’ initiatives intended to both shock and kickover frozen paradigms. The Munich speeches did exactly that all right! Yet that does not make them accidental; but rather parts that fit into a bigger picture. It is clear now that the Trump blitzkrieg across the American Administrative State could not have been mounted unless carefully pre-planned and prepared over the last four years. Trump’s flurry of Presidential Executive Orders at the outset of his Presidency were not whimsical. Leading U.S. constitutional lawyer, Johnathan Turley, and other lawyers say that the Orders were well drafted legally and with the clear understanding that legal challenges would ensue. What’s more, that Trump Team welcome those challenges. What is going on? The newly confirmed head of the Office of Budget Management(OBM), Russ Vought, says his Office will become the “on/off switch” for allExecutive expenditure under the new Executive Orders. Vought calls the resulting whirlpool, the application of Constitutional radicalism. And Trump has now issued the Executive Order that reinstates the primacy of the Executive as the controlling mechanism of government. Vaught, who was in OBM in Trump 01, is carefully selecting the ground for all-out financial war on the Deep State. It will be fought out firstly at the Supreme Court – which the Trump Team expect confidently to win (Trump has the 6-3 conservative majority). The new régime will then be applied across all agencies and departments of state. Expect shrieks of pain. The point here is that the Administrative State – aloof from executive control – has taken to itself prerogatives such as immunity to dismissal and the self-awarded authority to shape policy – creating a dual state system, run by unelected technocrats, which, when implanted in departments such as Justice and the Pentagon, have evolved into the American Deep State. Article Two of the Constitution however, says very bluntly: Executive power shall be vested in the U.S. President (with no ifs or buts at all.) Trump intends for his Administration to recover that lost Executive power. It was, in fact, lost long ago. Trump is re-claiming too, the Executive’s right to dismiss ‘servants of the State’, and to ‘switch off’ wasteful expenditure at his discretion, as part of a unitary executive prerequisite. Of course, the Administrative State is fighting back. Turley’s article is headlined: They Are Taking Away Everything We Have: Democrats and Unions Launch Existential Fight. Their aim has been to cripple the Trump initiative through using politicised judges to issue restraint orders. Many mainstream lawyers believe Trump’s Unitary Executive claim to be illegal. The question is whether Congress can stand up Agencies designed to act independently of the President; and how does that square with the separation of powers and Article Two that vests unqualified executive power with one sole elected official – the U.S. President. How did the Democrats not see this coming? Lawyer Robert Barnes essentially says that the ‘blitzkrieg’ was “exceptionally well-planned” and had been discussed in Trump circles since late 2020. The latter team had emerged from within a generational and cultural shift in the U.S.. This latter had given rise to a Libertarian/Populist wing with working class roots who often had served in the military, yet had come to despise the Neo-con lies (especially those of 9/11) that brought endless wars. They were animated more by the old John Adams adage that ‘America should not go abroad in search of monsters to slay’. In short, they were not part of the WASP ‘Anglo’ world; they came from a different Culture that harked back to the theme of America as Republic, not as Empire. This is what you see with Vance and Hegseth – a reversion to the Republican precept that the U.S. should not become involved in European wars. Ukraine is not America’s war. The Deep State, it seems, were not paying attention to what a posse of ‘populist’ outliers, tucked away from the rarefied Beltway talking shop, were up to: They (the outliers) were planning a concerted attack on the Federal expenditure spigot – identified as the weak spot about which a Constitutional challenge could be mounted that would derail – in its entirety – the expenditures of the Deep State. It seems that one aspect to the surprise has been the Trump Team’s discipline: ‘no leaks’. And secondly, that those involved in the planning are not drawn from the preeminent Anglo-sphere, but rather from a strand of society that was offended by the Iraq war and which blames the ‘Anglo-sphere’ for ‘ruining’ America. So Vance’s speech at Munich was not disruptive – merely for the sake of being disruptive; he was, in fact, encouraging the audience to recall early Republican Values. This was what is meant by his complaint that Europe had turned away from “our shared values” – i.e. the values that animated Americans seeking escape from the tyranny, prejudices and corruption of the Old World. Vance was (quite politely) chiding the Euro-élites for backsliding to old European vices. Vance implicitly was hinting too, that European conservative libertarians should emulate Trump and act to slough-off their ‘Administrative States’, and recover control over executive power. Tear down the firewalls, he advised. Why? Because he likely views the ‘Brussels’ Technocratic State as nothing other than a pure offshoot to the American Deep State – and therefore very likely to try to torpedo and sink Trump’s initiative to normalise relations with Moscow. If these were Vance’s instincts, he was right. Macron almost immediately summoned an ‘emergency meeting’ of ‘the war party’ in Paris to consider how to frustrate the American initiative. It failed however, descending reportedly into quarrelling and acrimony. It transpired that Europe could not gather a ‘sharp-end’ military force greater than 20,-000-30,000 men. Scholtz objected in principle to their involvement; Poland demurred as a close neighbour of Ukraine; and Italy stayed silent. Starmer, however, after Munich, immediately rang Zelensky to say that Britain saw Ukraine to be on an irrevocable path to NATO membership – thus directly contradicting U.S. policy and with no support from other states. Trump will not forget this, nor will he forget Britain’s former role in supporting the Russiagate slur during his first term in office. The meeting did however, underline Europe’s divisions and impotence. Europe has been sidelined and their self-esteem is badly bruised. The U.S. would in essence leave Europe to their own delusions, which would be calamitous for the Brussels autocracy. Yet, far more consequential than most of the happenings of the past few days was when Trump, speaking with Fox News,after attending Daytona, dismissedZelensky’s canard of Russia wanting to invade NATO countries. “I don’t agree with that; not even a little bit”, Trump retorted. Trump does not buy into the primary lie intended as the glue which holds this entire EU geo-political structure together. For, without the ‘Russia threat’; without the U.S. believing in the globalist linchpin lie, there can be no pretence of Europe needing to prepare for war with Russia. Europe ultimately will have to come to reconcile its future as a periphery in Eurasia.
Interesting. Maybe the translation could be removed, it was a bit hard to follow. Will Russian continue to invade NATO countries, if he gets what he wanted in Ukraine? that’s the million dollar question. I used to believe he would, but now after it was proven his army didn’t have the might any more, not even one tenth of what it used to have, I don’t know if he himself dares to want it, not in the near future at least.
作者简介： https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alastair_Crooke
原文链接（付费）：https://conflictsforum.substack.com/p/america-as-republic-not-as-empire
免费转发链接（根据.su domain, 目测是亲俄网站）：https://strategic-culture.su/contributors/alastair-crooke/
Deepseek中文翻译：
抛弃帝国主义，重归共和；美国的猝然转向令欧洲陷入徒劳喧嚣
**碎片正拼凑成清晰的图景——一个预先设计的模式**
国防部长赫格塞斯（Hegseth）在慕尼黑安全会议上抛出了四个“不”：**不接纳乌克兰加入北约**；**不恢复2014年之前的边界**；**不提供“第五条”维和部队支持**；**不在乌克兰部署美军**。最后，他更是锦上添花地宣布，驻欧美军不会“永远存在”——甚至对北约的延续性打上了问号。
直言不讳！美国显然正在与乌克兰切割，并打算与俄罗斯关系正常化。
随后，副总统万斯（Vance）在欧洲精英云集的会场投下一枚“炸弹”。他指责欧洲精英背离了“共同”的民主价值观，过度依赖压制和审查民众（动辄监禁公民）；更重要的是，他痛批欧洲的“防疫隔离墙”（防火墙）政策——即任何非中左翼政党均被贴上政治禁忌标签。他反问：这所谓的“威胁”是虚构的，你们到底在害怕什么？难道对“民主”如此缺乏信心？
他暗示，如果欧洲继续打压政治反对派、以言论罪逮捕公民，甚至效仿罗马尼亚近期取消选举的行为，美国将不再支持欧洲。“如果你们连自己的选民都害怕，”万斯说，“美国也爱莫能助。”
扎心了！万斯精准击中了欧洲的痛处。
欧洲为何陷入集体恐慌？是害怕美俄结成强权联盟，终结欧洲长期依赖美国力量、通过所谓“华盛顿优先倾听欧洲”的幌子维持存在感的幻想？还是因为乌克兰/泽连斯基这一被欧洲精英奉为“粘合剂”的偶像崇拜被美国抛弃，导致其强行捏造的欧洲统一身份认同随之崩塌？二者或许共同点燃了怒火。
对美国而言，让欧洲沉浸在自己的妄想中自生自灭，将是对布鲁塞尔技术官僚统治的致命打击。
许多人可能轻率地认为，美国在慕尼黑的“双簧戏”不过是特朗普式“疯狂提案”的又一案例——旨在打破僵化范式、制造轰动效应。慕尼黑的演讲确实做到了这一点！但这绝非偶然，而是更大棋局中的落子。
如今已清晰可见，特朗普对美国行政体系的闪电战若非经过过去四年的周密策划，绝无可能发动。其上任初期签署的大量总统行政令并非一时兴起。美国宪法权威学者乔纳森·特利（Johnathan Turley）等律师指出，这些行政令在法理上严谨且早有预判，甚至有意引发司法挑战。更重要的是，特朗普团队欢迎这些挑战。
究竟发生了什么？新任预算管理办公室（OMB）主任拉斯·沃特（Russ Vought）宣称，该办公室将成为新行政令下所有政府支出的“总开关”。沃特将这场风暴称为“宪法激进主义的实践”。特朗普更已签署行政令，恢复行政部门作为政府控制机制的最高权威。
曾在特朗普首个任期内任职于OMB的沃特，正精心选择战场，向“深层政府”（Deep State）发起全面财政战争。首战将在最高法院打响——特朗普团队信心十足（最高法院保守派以6-3占优）。新制度随后将覆盖所有联邦机构。准备好迎接哀嚎吧！
关键在于，长期游离于行政管控之外的“行政国”（Administrative State）已自我赋权——例如免于解雇的特权、自行制定政策的权威——形成由非民选技术官僚运营的“双重政府”体系。当这一体系渗透至司法部和五角大楼等核心部门，便演变为美国的“深层政府”。
然而，**美国宪法第二条**直截了当地写道：行政权属于美国总统（毫无附加条件）。特朗普政府的目标是夺回失去的行政权。事实上，这种权力早已旁落。特朗普还主张恢复总统解雇“国家公仆”的权力，以及自主裁量“切断”浪费性支出的权力，以此重构单一行政权威。
当然，“行政国”正在反击。特利的文章标题写道：《他们正在夺走我们的一切：民主党与工会发起生存之战》。其策略是通过政治化法官发布禁令，扼杀特朗普的倡议。许多主流律师认为特朗普的“单一行政权”主张非法。争议焦点在于：国会能否设立独立于总统的机构？此举如何与三权分立及宪法第二条赋予总统的绝对行政权兼容？
民主党为何毫无防备？律师罗伯特·巴恩斯（Robert Barnes）指出，这场“闪电战”经过了“异常缜密的策划”，自2020年底起便在特朗普阵营中酝酿。该团队源自美国一代人的文化转向——崛起于工人阶级、常具军旅背景的自由意志/民粹主义派系。他们唾弃新保守主义的谎言（尤其是9/11相关谎言）引发的无休止战争，更推崇约翰·亚当斯（John Adams）的格言：“美国不应远赴海外寻找怪兽斩杀。”
简言之，他们不属于盎格鲁-撒克逊白人新教（WASP）的“英语圈”，而是来自另一种文化传统——主张美国作为共和国而非帝国存在。这正是万斯与赫格塞斯展现的理念：回归美国不应卷入欧洲战争的共和原则。乌克兰不是美国的战争。
“深层政府”显然忽视了这群远离华盛顿精英话语场的“民粹异类”：他们谋划对联邦支出阀门发起协同攻击——瞄准宪法挑战的突破口，一举截断“深层政府”的资金命脉。
令人意外之处有二：一是特朗普团队的纪律性——**零泄密**；二是策划者并非来自传统盎格鲁精英圈，而是源于被伊拉克战争激怒、谴责“英语圈”“毁掉美国”的社会群体。
因此，万斯的慕尼黑演讲并非为颠覆而颠覆，而是呼吁听众重拾早期共和价值观。他指责欧洲背离“共同价值观”，实指美国先辈为逃离旧大陆暴政、偏见与腐败所秉持的精神。万斯（以相当礼貌的方式）批评欧洲精英重蹈历史覆辙。
万斯还隐晦暗示，欧洲保守自由派应效仿特朗普，摆脱“行政国”束缚，夺回行政权。他建议：“拆掉防火墙。”
为何？因为他很可能视布鲁塞尔技术官僚体系为美国“深层政府”的分支，必然试图破坏特朗普对俄关系正常化的努力。
若这是万斯的直觉，他猜对了。马克龙几乎立即在巴黎召集“战争派”紧急会议，谋划阻挠美国倡议。然而会议以争吵与相互攻讦告终，无果而收场。
事实证明，欧洲拼凑不出一支超过2万至3万人的精锐部队。朔尔茨（Scholz）原则性反对介入；波兰作为乌克兰邻国态度暧昧；意大利保持沉默。但英国工党领袖斯塔默（Starmer）会后急电泽连斯基，宣称英国视乌克兰加入北约为“不可逆之路”——公然与美国政策唱反调，却未获他国支持。特朗普不会忘记这一幕，亦不会忘记英国在其首个任期内支持“通俄门”诽谤的旧账。
这场会议凸显了欧洲的分裂与无能。欧洲已被边缘化，自尊严重受挫。美国放任欧洲沉溺于幻想，对布鲁塞尔的技术官僚统治无异于灾难。
然而，过去几日最具深远意义的事件，莫过于特朗普在戴托纳活动后接受福克斯新闻采访时，驳斥了泽连斯基所谓“俄罗斯欲入侵北约国家”的谎言。“我不同意，一丁点都不信，”特朗普直言。
特朗普拒绝接受这一支撑欧盟地缘政治架构的核心谎言。若失去“俄罗斯威胁”叙事，若美国不再相信全球主义轴心的谎言，欧洲便再无借口备战俄罗斯。最终，欧洲将不得不接受自己作为欧亚大陆边缘地带的未来。
The bits are falling into a distinct pattern – a pre-prepared pattern. Defence Secretary Hegseth at the Munich Security Conference gave us four ‘noes’: No to Ukraine in NATO; No to a return to pre-2014 borders; No to ‘Article 5’ peacekeeper backstops, and ‘No’ to U.S. troops in Ukraine. And in a final flourish, he added that U.S. troops in Europe are not ‘forever’ – and even placed a question mark over the continuity of NATO. Pretty plain speaking! The U.S. clearly is cutting away from Ukraine. And they intend to normalise relations with Russia. Then, Vice-President Vance threw his fire cracker amongst the gathered Euro-élites. He said that the élites had retreated from “shared” democratic values; they were overly reliant on repressing and censoring their peoples (prone to locking them up); and, above all, he excoriated the European Cordon Sanitaire (‘firewall’) by which European parties outside the Centre-Left are deemed non-grata politically: It’s a fake ‘threat’, he suggested. Of what are you really so frightened? Have you so little confidence in your ‘democracy’? The U.S., he implied, will no longer support Europe if it continues to suppresspolitical constituencies, arrest citizens for speech offenses, and particularly cancel elections as was done recently in Romania. “If you’re running in fear of your own voters”, Vance said, “there is nothing America can do for you”. Ouch! Vance had hit them where it hurts. It is difficult to say what specifically most triggered the catatonic European breakdown: Was it the fear of the U.S. and Russia joining together as a major power nexus – thus stripping Europe from ever again being able glide along on the back of American power, through the specious notion that any European state must have exceptional access to the Washington ‘ear’? Or was it the ending of the Ukraine/Zelensky cult which was so prized amongst the Euro-élite as the ‘glue’ around which a faux European unity and identity could be enforced? Both probably contributed to the fury. That the U.S. would in essence leave Europe to their own delusions would be a calamitous event for the Brussels technocracy. Many may lazily assume that the U.S. double act at Munich was just another example of the well-known Trumpian fondness for dropping ‘wacky’ initiatives intended to both shock and kickover frozen paradigms. The Munich speeches did exactly that all right! Yet that does not make them accidental; but rather parts that fit into a bigger picture. It is clear now that the Trump blitzkrieg across the American Administrative State could not have been mounted unless carefully pre-planned and prepared over the last four years. Trump’s flurry of Presidential Executive Orders at the outset of his Presidency were not whimsical. Leading U.S. constitutional lawyer, Johnathan Turley, and other lawyers say that the Orders were well drafted legally and with the clear understanding that legal challenges would ensue. What’s more, that Trump Team welcome those challenges. What is going on? The newly confirmed head of the Office of Budget Management(OBM), Russ Vought, says his Office will become the “on/off switch” for allExecutive expenditure under the new Executive Orders. Vought calls the resulting whirlpool, the application of Constitutional radicalism. And Trump has now issued the Executive Order that reinstates the primacy of the Executive as the controlling mechanism of government. Vaught, who was in OBM in Trump 01, is carefully selecting the ground for all-out financial war on the Deep State. It will be fought out firstly at the Supreme Court – which the Trump Team expect confidently to win (Trump has the 6-3 conservative majority). The new régime will then be applied across all agencies and departments of state. Expect shrieks of pain. The point here is that the Administrative State – aloof from executive control – has taken to itself prerogatives such as immunity to dismissal and the self-awarded authority to shape policy – creating a dual state system, run by unelected technocrats, which, when implanted in departments such as Justice and the Pentagon, have evolved into the American Deep State. Article Two of the Constitution however, says very bluntly: Executive power shall be vested in the U.S. President (with no ifs or buts at all.) Trump intends for his Administration to recover that lost Executive power. It was, in fact, lost long ago. Trump is re-claiming too, the Executive’s right to dismiss ‘servants of the State’, and to ‘switch off’ wasteful expenditure at his discretion, as part of a unitary executive prerequisite. Of course, the Administrative State is fighting back. Turley’s article is headlined: They Are Taking Away Everything We Have: Democrats and Unions Launch Existential Fight. Their aim has been to cripple the Trump initiative through using politicised judges to issue restraint orders. Many mainstream lawyers believe Trump’s Unitary Executive claim to be illegal. The question is whether Congress can stand up Agencies designed to act independently of the President; and how does that square with the separation of powers and Article Two that vests unqualified executive power with one sole elected official – the U.S. President. How did the Democrats not see this coming? Lawyer Robert Barnes essentially says that the ‘blitzkrieg’ was “exceptionally well-planned” and had been discussed in Trump circles since late 2020. The latter team had emerged from within a generational and cultural shift in the U.S.. This latter had given rise to a Libertarian/Populist wing with working class roots who often had served in the military, yet had come to despise the Neo-con lies (especially those of 9/11) that brought endless wars. They were animated more by the old John Adams adage that ‘America should not go abroad in search of monsters to slay’. In short, they were not part of the WASP ‘Anglo’ world; they came from a different Culture that harked back to the theme of America as Republic, not as Empire. This is what you see with Vance and Hegseth – a reversion to the Republican precept that the U.S. should not become involved in European wars. Ukraine is not America’s war. The Deep State, it seems, were not paying attention to what a posse of ‘populist’ outliers, tucked away from the rarefied Beltway talking shop, were up to: They (the outliers) were planning a concerted attack on the Federal expenditure spigot – identified as the weak spot about which a Constitutional challenge could be mounted that would derail – in its entirety – the expenditures of the Deep State. It seems that one aspect to the surprise has been the Trump Team’s discipline: ‘no leaks’. And secondly, that those involved in the planning are not drawn from the preeminent Anglo-sphere, but rather from a strand of society that was offended by the Iraq war and which blames the ‘Anglo-sphere’ for ‘ruining’ America. So Vance’s speech at Munich was not disruptive – merely for the sake of being disruptive; he was, in fact, encouraging the audience to recall early Republican Values. This was what is meant by his complaint that Europe had turned away from “our shared values” – i.e. the values that animated Americans seeking escape from the tyranny, prejudices and corruption of the Old World. Vance was (quite politely) chiding the Euro-élites for backsliding to old European vices. Vance implicitly was hinting too, that European conservative libertarians should emulate Trump and act to slough-off their ‘Administrative States’, and recover control over executive power. Tear down the firewalls, he advised. Why? Because he likely views the ‘Brussels’ Technocratic State as nothing other than a pure offshoot to the American Deep State – and therefore very likely to try to torpedo and sink Trump’s initiative to normalise relations with Moscow. If these were Vance’s instincts, he was right. Macron almost immediately summoned an ‘emergency meeting’ of ‘the war party’ in Paris to consider how to frustrate the American initiative. It failed however, descending reportedly into quarrelling and acrimony. It transpired that Europe could not gather a ‘sharp-end’ military force greater than 20,-000-30,000 men. Scholtz objected in principle to their involvement; Poland demurred as a close neighbour of Ukraine; and Italy stayed silent. Starmer, however, after Munich, immediately rang Zelensky to say that Britain saw Ukraine to be on an irrevocable path to NATO membership – thus directly contradicting U.S. policy and with no support from other states. Trump will not forget this, nor will he forget Britain’s former role in supporting the Russiagate slur during his first term in office. The meeting did however, underline Europe’s divisions and impotence. Europe has been sidelined and their self-esteem is badly bruised. The U.S. would in essence leave Europe to their own delusions, which would be calamitous for the Brussels autocracy. Yet, far more consequential than most of the happenings of the past few days was when Trump, speaking with Fox News,after attending Daytona, dismissedZelensky’s canard of Russia wanting to invade NATO countries. “I don’t agree with that; not even a little bit”, Trump retorted. Trump does not buy into the primary lie intended as the glue which holds this entire EU geo-political structure together. For, without the ‘Russia threat’; without the U.S. believing in the globalist linchpin lie, there can be no pretence of Europe needing to prepare for war with Russia. Europe ultimately will have to come to reconcile its future as a periphery in Eurasia.
宇宙的运行周期决定的，天时到了。目前人类只有两个选择，逆天时而动，随着旧的matrix一起，自取灭亡；顺势而为，升级为银河联邦大家庭的成员之一。
地球三维matrix 已于2024年12月21日停止运作了。地球上历经几十亿年的social experiment 也随之结束了，地球上的转世投胎结束了。
无法接受现实还生活在illusion里的人，我只能祝你们好运！归根结底，每个人对自己的灵魂进化负全责。
我个人浅见，就是要和平，合作。只有和平合作，才能确保我们这个地球文明有更多的人存活下来。
因为地球很快进入photon belt. 这个是宇宙中目前最重要的头等大事，决定着我们这波地球文明的未来，也关系到整个宇宙的持续进化和发展。
这个photon belt 是个高能量场，进入以后，地球上所有的电器设备全部失灵，无法正常运转。大家想象一下没有电，没有通讯的生活。整个经历，预计历时三年。
如果一个人个人能量频率不高，是根本无法在这个过程中存活下来的。所以现在我们最不应该要的就是战争。每个人都应该把全部生活的重点，都转移到提高个人能量频率上来。也只有人与人之间的合作互助，才能让我们一起存活下来。
据说从photon belt出来以后，人类的意识进化水平3年相当于2000年的进度。
3 days darkness， 可能很多人都听说过，就是最初进入这个photon belt 会经历的。
等我们从photon belt 里出来，我们所有活下来的人都意识到。原来我们都是同一个整体，都来自于同一个源头，在经历分离的游戏，创造和灵性进化是我们的天然使命。每个人都会有各自不同的天才被激活，到时候必定是激动人心，无比畅快的生活。
所以，黄金时代还是梦吗？是遥远的未来吗？