I shared this note with the Washington Post team this morning: I’m writing to let you know about a change coming to our opinion pages. We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets. We’ll cover other topics too of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others. There was a time when a newspaper, especially one that was a local monopoly, might have seen it as a service to bring to the reader’s doorstep every morning a broad-based opinion section that sought to cover all views. Today, the internet does that job. I am of America and for America, and proud to be so. Our country did not get here by being typical. And a big part of America’s success has been freedom in the economic realm and everywhere else. Freedom is ethical — it minimizes coercion — and practical — it drives creativity, invention, and prosperity. I offered David Shipley, whom I greatly admire, the opportunity to lead this new chapter. I suggested to him that if the answer wasn’t “hell yes,” then it had to be “no.” After careful consideration, David decided to step away. This is a significant shift, it won’t be easy, and it will require 100% commitment — I respect his decision. We’ll be searching for a new Opinion Editor to own this new direction. I’m confident that free markets and personal liberties are right for America. I also believe these viewpoints are underserved in the current market of ideas and news opinion. I’m excited for us together to fill that void. Jeff
changan5 发表于 2025-02-26 11:36 嘴上说着推崇 personal liberties，结果就把不同意他意见的给赶走了，哈哈
我的理解是，要是基于下面的定义，感觉他说的也挑不出什么毛病，因为他只是表明态度规定符合他们公司两大支柱宗旨的言论类型可予以发表，与之相左的言论类型则留给别家媒体。 "but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others. " “Freedom of Speech The right to freedom of speech is protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution. Most categories of speech are “protected” to some extent by the First Amendment, but there are exceptions, including things like incitement, true threats, defamation, obscenity, fraud, and others. ” https://freespeech.pitt.edu/rights-responsibilities#:~:text=The%20right%20to%20freedom%20of,obscenity%2C%20fraud%2C%20and%20others.
只是Opinion那一块的变动, 不影响 News "I’m writing to let you know about a change coming to our opinion pages. ""I respect his decision. We’ll be searching for a new Opinion Editor to own this new direction."
公开信原文 https://medium.com/@jeffreypbezos/no-thank-you-mr-pecker-146e3922310f 在公开信里，光头直接把对方用来威胁他的黑料，他自己就给公开了 In addition to the “below the belt selfie — otherwise colloquially known as a ‘d*ck pick’” — The Enquirer obtained a further nine images. These include: · Mr. Bezos face selfie at what appears to be a business meeting. · Ms. Sanchez response — a photograph of her smoking a cigar in what appears to be a simulated oral sex scene. · A shirtless Mr. Bezos holding his phone in his left hand — while wearing his wedding ring. He’s wearing either tight black cargo pants or shorts — and his semi-erect manhood is penetrating the zipper of said garment. · A full-length body selfie of Mr. Bezos wearing just a pair of tight black boxer-briefs or trunks, with his phone in his left hand — while wearing his wedding ring. · A selfie of Mr. Bezos fully clothed. · A full-length scantily-clad body shot with short trunks. · A naked selfie in a bathroom — while wearing his wedding ring. Mr. Bezos is wearing nothing but a white towel — and the top of his pubic region can be seen. · Ms. Sanchez wearing a plunging red neckline dress revealing her cleavage and a glimpse of her nether region. · Ms. Sanchez wearing a two-piece red bikini with gold detail dress revealing her cleavage. It would give no editor pleasure to send this email. I hope common sense can prevail — and quickly. 面对勒索，选择正面硬杠，绝对猛男一个。。 所以这种公开信不可能是别人写的。。 光头写作能力还是过关的。。
你也可以搜索一下当时的各种新闻报导，有不错的总结 Jeff Bezos Publishes National Enquirer’s “Extortion” Letter About “Below the Belt Selfies” https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/jeff-bezos-publishes-national-enquirers-threat-letter-below-belt-selfies-1184078/
I’m writing to let you know about a change coming to our opinion pages. We are going to be writing every day in support and defense of two pillars: personal liberties and free markets. We’ll cover other topics too of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others.
There was a time when a newspaper, especially one that was a local monopoly, might have seen it as a service to bring to the reader’s doorstep every morning a broad-based opinion section that sought to cover all views. Today, the internet does that job.
I am of America and for America, and proud to be so. Our country did not get here by being typical. And a big part of America’s success has been freedom in the economic realm and everywhere else. Freedom is ethical — it minimizes coercion — and practical — it drives creativity, invention, and prosperity.
I offered David Shipley, whom I greatly admire, the opportunity to lead this new chapter. I suggested to him that if the answer wasn’t “hell yes,” then it had to be “no.” After careful consideration, David decided to step away. This is a significant shift, it won’t be easy, and it will require 100% commitment — I respect his decision. We’ll be searching for a new Opinion Editor to own this new direction. I’m confident that free markets and personal liberties are right for America. I also believe these viewpoints are underserved in the current market of ideas and news opinion. I’m excited for us together to fill that void. Jeff
嘴上说着推崇 personal liberties，结果就把不同意他意见的给赶走了，哈哈
no one knows better about XXXX than me, just beatuiful！
喜欢他，所以最近买了他家的会员。 离婚时能看出他是个decent 人 这个信看出他是有信仰的人
普林斯顿的高材生, 肯定没有短板. 不过这样的人选举时不招人喜欢, 太精英了. 不过他也是花了心思了, 看来还不太想把报社的工作人员都惹毛了.
显然一个是凭本事进的藤，另一个凭别的进的。
普林斯顿出身啊，比沃顿出身的基本功扎实啊。但这不妨碍他们大资本家的底色，基本立场一致。
这个没啥, 老板决定报纸的风向, 小兵意见不一样就另谋高就吧, business世界就是如此 liberal应该主要是关于堕胎啊同性恋啊这类问题
现如今的美国就是被这种“本事”给玩坏了。就是做表面文章，说漂亮话。把一件坏事非要spin 成听上去很合情合理的事情。 这点上懂王确实要好多了，直来直去，我不待见你就直接开骂。哪用得着那么酸溜溜的，噢，我给了你这个举世无双的机会，你自己扛不住啊！ 这就是藤校出来的精英，面子功夫绝对到家。这也是为啥红脖们选懂王，看不上主党里那些斯文败类。 自从Mitt Romney失势开始，共和党就开始走红脖路线了。
硅谷和拜登和民主党闹翻的根本原因
光头说 personal liberty doesn’t guarantee employment
不同的人读不同的感受呀，我觉得是在站队表忠心呀
不单单传统。别忘了，X。
Anyway， .....
我的理解是，要是基于下面的定义，感觉他说的也挑不出什么毛病，因为他只是表明态度规定符合他们公司两大支柱宗旨的言论类型可予以发表，与之相左的言论类型则留给别家媒体。
"but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others. "
“Freedom of Speech The right to freedom of speech is protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution. Most categories of speech are “protected” to some extent by the First Amendment, but there are exceptions, including things like incitement, true threats, defamation, obscenity, fraud, and others. ”
https://freespeech.pitt.edu/rights-responsibilities#:~:text=The%20right%20to%20freedom%20of,obscenity%2C%20fraud%2C%20and%20others.
通过控制你的思想控制你的钱包。
我也觉得产品聚焦，定位清晰，这是件好事。。。
肯定不是，光头写作能力还是很强的。。
几年前有人拿了他的裸照想威胁勒索他，结果光头自己洋洋洒洒写了一大篇，公开发表，直接正面硬怼。。 当时还没chatGPT，而且这种私人丑事，也不可能找秘书写。。
是的，赞同。 思路非常清晰 而且能就以简单的词和简短句子 把复杂的问题讲清楚
全文一种淡淡的， 但是决然地态度
我赞他！！！！
写不出
只是Opinion那一块的变动, 不影响 News "I’m writing to let you know about a change coming to our opinion pages. " "I respect his decision. We’ll be searching for a new Opinion Editor to own this new direction."
你不会真相信新闻回写得客观吧？ 任何新闻都可以写出立场 你看看各大媒体怎么报道Luigi 事情就知道了
还有这个瓜 有原文吗
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/vBmavNoChZc Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos delivers graduation speech at Princeton University
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/EctzLTFrktc
公开信原文 https://medium.com/@jeffreypbezos/no-thank-you-mr-pecker-146e3922310f
在公开信里，光头直接把对方用来威胁他的黑料，他自己就给公开了 In addition to the “below the belt selfie — otherwise colloquially known as a ‘d*ck pick’” — The Enquirer obtained a further nine images.
These include: · Mr. Bezos face selfie at what appears to be a business meeting. · Ms. Sanchez response — a photograph of her smoking a cigar in what appears to be a simulated oral sex scene. · A shirtless Mr. Bezos holding his phone in his left hand — while wearing his wedding ring. He’s wearing either tight black cargo pants or shorts — and his semi-erect manhood is penetrating the zipper of said garment. · A full-length body selfie of Mr. Bezos wearing just a pair of tight black boxer-briefs or trunks, with his phone in his left hand — while wearing his wedding ring. · A selfie of Mr. Bezos fully clothed. · A full-length scantily-clad body shot with short trunks. · A naked selfie in a bathroom — while wearing his wedding ring. Mr. Bezos is wearing nothing but a white towel — and the top of his pubic region can be seen. · Ms. Sanchez wearing a plunging red neckline dress revealing her cleavage and a glimpse of her nether region. · Ms. Sanchez wearing a two-piece red bikini with gold detail dress revealing her cleavage. It would give no editor pleasure to send this email. I hope common sense can prevail — and quickly.
面对勒索，选择正面硬杠，绝对猛男一个。。
所以这种公开信不可能是别人写的。。 光头写作能力还是过关的。。
你也可以搜索一下当时的各种新闻报导，有不错的总结 Jeff Bezos Publishes National Enquirer’s “Extortion” Letter About “Below the Belt Selfies” https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/jeff-bezos-publishes-national-enquirers-threat-letter-below-belt-selfies-1184078/