In the meantime, the agency is reviewing thousands of active research projects that may be in violation of Trump’s executive orders. Dozens of terms are on a list of flagged words, including “female,” “historically” and “male-dominated,” The Washington Post reported Tuesday. 意思是这些词会被flag,也就是说会被当keyword，search出来的内容会被仔细看？因为所有项目都在under review. 不是有这些词就会被抓成文字狱。 ============================== 全文： As NIH Grant Reviews Resume, NSF Hunts for Flagged Terms By Kathryn Palmer The National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health and other science agencies are continuing to scramble to comply with President Trump’s orders to eliminate federal support for diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, among other topics, while also beginning to restart some grant reviews. The NSF, which paused its grant review panels last week, is continuing the pause through at least Feb. 7, according to National Public Radio. In the meantime, the agency is reviewing thousands of active research projects that may be in violation of Trump’s executive orders. Dozens of terms are on a list of flagged words, including “female,” “historically” and “male-dominated,” The Washington Post reported Tuesday. And two weeks after the NIH abruptly paused its scheduled grant review panels, Science reported Monday that the meetings are back on track and scientists may resume travel for site visits and collaborative research. However, orders banning communication, including public speaking, remain in effect at the agency, though they were originally set to lift Feb. 2. In addition, advisory committees that meet to finalize grants will do so in secret and the NIH is still in the process of reviewing programs that could violate Trump’s executive orders banning funding for programs supporting DEI and “gender ideology.” According to Science, review of grant applications that don’t clearly violate the anti-DEI policies can continue. Moreover, orders from federal judges issued Jan. 31 and Feb. 3 state that agencies can’t terminate awards based on an executive order from the president or memo from the Office of Management and Budget, which has since rescinded a memo ordering a freeze on all federal grants and loans.
Minimum “biased” data “discriminatory” variables phase “excluded” ”inclusion” of data Bell “inequality”
另外，文章里还禁止使用 female, disabilities, trauma 等等等等一大堆。
黄川都是文盲。不认识字。
请出示英文原文： 会被flag 并直接被拒
说到基金和关键词，我还有个亲身经历，帮人填表申请中国的医保局报销，那个网页内容一填就马上断线，我也觉得奇了大怪了。最后头发都挠掉了几百根，恍然大悟里面有个关键敏感词“金二”，彼时金正日还活着，那是中国的敏感词，所以如果申请文字里出现了“基金二科”，就会中招。文字内容换到基金第二科或者其它方式避免关键词就好了，网页不会被重置。
没想到20年后美国的基金也这么玩，呵呵。
听口音像2024奥威尔*德刚*郭
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/quick-takes/2025/02/05/nsf-hunts-female-other-flagged-terms#:~:text=In%20the%20meantime%2C%20the%20agency,The%20Washington%20Post%20reported%20Tuesday.
这个好玩儿
这是在审核NSF资助的项目里，有没有DEI项目。。 因为联邦政府现在停止给任何DEI项目拨款
那么审核的第一步，肯定是通过关键词来缩小检索范围啊。。
但你这标题写的，好像正儿八经的非DEI研究项目里，只要出现几个这种单词，就会被拒 这完全是两回事啊
好好健身保养吧，熬过这个时代
别装温和派，直说你给川普投票得了，敢作敢当
土共厉害了，被美帝抄作业😂😂😂
哈哈，以后实验只用公老鼠公猴子。最好proposal里写用公白鼠，公白猴做生物实验，一定会中标。White male deserves the privilege，and they are the best！ MAGA！
没见过，好吗。。。中国的违禁词跟这种不一样。。。
哦，我还以为以后所有的paper都适用呢。。。
美国的茉莉花在中国没开，文革之花在美国开了
川皇二次登基后，大家都不好意思继续笑话习帝独裁和治大国如翻大饼了。
正解。要是仅靠几个关键词就拒proposal就太儿戏了
针对什么问题研究的文章？和DEI高度相关吗？
这位层主展开讲讲
什么杂志？什么measurement？能不能提供一点细节
In the meantime, the agency is reviewing thousands of active research projects that may be in violation of Trump’s executive orders. Dozens of terms are on a list of flagged words, including “female,” “historically” and “male-dominated,” The Washington Post reported Tuesday.
意思是这些词会被flag,也就是说会被当keyword，search出来的内容会被仔细看？因为所有项目都在under review. 不是有这些词就会被抓成文字狱。 ==============================
全文： As NIH Grant Reviews Resume, NSF Hunts for Flagged Terms By Kathryn Palmer
The National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health and other science agencies are continuing to scramble to comply with President Trump’s orders to eliminate federal support for diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, among other topics, while also beginning to restart some grant reviews. The NSF, which paused its grant review panels last week, is continuing the pause through at least Feb. 7, according to National Public Radio. In the meantime, the agency is reviewing thousands of active research projects that may be in violation of Trump’s executive orders. Dozens of terms are on a list of flagged words, including “female,” “historically” and “male-dominated,” The Washington Post reported Tuesday. And two weeks after the NIH abruptly paused its scheduled grant review panels, Science reported Monday that the meetings are back on track and scientists may resume travel for site visits and collaborative research. However, orders banning communication, including public speaking, remain in effect at the agency, though they were originally set to lift Feb. 2. In addition, advisory committees that meet to finalize grants will do so in secret and the NIH is still in the process of reviewing programs that could violate Trump’s executive orders banning funding for programs supporting DEI and “gender ideology.” According to Science, review of grant applications that don’t clearly violate the anti-DEI policies can continue. Moreover, orders from federal judges issued Jan. 31 and Feb. 3 state that agencies can’t terminate awards based on an executive order from the president or memo from the Office of Management and Budget, which has since rescinded a memo ordering a freeze on all federal grants and loans.
川粉，呵呵
居然是真的，这效率。。。
神经病才会到处喊别人川粉，现在从一个极端走向另一个极端，人家就是说了自己的看法，就喊人家川粉，简直是有病
川粉是什么恶毒骂人词吗？
无所谓吧，美国各州选川普的人多，才让川普大支持率获胜。除了鲜花版。
发文章也要查？这是什么方向的journal？
这个为啥要悲哀
不是恶毒词，但不要乱扣帽子，和当年文革一样的作风
我以为你们支持文革？
川粉就是一堆畏威而不怀德，没骨气没脊梁没信仰的小人奴才，不仅愚蠢而且短视，不仅贱而且瞎，骂的就是你这种。
搞统计、临床试验的和搞心理学的怎么办？无语