美国最高法院以所谓“国家安全(用户数据)”为由，强奸民意，查封TikTok，同样的每一个理由(对错不论)都适用于小红书，需要多久会对小红书下手呢？没有佩罗西访台，台海中线可能还会多保持几年；没有美国高院查封，中美民众大团结估计还不能这么快。处心积虑为了禁止，很多时候反而推进了事件的发生。让子弹飞一会儿，让暴风雨来的更猛烈些吧！大家觉得小红书热潮能过春节不？ What the Supreme Court said in its ruling on the TikTok ban "The act''s prohibitions and divestiture requirement are designed to prevent China — a designated foreign adversary — from leveraging its control over ByteDance Ltd. to capture the personal data of U.S. TikTok users. This objective qualifies as an important government interest under intermediate scrutiny," the court said, referencing the middle standard applied by courts to assess the constitutionality of a law. Under intermediate scrutiny, a challenged law must further an important government interest and be substantially related to that interest to be upheld. It is a less demanding standard than strict scrutiny, the highest level of judicial review, and more stringent than rational-basis review, the lowest, most lenient tier. The court noted that TikTok "collects extensive personal information from and about its users," including location data and contact lists. The justices reiterated the government''s concerns that such information may allow China to track the locations of federal employees, craft dossiers of information for blackmail and conduct corporate espionage. The court''s opinion also cited Congress''s finding that under Chinese law, companies can be required to turn over data to the Chinese government. "The government had good reason to single out TikTok," it said. The court went on to say that the law, called the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, is "sufficiently tailored to address the government''s interest in preventing a foreign adversary from collecting vast swaths of sensitive data about the 170 million U.S. persons who use TikTok."
What the Supreme Court said in its ruling on the TikTok ban "The act''s prohibitions and divestiture requirement are designed to prevent China — a designated foreign adversary — from leveraging its control over ByteDance Ltd. to capture the personal data of U.S. TikTok users. This objective qualifies as an important government interest under intermediate scrutiny," the court said, referencing the middle standard applied by courts to assess the constitutionality of a law.
Under intermediate scrutiny, a challenged law must further an important government interest and be substantially related to that interest to be upheld. It is a less demanding standard than strict scrutiny, the highest level of judicial review, and more stringent than rational-basis review, the lowest, most lenient tier.
The court noted that TikTok "collects extensive personal information from and about its users," including location data and contact lists. The justices reiterated the government''s concerns that such information may allow China to track the locations of federal employees, craft dossiers of information for blackmail and conduct corporate espionage.
The court''s opinion also cited Congress''s finding that under Chinese law, companies can be required to turn over data to the Chinese government. "The government had good reason to single out TikTok," it said. The court went on to say that the law, called the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, is "sufficiently tailored to address the government''s interest in preventing a foreign adversary from collecting vast swaths of sensitive data about the 170 million U.S. persons who use TikTok."
那时候会有一波大的爆冲。不过永远呆下去是不可能的，小红书老用户们要苦一段时间而已。
白宫刚发表声明了，说看不懂TT这是什么操作思维。
感觉智囊团可能是被这几天的小红书事件给干的宕机了，找不着北，完全迷糊了。。。