你在瞎扯吧。Laken Riley Act是针对非法移民。 Under this bill, DHS must detain an individual who (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted for, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting.
mrbrilliant 发表于 2025-01-14 22:09 你在瞎扯吧。Laken Riley Act是针对非法移民。 Under this bill, DHS must detain an individual who (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted for, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting.
mrbrilliant 发表于 2025-01-14 22:09 你在瞎扯吧。Laken Riley Act是针对非法移民。 Under this bill, DHS must detain an individual who (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted for, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting.
回复 16楼 Temporarilycalm 的帖子 这里 https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/29 法案全文也不长，我就复制粘贴在这里了： 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 29AN ACT To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to take into custody aliens who have been charged in the United States with theft, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1.Short title. This Act may be cited as the “Laken Riley Act”. SEC. 2. Detention of certain aliens who commit theft. Section 236(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226(c)) is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) in subparagraph (C), by striking “or”; (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking the comma at the end and inserting “, or”; and (C) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following: “(E) (i) is inadmissible under paragraph (6)(A), (6)(C), or (7) of section 212(a), and “(ii) is charged with, is arrested for, is convicted of, admits having committed, or admits committing acts which constitute the essential elements of any burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting offense,”; (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (4); and (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following: “(2) DEFINITION.—For purposes of paragraph (1)(E), the terms ‘burglary’, ‘theft’, ‘larceny’, and ‘shoplifting’ have the meaning given such terms in the jurisdiction where the acts occurred. “(3) DETAINER.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall issue a detainer for an alien described in paragraph (1)(E) and, if the alien is not otherwise detained by Federal, State, or local officials, shall effectively and expeditiously take custody of the alien.”. SEC. 3. Enforcement by attorney general of a State. (a) Inspection of applicants for admission.—Section 235(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1225(b)) is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following: “(3) ENFORCEMENT BY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF A STATE.—The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the detention and removal requirements under paragraphs (1) or (2) that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate injunctive relief. The court shall advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of a civil action filed under this paragraph to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this paragraph, a State or its residents shall be considered to have been harmed if the State or its residents experience harm, including financial harm in excess of $100.”. (b) Apprehension and detention of aliens.—Section 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226), as amended by this Act, is further amended— (1) in subsection (e)— (A) by striking “or release”; and (B) by striking “grant, revocation, or denial” and insert “revocation or denial”; and (2) by adding at the end the following: “(f) Enforcement by attorney general of a State.—The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging an action or decision by the Attorney General or Secretary of Homeland Security under this section to release any alien or grant bond or parole to any alien that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Attorney General or Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate injunctive relief. The court shall advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of a civil action filed under this subsection to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this subsection, a State or its residents shall be considered to have been harmed if the State or its residents experience harm, including financial harm in excess of $100.”. (c) Penalties.—Section 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1253) is amended by adding at the end the following: “(e) Enforcement by attorney general of a State.—The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the requirement to discontinue granting visas to citizens, subjects, nationals, and residents as described in subsection (d) that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of State on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate injunctive relief. The court shall advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of a civil action filed under this subsection to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this subsection, a State or its residents shall be considered to have been harmed if the State or its residents experience harm, including financial harm in excess of $100.”. (d) Certain classes of aliens.—Section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)) is amended— (1) by striking “Attorney General” each place it appears and inserting “Secretary of Homeland Security”; and (2) by adding at the end the following: “(C) The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the limitation under subparagraph (A) that parole solely be granted on a case-by-case basis and solely for urgent humanitarian reasons or a significant public benefit, that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate injunctive relief. The court shall advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of a civil action filed under this subparagraph to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this subparagraph, a State or its residents shall be considered to have been harmed if the State or its residents experience harm, including financial harm in excess of $100.”. (e) Detention.—Section 241(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1231(a)(2)) is amended— (1) by striking “During the removal period,” and inserting the following: “(A) IN GENERAL.—During the removal period,”; and (2) by adding at the end the following: “(B) ENFORCEMENT BY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF A STATE.—The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the detention requirement under subparagraph (A) that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate injunctive relief. The court shall advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of a civil action filed under this subparagraph to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this subparagraph, a State or its residents shall be considered to have been harmed if the State or its residents experience harm, including financial harm in excess of $100.”. (f) Limit on injunctive relief.—Section 242(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1252(f)) is amended by adding at the end following: “(3) CERTAIN ACTIONS.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to an action brought pursuant to section 235(b)(3), subsections (e) or (f) of section 236, or section 241(a)(2)(B).”. Passed the House of Representatives January 7, 2025. Attest:
Clerk. 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 29AN ACT To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to take into custody aliens who have been charged in the United States with theft, and for other purposes.
不是，是各州检察长如果因为联邦政府ICE和国务院不作为造成本州超过100刀的财务损失，就可以控告联邦政府ICE和国务院。 个人被遣返没有金额限制，就是“is charged with, is arrested for, is convicted of, admits having committed, or admits committing acts which constitute the essential elements of any burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting offense”并且“is inadmissible under paragraph (6)(A), (6)(C), or (7) of section 212(a),”就要被遣返。
回复 23楼 maaagiaaa2004 的帖子 很遗憾，是针对任何移民。合法或者非法都算。 “”“The bill also would impact legal immigration. The legislation instructs Customs and Border Protection officers to consider a person “inadmissible” to the U.S. if they are arrested for, or admit to, committing acts that constitute theft or shoplifting. That would mean someone with a valid visa to be in the U.S. could be removed before they had a chance to defend themselves from such charges in front of a judge.”“” 您看这段话的出处 https://time.com/7205925/laken-riley-act/ 关键是他只要 “”“arrested for theft or shoplifting”“” 这个是警察说的算的。本来可上庭，无罪可释放并且可以起诉警察随意逮捕。但是这个法案可以让你先驱逐出境，没机会开庭。 至于theft or shoplifting，你当然不会去偷啦，但是就像楼主说的，超市忘记刷了个东西，警察可以认为你theft or shoplifting，然后arrest。然后见我上面那句话。
ecaeca 发表于 2025-01-14 22:44 不是，是各州检察长如果因为联邦政府ICE和国务院不作为造成本州超过100刀的财务损失，就可以控告联邦政府ICE和国务院。 个人被遣返没有金额限制，就是“is charged with, is arrested for, is convicted of, admits having committed, or admits committing acts which constitute the essential elements of any burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting offense”并且“is inadmissible under paragraph (6)(A), (6)(C), or (7) of section 212(a),”就要被遣返。
我总结一下就是：大街上任何移民，如果被别人指控犯罪，哪怕是Costco结账漏扫了一件商品这种shoplifting，只需要有人指控 accuse，不需要法庭审判，不需要其它司法程序，ICE就可以直接无限期关押，没有见律师的权利
回忆一下班上昨天说的那个中国留学生合法移民，身上带着证件，但是警察不看不听他说，直接被ICE拘押2个月，人间蒸发，不让见律师，自己的Tesla车也不知去向的事情
Jan 20号之后的美国，谁看你不顺眼，只要举报你Costco漏扫一个酸奶，你就可能被人间消失关押到黑牢里面。你是合法移民，叶随身携带了绿卡？重新去读读昨天班上讨论的那个中国留学生都事情，你带证件，警察不理你不看你证件直接拷上送到大通铺去，你有嘴说得清吗？
哈哈哈，这件事唯一让我欣慰的是，我11/05号重仓买的GEO股票倒是涨了100%了。真金白银证明，我对 MAGA的预测判断100%正确
是的。就是我。有什么不好承认的？
我后来仔细研究了我对数据，完全没错。证明musk直接入侵投票机改票了
我大选之前分析了它们可能会这么干，但是还是不相信它们敢这么干。结果出来后，终于明白了这次它们是要来真大了，知道它们敢这么干之后，第二天立刻重仓入了TSLA PLTR GEO 和crypto 这几只MAGA股涨势，你自己也看到了
但是我之前预言不变。全球变暖，病毒和纳粹党上台导致全球人口20年减少80%。你没必要攻击我这个Cassandra messenger 大家一起享受下面要到来的吧，不管你是不是MAGA，谁都逃不掉
你知道musk这次敢直接用技术手段改票，你就知道不是什么4年的问题。问你一下希特勒几年？斯大林几年？
我当时没有回答她。心里说，四年后可能就是XX帝国了。
那你现在搬到那个国家去了？
MUSK入侵投票机改票？你这逻辑和1.6的红脖子一样，还说自己不是MAGA.
你在瞎扯吧。Laken Riley Act是针对非法移民。
Under this bill, DHS must detain an individual who (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted for, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting.
牛人都差不多，L Z和大统领是一卦的。
这个法不是只对非法移民，是对非公民的。既使有绿卡也可以关押。偷窃>100刀的。
出门右拐看昨天留学生关大通铺喝厕所水60天的那个帖子
中国那句话怎么说的呢，说你是你就是！不是也是！说你不是你就不是！是也不是！
一张黄皮，你怎么证明自己是公民？昨天那个帖子，ICE看到黄皮直接手铐铐起来，你掏证件的机会都没有
况且，就算你每天把那张入籍纸揣在身上，你递给人嘛噶ICE查验，人家接过去一把撕了扔垃圾桶，说我没看到，抓起来。你有脾气？要lawyer？学学昨天帖子里ICE原话：shut up!
废话。高IQ的特点就是根据观察到的事实考虑一切可能性。低IQ只会人云亦云，把所有自己理解不了的dimension都一概画成阴谋论
显然我的大选模型没有错，你回去读当时分析，我特别强调了Iowa的那个ann的模型。
后来trump的行为恰恰证明了我都观察，trump大选后专门高调起诉了Iowa的ann，因为她的民调结果是真实的表现了trump会大败（如果musk没有改选票机的话）。trump心虚了。否则正常逻辑，一个Iowa非摇摆州的一个民调而已，至于trump在“赢了”大选后还念念不忘的去告吗？显然是做贼心虚
有link吗？找不到 我是说 留学生大通铺 的link
‘’musk直接入侵投票机改票‘’就是典型的阴谋论。
ignorance is power
恐怕你这种川粉压根不知道2020年之后 MAGA一直在好几个州诉讼audit dominion voting machine把 source code都通过法庭程序完全获取了吧
你也不知道好多州tabulator联网是starlink吧
yeah 在你们眼里事实和逻辑是“阴谋论” 但是5G芯片疫苗和蜥蜴人是“真想”
这里
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/29
法案全文也不长，我就复制粘贴在这里了：
119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 29 AN ACT To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to take into custody aliens who have been charged in the United States with theft, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the “Laken Riley Act”. SEC. 2. Detention of certain aliens who commit theft. Section 236(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226(c)) is amended— (1) in paragraph (1)— (A) in subparagraph (C), by striking “or”; (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking the comma at the end and inserting “, or”; and
(C) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following: “(E) (i) is inadmissible under paragraph (6)(A), (6)(C), or (7) of section 212(a), and “(ii) is charged with, is arrested for, is convicted of, admits having committed, or admits committing acts which constitute the essential elements of any burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting offense,”; (2) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (4); and
(3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following: “(2) DEFINITION.—For purposes of paragraph (1)(E), the terms ‘burglary’, ‘theft’, ‘larceny’, and ‘shoplifting’ have the meaning given such terms in the jurisdiction where the acts occurred. “(3) DETAINER.—The Secretary of Homeland Security shall issue a detainer for an alien described in paragraph (1)(E) and, if the alien is not otherwise detained by Federal, State, or local officials, shall effectively and expeditiously take custody of the alien.”. SEC. 3. Enforcement by attorney general of a State. (a) Inspection of applicants for admission.—Section 235(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1225(b)) is amended— (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following: “(3) ENFORCEMENT BY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF A STATE.—The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the detention and removal requirements under paragraphs (1) or (2) that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate injunctive relief. The court shall advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of a civil action filed under this paragraph to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this paragraph, a State or its residents shall be considered to have been harmed if the State or its residents experience harm, including financial harm in excess of $100.”. (b) Apprehension and detention of aliens.—Section 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226), as amended by this Act, is further amended— (1) in subsection (e)— (A) by striking “or release”; and (B) by striking “grant, revocation, or denial” and insert “revocation or denial”; and
(2) by adding at the end the following: “(f) Enforcement by attorney general of a State.—The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging an action or decision by the Attorney General or Secretary of Homeland Security under this section to release any alien or grant bond or parole to any alien that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Attorney General or Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate injunctive relief. The court shall advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of a civil action filed under this subsection to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this subsection, a State or its residents shall be considered to have been harmed if the State or its residents experience harm, including financial harm in excess of $100.”. (c) Penalties.—Section 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1253) is amended by adding at the end the following: “(e) Enforcement by attorney general of a State.—The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the requirement to discontinue granting visas to citizens, subjects, nationals, and residents as described in subsection (d) that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of State on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate injunctive relief. The court shall advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of a civil action filed under this subsection to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this subsection, a State or its residents shall be considered to have been harmed if the State or its residents experience harm, including financial harm in excess of $100.”. (d) Certain classes of aliens.—Section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)) is amended— (1) by striking “Attorney General” each place it appears and inserting “Secretary of Homeland Security”; and (2) by adding at the end the following: “(C) The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the limitation under subparagraph (A) that parole solely be granted on a case-by-case basis and solely for urgent humanitarian reasons or a significant public benefit, that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate injunctive relief. The court shall advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of a civil action filed under this subparagraph to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this subparagraph, a State or its residents shall be considered to have been harmed if the State or its residents experience harm, including financial harm in excess of $100.”. (e) Detention.—Section 241(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1231(a)(2)) is amended— (1) by striking “During the removal period,” and inserting the following: “(A) IN GENERAL.—During the removal period,”; and (2) by adding at the end the following: “(B) ENFORCEMENT BY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF A STATE.—The attorney general of a State, or other authorized State officer, alleging a violation of the detention requirement under subparagraph (A) that harms such State or its residents shall have standing to bring an action against the Secretary of Homeland Security on behalf of such State or the residents of such State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate injunctive relief. The court shall advance on the docket and expedite the disposition of a civil action filed under this subparagraph to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this subparagraph, a State or its residents shall be considered to have been harmed if the State or its residents experience harm, including financial harm in excess of $100.”. (f) Limit on injunctive relief.—Section 242(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1252(f)) is amended by adding at the end following: “(3) CERTAIN ACTIONS.—Paragraph (1) shall not apply to an action brought pursuant to section 235(b)(3), subsections (e) or (f) of section 236, or section 241(a)(2)(B).”. Passed the House of Representatives January 7, 2025. Attest:
Clerk. 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 29 AN ACT To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to take into custody aliens who have been charged in the United States with theft, and for other purposes.
不是，是各州检察长如果因为联邦政府ICE和国务院不作为造成本州超过100刀的财务损失，就可以控告联邦政府ICE和国务院。
个人被遣返没有金额限制，就是“is charged with, is arrested for, is convicted of, admits having committed, or admits committing acts which constitute the essential elements of any burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting offense”并且“is inadmissible under paragraph (6)(A), (6)(C), or (7) of section 212(a),”就要被遣返。
你知道这么多，怎么模型里没考虑到这些？现在马后炮只能显示自己愚蠢。
是针对“任何移民”吗？
很遗憾，是针对任何移民。合法或者非法都算。
“”“The bill also would impact legal immigration. The legislation instructs Customs and Border Protection officers to consider a person “inadmissible” to the U.S. if they are arrested for, or admit to, committing acts that constitute theft or shoplifting. That would mean someone with a valid visa to be in the U.S. could be removed before they had a chance to defend themselves from such charges in front of a judge.”“”
您看这段话的出处 https://time.com/7205925/laken-riley-act/
关键是他只要 “”“arrested for theft or shoplifting”“” 这个是警察说的算的。本来可上庭，无罪可释放并且可以起诉警察随意逮捕。但是这个法案可以让你先驱逐出境，没机会开庭。
至于theft or shoplifting，你当然不会去偷啦，但是就像楼主说的，超市忘记刷了个东西，警察可以认为你theft or shoplifting，然后arrest。然后见我上面那句话。
谢谢。大家要当心，这个法律会推动一批人入藉。 这个法律可以被执行得非常邪恶。
这位楼主有点神经兮兮的..