我家孩子打网球。由于网球比赛一般都是自己计分，call out, cheating has no penalty or consequences。我的经历里面，总体来说华裔小朋友是最老实的。基本没有耍赖的。印度小朋友里面耍懒的最多。白人和黑人基本里面大概有20%会赖皮。东欧后裔的小朋友比较老实，和华裔相当。混血小朋友在我遇到的里面也有些极品赖皮的。不过这只是我的个人经历。
转发几个我觉得说的不错的 https://x.com/furongh/status/1867974868571930683?s=46&t=AkbIWSGyBh9YYJeUGA5rtg I saw a slide circulating on social media last night while working on a deadline. I didn’t comment immediately because I wanted to understand the full context before speaking. After learning more, I feel compelled to address what I witnessed during an invited talk at NeurIPS 2024 by Professor Rosalind Picard. I deeply respect Professor Picard’s scholarship and contributions to the field. However, her comments during the talk reflected a deeply troubling and racist view of Chinese scholars. This was not just inappropriate but also profoundly disheartening. First, it was entirely unnecessary to mention the student’s nationality when discussing an incident of cheating. The point about academic integrity could have been made without emphasizing nationality. Yet, Professor Picard chose to highlight it. This choice perpetuates harmful stereotypes about Chinese scholars and reflects a broader bias against Asians, often rooted in the assumption that we “work hard, avoid conflict, and don’t push back.” This needs to change. Asians, like everyone else, have the right to speak out and demand accountability when racism occurs. We will ensure that being racist against Asians has consequences, including here, Professor Picard. What made this incident worse was how it unfolded during the Q&A session. A Chinese attendee asked a professional and thoughtfully articulated question. She began by thanking Professor Picard for her talk and posed this question: Are you calling out the student’s nationality because you find most Chinese scholars honest, and the fact that the cheating student was Chinese is rare? Is that why you emphasized nationality? This was a generous and high-EQ question, offering Professor Picard an opportunity to reconsider or clarify her comments. Unfortunately, she doubled down instead. Professor Picard reinforced her remarks by quoting the student’s excuse —that ethics wasn’t taught in their school—and generalized this as a broader issue with Chinese education. This statement is both factually incorrect and deeply offensive. There are glaring logical flaws in this argument: 1.If the student cheated, why would their excuse about ethics education be taken at face value? A serious scholar would investigate the claim before making it a central part of their argument. 2.Even if the student’s school didn’t teach ethics (which is false for schools in China), other sources like family and community often instill strong ethical values. Ignoring this nuance is careless and reinforces stereotypes. What is most heartbreaking is that Professor Picard couldn’t even acknowledge something as simple as: “Most Chinese scholars are honest and upright.” Instead, she focused on the singular exception and added, “Of course, with this one exception in this case” in her response. I regret that this happened at NeurIPS. I regret that this happened in my research community—a place I have cherished and contributed to for over 14 years. I regret that this happened at MIT, an institution of excellence and aspiration for many Chinese scholars. Racism has no place in academia, and incidents like this tarnish the principles of inclusion and respect that we, as a global research community, should uphold. I hope NeurIPS and the broader academic community take this as a wake-up call to address the biases and systemic issues that enable such comments to go unchallenged. We must do better. @MIT_CSAIL @NeurIPSConf
所以说要讲政治正确，作为少数族裔，不知道什么时候就被攻击了。
哪个县城？披露后受到的惩罚是什么？广西都安某年高考有集体舞弊的现象。后果是当年这个县所有的高考考生退回原籍重考。
并没有一个中国教授出来为中国学生说话。
是长春下面的一个叫双阳县的地方，他在新闻调查的这个节目最后被毙了，不准播，自然也就不会有什么结果了。
中国人对高考公平性特别关注，有个湖南卫视的主持人自己显白说自己不是应届毕业生，走关系按照应届毕业生的身份考上军艺，事情发酵被湖南卫视除名，他继父也被查办
严格来说，这个事儿实际上是针对national origin的歧视。
当然，对我们第一代来说，这二者是一回事。而美国人显然对种族歧视更敏感。
所以在反击她的时候，往这个方面引导，是合理的策略。
你是外星球的吗？! X上一堆中国教授发声了。
你没有上过思想品德？谁小时候没有被这些影响过 然后天天写日记没有事情可写时就写了今天帮了哪个老人家过马路这种事的？
你们这些人啊， 总是可以挑出各种奇怪的角度来攻击中国人
真的这么恨吗？
德智体美劳没听说过？
中国的ethics道德是贯穿在广泛的德育方面， 且德是放在智体之前， 怎么没有？
对于别有用心的人，不要期望感化他们的良知和三观。
坚持4不政策，不废话，不解释，不接受道歉，不和好。
歧视黑人，gay，精神病人--- 美国现在跟文革一样，整天意识形态，政治正确 歧视Chinese --- DEI不够，必须有real consequences
没有教养没有道德的是你这种自恨垃圾 请不要随便代表华人学生 呸
嗯，我们知道你的价值观了
怎么可能， X和linkedin 上很多教授业界都在谴责会议方和教授， 不光中国的， 华人， 还有很多外国人， 要不你以为会有不情不愿的道歉吗
哇，有这么自恨的人。
那个人是个野鸡学校毕业的。你看他说的，他们学校有机会就作假，考试普遍作弊。
烙印的确无品，但是这不能说明咱们就好啊。 你看看现在中国的大学里，哪个教授不是抄袭？ 习三烂的文凭肯定是假的！ 你还说个屁啊。
问题是即使中国的野鸡大学，也没有听说学生考试普遍作弊啊！