有一说一，华人支持民主党的，都是很有牺牲奉献精神的 最近华人区的ROSEMEAD又被民主党要安插400户HOMELESS了，而且是那种有mental health problem的HOMELESS，大家都知道HOMELESS吸毒，一身的STD还有治安也不好。但是华人民主党粉甘之如饴，觉得民主党在他们家门口搞HOMELESS是对他们的恩宠。虽然HOMELESS的shelter街对面就是一个小学，在一个Mile范围内就有四个学校，包括小学和中学。ROSEMEAD一半的人口都是华人，人家民主党就专门往华人社区塞HOMELESS。纽约法拉盛也是一样被安插了HOMELESS。旧金山华人区的小学门口就是大麻店。民主党真是对华人民主党粉是宠爱有加。深怕HOMELESS的温暖不能直接给到华人民主党粉，直接送到华人民主党支持者的家门口了。 Jimmy Kimmel kill all chinese, 黑人rob chinese, Obama says it is freedom of speech 还有法拉盛的地铁，黑哥哥推华人下地铁，直接被摔死，这种事情屡见不鲜。还有民主党统治的大城市，很多华人被黑人打死。比如前几天，HOUSTON的大华超市的华人被黑人零元购打死。民主党对华人民主党粉是真爱。 支持共和党的华人只是牺牲一点钱，支持民主党的华人需要献出自己的生命！！！
DOI EXAMINATION FINDS COMPLIANCE AND GOVERNANCE RISKS AT 51 CITY-FUNDED NONPROFITS THAT OPERATE NYC HOMELESS SHELTERS AND FLAWED CITY OVERSIGHT OF DHS-FUNDED PROVIDERS —DOI issued 32 reforms to address system-wide vulnerabilities— Jocelyn E. Strauber, Commissioner of the New York City Department of Investigation (“DOI”), issued a Report today memorializing the key findings from DOI’s extensive examination of compliance risks at 51 nonprofit human service providers that operate many of the homeless shelters in New York City and of the City’s oversight of the shelter system. The Report includes DOI’s 32 recommendations for reform, intended to protect the billions of dollars that the City spends annually on shelter services from corruption, waste, fraud, and abuse. A copy of the Report follows this release and can be found here: https://www.nyc.gov/site/doi/newsroom/public-reports.page
DOI Commissioner Jocelyn E. Strauber said, “When it comes to protecting the vast taxpayer resources that City-funded nonprofits receive, prevention is key. City-funded nonprofit service providers pose unique compliance and governance risks, and comprehensive City oversight is the best way to stop corruption, fraud, and waste before it starts. This deep dive into the City-funded homeless service provider system builds on DOI’s extensive experience investigating nonprofit fraud, and our 2021 Report concerning City-funded nonprofits. Today’s Report provides ample evidence of the risks specific to nonprofits and shortcomings in City oversight and makes 32 recommendations to strengthen controls around this essential network. I thank the DOI team that has worked tirelessly on this investigation and the many City entities that provided assistance, including the staff from the City Department of Social Services who worked closely with DOI to support this examination.” The City, through the City Department of Social Services (“DSS”) and the City Department of Homeless Services (“DHS”), operates the largest homeless shelter system of any municipality in the United States. DHS-funded shelters currently support an average of over 86,000 people per night at a cost of approximately $4 billion annually in FY 2024, up from $2.7 billion annually in FY 2022, due in large part to the influx of asylum seekers over the past two years. (DOI did not review City-funded contracts involving services to the asylum seekers that were procured under emergency procedures for this Report. DOI has oversight of these expenditures through an integrity monitor that is supervised by and reports to DOI.)
The examination for this Report began in 2021, well before the influx of asylum seekers, although some of the providers DOI examined are providing asylum seeker services. DOI’s focus on this area was prompted in part by the investigation of Victor Rivera, the former CEO of nonprofit City service provider Bronx Parent Housing Network, who ultimately pled guilty to a federal bribery-and-kickback scheme involving that nonprofit. DOI investigators drew on their knowledge of financial and administrative vulnerabilities in City-funded nonprofit providers generally to examine individual shelter providers’ governance and compliance practices, and potential conflicts of interest and other potential misconduct during this examination of 51 nonprofit organizations operating shelters for DHS. DOI reviewed the 2 operations of these organizations and their responses to a detailed questionnaire; analyzed an array of materials including audit reports, financial ledgers, invoices, and disclosures to the City; and conducted dozens of interviews, including of certain providers’ senior executives. DOI also evaluated the oversight of these providers by the City, including by DHS and DSS. The provider practices and City oversight reflected in the Report dates from 2018 through the present, although the majority of DOI’s information-gathering was completed from 2022 through 2024.
DOI received approximately 70 responses to the questionnaire distributed to City-funded nonprofit organizations. To date, DOI has completed findings on 51 providers and issued related referral letters to DSS, each one summarizing DOI’s findings as to individual shelter providers and, in total, raising hundreds of governance and compliance concerns at these providers. The findings in these referrals already have caused some providers to make improvements to their policies and procedures. The Report makes 32 recommendations to the relevant City agencies to address system-wide vulnerabilities, strengthen controls with respect to providers to protect the substantial public funds providers receive, and enhance public trust. Aspects of this examination are still ongoing, and this Report is a summary of DOI’s major findings to date. This Report builds on the findings from the investigations DOI has conducted in recent years that have focused on the City’s nonprofit vendor spending and which have resulted in criminal charges, administrative findings, integrity monitorships, and recommendations to improve City oversight of these contracts and providers. Since 2018, DOI investigations have resulted in at least 25 arrests on charges involving fraud and corruption at City-funded nonprofits, including prosecutions related to homeless service providers. Since 2018, DOI also has issued more than a dozen administrative referrals to City agencies – in addition to the administrative referrals issued as part of this examination -- reporting findings of mismanagement, noncompliance, or other non-criminal misconduct at City-funded nonprofits. In 2021, DOI issued Report on Corruption Vulnerabilities in the City’s Oversight and Administration of Not-for-Profit Human Services, which identified gaps in the City’s general oversight of its contracts with nonprofit human service providers. Many of DOI’s prior findings and recommendations remain relevant to the findings of this Report, which focuses solely on the unique issues associated with the oversight of DHSfunded shelter providers.
This Report identifies a variety of compliance and governance risks at these providers, as well as in the City’s overall management of the shelter system. These risks vary in their severity and include: • Conflicts of interest affecting City money. DOI identified cases where insiders at the shelter provider had personal business interests involving the shelter through which they received payments outside their regular compensation. In some cases, shelter executives simultaneously held employment at a private entity, such as a security company, that was hired to provide services at City-funded shelters. • Poor Citywide controls over how City money is used for executive compensation. DOI identified multiple shelter executives who received more than $500,000 per year, and in some cases, more than $700,000 per year, from providers and related organizations. Executive compensation in these cases is funded either largely or in part through City funds. The City lacks sufficient rules concerning how much City money can be allocated to nonprofit executives’ salaries. • Nepotism, in violation of City contracts. DOI found shelter providers that have employed immediate family members of senior executives and board members, in apparent violation of their City contracts. For instance, one provider that is largely funded by the City employed its CEO’s children since at least 2007. This provider subsequently entered into a DOI-managed monitorship agreement. • Shelter providers failing to follow competitive bidding rules when procuring goods and services with public money. DOI found numerous cases where shelter providers did not comply with the City’s competitive bidding requirements or where it was unclear whether shelter providers conducted true competitive bidding processes. For example, this review identified multiple instances where shelter providers awarded multimillion-dollar building maintenance service contracts to companies affiliated with the buildings’ landlords.
DOI issued 32 recommendations to address the system-wide vulnerabilities noted in this Report. Included among the key recommendations are: ➢ DSS should appoint a Chief Vendor Compliance Officer to provide overall leadership for DSS and DHS’s compliance strategy with respect to nonprofit human service contracts, including contracts with shelter providers. ➢ Shelter providers should be required to regularly disclose additional information relevant to identifying compliance risks, including potential conflicts of interest for key persons. ➢ DSS and DHS should take steps to improve their oversight of shelter operators’ expenditures, including by immediately stopping payments for costs that are not accompanied by a proper description and ensuring that relevant agency staff receive regular financial compliance training. ➢ The City should update its electronic procurement and invoicing systems to better enable thirdparty oversight and centralize key documentation.
This Report also reiterates many of the 23 recommendations that DOI issued in its November 2021 Report on Corruption Vulnerabilities in the City’s Oversight and Administration of Not-for-Profit Human Services. While the City has implemented some reforms since the 2021 Report and is also undertaking some work that closely tracks DOI’s recommendations, many of the recommendations from 2021 have not been implemented at any substantial level. The 2021 Report recommended, among other things, that the City: Reform its conflict-of-interest disclosure system for the City’s human service providers. Develop more specific guidance to agencies on executive compensation and consider setting a cap or other parameters on City-funded executive compensation. Conduct more robust reviews of expenses that human service providers invoice to the City, including by reviewing larger samples of supporting documentation. New York City is currently making an unprecedented financial commitment to address homelessness. For that reason, it is more important than ever that it implement stronger risk management and compliance controls around this spending. Accepting and implementing the reforms set forth in this Report, as well as in DOI’s November 2021 Report, would be critical steps in this direction. DOI Commissioner Strauber thanks DSS Commissioner Molly Wasow Park and her staff, for their partnership on this examination and the Mayor’s Office of Contracts and Mayor’s Office of Risk Management and Compliance for their assistance. DOI also received support from two private firms with experience in investigations, audits, and compliance monitoring, who provided auditing and investigative resources with respect to certain provider reviews. At DOI, this examination was conducted by Deputy Inspector General/Special Counsel Daniel Kacinski and Confidential Investigator Rushelle Sharpe, with the assistance of Senior Investigative Auditor Olga Avram and Senior Investigative Attorney Alex Cane in DOI’s Office of the Inspector General for CityFunded Nonprofits. Data Analysts Anthony McDowald and Zachary Sayle and Director of Data Analytics Shyam Prasad in DOI’s Data Analytics Unit provided technical assistance. The examination was supervised 4 by Senior Inspector General Andrew Sein, Deputy Commissioner of Strategic Initiatives Christopher Ryan, and Deputy Commissioner/ Chief of Investigations Dominick Zarrella. https://www.nyc.gov/assets/doi/press-releases/2024/October/39DHSRptRelease10.17.2024.pdf
dvdhe 发表于 2024-10-21 15:20 有一说一，华人支持民主党的，都是很有牺牲奉献精神的 最近华人区的ROSEMEAD又被民主党要安插400户HOMELESS了，而且是那种有mental health problem的HOMELESS，大家都知道HOMELESS吸毒，一身的STD还有治安也不好。但是华人民主党粉甘之如饴，觉得民主党在他们家门口搞HOMELESS是对他们的恩宠。虽然HOMELESS的shelter街对面就是一个小学，在一个Mile范围内就有四个学校，包括小学和中学。ROSEMEAD一半的人口都是华人，人家民主党就专门往华人社区塞HOMELESS。纽约法拉盛也是一样被安插了HOMELESS。旧金山华人区的小学门口就是大麻店。民主党真是对华人民主党粉是宠爱有加。深怕HOMELESS的温暖不能直接给到华人民主党粉，直接送到华人民主党支持者的家门口了。 Jimmy Kimmel kill all chinese, 黑人rob chinese, Obama says it is freedom of speech 还有法拉盛的地铁，黑哥哥推华人下地铁，直接被摔死，这种事情屡见不鲜。还有民主党统治的大城市，很多华人被黑人打死。比如前几天，HOUSTON的大华超市的华人被黑人零元购打死。民主党对华人民主党粉是真爱。 支持共和党的华人只是牺牲一点钱，支持民主党的华人需要献出自己的生命！！！
Mark Cuban: "You can't be a US citizen and bet on the US election on Polymarket."
David Hogg: "The irony of all this is that a lot of these Republicans are buying it thinking that's going to determine the outcome of the election, and they're just gaslighting themselves." pic.twitter.com/ffA9bhQmJU — Blue Georgia (@BlueATLGeorgia) October 19, 2024
Mark Cuban: "You can't be a US citizen and bet on the US election on Polymarket."
David Hogg: "The irony of all this is that a lot of these Republicans are buying it thinking that's going to determine the outcome of the election, and they're just gaslighting themselves." pic.twitter.com/ffA9bhQmJU — Blue Georgia (@BlueATLGeorgia) October 19, 2024
就是这样的，之前版上也有讨论 2016年很多中国来的第一代移民都被川普蒙蔽了（包括我自己），觉得川普会带来改变，可以给他试试 但那一年很多第二代甚至1.5代的移民就敏感的嗅到了川普会带来的一系列white supremacy冲击，坚决反对他 他在任四年，大多数第一代移民也看清楚了 fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me. 美国本土中下层白人因为生活贫困支持一个change candidate我可以理解。有色人种支持川普简直是有病
dvdhe 发表于 2024-10-21 15:20 有一说一，华人支持民主党的，都是很有牺牲奉献精神的 最近华人区的ROSEMEAD又被民主党要安插400户HOMELESS了，而且是那种有mental health problem的HOMELESS，大家都知道HOMELESS吸毒，一身的STD还有治安也不好。但是华人民主党粉甘之如饴，觉得民主党在他们家门口搞HOMELESS是对他们的恩宠。虽然HOMELESS的shelter街对面就是一个小学，在一个Mile范围内就有四个学校，包括小学和中学。ROSEMEAD一半的人口都是华人，人家民主党就专门往华人社区塞HOMELESS。纽约法拉盛也是一样被安插了HOMELESS。旧金山华人区的小学门口就是大麻店。民主党真是对华人民主党粉是宠爱有加。深怕HOMELESS的温暖不能直接给到华人民主党粉，直接送到华人民主党支持者的家门口了。 Jimmy Kimmel kill all chinese, 黑人rob chinese, Obama says it is freedom of speech 还有法拉盛的地铁，黑哥哥推华人下地铁，直接被摔死，这种事情屡见不鲜。还有民主党统治的大城市，很多华人被黑人打死。比如前几天，HOUSTON的大华超市的华人被黑人零元购打死。民主党对华人民主党粉是真爱。 支持共和党的华人只是牺牲一点钱，支持民主党的华人需要献出自己的生命！！！
🔥 最新回帖
中国的左派不等同于美国的左派，请先搞清楚事实。
完全没有捐款。学校出钱给搞活动。我一般不在论坛对人说话不客气。但你这种不了解情况就下结论一叶障目真是讨厌。
the history from 2016 to 2020
I voted him @ 2016
🛋️ 沙发板凳
仅仅20天，就是2024总统大选日！这不是一场川普与哈里斯的个性竞赛，也不是人气比赛，这一天事关美国主权国家的生死存亡、事关战争、儿童失踪和婴儿死亡，事关美国《宪法》的去留......
10月15日，马斯克对这位发出自己真实声音的选民Jason的X贴文给了一个简洁有力的评价：真棒！（Bravo！），成为今天X上的一个亮点，24小时不到，近48百万的阅读量，在这里分享给大家。
其中，Jason说到川普“无端奚落他人"，这是媒体的谎言。川普只是对那些攻击他或他的支持者的人，毫不客气地回应过去而已。
说川普是一个“性格粗暴”的人又是一个媒体骗局，不让自己被人踩在脚下并不代表你性格残暴。相反，数十年来，川普关爱穷人和病人的故事不胜枚举。
请看下面全文：
马斯克的回复：（喝彩声）真棒！
Jason的X文：我受不了川普。他夸夸其谈，无端奚落他人，性格粗暴。但我已下定决心，我会投票给他，其原因如下： 他把美国人及其福祉放在第一位。卡马拉不会。 他会把马斯克带入内阁，担任政府工作效率沙皇，消除浪费。仅这一点可能就是投票给他的最好理由。 他会把小肯尼迪带入内阁，让美国人再次健康起来。他最终会弄清楚为什么我们的食品公司会破坏我们孩子的健康。 我厌倦了媒体不断对川普的撒谎，首先是无休止的种族主义指控。这些都是无稽之谈。我知道的最新一件事是什么？纳尔逊·曼德拉入狱后，他派飞机送他回家，但美国不愿意。这是种族主义吗？不是！ 我厌倦了美国卷入外国战争。川普会再次阻止我们卷入战争。他疯狂到足以让外国退缩。他们不怕卡马拉。他们会害怕川普。 川普认为美国这个国家本质上是好的。卡马拉认为它本质上是邪恶的。 川普将结束开放边境的荒谬行为，这种行为使我们的国家更不安全，经济更不稳定，并带来数百万非法移民，他们争夺美国人的工作。 这个政府必须印制数十亿美元来照顾非法移民。这让我们所有的美元都贬值，价格飙升。 川普会囤积比特币。 川普会禁止男性进入女厕所和女性运动竞技场地。 川普是一个重量级的人格和谈判者。卡马拉是一个虚伪的人和一个轻量级的谈判者。 希望卡马拉·哈里斯获胜的人是这个国家最令人讨厌的人。他们推行人称代词、口罩、无休止的疫苗接种、取消文化、暴乱、公然针对白人的种族主义、性别混淆、破坏美国宪法。 川普会颠覆当前的政治体系。他差点三次成为暗杀的受害者。而且还一直在继续。他在采访中不是最出色的佼佼者，但他至少让自己出现在公众面前，一次又一次，而卡玛拉没有举行过一次新闻发布会。 哈里斯和媒体试图为她撑腰，掩盖了拜登认知能力下降的事实。他们指川普是对民主的威胁。然而她却在毫无票数的情况下被提名为候选人。她想控制最高法院。她想取消filibuster(阻挠议事的“费力把事拖”）。她起诉小肯尼迪，不让他参加投票。对民主的威胁是川普吗？真胡说八道！ 那些支持哈里斯的人将川普的支持者视为卑鄙、愚蠢、无知的法西斯分子。如果家人支持川普，他们就与之断绝关系，或者不邀请他们参加感恩节晚餐。这太可耻了。 每次她发言，我都试着给她一个机会。但她是我见过的最虚伪、最傲慢的政客，从来没见过的！我不能不说岀来！ 她和那些支持她的人抵制选民身份证，认为要求出示身份证是种族歧视。她的司法部正在起诉弗吉尼亚州试图清除选民名单上的非法移民。为什么我们不希望每一个美国公民拥有一票呢？相信市中心贫民区的人完全有能力获得政府颁发的身份证，还是相信他们没有能力，哪个更具有种族主义的色彩呢？
就是这样。我说完了。谢谢你听我说完。
很多人说什么共和党种族歧视，川普是纳粹，川普上台以后，华人就要进集中营，还有被当作间谍，还有不能买房子。
其实这些都是烟雾弹。都是次要矛盾。
美国现在的主要矛盾是什么？
过去三，四十年，美国的制造业转移去了亚洲还有墨西哥等等人工便宜的国家。美国多于一百多万的工厂Outsourced到国外去了。现在美国连抗生素都要依赖中国，因为抗生素的原研药95%需要从中国进口，等于中国卡住了美国的脖子。
以前，来美国，下了飞机就有工作。现在？美国公民都没有工作，还来了几千万非法移民抢本国人的工作。
说穿了，美国没有制造业，没有工作了。
而且白领工作也在outsourced到印度，比如软件工程师。美国现在能outsourced的工作都外包了。
美国本国人咋办？难道就靠天天吸大麻，还有做流浪汉？或者是去自杀？
美国说穿了需要一个川普一样的人物出来。川普说话不好听，但是他实事求是，戳破了民主党的政治正确的谎言。民主党那一套就是sugarcoating美国的现实。因为美国的现实就是很糟糕，需要下猛药来医治。
民主党一味的煽动种族矛盾，拿种族做文章，压根就没有抓住主要矛盾。‘
美国的主要矛盾是美国没有工作了。广大的美国公民没有工作，还来了几千万非法移民抢工作。普通的美国老百姓生活在水深火热之中。
美国普通老百姓面临着三座大山：医疗，教育，养老。 医疗对于普通老百姓来说，又贵又不好，教育，大学学费和mortgage差不多贵了，养老也是贵得要命。
久病床前无孝子。美国老百姓养非法移民太久了，早被耗光了爱心和热情。美国老百姓被道德绑架太久了，美国老百姓需要为自己活了。
乌克兰的战争，以色列的战争，美国老百姓都不想付钱。几千亿美金，几千亿美金的砸进去，也没有见到啥效果。川普说他上台会终结战争，这是好事。
美国现在穷得叮当响，应该专注自己国内的发展，而不是天天花不是自己的钱。美国财政赤字已经out of the roof, 美国人民已经负担不起了。
美国的皇帝的新装被川普戳破是好事，长痛不如短痛。承认现实，才能改变不好的现状，而不是陶醉于政治正确编造的谎言里面。
美国现在各行各业都是shithole了，医疗，教育，养老都一塌糊涂，差得要命。很多人被民主党忽悠，还觉得美国老子天下第一。
美国其实生活水平压根不如中国。 美国已经全面落后中国了。
如果再让民主党上台，中国啥都不用做，只需要等着民主党自己做死就行了。
当年大家出国，不是为了来美国吃福利的，大家都是想着来美国有一番作为。至少今天的生活要比昨天好，和自己比。
大家问问自己，你今天的生活比四年前更好了吗？？？？？？
当年中共利用农民夺取了政权，夺取政权以后，农民还是被剥削得最厉害的。
中共有中宣部，现在民主党也利用主流媒体天天给美国人民洗脑。
在国内，看中共的报道很多时候要反着看，在美国，主流媒体很多时候也要反过来看。
像HRRIS这种烂人居然也能做总统。如果HARRIS真的当上总统，美国估计离跌落世界强权也不远了。
民主党这样乱搞，中共什么都不用做，就能躺赢了！
支持民主党的很多都是什么政治庇护之流喜欢吃福利的，没有接受过什么教育，很容易被主流媒体洗脑，也就是很多支持民主党的都是吊丝！
最近华人区的ROSEMEAD又被民主党要安插400户HOMELESS了，而且是那种有mental health problem的HOMELESS，大家都知道HOMELESS吸毒，一身的STD还有治安也不好。但是华人民主党粉甘之如饴，觉得民主党在他们家门口搞HOMELESS是对他们的恩宠。虽然HOMELESS的shelter街对面就是一个小学，在一个Mile范围内就有四个学校，包括小学和中学。ROSEMEAD一半的人口都是华人，人家民主党就专门往华人社区塞HOMELESS。纽约法拉盛也是一样被安插了HOMELESS。旧金山华人区的小学门口就是大麻店。民主党真是对华人民主党粉是宠爱有加。深怕HOMELESS的温暖不能直接给到华人民主党粉，直接送到华人民主党支持者的家门口了。
Jimmy Kimmel kill all chinese, 黑人rob chinese, Obama says it is freedom of speech
还有法拉盛的地铁，黑哥哥推华人下地铁，直接被摔死，这种事情屡见不鲜。还有民主党统治的大城市，很多华人被黑人打死。比如前几天，HOUSTON的大华超市的华人被黑人零元购打死。民主党对华人民主党粉是真爱。
支持共和党的华人只是牺牲一点钱，支持民主党的华人需要献出自己的生命！！！
犯人还经常自己吞咽异物，比如plastic spoon等等，这样犯人就会被送到医院去。犯人有的时候比如rose bowl球赛，他们就吞咽异物，被送到医院，医院病房里有电视，他们就可以看球赛了。
有的犯人每个星期吞咽一次异物，就是为了去医院放风。就这样，人家还雇佣律师要告监狱。
犯人在监狱里面也有各种人权，要求mattress, 免费配眼镜，半年免费洗一次牙齿，还有ACLU的FLYER墙上到处都是，说有事给ACLU打电话，ACLU给他们撑腰。
DOJ也经常有人去监狱检查。
监狱现在其实更加像一个大型医疗机构, 至少一半的犯人是有精神病的。需要大量的医生护士还有各种医务工作人员。监狱里面24小时有药房，药剂师，X-ray, X-ray技师，Lab, CLS (clinical lab scientist), Health IT, Health Information Management, Infection control, patient safety officer, patient privacy officer, 还有RN，医生，medical urgent care 24X7, 还有psychy urgent care 24X7, 还有各种专科，比如podiatry, dentist, cardiac, ortho, eye clinic,免费配眼镜，半年免费洗一次牙齿，还有ophthalmologist, 也有24小时的psychiatrist，psychologist， Psychologist最大的雇主就是监狱，起码一个监狱有上百个psychologist
监狱犯人24小时随时能看到医生（不管是medical还是psych)，随时能看病，比普通人的 医疗待遇强太多了。就这，DOJ还说，监狱对犯人不够好，医疗待遇没有跟上，所以监狱需要雇佣更多的医疗工作人员。
监狱归警察管，警察下面会有一个medical services bureau, 每年几十亿美金的预算，然后雇佣了很多各种医生护士药剂师还有各种医务工作人员
这个medical services bureau至少有几千人的规模，有工会，有pension。监狱因为工作环境不好，很多人进去以后，呆不了多久，就离开了。
监狱为了留住医疗工作人员，不惜给医生护士20%的retention bonus.就是只要留下工作，每个paycheck，多给20%的钱，就这样，还是有很多人离开。
比如招了50个人，六个月试用期结束的时候，可能最多十个人留下来了，其余的就走了。不然为啥要给20%的retention bonus.
监狱不是每个人都适合在那儿上班的，很多在那儿上班的都是第一代移民。第一代移民为了赚钱生存，不计较工作环境不好。
检查报告指出纽约市收容所系统存在一系列问题！
据侨报报道，市调查局（DOI）17日（周四）发布针对本市收容所系统检查报告，发现利益冲突、裙带主义以及包括多名主管年薪高达50万乃至70万的薪水超高等一系列问题，并提出多项改革意见。
该审查始于2021年，调查了51个非营利组织服务供应商。报告中指出的第一大问题为影响本市资金的利益冲突。 DOl确定了收容所服务供应商的内部人员有涉及收容所内部人士商业利益的情况，部分内部人士通过收容所获得常规补偿以外的付款。 部分收容所主管同时在受雇为收容所提供服务的私人实体工作。多名庇护所主管薪资超高，每年从供应商和相关组织获得超过50万到70万美元，其中主要或部分来自城市资金，因此本市缺乏足够规定以确定对于收容所高管工资的分配。
此外，DOI发现收容所系统存在违法城市合同的裙带主义，有服务供应商雇用了收容所主管和董事会成员的直系亲属。
而第三大问题为庇护所供应商在用公共资金采购商品和服务时未能遵守竞争性投标规则。
DOI局长史特劳勃(Jocelyn E.Strauber)表示，“市府资助的非营利服务提供商构成了独特的合规和治理风险，全面的城市监督是在腐败、欺诈和浪费开始之前阻止问题发生的最佳方式。今天的报告充分证明了非营利组织特有风险和城市监督缺陷，提出了32项建议以加强对这一重要系统的控制。” DOl发布了32条建议，以解决报告中指出的全系统漏洞。
包括市社会服务局（DSS）应任命一名首席供应商审核官，为DSS和国土安全部在非营利性利民服务合同方面的合规战略提供全面领导、应要求收容所提供者定期披露与识别合规风险相关的信息，包括关键人物的潜在利益冲突、DSS和市游民服务局（DHS）应采取措施改善对服务商支出的监督，包括立即停止支付模糊费用并确保相关工作人员定期接受财务合规培训、本市应更新其电子采购和发票系统，以更好地实现第三方监督并集中关键文件。
市府方面在对报告的回应中称，市府官员已同意了许多建议，并将制定一个书面计划，在90天内解决调查结果。
DOI EXAMINATION FINDS COMPLIANCE AND GOVERNANCE RISKS AT 51 CITY-FUNDED NONPROFITS THAT OPERATE NYC HOMELESS SHELTERS AND FLAWED CITY OVERSIGHT OF DHS-FUNDED PROVIDERS —DOI issued 32 reforms to address system-wide vulnerabilities—
Jocelyn E. Strauber, Commissioner of the New York City Department of Investigation (“DOI”), issued a Report today memorializing the key findings from DOI’s extensive examination of compliance risks at 51 nonprofit human service providers that operate many of the homeless shelters in New York City and of the City’s oversight of the shelter system. The Report includes DOI’s 32 recommendations for reform, intended to protect the billions of dollars that the City spends annually on shelter services from corruption, waste, fraud, and abuse. A copy of the Report follows this release and can be found here: https://www.nyc.gov/site/doi/newsroom/public-reports.page
DOI Commissioner Jocelyn E. Strauber said, “When it comes to protecting the vast taxpayer resources that City-funded nonprofits receive, prevention is key. City-funded nonprofit service providers pose unique compliance and governance risks, and comprehensive City oversight is the best way to stop corruption, fraud, and waste before it starts. This deep dive into the City-funded homeless service provider system builds on DOI’s extensive experience investigating nonprofit fraud, and our 2021 Report concerning City-funded nonprofits. Today’s Report provides ample evidence of the risks specific to nonprofits and shortcomings in City oversight and makes 32 recommendations to strengthen controls around this essential network. I thank the DOI team that has worked tirelessly on this investigation and the many City entities that provided assistance, including the staff from the City Department of Social Services who worked closely with DOI to support this examination.”
The City, through the City Department of Social Services (“DSS”) and the City Department of Homeless Services (“DHS”), operates the largest homeless shelter system of any municipality in the United States. DHS-funded shelters currently support an average of over 86,000 people per night at a cost of approximately $4 billion annually in FY 2024, up from $2.7 billion annually in FY 2022, due in large part to the influx of asylum seekers over the past two years. (DOI did not review City-funded contracts involving services to the asylum seekers that were procured under emergency procedures for this Report. DOI has oversight of these expenditures through an integrity monitor that is supervised by and reports to DOI.)
The examination for this Report began in 2021, well before the influx of asylum seekers, although some of the providers DOI examined are providing asylum seeker services. DOI’s focus on this area was prompted in part by the investigation of Victor Rivera, the former CEO of nonprofit City service provider Bronx Parent Housing Network, who ultimately pled guilty to a federal bribery-and-kickback scheme involving that nonprofit. DOI investigators drew on their knowledge of financial and administrative vulnerabilities in City-funded nonprofit providers generally to examine individual shelter providers’ governance and compliance practices, and potential conflicts of interest and other potential misconduct during this examination of 51 nonprofit organizations operating shelters for DHS. DOI reviewed the 2 operations of these organizations and their responses to a detailed questionnaire; analyzed an array of materials including audit reports, financial ledgers, invoices, and disclosures to the City; and conducted dozens of interviews, including of certain providers’ senior executives. DOI also evaluated the oversight of these providers by the City, including by DHS and DSS. The provider practices and City oversight reflected in the Report dates from 2018 through the present, although the majority of DOI’s information-gathering was completed from 2022 through 2024.
DOI received approximately 70 responses to the questionnaire distributed to City-funded nonprofit organizations. To date, DOI has completed findings on 51 providers and issued related referral letters to DSS, each one summarizing DOI’s findings as to individual shelter providers and, in total, raising hundreds of governance and compliance concerns at these providers. The findings in these referrals already have caused some providers to make improvements to their policies and procedures. The Report makes 32 recommendations to the relevant City agencies to address system-wide vulnerabilities, strengthen controls with respect to providers to protect the substantial public funds providers receive, and enhance public trust.
Aspects of this examination are still ongoing, and this Report is a summary of DOI’s major findings to date.
This Report builds on the findings from the investigations DOI has conducted in recent years that have focused on the City’s nonprofit vendor spending and which have resulted in criminal charges, administrative findings, integrity monitorships, and recommendations to improve City oversight of these contracts and providers. Since 2018, DOI investigations have resulted in at least 25 arrests on charges involving fraud and corruption at City-funded nonprofits, including prosecutions related to homeless service providers. Since 2018, DOI also has issued more than a dozen administrative referrals to City agencies – in addition to the administrative referrals issued as part of this examination -- reporting findings of mismanagement, noncompliance, or other non-criminal misconduct at City-funded nonprofits.
In 2021, DOI issued Report on Corruption Vulnerabilities in the City’s Oversight and Administration of Not-for-Profit Human Services, which identified gaps in the City’s general oversight of its contracts with nonprofit human service providers. Many of DOI’s prior findings and recommendations remain relevant to the findings of this Report, which focuses solely on the unique issues associated with the oversight of DHSfunded shelter providers.
This Report identifies a variety of compliance and governance risks at these providers, as well as in the City’s overall management of the shelter system. These risks vary in their severity and include:
• Conflicts of interest affecting City money. DOI identified cases where insiders at the shelter provider had personal business interests involving the shelter through which they received payments outside their regular compensation. In some cases, shelter executives simultaneously held employment at a private entity, such as a security company, that was hired to provide services at City-funded shelters.
• Poor Citywide controls over how City money is used for executive compensation. DOI identified multiple shelter executives who received more than $500,000 per year, and in some cases, more than $700,000 per year, from providers and related organizations. Executive compensation in these cases is funded either largely or in part through City funds. The City lacks sufficient rules concerning how much City money can be allocated to nonprofit executives’ salaries.
• Nepotism, in violation of City contracts. DOI found shelter providers that have employed immediate family members of senior executives and board members, in apparent violation of their City contracts. For instance, one provider that is largely funded by the City employed its CEO’s children since at least 2007. This provider subsequently entered into a DOI-managed monitorship agreement.
• Shelter providers failing to follow competitive bidding rules when procuring goods and services with public money. DOI found numerous cases where shelter providers did not comply with the City’s competitive bidding requirements or where it was unclear whether shelter providers conducted true competitive bidding processes. For example, this review identified multiple instances where shelter providers awarded multimillion-dollar building maintenance service contracts to companies affiliated with the buildings’ landlords.
DOI issued 32 recommendations to address the system-wide vulnerabilities noted in this Report. Included among the key recommendations are:
➢ DSS should appoint a Chief Vendor Compliance Officer to provide overall leadership for DSS and DHS’s compliance strategy with respect to nonprofit human service contracts, including contracts with shelter providers.
➢ Shelter providers should be required to regularly disclose additional information relevant to identifying compliance risks, including potential conflicts of interest for key persons.
➢ DSS and DHS should take steps to improve their oversight of shelter operators’ expenditures, including by immediately stopping payments for costs that are not accompanied by a proper description and ensuring that relevant agency staff receive regular financial compliance training.
➢ The City should update its electronic procurement and invoicing systems to better enable thirdparty oversight and centralize key documentation.
This Report also reiterates many of the 23 recommendations that DOI issued in its November 2021 Report on Corruption Vulnerabilities in the City’s Oversight and Administration of Not-for-Profit Human Services. While the City has implemented some reforms since the 2021 Report and is also undertaking some work that closely tracks DOI’s recommendations, many of the recommendations from 2021 have not been implemented at any substantial level. The 2021 Report recommended, among other things, that the City:
Reform its conflict-of-interest disclosure system for the City’s human service providers.
Develop more specific guidance to agencies on executive compensation and consider setting a cap or other parameters on City-funded executive compensation.
Conduct more robust reviews of expenses that human service providers invoice to the City, including by reviewing larger samples of supporting documentation.
New York City is currently making an unprecedented financial commitment to address homelessness. For that reason, it is more important than ever that it implement stronger risk management and compliance controls around this spending. Accepting and implementing the reforms set forth in this Report, as well as in DOI’s November 2021 Report, would be critical steps in this direction.
DOI Commissioner Strauber thanks DSS Commissioner Molly Wasow Park and her staff, for their partnership on this examination and the Mayor’s Office of Contracts and Mayor’s Office of Risk Management and Compliance for their assistance.
DOI also received support from two private firms with experience in investigations, audits, and compliance monitoring, who provided auditing and investigative resources with respect to certain provider reviews.
At DOI, this examination was conducted by Deputy Inspector General/Special Counsel Daniel Kacinski and Confidential Investigator Rushelle Sharpe, with the assistance of Senior Investigative Auditor Olga Avram and Senior Investigative Attorney Alex Cane in DOI’s Office of the Inspector General for CityFunded Nonprofits. Data Analysts Anthony McDowald and Zachary Sayle and Director of Data Analytics Shyam Prasad in DOI’s Data Analytics Unit provided technical assistance. The examination was supervised 4 by Senior Inspector General Andrew Sein, Deputy Commissioner of Strategic Initiatives Christopher Ryan, and Deputy Commissioner/ Chief of Investigations Dominick Zarrella.
https://www.nyc.gov/assets/doi/press-releases/2024/October/39DHSRptRelease10.17.2024.pdf
我也注意到这个现象。而且就是第一代的别的亚裔支持trump比例要低很多，相对于网上看到的越南裔跟一部分华人来说
我不敢代表所有的Asian parents, 就我周围的data points来看，只要夫妻两都拿W2，家里有娃的，几乎没有不投Trump的，养蛙的费用在高通胀的环境下尤其明显，这是单身小年轻没有办法体会的。
你说得特别好
你和你的朋友圈真是奇葩中的奇葩啊 我认识的，包括我自己就没有看得上trump的
不是只有华人区被建affordable housing, 在以白人为主，高收入的santa monica等西洛杉矶也在建affordable housing. homeless在洛杉矶是个普遍问题， 不要把它形容只针对华人区
民主党的支持者的智商真是堪忧啊
川普作为一个几十亿美金的有钱人，有兴趣关注你们这些种族歧视的小事吗？
如果川普当上总统了，每天要处理国际国内大事，哪儿有时间和精力来歧视华裔？才不到2%的人口。
真是太把自己当回事了。
好比一个大公司的员工，觉得下一个CEO会记着他在公司的break room喝免费的咖啡的时候多喝了两口？？？？？？？就因为多喝了两口免费咖啡，CEO会把自己FIRE掉？？？？
种族歧视压根就不是什么主要矛盾。
美国现在主要矛盾是资本家贪婪，炒作种族矛盾，然后挑动老百姓互相斗，然后globalist的大资本家继续全球割韭菜，越来越富裕。美国的老百姓越来越穷，生活水平断崖式下降！
加上几千万非法移民，美国现在治安简直比第三世界还差。以前路不拾遗的美国，不用锁门的HOUSE，现在家家户户都胆战心惊，害怕入室抢劫和偷盗。
那是你的圈子问题。
我觉得很多人并不是反对共和党， 但反对trump
这些国家的移民都无一例外的吃够了左派的苦头，对于民主党的独裁做法当然很警惕。
屏蔽就好了，这几个复读机真的烦人
首先，我想表达一下作为一名在科技行业工作的女性的观点。今年早些时候，我在一家规模相当大的科技公司被裁员。许多工作现在都被外包到海外，我的职位也因此受到了影响。我花了4个月才找到一份新工作，但工资相比之前的有所下降。我不需要工作签证，我是美国公民。和我同时被裁的印度同事需要签证支持，但至今还没有找到工作。
Kamala一直在强调reproductive freedom。我经历了两次abortion——一次是出于个人原因，一次是因为baby基因问题。是的，我非常重视我的reproductive freedom，但在经济如此不景气、物价如此高昂的情况下，甚至很难考虑要孩子和组建家庭。物价高企，生活捉襟见肘，我真的还有freedom选择是否要孩子吗？特朗普从未完全反对堕胎禁令，他说这应是各州决定的问题。作为每个州的居民，你有权投票表达你的意见。卡玛拉在过去3年半里担任副总统，但她并没有改善经济。在特朗普任期内，经济并没有像现在这样糟糕。每个vote都是compromise， 只是个人觉得哪个更重要。对我来说是经济是物价是生活稳定。这些都是我在Kamala身上看不到的。这就是为什么我要投票Trump.
http://xhslink.com/a/3nCN93BhTLdY
还有什么川普上台，驱赶非法移民，就会把合法的美国公民也赶走，谁叫你不是白人？？？
要多傻才会相信这些啊。大家又不是没有在美国生活，工作的经历。
天天上班，看见白人社会底层，流浪汉，吸毒，自杀，还有各种白人吊丝，谁还把白人当回事啊。
只有民主党的宣传员才会把皮肤白当成一件特别重要的事情拿出来，叫花子捡了块铁，一天念到黑。
在美国读过书，有正经工作的，比绝大多数的白人日子过得好，白人是给我们当下属，跑腿的。结果到了民主党宣传员这里，白人简直成了神族一样。
NBA球星巴克利说过，黑人小孩如果努力读书，在学校里会被其他的黑人小孩嘲笑，像白人一样。
民主党宣传员就像那些幼稚的黑人小孩一样，天天嘲笑努力上进的华人。
得了吧 这里大部分有孩子
不好意思，没觉得，因为这个圈子有local的，有同事的，有跨洲的，华裔父母都和我们类似的背景，领W2老老实实养娃的良民，对民主党在学校的LGBT哪一套，那纳税人的钱养homeless和非法移民,还有经济上的通胀，加税，感受是非常深的。
什么时候W2成了可以炫耀的事情了？ 我们普通人不就是靠Ｗ2养家糊口吗🤣？ 我们又不是有钱人，也不是做生意的人可以有现金收入
就这眼界
逻辑漏洞：他们喜欢独裁者为什么不继续呆在独裁国家？
你心里戏真多，从哪里能看出来我在炫耀W2了？ 我只是在说一个fact而已。我周围比较熟的人，基本和我的背景差不多，大家都有娃，有投票权，age 40+, 夫妻双方领W2，对税敏感，对养娃费用敏感，对AA反感，对学校的教LGBT反感，对男女同厕反感，这批人你去问问他们投谁？我们有我们自己的priority, 不要动不动被人代表，明白？
所以你是同意川普是独裁者？上台会清算反对的人？
可是trump是made in china最忠实的执行者，看看他的旗帜帽子手表鞋子，还有圣经。 harris waltz的竞选产品大多是American made, union printed
确实，内心戏这么多
支持谁就去投票，还有啥比这个更能表达你的声音？
你被谁代表了？
川普salt不就是对华人w2这一类的家庭精准加税吗？ 当然民主党也爱税收上台之后乐享其成。 而且川普如何降低养娃费用？ 靠宗教化不搞教育吗？
美国公民是不可以下注的，还美国民意
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://x.com/blueatlgeorgia/status/1847487215623889002
因为你们都是教会的，对不
我同意不同意很重要吗？ 如果你们认定的独裁者当选美国总统，你们还不逃离美国，说明： 1、你们的命不值钱 2、你们自欺欺人
你要是每年自己准备保税就知道了，税改之前，像这种夫妻两都领W2的家庭，因为AMT的原因，实际上SALT是不能deductible的，川普把AMT门槛提高，然后Cap SALT,对于很多家庭都是实际上减税的，你要不信的话去问问这种类似背景的家庭。
能不把你这堆屎到处丢吗？
我不去教会，我的朋友圈里有教会的，也有不是的，这个去不去教会其实不是关键。
哈哈，我说过几次了
第一次有人发出这些bets说真金白银不说谎，我就好奇去看那些网站是什么。 有的网站一打开就说因为我的IP是美国的，不可以在上面BETS，所以我就说非美国人买这些bets，怎么能反应美国选民的意向？ 也有网站美国的有些州可以买，有些州不可以买。 但如果这些所有的网站都差不多，说明啥问题？ 只能说明非美国人对trump的上台很热烈，但那些人手中有投票权吗？
你要笑死我。赌博网的民意？纵观古今中外，哪个赌狗靠赌走上康庄大道的？再说了，你就是往里投一个亿美金，你也就一票。
可惜trump supporters不开窍，还老拿这些来说，说明他们自己也没钱去投注，也不会自己做研究人家喂啥就吃啥，要么就是不是在美国（而且他们很喜欢贼喊捉贼，说人家是龙虾党，不在美国）
选举结果两周后就揭晓了，哪一方打嘴炮都没有用。就这个主贴而言，能投票的parents, 大部分都已经至少40+了，这些人有自己的concern, 投谁不投谁，心里都有数，不会受那些没有投票权甚至人不在美国的声音影响。只不过都要养娃，都要工作，平时没有那么多时间在网上发声而已。
只能说物以类聚。我们双w2见到你们这种人都要敬而远之，之前群里蹦跶的川粉就是大家不想理还说大家用沉默表示支持，背后大家聚会都说他们是sb
湾湾，全是湾湾。到处造谣，诋毁华人，为反华政客站台，拼命为maga摇旗呐喊的全是湾湾。
加州台裔造势支持川普 不满美国经济治安现况 | 文学城 (wenxuecity.com)
你这里的智商已经显现出来， trump有几十亿？ 你知道他做生意怎么赚钱？ 一个字，懒。 赖不过，就走法庭。
你这一句把自己当回事就看出独裁者基因了。
民主就是每一票都要体现自己的想法，存在感！
我家就是两个W2带两娃，上次投Biden，这次会投Harris。我们专门请了假明天去现场早投，就怕邮寄途中有点意外搞丢。
躲在社会缝缝里，当然说自己没事啦。但又不敢把孩子送去maga学校，其实心里是明白的，身体是诚实的。
同样的话也可以原样奉还给你们这些trump hater啊，你们这些人在投trump的人心中也是同样当傻子一样看。
其实这点我不是很理解，首先我不知道是不是台湾地区移民支持川普的多，如果是的话，讲道理台湾人民不是更摇旗呐喊民主的么。。。为啥会支持川普。。。
难道你觉得我们需要川粉的肯定？不必了
我认识的台湾人支持川普的少，因为自己全家在美国也怕是歧视。当年李文和也没有因为他是台湾人就不被抓啊。赵晓兰姐姐那么有地位的也是说没就没了。
真的有人信他写的吗？（如果你觉得他对的，可以为我点赞，我想做下统计, 谢谢）.
就看到他说trump要芭制造业搬回美国就看不下去了
我碰到一个川疯子居然在微信群里叫嚣，沉默就是支持evil（某民主党的法案），然后大家更沉默了。🤣
嗯。美国没工作了~~~~ 千万非法移民~~~~~ 100多万工厂搬离美国。
我也看不下去了。网络如此发达的今天，去官网看下数据很难吗？去自己认证下这些数字很难吗？
这种真假参半，，跨萨其实，不像是个真情实感的人写的出来的。我赌两毛，应该是宣传部统一文件。 才如此的专业~~~
It's a majia_id, just ignore it.
川粉真是一个比一个神经
是的，的确这样。二代基本上在2016年就能看懂川普和他的基本盘意味着什么。抛弃政治正确就是全部裸奔了。 政治正确就好像一个面纱一样那么脆弱，那么多人却不知道好好地珍惜
网上也一样，省得互相谩骂，没必要啊。呵呵。。。
为什么不谈？ 反正我一不会继续跟川粉老板，吃过的亏不会吃第二次；二不会和川粉的娃playdate。三观都完全对立了还让娃playdate是什么情况，学蠢学坏吗？
同样的话送给深蓝州川粉，比如上面那个dvdhe
算了吧 就现在这两个党的水准 哪个配和土共的执政水平比啊 。别给自己贴金了。
我觉得你这个可以开一个关于BETS的科普帖，这个视频很好
同意美国的实际矛盾是资本家和劳动人民的矛盾，但是现在是谁使劲把这个矛盾给转移到移民的头上？整天在媒体上制造移民话题？让老百姓的怨气都发在移民头上？你以为懂王能有这个能力让资本家让利？他自己就是资本家的一员，连打印个圣经都要去中国，最好的用身体说话的例子。懂王家女儿以前做的衣服都是中国产地，也是为了美国制造业空心化做了贡献的。这样的人不知道有什么值得相信他能救美国老百姓于水深火热之中的，都是自己脑补太多。
能提出问题来，并不代表他他能解决问题。2016年很多华人就是被他这个敢于提出问题给蒙蔽了，认可他的人很多。可是在他任上四年，又有什么政绩呢？边境墙修了多少里？流失的制造业工作回来多少？基建了什么项目？一样什么都没有。除了整天到处嚷嚷，发帖，天天不是开除这个就是开除那个，演电影呢。
大家不满意民主党很正常，但是用一个同样没有政绩的疯子来代替一个没有政绩的无能之人，只能是更差的选项。
那我们也可以说，看得上卡马拉的是奇葩中的奇葩。
那就说明in general 民主党的政策对中产，上中产非常不利
m k
现在政治是敏感，但在亚裔社区（除了一代部分川粉聚集区）反对川普没啥不能聊的，大家坐下就是骂川普可太常见了
独裁的到底是谁你可能不能只看主媒，要自己思考一下了， 强制疫苗的是谁？要求twitter, facebook censor 所谓misinformation 的是谁？ 主党典型的贼喊捉贼
编的呗！还真有人相信？还一代移民英语不好不了解美国社会，这些人要么国内水军，即便在美国也就领福利的龙虾党，对美国社会的了解渠道全靠中文
犹如当年某些智商变异的犹太人相信吉普赛人是自己的主要威胁，纳粹打击吉普赛人对自己有利
只许你说不许别人说？言论自由呢？
对啊，很多二代都被民主党洗脑洗得失去独立思考的能力了。我们一代在家还得费劲给二代反洗脑呢
可能人群也是气味相投的扎堆吧。 我身边川粉极少。有也不好意思说自己是。
觉得没有啥可科普的，trump supporters自己喜欢就可以，和隔壁那个Casey的帖子一样。 你和我看到这种数据都会自己先去查一下。
问题是，川普当选后他们会离开美国吗？都是精致的利己主义者，整天就只关心自己的三瓜俩枣，宁可冒着被抓到集中营去也不肯放弃赚美元的机会吧
“我经历了两次abortion——一次是出于个人原因，一次是因为baby基因问题”
你这是吃完饭就把锅砸了，而且砸得理直气壮。若你在红州，你得多抚养两个孩子，其中一个是有先天疾病的。若是如此，你的生活将会是怎样的呢？
反了吧，现在独裁的明明是主党，哈三这个候选人是选上去的吗？
这个类比特别形象
我们左派敏感度高，遇到内乱自然会先作准备。你还是管好你自己吧，别做傻白甜自己主动上赶子去参加集中营建设
你们自己发帖说去呗没人拦着。你们跑别人帖子里撒野就是侵害楼主的言论自由。
别人的帖子就不能发表反对的声音？不想看拉黑不就完了还理直气壮的说言论自由。搞笑吧你！
你说的民主党的问题都存在，但你要用这种语气来说Trump不会怎么样，真的和邪教没啥区别，大家都经历过Trump当政，还有川粉说他说Chinese virus是开玩笑的，针对亚裔的恶行提高了多少，都是有数据可查的，不用在这里用这种提这个就是神经病的语气。
Trump当选，亚裔肯定不会进集中营，但华裔进不进集中营，就这些个华裔都是间谍抓不过来的氛围，真没人知道。