有一说一，华人支持民主党的，都是很有牺牲奉献精神的 最近华人区的ROSEMEAD又被民主党要安插400户HOMELESS了，而且是那种有mental health problem的HOMELESS，大家都知道HOMELESS吸毒，一身的STD还有治安也不好。但是华人民主党粉甘之如饴，觉得民主党在他们家门口搞HOMELESS是对他们的恩宠。虽然HOMELESS的shelter街对面就是一个小学，在一个Mile范围内就有四个学校，包括小学和中学。ROSEMEAD一半的人口都是华人，人家民主党就专门往华人社区塞HOMELESS。纽约法拉盛也是一样被安插了HOMELESS。旧金山华人区的小学门口就是大麻店。民主党真是对华人民主党粉是宠爱有加。深怕HOMELESS的温暖不能直接给到华人民主党粉，直接送到华人民主党支持者的家门口了。 Jimmy Kimmel kill all chinese, 黑人rob chinese, Obama says it is freedom of speech 还有法拉盛的地铁，黑哥哥推华人下地铁，直接被摔死，这种事情屡见不鲜。还有民主党统治的大城市，很多华人被黑人打死。比如前几天，HOUSTON的大华超市的华人被黑人零元购打死。民主党对华人民主党粉是真爱。 支持共和党的华人只是牺牲一点钱，支持民主党的华人需要献出自己的生命！！！
DOI EXAMINATION FINDS COMPLIANCE AND GOVERNANCE RISKS AT 51 CITY-FUNDED NONPROFITS THAT OPERATE NYC HOMELESS SHELTERS AND FLAWED CITY OVERSIGHT OF DHS-FUNDED PROVIDERS —DOI issued 32 reforms to address system-wide vulnerabilities— Jocelyn E. Strauber, Commissioner of the New York City Department of Investigation (“DOI”), issued a Report today memorializing the key findings from DOI’s extensive examination of compliance risks at 51 nonprofit human service providers that operate many of the homeless shelters in New York City and of the City’s oversight of the shelter system. The Report includes DOI’s 32 recommendations for reform, intended to protect the billions of dollars that the City spends annually on shelter services from corruption, waste, fraud, and abuse. A copy of the Report follows this release and can be found here: https://www.nyc.gov/site/doi/newsroom/public-reports.page
DOI Commissioner Jocelyn E. Strauber said, “When it comes to protecting the vast taxpayer resources that City-funded nonprofits receive, prevention is key. City-funded nonprofit service providers pose unique compliance and governance risks, and comprehensive City oversight is the best way to stop corruption, fraud, and waste before it starts. This deep dive into the City-funded homeless service provider system builds on DOI’s extensive experience investigating nonprofit fraud, and our 2021 Report concerning City-funded nonprofits. Today’s Report provides ample evidence of the risks specific to nonprofits and shortcomings in City oversight and makes 32 recommendations to strengthen controls around this essential network. I thank the DOI team that has worked tirelessly on this investigation and the many City entities that provided assistance, including the staff from the City Department of Social Services who worked closely with DOI to support this examination.” The City, through the City Department of Social Services (“DSS”) and the City Department of Homeless Services (“DHS”), operates the largest homeless shelter system of any municipality in the United States. DHS-funded shelters currently support an average of over 86,000 people per night at a cost of approximately $4 billion annually in FY 2024, up from $2.7 billion annually in FY 2022, due in large part to the influx of asylum seekers over the past two years. (DOI did not review City-funded contracts involving services to the asylum seekers that were procured under emergency procedures for this Report. DOI has oversight of these expenditures through an integrity monitor that is supervised by and reports to DOI.)
The examination for this Report began in 2021, well before the influx of asylum seekers, although some of the providers DOI examined are providing asylum seeker services. DOI’s focus on this area was prompted in part by the investigation of Victor Rivera, the former CEO of nonprofit City service provider Bronx Parent Housing Network, who ultimately pled guilty to a federal bribery-and-kickback scheme involving that nonprofit. DOI investigators drew on their knowledge of financial and administrative vulnerabilities in City-funded nonprofit providers generally to examine individual shelter providers’ governance and compliance practices, and potential conflicts of interest and other potential misconduct during this examination of 51 nonprofit organizations operating shelters for DHS. DOI reviewed the 2 operations of these organizations and their responses to a detailed questionnaire; analyzed an array of materials including audit reports, financial ledgers, invoices, and disclosures to the City; and conducted dozens of interviews, including of certain providers’ senior executives. DOI also evaluated the oversight of these providers by the City, including by DHS and DSS. The provider practices and City oversight reflected in the Report dates from 2018 through the present, although the majority of DOI’s information-gathering was completed from 2022 through 2024.
DOI received approximately 70 responses to the questionnaire distributed to City-funded nonprofit organizations. To date, DOI has completed findings on 51 providers and issued related referral letters to DSS, each one summarizing DOI’s findings as to individual shelter providers and, in total, raising hundreds of governance and compliance concerns at these providers. The findings in these referrals already have caused some providers to make improvements to their policies and procedures. The Report makes 32 recommendations to the relevant City agencies to address system-wide vulnerabilities, strengthen controls with respect to providers to protect the substantial public funds providers receive, and enhance public trust. Aspects of this examination are still ongoing, and this Report is a summary of DOI’s major findings to date. This Report builds on the findings from the investigations DOI has conducted in recent years that have focused on the City’s nonprofit vendor spending and which have resulted in criminal charges, administrative findings, integrity monitorships, and recommendations to improve City oversight of these contracts and providers. Since 2018, DOI investigations have resulted in at least 25 arrests on charges involving fraud and corruption at City-funded nonprofits, including prosecutions related to homeless service providers. Since 2018, DOI also has issued more than a dozen administrative referrals to City agencies – in addition to the administrative referrals issued as part of this examination -- reporting findings of mismanagement, noncompliance, or other non-criminal misconduct at City-funded nonprofits. In 2021, DOI issued Report on Corruption Vulnerabilities in the City’s Oversight and Administration of Not-for-Profit Human Services, which identified gaps in the City’s general oversight of its contracts with nonprofit human service providers. Many of DOI’s prior findings and recommendations remain relevant to the findings of this Report, which focuses solely on the unique issues associated with the oversight of DHSfunded shelter providers.
This Report identifies a variety of compliance and governance risks at these providers, as well as in the City’s overall management of the shelter system. These risks vary in their severity and include: • Conflicts of interest affecting City money. DOI identified cases where insiders at the shelter provider had personal business interests involving the shelter through which they received payments outside their regular compensation. In some cases, shelter executives simultaneously held employment at a private entity, such as a security company, that was hired to provide services at City-funded shelters. • Poor Citywide controls over how City money is used for executive compensation. DOI identified multiple shelter executives who received more than $500,000 per year, and in some cases, more than $700,000 per year, from providers and related organizations. Executive compensation in these cases is funded either largely or in part through City funds. The City lacks sufficient rules concerning how much City money can be allocated to nonprofit executives’ salaries. • Nepotism, in violation of City contracts. DOI found shelter providers that have employed immediate family members of senior executives and board members, in apparent violation of their City contracts. For instance, one provider that is largely funded by the City employed its CEO’s children since at least 2007. This provider subsequently entered into a DOI-managed monitorship agreement. • Shelter providers failing to follow competitive bidding rules when procuring goods and services with public money. DOI found numerous cases where shelter providers did not comply with the City’s competitive bidding requirements or where it was unclear whether shelter providers conducted true competitive bidding processes. For example, this review identified multiple instances where shelter providers awarded multimillion-dollar building maintenance service contracts to companies affiliated with the buildings’ landlords.
DOI issued 32 recommendations to address the system-wide vulnerabilities noted in this Report. Included among the key recommendations are: ➢ DSS should appoint a Chief Vendor Compliance Officer to provide overall leadership for DSS and DHS’s compliance strategy with respect to nonprofit human service contracts, including contracts with shelter providers. ➢ Shelter providers should be required to regularly disclose additional information relevant to identifying compliance risks, including potential conflicts of interest for key persons. ➢ DSS and DHS should take steps to improve their oversight of shelter operators’ expenditures, including by immediately stopping payments for costs that are not accompanied by a proper description and ensuring that relevant agency staff receive regular financial compliance training. ➢ The City should update its electronic procurement and invoicing systems to better enable thirdparty oversight and centralize key documentation.
This Report also reiterates many of the 23 recommendations that DOI issued in its November 2021 Report on Corruption Vulnerabilities in the City’s Oversight and Administration of Not-for-Profit Human Services. While the City has implemented some reforms since the 2021 Report and is also undertaking some work that closely tracks DOI’s recommendations, many of the recommendations from 2021 have not been implemented at any substantial level. The 2021 Report recommended, among other things, that the City: Reform its conflict-of-interest disclosure system for the City’s human service providers. Develop more specific guidance to agencies on executive compensation and consider setting a cap or other parameters on City-funded executive compensation. Conduct more robust reviews of expenses that human service providers invoice to the City, including by reviewing larger samples of supporting documentation. New York City is currently making an unprecedented financial commitment to address homelessness. For that reason, it is more important than ever that it implement stronger risk management and compliance controls around this spending. Accepting and implementing the reforms set forth in this Report, as well as in DOI’s November 2021 Report, would be critical steps in this direction. DOI Commissioner Strauber thanks DSS Commissioner Molly Wasow Park and her staff, for their partnership on this examination and the Mayor’s Office of Contracts and Mayor’s Office of Risk Management and Compliance for their assistance. DOI also received support from two private firms with experience in investigations, audits, and compliance monitoring, who provided auditing and investigative resources with respect to certain provider reviews. At DOI, this examination was conducted by Deputy Inspector General/Special Counsel Daniel Kacinski and Confidential Investigator Rushelle Sharpe, with the assistance of Senior Investigative Auditor Olga Avram and Senior Investigative Attorney Alex Cane in DOI’s Office of the Inspector General for CityFunded Nonprofits. Data Analysts Anthony McDowald and Zachary Sayle and Director of Data Analytics Shyam Prasad in DOI’s Data Analytics Unit provided technical assistance. The examination was supervised 4 by Senior Inspector General Andrew Sein, Deputy Commissioner of Strategic Initiatives Christopher Ryan, and Deputy Commissioner/ Chief of Investigations Dominick Zarrella. https://www.nyc.gov/assets/doi/press-releases/2024/October/39DHSRptRelease10.17.2024.pdf
当然如果你想被喊Chinese Virus，想身先士卒为Maga捐躯，就选川普吧。
民主党和共和党都可以选，但是现在的共和党已经被MAGA邪教夺舍了！
自己不努力，怪别人不在乎
你是刚来美国吗？
有些人就是比亲生儿女还孝顺，替你操心啊。千错万错咱可不能选错。指着华人的脸就说你智商不行，听我的，我让你选民主党你就只能选民主党。
言论自由。
这些人大部分都不是选民，是非法移民们最后歇斯底里的疯狂。这些人想搞坏这个国家就是为了自己趁机渔利，大家不要理他们，做好自己应做的努力，不要让民主党再祸害了。
你最好带上MAGA的红帽子，去参加一下rally, 感受一下被称呼为Chinese spy 的亲切，再诚挚地投一票给Trump the racist.
你赶紧走吧，我们华人为国捐躯心甘情愿。
又来一个" “无脑 选猪选屎选木偶 也不能选川普“的华左！
我为了我自己子子孙孙的祖国不受极左摧残毁灭，写了很多基于事实和数据的贴子。希望有困惑，觉得两边都是屎的读一下。
左党才是种族主义，排在华人/亚裔 前面的至少有：黑人，西裔，穆斯林，印第安人，LGBTQ+，白左，非法移民，罪犯，。。。
华人/亚裔 因为靠自己努力，经济条件好了，左党认定为 “特权种族”。
左党的最爱是：几百万上千万的罪犯和前罪犯，包括真正的杀人犯，强奸犯，毒贩，黑帮，盗匪，他们绝大多数 投主党。释放罪犯，零元购无罪，抓了就放，用公款建吸毒站，削减警察，降低刑罚，犯罪率高涨。
华人 选主党保命？这是人财两空！
绝大多数案子 华人都是被“某些”主党支持者 谋杀。白人种族主义者仇杀华人？四十年来都找不到几个案例，不信你来找！这是 “媒体不会报道“，但大家都知道，却又 “经常被忘了” 的事实：https://huaren.us/showtopic.html?topicid=3054033
主媒说川普是种族主义；华左进一步说他最恨华人，害得华人脸上被刻中国病毒，关集中营。然后 华左要求所有华人 “无脑 选猪选屎选木偶，也不能选川普“！ 这是正中了极左和深层政府的圈套。看清楚：美国民主党 和 共和党的建制派们 是同事加朋友，没有仇恨。他们是欺骗底层屁民，煽动恐惧和仇恨。
主媒现在最恨川普，所以极力宣传川普最恨黑人，川普最恨西裔，川普最恨穆斯林，川普最恨亚裔，川普最恨女人，川普最恨华人! 目的就是以此煽动对川普的恐惧和仇恨。
如果川普真恨谁，那也是 建制派深层政府和左媒。他们是真要他的命！普通屁民即使反川，也没伤他，是他想团结的对象；普通华美就算“都无脑反川”，在各路反川力量中也微不足道。（华人仅占1.5%的人口，还有很多非公民，又集中在极个别深蓝州，不影响总统大选）。所以华左说的 “川普最恨华人的说法“ 没有逻辑，自欺欺人也吓唬他人。
川普第一任期里面，除了大嘴巴 不遵守 “左派制定“的 政治正确，在政策上处处受到建制派的制约，媒体天天骂他。川普没有控制媒体，反被媒体封嘴；没有审判/关押 希拉里，没有抓或关任何一个反对他的人；恰恰相反，川普支持者反而屡屡被建制派抓/关，他本人也一直被希拉里诬陷通俄，被调查了整整三年。这哪点象最危险 独裁者？
主媒为什么要宣传 川普 是 最坏，最无耻，最危险的独裁者呢？因为他们是深层政府和极左派的喉舌。 极左派恨川普是因为他反对极左的政策，而深层政府则是 害怕川普的大嘴巴 和他的不受他们控制的个性。深层政府并不害怕川普和他的政策，怕的是美国民众以后 继续选出象川普一样不是他们一伙 或不受他们控制的总统。
深层政府想通过编织罪名，调查/羞辱/激怒川普，使其犯程序性错误，然后用法律战搞定川普。他们编造了“通俄门”，刺激川普 解职 特别检察官；川普也经常发推反击，声称他作为总统有权这么做。如果真做了，建制派就可以给川普安插一个 干扰司法的罪名，撵他下台。但川普嘴上说归说，骂归骂，就是不给深层政府借口。三年调查结束后，川普获得清白，让更多人看透了主流媒体和深层政府的恶劣。
深层政府 又通过宣传机器想把川普搞臭，然后在选举中把他拖下马。他们利用川普的“非政治正确”大嘴巴，歪曲川普的本意，以此煽动对川普的恐惧和仇恨，比如： - 川普说 警察命也是命，主流媒体就说他是 歧视/仇视黑人；
- 川普说墨西哥非法移民里有很多帮派分子和强奸犯，主流媒体就声称 他是说“墨西哥人（移民）都是强奸犯”，他就是歧视/仇视西裔；
- 川普说来自拉美的MS-13黑帮组织在美国犯下严重罪行，那些人是畜生，要严加惩罚，主媒 就指控他说 ” 拉美的移民都是畜生“。
- 川普说某几个社会混乱，治安极差，谋杀率爆表的拉美国家是屎坑国(海地？)，主媒 就指控他是 歧视/仇视 拉美国家，歧视/仇视那些国家来的移民。
- 川普说 某中东国家支持恐怖主义，主媒 就指控他 歧视/仇视穆斯林。
- 川普要 打击非法入境，遣返非法移民，主媒 就指控他 反对 所有移民，歧视已经拿绿卡甚至入籍的移民。
- 川普反击 中共造谣“美国病毒/美国投毒“，说“中国病毒”，主媒 就指控他是歧视/仇视 华裔。华左就说他害得 华人被骂中国病毒，被吐口水；脸上被刻中国病毒，被攻击，关集中营；被屠杀。。。
事实上，华人被骂“中国病毒”，被攻击，被推下地铁，都在深蓝区，是白左和名贵们骂的，跟川普有什么关系？再说，跟他是不是总统又有什么关系？过去四年他也不是总统啊！
( 华人走在街上要担心谁？左党支持者说是川粉/红脖子。直接看数据吧。看了吓死人，但其实大家都知道！ https://huaren.us/showtopic.html?topicid=3052240
白人/红脖子 仇华？看看 谁伤害谁 案例大全。 华左比白左更政治正确：亚命贱，华命贱？ https://huaren.us/showtopic.html?topicid=3054033 )
- 2016年川普说 小布什弟弟 等人没有铁杆支持者，而他有，用了一个吹牛的说法：我有铁杆支持者，我就算在第五大道杀个人，他们还支持我。这当然只是一个“川普式” 夸张的说法；但主媒就假装 川普在第五大道杀过人，然后支持者都那么无脑支持他。
- 川普二三十年前被人偷录的私下聊天的话，比较不堪，然后就被攻击为道德恶劣，侮辱妇女。其实看看哈里斯和她老公，都没有比川普更道德高尚；克林顿则更要恶劣多了。 （左派声称的 川普 “六次破产”， “人品最坏” 的 事实真相：没有一次破产！人品不输其他亿万富豪/政客。 https://huaren.us/showtopic.html?topicid=3054008&postid=102553055#102553055）
- 造谣说川普 偷税漏税。川普实际交税金额非常高，比一般大富豪都要高：（年年交巨额地税；而持有股票的亿万富豪却不交股票税）https://huaren.us/showtopic.html?topicid=3051150）
- 说川普1/6暴动，阴谋推翻民主选举。实际上恰恰是Deep State操控选举（作弊？）而引起广泛质疑。不论质疑是否正确，民众受宪法保护，有权质疑，游行，抗议和示威是肯定的。Twitter files 有完整的1/6视频，绝大多数人都很和平，没人带武器，几小时就结束，国会建筑没有任何大的损坏，也没有抢，烧，杀。只有被黑警察打死一个白人退伍女兵。
（美国国会骚乱？一月六日事件 的真实事实，数字 和 法律：无人持枪，没有武装，只有一黑警杀手无寸铁的一白人退伍女兵；规模不到名贵暴动的1%。 https://huaren.us/showtopic.html?topicid=3050630&postid=102404337#102404337）
这样的一次示威抗议活动，如果发生在其他国家，美国100%会支援抗议者。别忘了，黑命贵抗议冲击白宫时，主媒那时非常开心。
大家睁开眼睛都能看到 自欧巴以来美国社会的极左化。传统社会和家庭价值观被颠倒，正常人的逻辑和常识被压制，被谴责。深蓝州如加州更是已经一党专政，最奇葩的反常识的法律政策都能通过。
“无脑 选猪选屎选木偶 也不能选川普“，哈里斯未必是猪是屎，但 是木偶 却是清清楚楚摆在台面上的，左党也毫不掩饰。他们唯一的牌 就是宣传川普仇恨所有人。
无视 真实发生和正在进行中的 各种极左危险如 治安问题，毒品问题，非法移民失控问题，无家可归问题，和左派对 华裔/亚裔的歧视 （ 这是真正真实的制度性的系统性的歧视，是左派所推崇的政治正确的歧视。美国根本没有右派推崇的制度性的歧视），还要选极左操控的木偶，我无法想象！
我为了我自己子子孙孙的祖国不受极左摧残，写了很多基于事实和数据的贴子。希望有困惑，觉得两边都是屎的读一下。
NumbersOnly 的总结。不骂人，不怕被骂，豁出去了！欢迎转贴 https://huaren.us/showtopic.html?topicid=3052898 https://huaren.us/showtopic.html?topicid=3052898&postid=102513097#102513097
MAGA川粉是怎么练出来的 - 记录我自己 怎么从欧巴粉 转为MAGA川粉 的过程和原因 https://huaren.us/showtopic.html?topicid=3044360 https://huaren.us/showtopic.html?topicid=3044707
你知道这里是政治宣传机器的，你要是不跟着风向走，小心水军口水淹了你，我根本不屑回那些人，没几个有有票圈的
谢谢提醒！
P西海岸的，有几个夏威夷的这时间还在上网？我都睡一觉醒了
一看你就孤陋寡闻，傻帽自以为是。
你要不要去油管上看看上周川胖子跟undecided Latino 有个town hall。川傻B说完Corona virus 停了一下马上特意加重语气说 China Virus 。上周刚说的，你给这样一个骂你的傻逼的开脱，是不是更傻?
心理那么脆弱还是回国，别在美国这种多种族的国家呆了，spain flu的时候西班牙说啥了？corvid最早是在中国发现的，还有疑问？
赞👍比群里几个只会骂人的哈哈粉智商高很多！毕竟哈哈姐本人就是个愚蠢的被人操纵的木偶。
民主党的OPEN BORDER还有合法毒品，还有对罪犯的宽容，还有免费变性手术，还有各种对HOMELESS的优惠政策，其实都是PUA美国老百姓，天天用种族关系挑拨离间，用莫须有的白人种族歧视来PUA美国老百姓。
美国有没有种族歧视，有。但是有没有民主党的危言耸听的什么白人至上，川普上台就送华人进集中营，还有各种PUA的言论。这些耸人听闻的言论，但凡有点常识的人都不会相信，但是民主党支持者居然能够深信不疑。
其实民主党就是吃人血馒头。
以前美国的种族歧视，搞得要内战，但是这是一个伤口。正确的做法，是淡化这件事，然后提倡种族团结，慢慢这个伤口就会愈合。但是民主党是每次都要揭开这个伤口，用这个伤口来炒作，把伤口越撕裂越大，以此来吃人血馒头。
民主党从来就没有为这个国家考虑过，从来就是小人心里，用这个国家的伤口来谋取自己的私利。
好比一个家庭，有3个兄弟姐妹，曾经打过架吵过架，有矛盾，正确的做法是大家淡化过去的矛盾，然后团结。民主党的做法是天天挑拨离间，搞得整个家庭天天三个兄弟姐妹大打出手，互相PK，鸡飞狗跳，民主党乐得从中坐收渔人之利。
一些意志薄弱的还有对主流媒体深信不疑的人，就被民主党gaslighting, 民主党成功的让很多新移民相信，民主党是高大上的，占领道德制高点的，民主党是能保护他们的。其实就是被民主党PUA了。
这种人看问题，看事情都是skin deep, judge a book by its cover, 压根看不到事情的本质。
就因为一些莫须有，被夸张了无数倍的种族歧视，就宁可忍受open border, 毒品泛滥，零元购，homeless shelter 安插进华人区，几千万非法移民进入美国抢饭碗，黑人对华人的各种欺负还有抢劫，黑人杀华人也是经常的见诸报刊媒体。
民主党真是玩得一手好PUA，好gaslighting! 民主党支持者明明是被民主党卖了还要帮民主党数钱，不过他们不觉得，还觉得他们是在反种族歧视。
美国的关键和主要矛盾，是过去几十年制造业流失，工作也流失，白领工作现在也外包。其实还是资本家的贪婪和广大老百姓没有工作的矛盾，但是资本家开动主流媒体，制造种族歧视话题，挑动各种族互相斗，结果没人关注到资本家赚得盆满钵满。
其实大家应该团结起来，一起去斗资本家，但是有了民主党这个搅屎棍，用种族歧视天天做文章，广大老百姓哪儿还能看到问题的本质，都忙于互相内斗了。
可怜，可悲，广大的美国老百姓被资本家玩弄于股掌之上。
加州海岸委员会刚刚拒绝了Space X提出的增加Felcon 9的发射次数，因为不喜欢Musk的政治立场。借口都不找了，直接实话实说。
主流媒体就是民主党的宣传部，天天抹黑民主党的对立面。说美国没有中宣部，都压根没有人相信。
一切不符合民主党的AGENDA的都是misinformation, 等于民主党说的话就是真理
当年苏联有一个报纸叫做真理报，大家都知道很多关于真理报的笑话，现在美国也堕落到了那一步了。
民主党和中共当年的做法有啥不一样啊，都是大政府，政府想怎么玩你就怎么玩你。
至于政敌，随便给你安插一个罪名，送你进监狱就行了。
这简直是要做中共和前苏联共产党一样的事情--独裁加上洗脑。
但凡自己有点独立思考能力的，也不会被民主党忽悠。
现在主流媒体都要反着看，一点都不敢相信了。
昨天早上送娃上学路上堵了好长，后来才发现是交通灯又坏了。我忍不住骂起来城市基础设施那么老旧，政府如果把给非移的钱拿来改造城市基础设施，关心提高一下自己国民的生活，才是务实的政府啊。
现在什么烂政府，乱搞
美国的基础设施现在连第三世界国家都不如。
transgender，或者变性，这些人其实很悲惨的。不过主流媒体不会告诉你。 要变性，用男的变女的举例，一些跨性别女性（即出生时被指定为男性、但性别认同为女性的人）可能选择服用激素替代疗法（Hormone Replacement Therapy，简称HRT）。以男性向女性的过渡为例，跨性别女性通常通过服用雌激素和睾酮阻滞剂来减少男性特征并发展出更女性化的特征。这是一项长期治疗，许多人需要持续用药以维持激素水平，且治疗的效果和需求因人而异。，每天都要吃，不吃就会变回男性。现代的医术并没有发达到能够把男的做手术，变出一个女性的子宫，就算阴道成型也很勉强。尽管医学技术已经能够通过性别确认手术（Sexual Reassignment Surgery，SRS）帮助跨性别者改变外生殖器的形态，子宫移植或生育功能的恢复在目前的技术上仍是非常困难甚至不可能的。因此，虽然手术能够帮助部分跨性别者在外形上接近他们的认同性别，但这并不意味着每个人都选择手术，也不代表变性过程能够完全改变生殖生理结构。所以这些变性者很痛苦的，每天要吃激素，然后又变不成真正的他们想变成的性别。很多都是重度抑郁，或者经常自杀。 不过这些，主流媒体是不会报道的，因为和民主党的AGENDA不符合。 总之，transgender不是什么好事。现在很多10岁左右的小孩就开始去儿童医院，开始吃激素，开始准备变性，真是悲哀。
关于未成年跨性别者的治疗问题，目前的医学共识是，任何医疗干预都需要经过严格的心理评估和医疗监护。儿童或青少年在接受任何涉及性别的医疗干预之前，通常会与医生、心理学家和家庭共同讨论，并依据个体情况选择适合的干预措施，例如青春期阻断药物，这些药物可以暂时抑制青春期的性发育，给年轻人更多时间来确认他们的性别认同。川普说他上台以后，会立法，18岁以前不能做变性手术，这是对的
阿根廷一直到这一届总统选举，就是跟Harris现在在做的一样，不断不断的开支票。反正都是纳税人的钱。根本不痛不痒。 说难听一点的，就是变相的买票。然后因为政府不断的花钱，通膨居高不下。你以为自己有个十米，在贫困线上就能退休？不好意思。阿根廷90年代10米披索是10米美金。现在十米披索还不够买台车。
这一切都是当初贝隆党（就是Eva Peron她先生）开的先例。 这种先例，只要开了一次，就需要几十年的洗礼，到了再开什么支票也无法满足了才会回归正途。
你假如希望自己小孩未来在一个被大家说到就说烂国家，那就去选猪党吧。 不要说不可能。阿根廷1900初期可是世界上最富裕强大的国家之一。地铁这两个字中文可能还没有时他们就已经盖好了。如今你听到一个从阿根廷来的人，你第一印象会是她是有钱人吗？！
很多人说什么共和党种族歧视，川普是纳粹，川普上台以后，华人就要进集中营，还有被当作间谍，还有不能买房子。
其实这些都是烟雾弹。都是次要矛盾。
美国现在的主要矛盾是什么？
过去三，四十年，美国的制造业转移去了亚洲还有墨西哥等等人工便宜的国家。美国多于一百多万的工厂Outsourced到国外去了。现在美国连抗生素都要依赖中国，因为抗生素的原研药95%需要从中国进口，等于中国卡住了美国的脖子。
以前，来美国，下了飞机就有工作。现在？美国公民都没有工作，还来了几千万非法移民抢本国人的工作。
说穿了，美国没有制造业，没有工作了。
而且白领工作也在outsourced到印度，比如软件工程师。美国现在能outsourced的工作都外包了。
美国本国人咋办？难道就靠天天吸大麻，还有做流浪汉？或者是去自杀？
美国说穿了需要一个川普一样的人物出来。川普说话不好听，但是他实事求是，戳破了民主党的政治正确的谎言。民主党那一套就是sugarcoating美国的现实。因为美国的现实就是很糟糕，需要下猛药来医治。
民主党一味的煽动种族矛盾，拿种族做文章，压根就没有抓住主要矛盾。‘
美国的主要矛盾是美国没有工作了。广大的美国公民没有工作，还来了几千万非法移民抢工作。普通的美国老百姓生活在水深火热之中。
美国普通老百姓面临着三座大山：医疗，教育，养老。 医疗对于普通老百姓来说，又贵又不好，教育，大学学费和mortgage差不多贵了，养老也是贵得要命。
久病床前无孝子。美国老百姓养非法移民太久了，早被耗光了爱心和热情。美国老百姓被道德绑架太久了，美国老百姓需要为自己活了。
乌克兰的战争，以色列的战争，美国老百姓都不想付钱。几千亿美金，几千亿美金的砸进去，也没有见到啥效果。川普说他上台会终结战争，这是好事。
美国现在穷得叮当响，应该专注自己国内的发展，而不是天天花不是自己的钱。美国财政赤字已经out of the roof, 美国人民已经负担不起了。
美国的皇帝的新装被川普戳破是好事，长痛不如短痛。承认现实，才能改变不好的现状，而不是陶醉于政治正确编造的谎言里面。
美国现在各行各业都是shithole了，医疗，教育，养老都一塌糊涂，差得要命。很多人被民主党忽悠，还觉得美国老子天下第一。
美国其实生活水平压根不如中国。 美国已经全面落后中国了。
如果再让民主党上台，中国啥都不用做，只需要等着民主党自己做死就行了。
当年大家出国，不是为了来美国吃福利的，大家都是想着来美国有一番作为。至少今天的生活要比昨天好，和自己比。
大家问问自己，你今天的生活比四年前更好了吗？？？？？？
当年中共利用农民夺取了政权，夺取政权以后，农民还是被剥削得最厉害的。
中共有中宣部，现在民主党也利用主流媒体天天给美国人民洗脑。
在国内，看中共的报道很多时候要反着看，在美国，主流媒体很多时候也要反过来看。
像HRRIS这种烂人居然也能做总统。如果HARRIS真的当上总统，美国估计离跌落世界强权也不远了。
民主党这样乱搞，中共什么都不用做，就能躺赢了！
支持民主党的很多都是什么政治庇护之流喜欢吃福利的，没有接受过什么教育，很容易被主流媒体洗脑，也就是很多支持民主党的都是吊丝！
对，美国需要疮破这样诈骗宣传品都made in china，自己不交税，用蓝州交的税每年补贴红州懒汉几千亿，还不忘给普京爹爹送试剂盒的天才。这样才能过上四年前在家里躲瘟疫，看着电视上疮破大骂china virus，领着疮破签名的几百块支票，憧憬在疮破大肿桶领导下一起走向最红最MAGA的密西西比阿拉巴马式幸福生活的不归路。
最近华人区的ROSEMEAD又被民主党要安插400户HOMELESS了，而且是那种有mental health problem的HOMELESS，大家都知道HOMELESS吸毒，一身的STD还有治安也不好。但是华人民主党粉甘之如饴，觉得民主党在他们家门口搞HOMELESS是对他们的恩宠。虽然HOMELESS的shelter街对面就是一个小学，在一个Mile范围内就有四个学校，包括小学和中学。ROSEMEAD一半的人口都是华人，人家民主党就专门往华人社区塞HOMELESS。纽约法拉盛也是一样被安插了HOMELESS。旧金山华人区的小学门口就是大麻店。民主党真是对华人民主党粉是宠爱有加。深怕HOMELESS的温暖不能直接给到华人民主党粉，直接送到华人民主党支持者的家门口了。
Jimmy Kimmel kill all chinese, 黑人rob chinese, Obama says it is freedom of speech
还有法拉盛的地铁，黑哥哥推华人下地铁，直接被摔死，这种事情屡见不鲜。还有民主党统治的大城市，很多华人被黑人打死。比如前几天，HOUSTON的大华超市的华人被黑人零元购打死。民主党对华人民主党粉是真爱。
支持共和党的华人只是牺牲一点钱，支持民主党的华人需要献出自己的生命！！！
犯人还经常自己吞咽异物，比如plastic spoon等等，这样犯人就会被送到医院去。犯人有的时候比如rose bowl球赛，他们就吞咽异物，被送到医院，医院病房里有电视，他们就可以看球赛了。
有的犯人每个星期吞咽一次异物，就是为了去医院放风。就这样，人家还雇佣律师要告监狱。
犯人在监狱里面也有各种人权，要求mattress, 免费配眼镜，半年免费洗一次牙齿，还有ACLU的FLYER墙上到处都是，说有事给ACLU打电话，ACLU给他们撑腰。
DOJ也经常有人去监狱检查。
监狱现在其实更加像一个大型医疗机构, 至少一半的犯人是有精神病的。需要大量的医生护士还有各种医务工作人员。监狱里面24小时有药房，药剂师，X-ray, X-ray技师，Lab, CLS (clinical lab scientist), Health IT, Health Information Management, Infection control, patient safety officer, patient privacy officer, 还有RN，医生，medical urgent care 24X7, 还有psychy urgent care 24X7, 还有各种专科，比如podiatry, dentist, cardiac, ortho, eye clinic,免费配眼镜，半年免费洗一次牙齿，还有ophthalmologist, 也有24小时的psychiatrist，psychologist， Psychologist最大的雇主就是监狱，起码一个监狱有上百个psychologist
监狱犯人24小时随时能看到医生（不管是medical还是psych)，随时能看病，比普通人的 医疗待遇强太多了。就这，DOJ还说，监狱对犯人不够好，医疗待遇没有跟上，所以监狱需要雇佣更多的医疗工作人员。
监狱归警察管，警察下面会有一个medical services bureau, 每年几十亿美金的预算，然后雇佣了很多各种医生护士药剂师还有各种医务工作人员
这个medical services bureau至少有几千人的规模，有工会，有pension。监狱因为工作环境不好，很多人进去以后，呆不了多久，就离开了。
监狱为了留住医疗工作人员，不惜给医生护士20%的retention bonus.就是只要留下工作，每个paycheck，多给20%的钱，就这样，还是有很多人离开。
比如招了50个人，六个月试用期结束的时候，可能最多十个人留下来了，其余的就走了。不然为啥要给20%的retention bonus.
监狱不是每个人都适合在那儿上班的，很多在那儿上班的都是第一代移民。第一代移民为了赚钱生存，不计较工作环境不好。
金牌讲师终于也是油管认证的大主播了， 十几万的粉丝
講師終於拿到十萬訂閱銀牌，希望之後能拿到百萬訂閱金牌
日更每部影片5萬瀏覽每月收益至少1萬美金，而且吃住免費不愁吃不愁住，這樣的日子說真的財富自由了...難怪講師開始上英文課了
哈哈，讲师的牌子终于寄到手中了，这应该是全网第一个通过要饭获得10万以上订阅量的YouTuber了
金牌讲师现在穿衣服都是穿一次就直接扔掉了，简直是牛得不要不要的了
无家可归者越多，政府和相关亲友的非盈利组织赚得越多，这个完美的问题只能搞大
各个环节都是牟利的巨大机会，民主党为啥那么有钱还不明白吗？交税的，收到福利的都是给这些民主党大佬做贡献的，加州典型，接下来民主党当选会扩张到全国的，再烂一点，烂的快一点
美国社会主义，流浪汉丁胖子金牌讲师被分房了，还有免费医疗
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/oE-RsUfgqmY
移民律师告诉你走线来的秘密
华人区Rosemead 柔斯密亚裔抗争游民户案新闻发布会：邓洪律师揭露游民户的危害和根源，刘龙珠律师解读抗争游民户计划的进展和呼吁；越南裔女士及视频后部华人妈妈们和华人女律师控诉修建游民户后的危险！
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/_8bkAy4sgk0
看看上面的视频，上面的视频解释为啥加州来了这么多走线来的。
华人移民律师问走线来的人，走线辛苦吗？走线的人说一点不辛苦。
为啥过去四年来了2000多万非法移民，因为走线来的人说，他们一路上都有NGO（non government organization) 的人帮助他们，给他们提供水还有食物，给他们指路，还有安排交通，一路上就和春游一样。
这些NGO很多都是劳模的天主教的慈善组织，帮助劳模来美国。
这里面的玄机是，这些NGO从民主党政府拿大部分的经费，自己只需要筹集小部分的费用和用钱去雇人。
民主党自己不方便出面，就用着NGO作为他们的代理，用我们美国纳税人的钱引入海量的非法移民，想利用这些非法移民非法投票，达到他们一党专政的目的。
可怜的美国纳税人，被民主党背刺，然后被人卖了，还要说民主党好。。。。
检查报告指出纽约市收容所系统存在一系列问题！
据侨报报道，市调查局（DOI）17日（周四）发布针对本市收容所系统检查报告，发现利益冲突、裙带主义以及包括多名主管年薪高达50万乃至70万的薪水超高等一系列问题，并提出多项改革意见。
该审查始于2021年，调查了51个非营利组织服务供应商。报告中指出的第一大问题为影响本市资金的利益冲突。 DOl确定了收容所服务供应商的内部人员有涉及收容所内部人士商业利益的情况，部分内部人士通过收容所获得常规补偿以外的付款。 部分收容所主管同时在受雇为收容所提供服务的私人实体工作。多名庇护所主管薪资超高，每年从供应商和相关组织获得超过50万到70万美元，其中主要或部分来自城市资金，因此本市缺乏足够规定以确定对于收容所高管工资的分配。
此外，DOI发现收容所系统存在违法城市合同的裙带主义，有服务供应商雇用了收容所主管和董事会成员的直系亲属。
而第三大问题为庇护所供应商在用公共资金采购商品和服务时未能遵守竞争性投标规则。
DOI局长史特劳勃(Jocelyn E.Strauber)表示，“市府资助的非营利服务提供商构成了独特的合规和治理风险，全面的城市监督是在腐败、欺诈和浪费开始之前阻止问题发生的最佳方式。今天的报告充分证明了非营利组织特有风险和城市监督缺陷，提出了32项建议以加强对这一重要系统的控制。” DOl发布了32条建议，以解决报告中指出的全系统漏洞。
包括市社会服务局（DSS）应任命一名首席供应商审核官，为DSS和国土安全部在非营利性利民服务合同方面的合规战略提供全面领导、应要求收容所提供者定期披露与识别合规风险相关的信息，包括关键人物的潜在利益冲突、DSS和市游民服务局（DHS）应采取措施改善对服务商支出的监督，包括立即停止支付模糊费用并确保相关工作人员定期接受财务合规培训、本市应更新其电子采购和发票系统，以更好地实现第三方监督并集中关键文件。
市府方面在对报告的回应中称，市府官员已同意了许多建议，并将制定一个书面计划，在90天内解决调查结果。
DOI EXAMINATION FINDS COMPLIANCE AND GOVERNANCE RISKS AT 51 CITY-FUNDED NONPROFITS THAT OPERATE NYC HOMELESS SHELTERS AND FLAWED CITY OVERSIGHT OF DHS-FUNDED PROVIDERS —DOI issued 32 reforms to address system-wide vulnerabilities—
Jocelyn E. Strauber, Commissioner of the New York City Department of Investigation (“DOI”), issued a Report today memorializing the key findings from DOI’s extensive examination of compliance risks at 51 nonprofit human service providers that operate many of the homeless shelters in New York City and of the City’s oversight of the shelter system. The Report includes DOI’s 32 recommendations for reform, intended to protect the billions of dollars that the City spends annually on shelter services from corruption, waste, fraud, and abuse. A copy of the Report follows this release and can be found here: https://www.nyc.gov/site/doi/newsroom/public-reports.page
DOI Commissioner Jocelyn E. Strauber said, “When it comes to protecting the vast taxpayer resources that City-funded nonprofits receive, prevention is key. City-funded nonprofit service providers pose unique compliance and governance risks, and comprehensive City oversight is the best way to stop corruption, fraud, and waste before it starts. This deep dive into the City-funded homeless service provider system builds on DOI’s extensive experience investigating nonprofit fraud, and our 2021 Report concerning City-funded nonprofits. Today’s Report provides ample evidence of the risks specific to nonprofits and shortcomings in City oversight and makes 32 recommendations to strengthen controls around this essential network. I thank the DOI team that has worked tirelessly on this investigation and the many City entities that provided assistance, including the staff from the City Department of Social Services who worked closely with DOI to support this examination.”
The City, through the City Department of Social Services (“DSS”) and the City Department of Homeless Services (“DHS”), operates the largest homeless shelter system of any municipality in the United States. DHS-funded shelters currently support an average of over 86,000 people per night at a cost of approximately $4 billion annually in FY 2024, up from $2.7 billion annually in FY 2022, due in large part to the influx of asylum seekers over the past two years. (DOI did not review City-funded contracts involving services to the asylum seekers that were procured under emergency procedures for this Report. DOI has oversight of these expenditures through an integrity monitor that is supervised by and reports to DOI.)
The examination for this Report began in 2021, well before the influx of asylum seekers, although some of the providers DOI examined are providing asylum seeker services. DOI’s focus on this area was prompted in part by the investigation of Victor Rivera, the former CEO of nonprofit City service provider Bronx Parent Housing Network, who ultimately pled guilty to a federal bribery-and-kickback scheme involving that nonprofit. DOI investigators drew on their knowledge of financial and administrative vulnerabilities in City-funded nonprofit providers generally to examine individual shelter providers’ governance and compliance practices, and potential conflicts of interest and other potential misconduct during this examination of 51 nonprofit organizations operating shelters for DHS. DOI reviewed the 2 operations of these organizations and their responses to a detailed questionnaire; analyzed an array of materials including audit reports, financial ledgers, invoices, and disclosures to the City; and conducted dozens of interviews, including of certain providers’ senior executives. DOI also evaluated the oversight of these providers by the City, including by DHS and DSS. The provider practices and City oversight reflected in the Report dates from 2018 through the present, although the majority of DOI’s information-gathering was completed from 2022 through 2024.
DOI received approximately 70 responses to the questionnaire distributed to City-funded nonprofit organizations. To date, DOI has completed findings on 51 providers and issued related referral letters to DSS, each one summarizing DOI’s findings as to individual shelter providers and, in total, raising hundreds of governance and compliance concerns at these providers. The findings in these referrals already have caused some providers to make improvements to their policies and procedures. The Report makes 32 recommendations to the relevant City agencies to address system-wide vulnerabilities, strengthen controls with respect to providers to protect the substantial public funds providers receive, and enhance public trust.
Aspects of this examination are still ongoing, and this Report is a summary of DOI’s major findings to date.
This Report builds on the findings from the investigations DOI has conducted in recent years that have focused on the City’s nonprofit vendor spending and which have resulted in criminal charges, administrative findings, integrity monitorships, and recommendations to improve City oversight of these contracts and providers. Since 2018, DOI investigations have resulted in at least 25 arrests on charges involving fraud and corruption at City-funded nonprofits, including prosecutions related to homeless service providers. Since 2018, DOI also has issued more than a dozen administrative referrals to City agencies – in addition to the administrative referrals issued as part of this examination -- reporting findings of mismanagement, noncompliance, or other non-criminal misconduct at City-funded nonprofits.
In 2021, DOI issued Report on Corruption Vulnerabilities in the City’s Oversight and Administration of Not-for-Profit Human Services, which identified gaps in the City’s general oversight of its contracts with nonprofit human service providers. Many of DOI’s prior findings and recommendations remain relevant to the findings of this Report, which focuses solely on the unique issues associated with the oversight of DHSfunded shelter providers.
This Report identifies a variety of compliance and governance risks at these providers, as well as in the City’s overall management of the shelter system. These risks vary in their severity and include:
• Conflicts of interest affecting City money. DOI identified cases where insiders at the shelter provider had personal business interests involving the shelter through which they received payments outside their regular compensation. In some cases, shelter executives simultaneously held employment at a private entity, such as a security company, that was hired to provide services at City-funded shelters.
• Poor Citywide controls over how City money is used for executive compensation. DOI identified multiple shelter executives who received more than $500,000 per year, and in some cases, more than $700,000 per year, from providers and related organizations. Executive compensation in these cases is funded either largely or in part through City funds. The City lacks sufficient rules concerning how much City money can be allocated to nonprofit executives’ salaries.
• Nepotism, in violation of City contracts. DOI found shelter providers that have employed immediate family members of senior executives and board members, in apparent violation of their City contracts. For instance, one provider that is largely funded by the City employed its CEO’s children since at least 2007. This provider subsequently entered into a DOI-managed monitorship agreement.
• Shelter providers failing to follow competitive bidding rules when procuring goods and services with public money. DOI found numerous cases where shelter providers did not comply with the City’s competitive bidding requirements or where it was unclear whether shelter providers conducted true competitive bidding processes. For example, this review identified multiple instances where shelter providers awarded multimillion-dollar building maintenance service contracts to companies affiliated with the buildings’ landlords.
DOI issued 32 recommendations to address the system-wide vulnerabilities noted in this Report. Included among the key recommendations are:
➢ DSS should appoint a Chief Vendor Compliance Officer to provide overall leadership for DSS and DHS’s compliance strategy with respect to nonprofit human service contracts, including contracts with shelter providers.
➢ Shelter providers should be required to regularly disclose additional information relevant to identifying compliance risks, including potential conflicts of interest for key persons.
➢ DSS and DHS should take steps to improve their oversight of shelter operators’ expenditures, including by immediately stopping payments for costs that are not accompanied by a proper description and ensuring that relevant agency staff receive regular financial compliance training.
➢ The City should update its electronic procurement and invoicing systems to better enable thirdparty oversight and centralize key documentation.
This Report also reiterates many of the 23 recommendations that DOI issued in its November 2021 Report on Corruption Vulnerabilities in the City’s Oversight and Administration of Not-for-Profit Human Services. While the City has implemented some reforms since the 2021 Report and is also undertaking some work that closely tracks DOI’s recommendations, many of the recommendations from 2021 have not been implemented at any substantial level. The 2021 Report recommended, among other things, that the City:
Reform its conflict-of-interest disclosure system for the City’s human service providers.
Develop more specific guidance to agencies on executive compensation and consider setting a cap or other parameters on City-funded executive compensation.
Conduct more robust reviews of expenses that human service providers invoice to the City, including by reviewing larger samples of supporting documentation.
New York City is currently making an unprecedented financial commitment to address homelessness. For that reason, it is more important than ever that it implement stronger risk management and compliance controls around this spending. Accepting and implementing the reforms set forth in this Report, as well as in DOI’s November 2021 Report, would be critical steps in this direction.
DOI Commissioner Strauber thanks DSS Commissioner Molly Wasow Park and her staff, for their partnership on this examination and the Mayor’s Office of Contracts and Mayor’s Office of Risk Management and Compliance for their assistance.
DOI also received support from two private firms with experience in investigations, audits, and compliance monitoring, who provided auditing and investigative resources with respect to certain provider reviews.
At DOI, this examination was conducted by Deputy Inspector General/Special Counsel Daniel Kacinski and Confidential Investigator Rushelle Sharpe, with the assistance of Senior Investigative Auditor Olga Avram and Senior Investigative Attorney Alex Cane in DOI’s Office of the Inspector General for CityFunded Nonprofits. Data Analysts Anthony McDowald and Zachary Sayle and Director of Data Analytics Shyam Prasad in DOI’s Data Analytics Unit provided technical assistance. The examination was supervised 4 by Senior Inspector General Andrew Sein, Deputy Commissioner of Strategic Initiatives Christopher Ryan, and Deputy Commissioner/ Chief of Investigations Dominick Zarrella.
https://www.nyc.gov/assets/doi/press-releases/2024/October/39DHSRptRelease10.17.2024.pdf
版上的川黑都被你打成非法移民了，不管人家有没有美国护照，估计你这是给川指明了一条路了，当上总统以后不管你有没有美国护照，只要是中国脸，就是非法移民，遣返！这就是他说的mass deportation ?
人一旦变得贱了，眼就容易瞎。不怪你，可以理解。
三年前你不识字儿？ 还是才走线来的？