$5 Trillion List of Tax Hikes Kamala Harris Just Endorsed https://www.atr.org/5-trillion-list-of-tax-hikes-kamala-harris-just-endorsed/ 去看链接吧，内容很全，从企业税，资本利得税到，财富税，遗产税，联邦税，医疗保险税， 股票回购等都有详细说明。太多了，万万税，选她的要不是文盲就是真的想自杀。 Capital gains and dividends tax Here is a direct quote from the Biden-Harris budget: “Together, the proposals would increase the top marginal rate on long-term capital gains and qualified dividends to 44.6 percent.“ Yes, you read that correctly: A Kamala Harris capital gains and dividends tax rate of 44.6% Small business tax rate hike to 39.6% 32% increase to Medicare taxes Unconstitutionalwealth tax on unrealized gains- 板上几个说的是这个 The Harris-endorsed budget calls for an annual 25 percent minimum tax on the unrealized gains of individuals with income and assets exceeding $100 million A second Death Tax by taking away stepped-up basis when parents die Global tax cartel with 21% minimum tax rate Quadrupled tax on stock buybacks — a Harris tax that will hit every American with a 401K or IRAor union pension 30% federal excise tax on electricity used in cryptocurrency mining 1031 置换都有限制要交税了 Real estate tax hike on Like-Kind exchanges Harris backs raising taxes on capital gains from real estate transaction by limiting what are knows as 1031 Like-Kind Exchanges to $500,000 in gains. 不复制粘贴了，只能说美国大限将至 Under the Harris plan, the combined federal-state capital gains tax exceeds 50% in many states. California will face a combined federal-state rate of 57.8%, New Jersey 55.3%, Oregon at 54.5%, Minnesota at 54.4%, and New York state at 53.4%. 大蓝州居民瑟瑟发抖中
Capital gains and dividends tax more than twice as high as communist China Here is a direct quote from the Biden-Harris budget: “Together, the proposals would increase the top marginal rate on long-term capital gains and qualified dividends to 44.6 percent.“ Yes, you read that correctly: A Kamala Harris capital gains and dividends tax rate of 44.6% 白纸黑字，啥帖子说的？帖子是昨天harris亲自发了给你解释的啊？
这个capital gain tax是给全部人的。 只有那个unrealized capital gain tax才是你说的一亿美金以上的。 哈粉们，虽然哈姐没发什么policy... 但还是该关注一下她已经支持的政策。 以前是大家只要是超过一年的capital gain就可以照著不同阶段10-15-20%... 她这次是要支持白等的法案，把一年以上也就是long term的capital gain一口气调到44.6% 也就是说，对于一亿以上大老们是，没有卖，要缴25% unrealized gain tax. 然后实际realized以后，扣除之前缴过的Unrealized gain tax缴44.6% 对于全部没有一亿的大众们，没有unrealized capital gain tax... 但realized后，short term照自己平时的tax bracket... long term 44.6%
Qualified dividends and long-term capital gainswould be taxed as ordinary income, plus the net investment income tax, for income that exceeds $1 million.
流浪的小孩 发表于 2024-08-23 23:55 Qualified dividends and long-term capital gainswould be taxed as ordinary income, plus the net investment income tax, for income that exceeds $1 million.
Biden Capital Gains Proposal Of 44.6% Comes With Caveats And Asterisks Andrew Leahey Contributor Andrew Leahey is an attorney and professor that covers tax. Follow
Apr 24, 2024,02:07pm EDT Updated Apr 25, 2024, 03:46pm EDT WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 16: U.S. President Joe [+] Biden (C) signs The Inflation Reduction Act with (L-R) Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-NY), House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-SC), Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Rep. Kathy Catsor (D-FL) in the State Dining Room of the White House August 16, 2022 in Washington, DC. The $737 billion bill focuses on climate change, lower health care costs and creating clean energy jobs by enacting a 15% corporate minimum tax, a 1-percent fee on stock buybacks and enhancing IRS enforcement. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) GETTY IMAGES Much has been made of President Joe Biden’s proposal in the Fiscal Year 2025 Budget of the United States Government, to raise capital gains rates. The number being bandied about is 44.6%, which would be the highest formal federal capital gains rate since its inception. That rate comes with many caveats and asterisks. The source of the 44.6% rate is a footnote from the General Explanations of the Administration’s FY 2025 Revenue Proposals, and it reads in relevant part, “A separate proposal would first raise the top ordinary rate to 39.6 percent.” It later adds, “An additional proposal would increase the net investment income tax rate by 1.2 percentage points above $400,000.” Additionally, “Together, the proposals would increase the top marginal rate on long-term capital gains and qualified dividends to 44.6 percent.” The main proposal, which lends context to the above-mentioned “separate proposal,” is to raise the long-term capital gains and qualified dividends rates to 37% for taxpayers with taxable income above $1 million. Taken as a whole, then, the 44.6% rate would only come to fruition under a separate proposal from the Biden administration’s main capital gains rate increase, and only apply to those individuals with taxable income above $1 million and investment income above $400,000. That isn’t quite as cataclysmic a policy shift as referring to a blanket 44.6% long-term capital gains rate would suggest. The presentation of the 44.6% capital gains rate proposal is a strategic policy maneuver—loudly shouting a startlingly high percentage while mutely ignoring the crucial aspect of income thresholds. The intent appears to be to play on public sentiments and concerns, more specifically the political landmine of adverse outcomes for small-business owners. At base, such tactics obscure the fact that the higher rate is couched in a proposal within a proposal and, even then, would only apply to high earners. The overarching result is a shifting away from the policy’s intended impact on America’s billionaires, who would likely attract minimal sympathy as against their mom-and-pop shop counterparts. The policy is clearly aimed at leveling the playing field between high ordinary income and investment income earners. The policy proposal is much more incremental than revolutionary – aimed, albeit in a small way, at ensuring high earners contribute a fairer portion relative to their massive financial undertakings. Per a 2021 White House release, American billionaires pay an average individual income tax rate of just 8.2%, which might cast them as somewhat less deserving of victim status in the eyes of the average taxpayer. To combat that, policies that would curtail the ability for wealthy individuals to avoid a higher tax bill could employ fearmongering about skyrocketing capital gains rates for ordinary taxpayers. There isn’t, at least in this proposal, any need for such an alarm.
eastbayguy 发表于 2024-08-24 02:55 回复 1楼 zerohedgeNY 的帖子 State of California already put almost ALL kind of income as ordinary income to be taxed, up to 13+% !
Unrealized capital gain 买了老黄股票的，早年的股票拿着没动的，比如Google, Amazon, Apple 好多年前买的房子， 以前是交易时有增值才税，现在不交易也税你。你亏了不退税给你。流氓强盗！ 另一边给低收入造房子，给首付买房子，给非法过来的免费，过程中自己搞钱，让非法的投票让她继续黑💩的祸国殃民，养蛆，把美国的通胀推到委内瑞拉，让富裕的美国南非化。 钱都是普通劳动纳税人来的，她陪睡收现金会交税吗？ 一点社会价值没创造过的政治老陪睡，不是让美国人好过，简直就是拿美国泄愤！苛捐杂税还不够多！！ 为什么不鼓励大家都努力工作，多创造社会财富？ 一味的打击纳税人 劳动者！这样的流氓只会带到阴沟里！
azenis 发表于 2024-08-23 23:16 这个capital gain tax是给全部人的。 只有那个unrealized capital gain tax才是你说的一亿美金以上的。 哈粉们，虽然哈姐没发什么policy... 但还是该关注一下她已经支持的政策。 以前是大家只要是超过一年的capital gain就可以照著不同阶段10-15-20%... 她这次是要支持白等的法案，把一年以上也就是long term的capital gain一口气调到44.6% 也就是说，对于一亿以上大老们是，没有卖，要缴25% unrealized gain tax. 然后实际realized以后，扣除之前缴过的Unrealized gain tax缴44.6% 对于全部没有一亿的大众们，没有unrealized capital gain tax... 但realized后，short term照自己平时的tax bracket... long term 44.6%
流浪的小孩 发表于 2024-08-23 23:55 Qualified dividends and long-term capital gainswould be taxed as ordinary income, plus the net investment income tax, for income that exceeds $1 million.
是年taxable income>1 million的人，long-term capital gain按照ordinary income税率来，他们propose the top ordinary income tax rate to increase to 39.6%，再加上5% net investment income tax(increased from current 3.8%)
azenis 发表于 2024-08-23 23:16 这个capital gain tax是给全部人的。 只有那个unrealized capital gain tax才是你说的一亿美金以上的。 哈粉们，虽然哈姐没发什么policy... 但还是该关注一下她已经支持的政策。 以前是大家只要是超过一年的capital gain就可以照著不同阶段10-15-20%... 她这次是要支持白等的法案，把一年以上也就是long term的capital gain一口气调到44.6% 也就是说，对于一亿以上大老们是，没有卖，要缴25% unrealized gain tax. 然后实际realized以后，扣除之前缴过的Unrealized gain tax缴44.6% 对于全部没有一亿的大众们，没有unrealized capital gain tax... 但realized后，short term照自己平时的tax bracket... long term 44.6%
44.6%是给taxable income 1million以上的，你要说这个是全部人。。我只好羡慕你和你的朋友圈了
普通中产给孩子留本来就不用交税啊 我们不配estate tax 孩子如果拿着不卖即使没有step up basis也不用交税啊 取消了step up，孩子卖的时候gain变多了。问题就是，同样的股票，凭什么留给孩子就可以免税，自己活着的时候卖就要叫capital gain tax？这个问题的答案本来就不那么明显吧？你怎么知道你是哪类？
azenis 发表于 2024-08-23 23:16 这个capital gain tax是给全部人的。 只有那个unrealized capital gain tax才是你说的一亿美金以上的。 哈粉们，虽然哈姐没发什么policy... 但还是该关注一下她已经支持的政策。 以前是大家只要是超过一年的capital gain就可以照著不同阶段10-15-20%... 她这次是要支持白等的法案，把一年以上也就是long term的capital gain一口气调到44.6% 也就是说，对于一亿以上大老们是，没有卖，要缴25% unrealized gain tax. 然后实际realized以后，扣除之前缴过的Unrealized gain tax缴44.6% 对于全部没有一亿的大众们，没有unrealized capital gain tax... 但realized后，short term照自己平时的tax bracket... long term 44.6%
是这个吗？ 根据该提案，哈里斯希望将资本利得税率调整为与美国富人的所得税率一致。如果他们的应税收入超过 100 万美元，他们可能需要对房屋和股息等资产的资本利得缴纳44.6% 的税。
有英文链接吗？没看到44.6%这个数字
https://www.atr.org/5-trillion-list-of-tax-hikes-kamala-harris-just-endorsed/
去看链接吧，内容很全，从企业税，资本利得税到，财富税，遗产税，联邦税，医疗保险税， 股票回购等都有详细说明。太多了，万万税，选她的要不是文盲就是真的想自杀。
Capital gains and dividends tax Here is a direct quote from the Biden-Harris budget: “Together, the proposals would increase the top marginal rate on long-term capital gains and qualified dividends to 44.6 percent.“ Yes, you read that correctly: A Kamala Harris capital gains and dividends tax rate of 44.6%
Small business tax rate hike to 39.6%
32% increase to Medicare taxes
Unconstitutional wealth tax on unrealized gains- 板上几个说的是这个 The Harris-endorsed budget calls for an annual 25 percent minimum tax on the unrealized gains of individuals with income and assets exceeding $100 million
A second Death Tax by taking away stepped-up basis when parents die
Global tax cartel with 21% minimum tax rate
Quadrupled tax on stock buybacks — a Harris tax that will hit every American with a 401K or IRA or union pension
30% federal excise tax on electricity used in cryptocurrency mining
1031 置换都有限制要交税了 Real estate tax hike on Like-Kind exchanges Harris backs raising taxes on capital gains from real estate transaction by limiting what are knows as 1031 Like-Kind Exchanges to $500,000 in gains.
不复制粘贴了，只能说美国大限将至
Under the Harris plan, the combined federal-state capital gains tax exceeds 50% in many states. California will face a combined federal-state rate of 57.8%, New Jersey 55.3%, Oregon at 54.5%, Minnesota at 54.4%, and New York state at 53.4%.
大蓝州居民瑟瑟发抖中
这是对7个小目标的超级富豪的，真是皇帝都不着急。。。就开始急起来了。
https://www.atr.org/5-trillion-list-of-tax-hikes-kamala-harris-just-endorsed/
去看链接吧，内容很全
Capital gains and dividends tax more than twice as high as communist China Here is a direct quote from the Biden-Harris budget: “Together, the proposals would increase the top marginal rate on long-term capital gains and qualified dividends to 44.6 percent.“ Yes, you read that correctly: A Kamala Harris capital gains and dividends tax rate of 44.6%
白纸黑字，啥帖子说的？帖子是昨天harris亲自发了给你解释的啊？
再说，民主党极有可能成为参议院少数派，众议院也大有可能继续掌握在共和党手中，哈里斯增税的提案，没几个能通过。如果川普上台，倒是会继续为亿万富翁减税，你要是有1亿美元资产而投川普，倒也正常。
Step up 取消是对的，不然有钱人越来越有钱
现在入不敷出，加税是不可避免的
不过加了那么资产税，怎么也得降点工资税吧，还有支出要控制yi x
这个capital gain tax是给全部人的。
只有那个unrealized capital gain tax才是你说的一亿美金以上的。
哈粉们，虽然哈姐没发什么policy... 但还是该关注一下她已经支持的政策。
以前是大家只要是超过一年的capital gain就可以照著不同阶段10-15-20%... 她这次是要支持白等的法案，把一年以上也就是long term的capital gain一口气调到44.6%
也就是说，对于一亿以上大老们是，没有卖，要缴25% unrealized gain tax. 然后实际realized以后，扣除之前缴过的Unrealized gain tax缴44.6%
对于全部没有一亿的大众们，没有unrealized capital gain tax... 但realized后，short term照自己平时的tax bracket... long term 44.6%
step up 就是父母死去的时候能给孩子留点 什么叫有钱的人更有钱 难道人死的时候不能留一点财富给孩子？ 比如房子，或者年轻时候打工握了一辈子的low basis stock… 或者年轻时存下的sp500 这就是普通中产的日子吧？
哈里斯左手收税右手印钱 就看华人这几年贫困线的涨法 真的 百万收入不是梦
钱从哪里来？支持哈里斯的愿意付吗？
肯定有更大的我们看不见的利益输送给他们了呀。
https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewleahey/2024/04/24/biden-capital-gains-rate-proposal-446/
Biden Capital Gains Proposal Of 44.6% Comes With Caveats And Asterisks Andrew Leahey Contributor Andrew Leahey is an attorney and professor that covers tax. Follow
Apr 24, 2024,02:07pm EDT Updated Apr 25, 2024, 03:46pm EDT
WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 16: U.S. President Joe [+] Biden (C) signs The Inflation Reduction Act with (L-R) Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-NY), House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-SC), Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Rep. Kathy Catsor (D-FL) in the State Dining Room of the White House August 16, 2022 in Washington, DC. The $737 billion bill focuses on climate change, lower health care costs and creating clean energy jobs by enacting a 15% corporate minimum tax, a 1-percent fee on stock buybacks and enhancing IRS enforcement. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images) GETTY IMAGES Much has been made of President Joe Biden’s proposal in the Fiscal Year 2025 Budget of the United States Government, to raise capital gains rates. The number being bandied about is 44.6%, which would be the highest formal federal capital gains rate since its inception. That rate comes with many caveats and asterisks. The source of the 44.6% rate is a footnote from the General Explanations of the Administration’s FY 2025 Revenue Proposals, and it reads in relevant part, “A separate proposal would first raise the top ordinary rate to 39.6 percent.” It later adds, “An additional proposal would increase the net investment income tax rate by 1.2 percentage points above $400,000.” Additionally, “Together, the proposals would increase the top marginal rate on long-term capital gains and qualified dividends to 44.6 percent.” The main proposal, which lends context to the above-mentioned “separate proposal,” is to raise the long-term capital gains and qualified dividends rates to 37% for taxpayers with taxable income above $1 million. Taken as a whole, then, the 44.6% rate would only come to fruition under a separate proposal from the Biden administration’s main capital gains rate increase, and only apply to those individuals with taxable income above $1 million and investment income above $400,000. That isn’t quite as cataclysmic a policy shift as referring to a blanket 44.6% long-term capital gains rate would suggest. The presentation of the 44.6% capital gains rate proposal is a strategic policy maneuver—loudly shouting a startlingly high percentage while mutely ignoring the crucial aspect of income thresholds. The intent appears to be to play on public sentiments and concerns, more specifically the political landmine of adverse outcomes for small-business owners. At base, such tactics obscure the fact that the higher rate is couched in a proposal within a proposal and, even then, would only apply to high earners. The overarching result is a shifting away from the policy’s intended impact on America’s billionaires, who would likely attract minimal sympathy as against their mom-and-pop shop counterparts. The policy is clearly aimed at leveling the playing field between high ordinary income and investment income earners. The policy proposal is much more incremental than revolutionary – aimed, albeit in a small way, at ensuring high earners contribute a fairer portion relative to their massive financial undertakings. Per a 2021 White House release, American billionaires pay an average individual income tax rate of just 8.2%, which might cast them as somewhat less deserving of victim status in the eyes of the average taxpayer. To combat that, policies that would curtail the ability for wealthy individuals to avoid a higher tax bill could employ fearmongering about skyrocketing capital gains rates for ordinary taxpayers. There isn’t, at least in this proposal, any need for such an alarm.
State of California already put almost ALL kind of income as ordinary income to be taxed, up to 13+% !
大多数州都这么干
这么高的capital gain tax 只针对100M的身家或者年入1百万以上的收入部分了。年入百万以下还是正常缴税的 川粉一直在刻意误导
买了老黄股票的，早年的股票拿着没动的，比如Google, Amazon, Apple 好多年前买的房子， 以前是交易时有增值才税，现在不交易也税你。你亏了不退税给你。流氓强盗！
另一边给低收入造房子，给首付买房子，给非法过来的免费，过程中自己搞钱，让非法的投票让她继续黑💩的祸国殃民，养蛆，把美国的通胀推到委内瑞拉，让富裕的美国南非化。
钱都是普通劳动纳税人来的，她陪睡收现金会交税吗？
一点社会价值没创造过的政治老陪睡，不是让美国人好过，简直就是拿美国泄愤！苛捐杂税还不够多！！
为什么不鼓励大家都努力工作，多创造社会财富？ 一味的打击纳税人 劳动者！这样的流氓只会带到阴沟里！
如果是100万的话很多人得到焦虑了
湾区不是贫困线都70万吗？版上家庭收入100万以上的就不少吧？家里几套房子的更是轻松就增值40万了，每年报税的时候都得算一算要交多少税了？今天不是就有人吵吵着地产税一下涨了5万了，那房子得增值了多少？再加上股票，以后看着股市上涨心里都得算算自己到底挣没挣到钱了？
加上通货膨胀，好一点的行业涨点工资，现在不够100万的很快就够了，一年不够2年、3年后你的资产增值也够了。
这么一想我这赤贫的都焦虑了！
只是超过的那部分这么交吧？
40%的企业税会让失业率double的。原因是每年发工资剩下的钱，本来是一种buffer，为了未来扩招。现在都收税了，肯定就是失业增加。
民主党的政策就是谁都别想发展。大家全部一起穷。
我周围投民主党的都是低收入或者政府工，教授，那种本身就是吃着国家的钱的。因为占着别人劳动产生价值的便宜，所以才会投民主党。
民主党上了我也不工作，这样也不用给别人提供工作。吃救济谁不会呀。
打着征富人税，利用hate拿选票而已
授人以渔才是长久之计 靠增税，还是无法改变美国生产不足供给不足的现象
英文链接有？不出示ID参加选举不等于非美国籍参加选举，对吧？
你不明白marginal tax是什么？你哪天收入1,000,001了，只有一块钱收40%的税率，又不是999,999和一百万是平均税率不一样，一旦多赚一元，跳崖式增长
现在股市这么疯长，房产也这么疯长，资本利得税再不加的话，贫富差距会越拉越大。穷人怎么辛苦都没机会翻身了。
long term 44.6%，short term 比long term 还低? 不可能。
估计穷的没交过税，或者根本不是美国人
离年收入一百万还运着呢，再说即使到了，也可以不卖，等退休后收入降下来后再卖，反正买得是index
unrealized 也要交税啊，😂
你有资产100米么？ 没有担心个p
大门130b, 放在trust 里， 80% 是capital gain 吧， 要是都卖的话50b 去税了
现在这2个法宝，大门挂了马上re set, 这130b 就传下去一分税不交了
房屋增值算么？如果算的话，会有很多退休的人没办法卖自住屋downsize, 造成房源更加短缺。
不控制支出就是瞎扯淡。收多少税都不够花的
不妨碍川粉呀。 上一次选举的时候有一次我看电视正好放川普的拉力，川普说：我们美国人一生都在交税，为什么死了还要交税啊？ 下边的人一起群情激愤的喊喊取消遗产税！
用已经交过税的钱辛苦一辈子增值了，死了还要交一遍税，羊毛真是往死里撸
卖房子的增值也算吗？很容易超过40万
卖房子的增值算capital gain，但是如果该房子是主要居所的话，有单身25w，夫妻联合50w的exclusion。就是说对于一般华人家庭来说，卖房子要赚90w才用考虑这个问题。赚90w的话差不多要买入卖出差价100w吧
而中产阶层都是打工的，收入都不明的，直接就被预扣了。再加上各种inflation, 地方州县市政府的跟风涨各种税费。民主党继续执政，中产阶层的实际收入会越来越低，各种环境也会越来越差。
但是对wealth tax的通过不抱希望 Moore的案子基本绕开了wealth tax的感觉
有2，3个投资房的话很容易达到吧？再说不卖也算啊。是总资产大于100M的才算吗？
有几个投资房总资产有1亿刀？
40万包括其他收入吗？如果你有你有工资股票收入20万，要从40万中扣除吧。
这些细节可能现在不清楚。要知道巨富的人有很多方法避税，想撸他们的羊毛是很困难的。最后加税都是加在中产的头上。
不一定 华尔街可能生意更多了 因为富人们可能就转投各种难以value的资产了
是年taxable income>1 million的人，long-term capital gain按照ordinary income税率来，他们propose the top ordinary income tax rate to increase to 39.6%，再加上5% net investment income tax(increased from current 3.8%)
100万，不是1亿。
44.6%是给taxable income 1million以上的，你要说这个是全部人。。我只好羡慕你和你的朋友圈了
普通中产给孩子留本来就不用交税啊 我们不配estate tax 孩子如果拿着不卖即使没有step up basis也不用交税啊
取消了step up，孩子卖的时候gain变多了。问题就是，同样的股票，凭什么留给孩子就可以免税，自己活着的时候卖就要叫capital gain tax？这个问题的答案本来就不那么明显吧？你怎么知道你是哪类？
unrealized gain tax (aka wealth tax)是资产100 million，可不就是一亿。我是针对楼上说有几个投资房的评论
各种给公司减税创造了就业吗？都搞share buyback去了
不一定，想想当初帮助共产党的有钱人。大家不要小看忽悠的力量。
主党真的关心穷人吗？其实，他们根本不管任何人的死活，只在乎自己。说最冠冕堂皇的话，做最没人性的事情。永远用道德绑架，情绪勒索去控制别人。但是他们自己呢，一点道德都没有的。比如Newsom lockdown别人，自己想去哪里去哪里，自己孩子送私立。这就是主党。
加州税收只会越来越高，但是生活质量却越来越差。加税有止境吗？主党说过有maximum 税率？没有。就他们这种无能，腐败的花钱方式，你觉得多少钱够他们花的？永远用激起矛盾的方式来掩盖自己的无能和失败。我做的不好，不是我的问题，是因为有钱人给的钱不够啊。
两道坎 年入100万 或者 资产1亿
为啥怎么说？
那岂不是对大多数人来说，long term比short term税率还高？ 作为理工男没法接受。 哪怕直接说只要是capital gain就按照正常收入来收税也还合理一些
怎么觉得一个好的社会，应该是不管父母有没有留钱，都可以靠诚实劳动过的不错。大家都不留钱给子女，都以整个社会的好处为目的，其实大家都会挺轻松的。圣经也差不多是这么教导的。
只给非法移民提供免费住房和免费大学那是不可能的，你看看原文。
出租房买的早的挺容易超过的。这个gain 也算在当年的taxable income 吗？那样也容易超过一米
卖一个房子，taxable income 容易超过一米
真心羡慕你，商量一下，你能不能晚点卖你的房子，等下次选举的时候我们一起选共和党的，然后你再卖房？再过4年trump应该不会再出来竞选了吧
估计他的一个房产是国家艺术馆
为啥共和党好点的人没法出头呢？这种税法对房产投资太不友好了。因为股票可以一点点卖。房子不行，一次卖gain太多了。这种对房市打击也挺致命的。因为老房东会赶紧卖房子。
另外夫妻卖自住房减税额50万也该改了吧。通胀房价涨这么厉害
果真如此，你们还会选d吗 毕竟房产增值才是最大的收益 特别是多年前买的自住一个房子，几十年下来积累的财富等到退休卖掉downsize是小老百姓的一个指望 在一些热门地区房价奇高 生活费用也奇高，再摊上奇高税率 中产越来越难 噢吧d搞得和共产没有两样
卖房这种事怎么能等四年，生孩子换大房 老人退休换小房 给孩子找合适学区 大人卖房搬家 尤其是随工作走的搬家卖房？
别提了，十几年前买投资房时候只是为了beat通胀，从没想过会靠房子发财。尤其经历08。哪想到现在一个房子增值就快一米了。现在觉得还是股票灵活啊。可以一点点的卖。