The Biden/@KamalaHarris administration charging station plan delivered seven out of 500k promised stations and cost $7.5 billion. In 2021, Biden/Harris set aside $65 billion for rural internet access (unclear how much if any progress we have made to date) when Starlink could do a better job with minimal taxpayer funding. Now, @KamalaHarris promises to build 3 million housing units in four years. How is that going to work? — Bill Ackman
哈哈哈哈，真别扯什么高素质低素质了。你不承认Grocery 趁通胀疯涨牟取暴利的事实，那我也没办法。 Tyson Foods’ execs and shareholders are some of the big beneficiaries of stock buybacks. Tyson raised the price of meat nearly 30 percent and saw its profit margins more than double between 2021 and 2022. It’s operating costs rose, but price increases more than offset those costs—by 33 percent. According to the Federal Trade Commission, Walmart, Kroger, and Amazon “used rising costs as an opportunity to further hike prices to increase their profits.” The price of food and drinks rose seven percent more than their costs. Walmart raised prices more than 50 percent on some of its generic food brands in the three years between 2020 and 2023. General Mills raised the price of cereal 12 percent in 2023 from the prior year. It also shrunk the amount of cereal in the box to 18.1 ounces from 19.3 ounces. Mediterranean 发表于 2024-08-18 06:08
这都什么鬼扯淡啊， Tyson Foods 因为成本上升太快，明明是亏本的吧 Tyson Foods on Monday (Nov. 13) reported an income loss in fiscal year 2023 of $648 million, well below the $3.238 billion of net income in fiscal 2022. 2022年也一样，the Springdale-based company ended fiscal 2022 with record revenue of $53.282 billion, up 13.2% from the prior year. Net income grew to $3.249 billion, up 6.26% year over year Revenue 增长比利润快，利润率自然是下降的 要不说你们容易被忽悠呢
宇宙洪荒 发表于 2024-08-17 11:53 The Biden/@KamalaHarris administration charging station plan delivered seven out of 500k promised stations and cost $7.5 billion. In 2021, Biden/Harris set aside $65 billion for rural internet access (unclear how much if any progress we have made to date) when Starlink could do a better job with minimal taxpayer funding. Now, @KamalaHarris promises to build 3 million housing units in four years. How is that going to work? — Bill Ackman
what makes you think a hedge fund manager acts in favor of your interest?
宇宙洪荒 发表于 2024-08-17 11:53 The Biden/@KamalaHarris administration charging station plan delivered seven out of 500k promised stations and cost $7.5 billion. In 2021, Biden/Harris set aside $65 billion for rural internet access (unclear how much if any progress we have made to date) when Starlink could do a better job with minimal taxpayer funding. Now, @KamalaHarris promises to build 3 million housing units in four years. How is that going to work? — Bill Ackman
宇宙洪荒 发表于 2024-08-17 11:53 The Biden/@KamalaHarris administration charging station plan delivered seven out of 500k promised stations and cost $7.5 billion. In 2021, Biden/Harris set aside $65 billion for rural internet access (unclear how much if any progress we have made to date) when Starlink could do a better job with minimal taxpayer funding. Now, @KamalaHarris promises to build 3 million housing units in four years. How is that going to work? — Bill Ackman
回复 16楼 alfred1 的帖子 From wiki: Ackman supported the Democratic Party and endorsed Dean Phillips for the 2024 presidential primaries. Ackman endorsed Michael Bloomberg as a prospective candidate for President of the United States in the 2016 presidential election. 实际上他几乎是最早一批民主党内部劝拜登不要竞选连任， 要给年轻人机会的。
副总统是备位。如果知道美国政治就知道副总统对政策的影响力很低。 不是有个笑话吗？ Once there were two brothers. One ran away to sea; the other was elected Vice President of the United States. And nothing was ever heard of either of them again. 当然现在情况有点不一样，她成了总统选举人，拜登跛脚了，所以她的影响力会升高。但毕竟政策现在还是拜登主导的，总不能迫不及待抢班夺权吧。
回复 46楼 SSBN826 的帖子 网上有人一步一步拆解如果限制grocery store 涨价会发生啥。 People need to stop overreacting about Kamala’s plan to reduce food inflation, as if it would lead to communism, mass starvation, and the end of America. I worked in M&A in the food industry. Here’s a step-by-step summary of what would actually happen: 1. The government announces that grocery retailers aren’t allowed to raise prices. 2. Grocery stores, which operate on 1-2% net margins, can’t survive if their suppliers raise prices. So the government announces that food producers (Kraft Heinz, ConAgra, Tyson, Hormel, et. al.) also aren’t allowed to raise prices. 3. Not all grocery stores are created equal. Stores in lower-income areas make less money than those in higher-income areas, as the former disproportionately sell lower-margin prepackaged foods (“center of the store”) instead of higher-margin fresh products like meat (“perimeter of the store”). Because stores in lower-income areas aren’t able to cover overhead (remember, even if their wholesale costs are fixed, their labor, utilities, insurance, and other operating expenses aren’t fixed… yet), grocery chains start to shut them down. Food deserts in rural areas and in low-income urban areas alike become worse. 4. Meanwhile, margins for food producers are also quickly eroding. Their primary costs (ingredients, energy, and labor) aren’t fixed, and their shrinking gross profits leave less cash flow available to cover overhead, maintain facilities, and reinvest in additional production capacity. 5. Grocery chains, which have finite shelf space, start to repurpose their stores (those they didn’t have to shut down, I should say) to sell more non-price-controlled items—everything from nutrition supplements to kitchenware to apparel—and less price-controlled food products. Your local Kroger or Safeway starts to look and feel more like a Walmart. 6. Food producers stop making products with lower margins. Grocery chain start competing with each other to secure inventory. Since they can’t compete by offering stronger prices (remember, producers aren’t allowed to raise prices here, and, even if they could, grocery chains no longer have the gross profit to bear price increases), they compete on things like payment terms. 7. Small grocery chains start to shut down entirely, or get sold to larger chains like Kroger. In addition to not being able to cover fixed costs, a major reason for this is because they can no longer reliably secure delivery of products, due to producers prioritizing sales to larger customers, which are able to leverage their stronger balance sheets to offer superior payment terms. 8. Smaller food producers—which typically sell via distributors, rather than directly to grocery chains—start to go out of business. Because these producers have an additional step their value chains, and because they have lower volumes over which to spread their fixed costs, their cost structure is inherently disadvantaged compared to major food producers. When grocery stores aren’t able to raise prices, cutting product costs becomes all the more important, and deprioritizing purchases from smaller producers is an easy way to do so. 9. As supply chains break down, lines start to form outside grocery stores every morning. Cities assign police officers to patrol store parking lots, and food producers draft contingency plans to assign armed escorts to delivery trucks. 10. The federal government announces a program to issue block grants for states to purchase and operate shuttered grocery stores. The USDA also seizes closed-down production facilities. 11. The government announces that prices for all key food costs—corn, wheat, cattle, energy, etc.—are also now fixed, to stop “profiteers” from gouging the now-government-operated food industry. 12. Shockingly, the government struggles to operate one of the most complex industries on the planet. The entire food supply chain starts imploding. 13. Communism, mass starvation, and the end of America quickly ensue.
宇宙洪荒 发表于 2024-08-17 17:13 回复 46楼 SSBN826 的帖子 网上有人一步一步拆解如果限制grocery store 涨价会发生啥。 People need to stop overreacting about Kamala’s plan to reduce food inflation, as if it would lead to communism, mass starvation, and the end of America. I worked in M&A in the food industry. Here’s a step-by-step summary of what would actually happen: 1. The government announces that grocery retailers aren’t allowed to raise prices. 2. Grocery stores, which operate on 1-2% net margins, can’t survive if their suppliers raise prices. So the government announces that food producers (Kraft Heinz, ConAgra, Tyson, Hormel, et. al.) also aren’t allowed to raise prices. 3. Not all grocery stores are created equal. Stores in lower-income areas make less money than those in higher-income areas, as the former disproportionately sell lower-margin prepackaged foods (“center of the store”) instead of higher-margin fresh products like meat (“perimeter of the store”). Because stores in lower-income areas aren’t able to cover overhead (remember, even if their wholesale costs are fixed, their labor, utilities, insurance, and other operating expenses aren’t fixed… yet), grocery chains start to shut them down. Food deserts in rural areas and in low-income urban areas alike become worse. 4. Meanwhile, margins for food producers are also quickly eroding. Their primary costs (ingredients, energy, and labor) aren’t fixed, and their shrinking gross profits leave less cash flow available to cover overhead, maintain facilities, and reinvest in additional production capacity. 5. Grocery chains, which have finite shelf space, start to repurpose their stores (those they didn’t have to shut down, I should say) to sell more non-price-controlled items—everything from nutrition supplements to kitchenware to apparel—and less price-controlled food products. Your local Kroger or Safeway starts to look and feel more like a Walmart. 6. Food producers stop making products with lower margins. Grocery chain start competing with each other to secure inventory. Since they can’t compete by offering stronger prices (remember, producers aren’t allowed to raise prices here, and, even if they could, grocery chains no longer have the gross profit to bear price increases), they compete on things like payment terms. 7. Small grocery chains start to shut down entirely, or get sold to larger chains like Kroger. In addition to not being able to cover fixed costs, a major reason for this is because they can no longer reliably secure delivery of products, due to producers prioritizing sales to larger customers, which are able to leverage their stronger balance sheets to offer superior payment terms. 8. Smaller food producers—which typically sell via distributors, rather than directly to grocery chains—start to go out of business. Because these producers have an additional step their value chains, and because they have lower volumes over which to spread their fixed costs, their cost structure is inherently disadvantaged compared to major food producers. When grocery stores aren’t able to raise prices, cutting product costs becomes all the more important, and deprioritizing purchases from smaller producers is an easy way to do so. 9. As supply chains break down, lines start to form outside grocery stores every morning. Cities assign police officers to patrol store parking lots, and food producers draft contingency plans to assign armed escorts to delivery trucks. 10. The federal government announces a program to issue block grants for states to purchase and operate shuttered grocery stores. The USDA also seizes closed-down production facilities. 11. The government announces that prices for all key food costs—corn, wheat, cattle, energy, etc.—are also now fixed, to stop “profiteers” from gouging the now-government-operated food industry. 12. Shockingly, the government struggles to operate one of the most complex industries on the planet. The entire food supply chain starts imploding. 13. Communism, mass starvation, and the end of America quickly ensue.
你说说现在grocery manufacturers 、grocery store 疯狂涨价远超正常inflation rate完全伤害消费者利益(你可以去一些论坛看看爆料，真的就是精准建模，疯狂涨价，根本不是你说的这样low profit margin) 政府该怎么办？川普的话术是：全是拜登和哈里斯的错(不是商家的错)，你们选我，价格自然就降下来了。当人是傻子吗？
回复 64楼 小亥 的帖子 根据左派媒体Washington Post: The 10 Best Things Trump Did in 2020 10. He improved the lives of a majority of Americans. 9. He expanded GOP support among non-White voters. 8. He made history as the first US president to speak in person at the March for Life. 7. He stopped the Democrats’ “blue wave.” 6. He shut down travel from China, held Beijing responsible for the pandemic and cracked down on China’s intellectual-property theft. 5. He took out Iran’s terrorist Quds force leader Qasem Soleimani. 4. He put Amy Coney Barrett on the Supreme Court. 3. He transformed the Middle East with the Abraham Accords. 2. He averted a second Great Depression with the Cares Act. 1. He launched Operation Warp Speed, the greatest public health achievement in history. 刨除有党派分歧的不论， 1、2、3、5 是对所有美国人和党派有好处的， 尤其是3，笔者认为完全可以得诺贝尔和平奖。 我个人认为疫苗这一条，对每个人也是非常重要的。
就是下面这个吗？你先说说为什么要平均5000才关闭边界，而不是100。你怎么统计所有口岸加起来的总数。如果没法统计的话，那就是无限制让非法移民入境。这样的议案不反对才是脑残了。 “DHS could close the border if Border Patrol encountered 4,000 or more migrants on average over seven days. The border would have to be shut down if those encounters reached a seven-day average of 5,000 or if they exceeded 8,500 in a single day.”
In 2021, Biden/Harris set aside $65 billion for rural internet access (unclear how much if any progress we have made to date) when Starlink could do a better job with minimal taxpayer funding.
Now, @KamalaHarris promises to build 3 million housing units in four years.
How is that going to work?
— Bill Ackman
🔥 最新回帖
这都什么鬼扯淡啊， Tyson Foods 因为成本上升太快，明明是亏本的吧
Tyson Foods on Monday (Nov. 13) reported an income loss in fiscal year 2023 of $648 million, well below the $3.238 billion of net income in fiscal 2022.
2022年也一样，the Springdale-based company ended fiscal 2022 with record revenue of $53.282 billion, up 13.2% from the prior year. Net income grew to $3.249 billion, up 6.26% year over year Revenue 增长比利润快，利润率自然是下降的
要不说你们容易被忽悠呢
Well said! 没想到华人上还有阿根廷长大的，层主应该多讲讲阿根廷，Venezuela怎样短短几十年时间从南美富国到今天的地步，不过说了估计也没用，这么多从大陆出来的，即使自己没亲身经历过国内的社会主义，难道还没听父母祖辈提起。当然很多只是trolls，纯粹搅浑水的。
remember what thatcher said: socialism is great till you run out of other people’s money.
哈里斯上台会怎么样我不知道，川普在台上的Chinese virus绝对是听够了不想再听，就这么简单
你们GOP有本事也推一个新人上来啊
嘴炮正能量总比嘴炮负能量的NPD强几千倍吧
🛋️ 沙发板凳
然后川普攻击她是共产主义，意识形态挂帅，就跟“何不食肉糜”一样。
一个理由就够了，不想听China Virus.
Never Trump
不是不管她说什么都要投她，而是她尊重宪法制度、不管她有什么政策都只能通过三权分立的infrastructure 实现，没那个基础就实现不了。反观另一边要无限扩大行政权，不承认民主制度，那就想实现啥就能实现啥，也不在乎制衡不制衡。
是的，就是这么个意思。她至少说的都是老百姓的pain point。你说川皇非得在高尔夫球场摆摊大谈物价飞涨，他就不能移驾grocery store开记者会。
Harris 的经济思路， 通过政府补贴提高需求， 但是控制价格削减供给， 价格只会更高， 然后经济陷入衰退。 在这个准乱世的时候美国经济衰退， 你猜三战的概率是增大还是减小？ 这时候如果中美变成交战国， 对在美华人是比现在更有利还是更不利？
川普不是一直要削减联邦政府机构么？ 还和马一龙一拍即合， 想成立一个减员增效委员会， 让马一龙来主持。 这个为啥是无限增大行政权力？
反观民主党， 拜登赢得了党内初选， 结果被党内大佬逼迫退出， 然后直接内定了哈里斯， 这个怎么看也和民主不搭边。
裁员和扩大行政权不矛盾啊。专家都滚了，大事小事定于一尊，吾皇万岁。
Thomas Sowell on affordable housing bd rent control
https://youtu.be/dnj2WRIG11U?si=x8Z114no6l8_EWBY
只可惜很多人不会象你想得这么远，而且很多支持哈里斯其实都在大大小小政府部门上班，他们一般不担心经济衰退丢工作什么的。
what makes you think a hedge fund manager acts in favor of your interest?
没错。就bill ackman那个嘴脸，说啥都不用太当真。
这位不是要人肉所有反对以色列屠杀的哈佛学生吗？都高调endorse trump了不要装理客中
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/billionaire-bill-ackman-endorses-trump-us-presidential-race-2024-07-14/
问她有什么policy的都是closet川粉
这人是华尔街犹太人，早期号称抵制不雇佣支持巴勒斯坦示威游行。
民主党比较同情巴勒斯坦人，激起很多犹太人的不满。
不要轻易听信别人，被当枪使了。他这样说可能自己在买入卖出。
我觉得好多中国人都有这种可笑的想法， 好像自己支持共产党就是赵家人了， 自己支持共和党就也是billionare了。
唉， 这些人看来对民主党失望极了， 以前都是支持民主党的。
我觉得民主党也很蠢， 基本属于脑子进水的那种， 但共和党的蠢， 不一样， 基本是属于根本没脑子。
所以， 我一般还是支持民主党的， 拜登除外， 拜登蠢得太阳系都快爆炸了。
就是那个把哈佛校长搞掉的Zionist？算了吧
咦？不是说民主党为富豪服务的呀？这位富豪不满意民主党呢，而且从2016就开始不满意了，那时bullish on trump，我们没有金鱼记忆，美国人民小本本都记着呢
连女人的子宫都要管，就别再提什么小政府了？
只怕到时候为了逼女人生孩子，得成立十个部门，从女孩的初潮以后的每一次月经都得管起来
美国又不是只有一个富豪。 你不会不知道吧？
两个党都被富豪收买了。 富豪也可以变换阵营。
From wiki:
Ackman supported the Democratic Party and endorsed Dean Phillips for the 2024 presidential primaries. Ackman endorsed Michael Bloomberg as a prospective candidate for President of the United States in the 2016 presidential election.
实际上他几乎是最早一批民主党内部劝拜登不要竞选连任， 要给年轻人机会的。
他当初猛烈抨击哈佛黑人女校长， 说她的履历不足， 其中一个就是作为scholar 的publication 不够strong。 As a result, 他老婆的论文被指抄袭。 不过明眼人一看就知道她老婆的学历和黑人女校长根本没有可比性。
我不太 care 他是黑是白， 是华尔街还是好莱坞。 我更关心他说的话本身是不是事实， 有没有根据。 如果说他来自华尔街，不可能代表普通中产， 那我凭什么相信哈里斯作为一个过往成绩不咋样的检查官，政客，可以代表普通中产呢？
对啊， 希望大家少一些成见， 多一些讨论。 十一月份投谁是另一回事， 至少能心平气和的说说话不好么？
共和党的position是堕胎这事联邦不管，各州自己决定。和联邦小政府的理念是一致的。
生孩子不管， 光管枪权， 明显是脑子进水太多。 哈哈
枪权是宪法里面。联邦政府需要执行宪法。
可拉倒吧。讨论政策的前提是双方认赌服输。现在一方歇斯底里地说：我的政策你们最好接受，不接受咱就bloodbath (之前也确实冲击过国会山了)。还讨论个什么劲啊。也不知道哪边不心平气和。
Harris 现在就是副总统啊， 很多她propose的政策现在就可以开始实施试试看， 不用在promise for 2025了。
建房子是为了低收入的有房子住，炒房者当然不高兴。
手动同意。不是民主党多好，（其实也满烂的），实在是Trump上台影响人身安全。
话说Trump当年败选，老羞成怒，煽动占领国会，如此动摇美国宪法民主基础的没下线行为，居然美国人还要考虑他。真是惊掉了下巴
川普连Fed reserve的职权都要接管，总统自己定利率。
副总统是备位。如果知道美国政治就知道副总统对政策的影响力很低。 不是有个笑话吗？
Once there were two brothers. One ran away to sea; the other was elected Vice President of the United States. And nothing was ever heard of either of them again.
当然现在情况有点不一样，她成了总统选举人，拜登跛脚了，所以她的影响力会升高。但毕竟政策现在还是拜登主导的，总不能迫不及待抢班夺权吧。
是呀，昨天又看了一下那个臭名昭著的project 2025，老混蛋上台了感觉美国会回到欧洲中世纪
最应该的不是让天朝不弄出这个武汉virus吗？更准确，可惜没人有这个胆，也就在中国之外的论坛上嚷嚷？
关于China virus 前几天有个网友回复很清楚了， 川普这个提法是针对疫情当时，中国一度说病毒可能是参加国内一个运动会的美国运动员传到武汉的， 是为了强调病毒的起源不是美国是中国。 我想现在对于病毒的起源也没有异议吧。
网上有人一步一步拆解如果限制grocery store 涨价会发生啥。
People need to stop overreacting about Kamala’s plan to reduce food inflation, as if it would lead to communism, mass starvation, and the end of America.
I worked in M&A in the food industry. Here’s a step-by-step summary of what would actually happen:
1. The government announces that grocery retailers aren’t allowed to raise prices.
2. Grocery stores, which operate on 1-2% net margins, can’t survive if their suppliers raise prices. So the government announces that food producers (Kraft Heinz, ConAgra, Tyson, Hormel, et. al.) also aren’t allowed to raise prices.
3. Not all grocery stores are created equal. Stores in lower-income areas make less money than those in higher-income areas, as the former disproportionately sell lower-margin prepackaged foods (“center of the store”) instead of higher-margin fresh products like meat (“perimeter of the store”). Because stores in lower-income areas aren’t able to cover overhead (remember, even if their wholesale costs are fixed, their labor, utilities, insurance, and other operating expenses aren’t fixed… yet), grocery chains start to shut them down. Food deserts in rural areas and in low-income urban areas alike become worse.
4. Meanwhile, margins for food producers are also quickly eroding. Their primary costs (ingredients, energy, and labor) aren’t fixed, and their shrinking gross profits leave less cash flow available to cover overhead, maintain facilities, and reinvest in additional production capacity.
5. Grocery chains, which have finite shelf space, start to repurpose their stores (those they didn’t have to shut down, I should say) to sell more non-price-controlled items—everything from nutrition supplements to kitchenware to apparel—and less price-controlled food products. Your local Kroger or Safeway starts to look and feel more like a Walmart.
6. Food producers stop making products with lower margins. Grocery chain start competing with each other to secure inventory. Since they can’t compete by offering stronger prices (remember, producers aren’t allowed to raise prices here, and, even if they could, grocery chains no longer have the gross profit to bear price increases), they compete on things like payment terms.
7. Small grocery chains start to shut down entirely, or get sold to larger chains like Kroger. In addition to not being able to cover fixed costs, a major reason for this is because they can no longer reliably secure delivery of products, due to producers prioritizing sales to larger customers, which are able to leverage their stronger balance sheets to offer superior payment terms.
8. Smaller food producers—which typically sell via distributors, rather than directly to grocery chains—start to go out of business. Because these producers have an additional step their value chains, and because they have lower volumes over which to spread their fixed costs, their cost structure is inherently disadvantaged compared to major food producers. When grocery stores aren’t able to raise prices, cutting product costs becomes all the more important, and deprioritizing purchases from smaller producers is an easy way to do so.
9. As supply chains break down, lines start to form outside grocery stores every morning. Cities assign police officers to patrol store parking lots, and food producers draft contingency plans to assign armed escorts to delivery trucks.
10. The federal government announces a program to issue block grants for states to purchase and operate shuttered grocery stores. The USDA also seizes closed-down production facilities.
11. The government announces that prices for all key food costs—corn, wheat, cattle, energy, etc.—are also now fixed, to stop “profiteers” from gouging the now-government-operated food industry.
12. Shockingly, the government struggles to operate one of the most complex industries on the planet. The entire food supply chain starts imploding.
13. Communism, mass starvation, and the end of America quickly ensue.
你说说现在grocery manufacturers 、grocery store 疯狂涨价远超正常inflation rate完全伤害消费者利益(你可以去一些论坛看看爆料，真的就是精准建模，疯狂涨价，根本不是你说的这样low profit margin) 政府该怎么办？川普的话术是：全是拜登和哈里斯的错(不是商家的错)，你们选我，价格自然就降下来了。当人是傻子吗？
搞笑吧，现在谁还能代表中产？现在是看谁不选弄死中产，弄死美华啊。china virus 走意识形态拉美华垫背来吸引自己基本盘，那只能先避开保命再说。错锋一下别划着自己，等下一轮再选回来呗。
川普上台极大概率干不成什么事情，这么多盯着。但是何经理上台，我怀疑她会是美国的掘墓人，到时候美华的处境更差。
越描越黑。你问问红脖们是你这样理解china virus 的吗？
试行？republicans 不让啊。就是左右双方妥协的方案都让懂王这个搅屎棍搅黄了。不要现在装B好不？
他主要是自己定他自己借钱的利率，哪管别人的死活
你没看过他接受现场质询以色列用他的AI技术杀人的视频吧？结巴。
一到Covid 就原形毕露。啥都不懂，还大嘴巴。
现在还要搞独裁
拜登自己以前的经济顾问说的，Harris是拜登政府政策关键的设计师。所以如果Harris 真想用她提出的方法限制通胀，她是可以做到的。
根据左派媒体Washington Post: The 10 Best Things Trump Did in 2020
10. He improved the lives of a majority of Americans.
9. He expanded GOP support among non-White voters.
8. He made history as the first US president to speak in person at the March for Life.
7. He stopped the Democrats’ “blue wave.”
6. He shut down travel from China, held Beijing responsible for the pandemic and cracked down on China’s intellectual-property theft.
5. He took out Iran’s terrorist Quds force leader Qasem Soleimani.
4. He put Amy Coney Barrett on the Supreme Court.
3. He transformed the Middle East with the Abraham Accords.
2. He averted a second Great Depression with the Cares Act.
1. He launched Operation Warp Speed, the greatest public health achievement in history.
刨除有党派分歧的不论， 1、2、3、5 是对所有美国人和党派有好处的， 尤其是3，笔者认为完全可以得诺贝尔和平奖。 我个人认为疫苗这一条，对每个人也是非常重要的。
应该凭票供应？
所以州政府变大政府管子宫就好了？
老白提的边境议案，和党议员都没问题，不是被你家川皇下旨，不许通过，要等他上位，好算他功劳，太无耻了
你真傻装傻，就算当初是说起源地，那现在有了官方说法，还大会上不停地放这个屁，完了歪个头等洪波三呼万岁，这是什么意思还不懂，脑子烧烤了吧
内容确实是HF老板评价Harris 的经济政策啊。 没毛病
这确实没办法， 主流左派媒体一如既往对川普的言论各种打压各种抹黑， 搞得他一直非常defensive。如果要说川普说了很多过分的话， 确实是这样， 但是主媒确实也非常过分， 如果想改变这个状态继续两边都要妥协， 否则无解。
就是下面这个吗？你先说说为什么要平均5000才关闭边界，而不是100。你怎么统计所有口岸加起来的总数。如果没法统计的话，那就是无限制让非法移民入境。这样的议案不反对才是脑残了。
“DHS could close the border if Border Patrol encountered 4,000 or more migrants on average over seven days. The border would have to be shut down if those encounters reached a seven-day average of 5,000 or if they exceeded 8,500 in a single day.”
嗯，朝鲜当局也是这么想的。 政府建房子钱从哪儿来？是政府的效率比较高吗？还是成本控制的好呢？
真是完全没有经济学常识呀！ grocery store的东西都是生活必需品，都是接近完全竞争市场，再近乎完全竞争市场怎么可能获得超额利润？
超额利润是在垄断或者近乎垄断的情况下才有可能达成的。
virus 们很享受，不觉得很悲哀吗
原来说的是这个议案，那民主党议员（参众两院）也很多反对的啊，说是太强硬了。
source [politico]: https://www.politico.com/news/2024/02/05/biden-bipartisan-immigration-deal-00139558
没错，对于日用品限价最终肯定是小买卖最先撑不住，他们最缺乏对上游供应商的议价能力。所以这个措施下来，反倒是有利于大企业。
您这个回复没啥内容啊。。。我是觉得挺悲哀的。这么多人在基本事实的认知上有巨大差别。
是说隔壁川家的那个燕麦小买卖先撑不住了？看把你们心疼的
我记得哈佛女校长抄袭非常之多，不列引用，bill ackman 老婆好像可能就一点点忘记列了 citation errors in portions of her dissertation. 学术不端程度差别很大。而且他老婆立刻道歉。哈佛黑女校长不道歉不辞职，死猪不怕开水烫。
你真是天真，很多grocery store地处偏僻，确实某种程度上就是对周边居民的垄断，这些疯狂涨价的很多。你可以多作一些了解。
估计lz不知道ackman是谁。lol。听他的不如直接听老川的
说实话我都不知道你说的是啥。。哈哈。
隔壁有人贴川普卖燕麦还是cereal来着，25块一盒。我找不着帖子了。
他本来是支持民主党的，但是不希望拜登继续参选。他和川普并不是一路人。
他的嘴脸在前一段哈佛、以色列巴勒斯坦冲突中一览无余。就是个bully加asshole，以为钱可以买一切。还妄想加入哈佛董事会。
你别搞笑了
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/harris-presidential-campaign-finds-legal-world-booster-paul-weiss-firm-2024-08-12/
估计能从民主党政府拿很多case
大妈还是研究怎么化妆吧，reuters这种谎话连篇的左媒报道能说明什么问题呢？
那个student loan debt forgiveness 不通过也不是照样实施了吗？她上台了 pack the court，民主党万岁了，跟我们屁民无关了。
因为是事实啊… 你知道什么。
Pack the court, 大法官取消终身制， 这些都是实实在在对三权分立的巨大威胁。 还有左派人士经常诟病的 electoral college 都是为了各个州相互制约平衡而特意设计的。
他咋啥都卖啊， 真是吃相不咋好看的。。。。
拜托有空去个community college或什么的上个Econ101.
这篇东西完全没错。
你去看看实施price control的国家，像阿根廷跟Venezuela... 我自己就是阿根廷长大的。现在还是常常回去看家人，我跟你说就是这么回事。
进口的商品只有富人负担得起。然后本国做的，除了本身就很好的产品，不然一律都是勉强能用而已。品质非常的差。因为这些东西价格不能涨，就只能到处偷工减料。
Venezuela因为本来就没生产什么东西。更惨。你能想像去超市，然后架子上几乎什么都没有。某些特定民生必须品是会事先通知，然后大家要在超市开门前几个钟头去排队买一份。不然就要去黑市买。
这种socialism一点开头都不能有。他唯一有可能成功的是像在挪威这样的地方，政府本身非常有钱。而教育水平非常高。我有遇过挪威人，我问他们不怕一堆人不工作去吃福利吗？他反而一脸不解的问我，为什么你会想这样做呢？那你如何回馈社会呢？这还是一个20出头的年轻人。
在政府本身没有钱，加上教育水平不达标的情况下，这种所谓price control就是一个无止境的轮回。先是超市，然后接下来任何民生必需品，食衣住行，全部都有price control. 因为没办法。你开了先例以后，市场的投资者全部往没有价格控制的行业去。最后变成什么都必须控制，不然什么都买不起。
Trump第一点主要政见是要采油。石油成本本来就占通膨一个很大部分。把石油打压下去，通膨会降是一定的。
然后通膨本来就是政府乱花钱造成的。缩紧政府不必要的开支，通膨更是会往下掉。你会觉得Harris那套说法有理，是因为你对经济学的基础完全没有概念。就像Harris那一群人一样。