Read my letter to the Dean of my law school regarding an incident that happened today with the woke mob. I really cannot stand them:
Dear Dean Lee, Greetings! My name is Charlie Cheon and I am a 3L (about to graduate this fall). I don''t know if you might recall me, but I was in your Employment Law class last year. I am also CC''ing Dean Lin, whom I have gotten to know over the years. I write to you to express my sincerest displeasure with regards to the way some students are handling the invitation of a guest by Professor Wax. I was quite incensed to see flyers posted all across the school smearing Professor Wax''s character. In my opinion, this—along with the fact that some of her students in the Conservative Legal Thoughts class were harassed (boo-ed and hissed at)—shows an effort to intimidate, indicating a lack of respect for civil discourse. To be clear, I understand that there are principles of free speech at play here. Students have a right to protest events which are not to their liking. I am not suggesting that the administration suppress their ability to share their viewpoints. I think, however, that there is something to be said here about how the administration has fostered an environment in which conservative students do not feel a likewise freedom to express their viewpoints. I suspect that if students were to post flyers across the school denouncing this belief system—that this new age conception of "White supremacy" is a religion, and that these disparate outcomes between different racial groups can be better explained by real intergroup differences with regards to attitude, behavior, and culture than systemic inequities—it would be met with a cold reception by the administration. I speculate that the law school would send a school-wide email stating that such viewpoints are incompatible with its values, denounce the viewpoints as "impermissible stereotyping", and remind students engaged in this behavior that while they are free to express their opinions, they cannot go around posting things across the building in a manner inconsistent with the posting rules (which are in plain display on billboards at the school). Similarly, if Black students were booed and hissed at by fellow students for attending an event sharing progressive (and I use this term loosely) viewpoints, the administration would have no qualms meting out punishment for the wrongdoers by holding that they were harassing students. This is, of course, just a conjecture, but my conclusion is based on my observations of the events that have unfolded here in these past few years, as well as my personal experience with the self-righteous mob at this school, an incident which Dean Lin has been made familiar. I felt the need to take a semester leave of absence because of them. Perhaps the law school administration does not have full control over the cultural milieu among its students, but it can surely set the tone for how those going in the profession of law should conduct themselves in the face of disagreements. In my opinion, it was a dereliction of duty for the previous Dean to denounce Professor Wax''s opinions, viewpoints, and factual statements (I happen to think that Professor Wax''s statements re: Black students not grading into the top quartile is most likely accurate in light of the lowered academic standards under which they were admitted, as offensive as this notion might be to some). He should have reaffirmed Penn''s commitment to free speech and left it at that. I hope that the current administration reassesses his position. If the law school aims to be content-neutral with regards to how they deal with such incidences, it should have to grapple with this de facto double-standard. Now, I understand that perspectives may vary and that I cannot obligate the administration to do something, the pressing necessity of which the administration may feel differently than I do. I nevertheless wish to express that I think it incumbent upon the leadership to clearly communicate to these students that, though they are free to protest, their views are their own, that there are other students and academics within the building that disagree with them, and that these dissenters are not thereby "causing harm" or engaging acts of "verbal violence" by doing so. They are not aware of this. In my opinion, this self-righteous mob considers itself the ultimate arbiters of truth, and that those who oppose them do so because they have evil intentions. I have serious doubts as to whether those immersed in this way of thinking could engage in critical thinking. Since my letter has some potent words, I would be remiss were I not to conclude by stating that I respect your authority as the Dean of the Law School. I likewise respect Dean Lin''s authority. I also happen to think that she has navigated these sorts of difficult situations with grace and integrity. I only write to you with the hopes that you might consider this perspective in rendering your decision—it is not an uncommon one within these halls. Thank you for your time, and I hope that you are staying warm! Sincerely, Charlie Cheon Show less
他发在youtube的关于学校里面的一件事情而发给LAW SCHOOL DEAN的letter。关于对保守派教授的不尊重，而作出的有理有据的申诉。读下来还是挺有逻辑的。
jiajia2018 发表于 2024-07-31 12:10 Read my letter to the Dean of my law school regarding an incident that happened today with the woke mob. I really cannot stand them:
Dear Dean Lee, Greetings! My name is Charlie Cheon and I am a 3L (about to graduate this fall). I don''t know if you might recall me, but I was in your Employment Law class last year. I am also CC''ing Dean Lin, whom I have gotten to know over the years. I write to you to express my sincerest displeasure with regards to the way some students are handling the invitation of a guest by Professor Wax. I was quite incensed to see flyers posted all across the school smearing Professor Wax''s character. In my opinion, this—along with the fact that some of her students in the Conservative Legal Thoughts class were harassed (boo-ed and hissed at)—shows an effort to intimidate, indicating a lack of respect for civil discourse. To be clear, I understand that there are principles of free speech at play here. Students have a right to protest events which are not to their liking. I am not suggesting that the administration suppress their ability to share their viewpoints. I think, however, that there is something to be said here about how the administration has fostered an environment in which conservative students do not feel a likewise freedom to express their viewpoints. I suspect that if students were to post flyers across the school denouncing this belief system—that this new age conception of "White supremacy" is a religion, and that these disparate outcomes between different racial groups can be better explained by real intergroup differences with regards to attitude, behavior, and culture than systemic inequities—it would be met with a cold reception by the administration. I speculate that the law school would send a school-wide email stating that such viewpoints are incompatible with its values, denounce the viewpoints as "impermissible stereotyping", and remind students engaged in this behavior that while they are free to express their opinions, they cannot go around posting things across the building in a manner inconsistent with the posting rules (which are in plain display on billboards at the school). Similarly, if Black students were booed and hissed at by fellow students for attending an event sharing progressive (and I use this term loosely) viewpoints, the administration would have no qualms meting out punishment for the wrongdoers by holding that they were harassing students. This is, of course, just a conjecture, but my conclusion is based on my observations of the events that have unfolded here in these past few years, as well as my personal experience with the self-righteous mob at this school, an incident which Dean Lin has been made familiar. I felt the need to take a semester leave of absence because of them. Perhaps the law school administration does not have full control over the cultural milieu among its students, but it can surely set the tone for how those going in the profession of law should conduct themselves in the face of disagreements. In my opinion, it was a dereliction of duty for the previous Dean to denounce Professor Wax''s opinions, viewpoints, and factual statements (I happen to think that Professor Wax''s statements re: Black students not grading into the top quartile is most likely accurate in light of the lowered academic standards under which they were admitted, as offensive as this notion might be to some). He should have reaffirmed Penn''s commitment to free speech and left it at that. I hope that the current administration reassesses his position. If the law school aims to be content-neutral with regards to how they deal with such incidences, it should have to grapple with this de facto double-standard. Now, I understand that perspectives may vary and that I cannot obligate the administration to do something, the pressing necessity of which the administration may feel differently than I do. I nevertheless wish to express that I think it incumbent upon the leadership to clearly communicate to these students that, though they are free to protest, their views are their own, that there are other students and academics within the building that disagree with them, and that these dissenters are not thereby "causing harm" or engaging acts of "verbal violence" by doing so. They are not aware of this. In my opinion, this self-righteous mob considers itself the ultimate arbiters of truth, and that those who oppose them do so because they have evil intentions. I have serious doubts as to whether those immersed in this way of thinking could engage in critical thinking. Since my letter has some potent words, I would be remiss were I not to conclude by stating that I respect your authority as the Dean of the Law School. I likewise respect Dean Lin''s authority. I also happen to think that she has navigated these sorts of difficult situations with grace and integrity. I only write to you with the hopes that you might consider this perspective in rendering your decision—it is not an uncommon one within these halls. Thank you for your time, and I hope that you are staying warm! Sincerely, Charlie Cheon Show less
他发在youtube的关于学校里面的一件事情而发给LAW SCHOOL DEAN的letter。关于对保守派教授的不尊重，而作出的有理有据的申诉。读下来还是挺有逻辑的。
jiajia2018 发表于 2024-07-31 12:10 Read my letter to the Dean of my law school regarding an incident that happened today with the woke mob. I really cannot stand them:
Dear Dean Lee, Greetings! My name is Charlie Cheon and I am a 3L (about to graduate this fall). I don''t know if you might recall me, but I was in your Employment Law class last year. I am also CC''ing Dean Lin, whom I have gotten to know over the years. I write to you to express my sincerest displeasure with regards to the way some students are handling the invitation of a guest by Professor Wax. I was quite incensed to see flyers posted all across the school smearing Professor Wax''s character. In my opinion, this—along with the fact that some of her students in the Conservative Legal Thoughts class were harassed (boo-ed and hissed at)—shows an effort to intimidate, indicating a lack of respect for civil discourse. To be clear, I understand that there are principles of free speech at play here. Students have a right to protest events which are not to their liking. I am not suggesting that the administration suppress their ability to share their viewpoints. I think, however, that there is something to be said here about how the administration has fostered an environment in which conservative students do not feel a likewise freedom to express their viewpoints. I suspect that if students were to post flyers across the school denouncing this belief system—that this new age conception of "White supremacy" is a religion, and that these disparate outcomes between different racial groups can be better explained by real intergroup differences with regards to attitude, behavior, and culture than systemic inequities—it would be met with a cold reception by the administration. I speculate that the law school would send a school-wide email stating that such viewpoints are incompatible with its values, denounce the viewpoints as "impermissible stereotyping", and remind students engaged in this behavior that while they are free to express their opinions, they cannot go around posting things across the building in a manner inconsistent with the posting rules (which are in plain display on billboards at the school). Similarly, if Black students were booed and hissed at by fellow students for attending an event sharing progressive (and I use this term loosely) viewpoints, the administration would have no qualms meting out punishment for the wrongdoers by holding that they were harassing students. This is, of course, just a conjecture, but my conclusion is based on my observations of the events that have unfolded here in these past few years, as well as my personal experience with the self-righteous mob at this school, an incident which Dean Lin has been made familiar. I felt the need to take a semester leave of absence because of them. Perhaps the law school administration does not have full control over the cultural milieu among its students, but it can surely set the tone for how those going in the profession of law should conduct themselves in the face of disagreements. In my opinion, it was a dereliction of duty for the previous Dean to denounce Professor Wax''s opinions, viewpoints, and factual statements (I happen to think that Professor Wax''s statements re: Black students not grading into the top quartile is most likely accurate in light of the lowered academic standards under which they were admitted, as offensive as this notion might be to some). He should have reaffirmed Penn''s commitment to free speech and left it at that. I hope that the current administration reassesses his position. If the law school aims to be content-neutral with regards to how they deal with such incidences, it should have to grapple with this de facto double-standard. Now, I understand that perspectives may vary and that I cannot obligate the administration to do something, the pressing necessity of which the administration may feel differently than I do. I nevertheless wish to express that I think it incumbent upon the leadership to clearly communicate to these students that, though they are free to protest, their views are their own, that there are other students and academics within the building that disagree with them, and that these dissenters are not thereby "causing harm" or engaging acts of "verbal violence" by doing so. They are not aware of this. In my opinion, this self-righteous mob considers itself the ultimate arbiters of truth, and that those who oppose them do so because they have evil intentions. I have serious doubts as to whether those immersed in this way of thinking could engage in critical thinking. Since my letter has some potent words, I would be remiss were I not to conclude by stating that I respect your authority as the Dean of the Law School. I likewise respect Dean Lin''s authority. I also happen to think that she has navigated these sorts of difficult situations with grace and integrity. I only write to you with the hopes that you might consider this perspective in rendering your decision—it is not an uncommon one within these halls. Thank you for your time, and I hope that you are staying warm! Sincerely, Charlie Cheon Show less
他发在youtube的关于学校里面的一件事情而发给LAW SCHOOL DEAN的letter。关于对保守派教授的不尊重，而作出的有理有据的申诉。读下来还是挺有逻辑的。
RedCrayon 发表于 2024-08-01 09:24 他都马上30, 不是小孩。 快速翻了下他其他视频，讲到mental health challenge, 他有anxiety之类。反正给人怒气冲冲感觉，听不下去。
他的布置非常简单（都接近潦草了），美国国旗上挂个亚洲美女，他的红t是oversized的。这一点都不符合他law School的背景。个人形象是他的brand，做YouTube有这么多人看呢，他未来雇主不会看吗？ 他的视频剪辑很多，尤其在开头部分，他向左上得凝视和嘴角的抽搐貌似不能受他自己控制。他的argument并没有一个law School graduate 应该有的深度。他年纪23，4岁的话还可能是因为对社会观察不足，要快30的话，个人觉得他的mental health challenge 还是比较大的。
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/HaUkK1MFmGU
🔥 最新回帖
正常二代投川普的很少 哪怕是黄右们的子女
我到没听说过Antifa暴打亚裔，有这方面的报道吗？
我说长相了吗，我说他状态不正常。
可见他不是专业有经验的播主，比较害羞紧张，而且眼睛一直盯着侧面的提词器。不能像要求Harris那样油滑的老政客那样要求。你们这些发帖的，还有你们家的孩子，能做出这样的视频而且条理清晰就很赞了。不过只要你们敢贴出来，肯定会有人会贬损你们，搞不好话更难听，觉得更不正常。
🛋️ 沙发板凳
真是这样！
这人是个韩二代还读法学院呢，挺会说 长相确实有点奇怪
后面美国国旗上的 女的是谁？
Maybe pick something about policy to argue instead of looks.
mlk jr had a dream
还真是… 小图看起来好丑
luckily not Chinese virus
智商低的，看谁都觉得smart
只有穷苦大众被歧视并识别出来被歧视的人希望社会平等，他们能有相同的社会地位，还有就是从小就受平等观念影响的人希望社会平等，因为平等观念刻入骨子里，这种人太少了。
要论破坏制度，没有谁能比得过猪党的。最近的例子就是1400万民主党人选出来的总统候选人，就被几个党内大哥拱下去了，比黑社会还要黑。
这角度洗的很新奇啊，你为什么觉得就是拜登不想退？ 他的状态大家有目共睹，他自己不知道吗。
同意你这个分析，毕竟中国几千年等级森严的帝制文化已经深深地渗透到了人们的思想中，特别是留一代毕竟大部分来美国之前世界观已经形成，现代社会中的人人平等和对弱势群体的保护等理念还不能完全接受，这个在我和孩子们的交流中能深深地感受到。
而且中国传统文化中的成王败寇的理念也容易让人产生一种对独裁者的英雄式的崇拜，所以中国会有很多川粉和普金粉。
“只有穷苦大众被歧视并识别出来被歧视的人希望社会平等，他们能有相同的社会地位，还有就是从小就受平等观念影响的人希望社会平等，因为平等观念刻入骨子里，这种人太少了。” 非移？
也有可能是零元购团体
你这个想法有些天真了，一旦川普这种种族主义的独裁者人成功上台，整个国家的大氛围都会改变，当然红州和摇摆州可能会首当其冲，轮到加州也不过是一个时间问题。
生活在红州不担心白人至上，就怕加州的妖风刮到全美国，怕红州变兰：红州没有那个能力搞高科技，黑人还多，搞起DEI比加州危害更大，治安再一恶化，兰州的极左幽灵游荡到全美国红州就没有好日子过了。红州也同样担心零元购纵容犯罪鼓励吸毒变性还有边境开放。
他说自己以前一直是川黑，投民主党的。这是才决定要投川普。
加州华人改变不了任何现状。何况一大堆吃福利的，不在乎小孩能不能上州大的华人
长相确实不像和党LOL
我也听不下去他的视频。表情太disttracting。 不过他写的似乎还显示出是有点思考的。
Dear Dean Lee,
Greetings! My name is Charlie Cheon and I am a 3L (about to graduate this fall). I don''t know if you might recall me, but I was in your Employment Law class last year. I am also CC''ing Dean Lin, whom I have gotten to know over the years.
I write to you to express my sincerest displeasure with regards to the way some students are handling the invitation of a guest by Professor Wax. I was quite incensed to see flyers posted all across the school smearing Professor Wax''s character. In my opinion, this—along with the fact that some of her students in the Conservative Legal Thoughts class were harassed (boo-ed and hissed at)—shows an effort to intimidate, indicating a lack of respect for civil discourse.
To be clear, I understand that there are principles of free speech at play here. Students have a right to protest events which are not to their liking. I am not suggesting that the administration suppress their ability to share their viewpoints. I think, however, that there is something to be said here about how the administration has fostered an environment in which conservative students do not feel a likewise freedom to express their viewpoints. I suspect that if students were to post flyers across the school denouncing this belief system—that this new age conception of "White supremacy" is a religion, and that these disparate outcomes between different racial groups can be better explained by real intergroup differences with regards to attitude, behavior, and culture than systemic inequities—it would be met with a cold reception by the administration. I speculate that the law school would send a school-wide email stating that such viewpoints are incompatible with its values, denounce the viewpoints as "impermissible stereotyping", and remind students engaged in this behavior that while they are free to express their opinions, they cannot go around posting things across the building in a manner inconsistent with the posting rules (which are in plain display on billboards at the school). Similarly, if Black students were booed and hissed at by fellow students for attending an event sharing progressive (and I use this term loosely) viewpoints, the administration would have no qualms meting out punishment for the wrongdoers by holding that they were harassing students. This is, of course, just a conjecture, but my conclusion is based on my observations of the events that have unfolded here in these past few years, as well as my personal experience with the self-righteous mob at this school, an incident which Dean Lin has been made familiar. I felt the need to take a semester leave of absence because of them. Perhaps the law school administration does not have full control over the cultural milieu among its students, but it can surely set the tone for how those going in the profession of law should conduct themselves in the face of disagreements. In my opinion, it was a dereliction of duty for the previous Dean to denounce Professor Wax''s opinions, viewpoints, and factual statements (I happen to think that Professor Wax''s statements re: Black students not grading into the top quartile is most likely accurate in light of the lowered academic standards under which they were admitted, as offensive as this notion might be to some). He should have reaffirmed Penn''s commitment to free speech and left it at that. I hope that the current administration reassesses his position. If the law school aims to be content-neutral with regards to how they deal with such incidences, it should have to grapple with this de facto double-standard.
Now, I understand that perspectives may vary and that I cannot obligate the administration to do something, the pressing necessity of which the administration may feel differently than I do. I nevertheless wish to express that I think it incumbent upon the leadership to clearly communicate to these students that, though they are free to protest, their views are their own, that there are other students and academics within the building that disagree with them, and that these dissenters are not thereby "causing harm" or engaging acts of "verbal violence" by doing so. They are not aware of this. In my opinion, this self-righteous mob considers itself the ultimate arbiters of truth, and that those who oppose them do so because they have evil intentions. I have serious doubts as to whether those immersed in this way of thinking could engage in critical thinking.
Since my letter has some potent words, I would be remiss were I not to conclude by stating that I respect your authority as the Dean of the Law School. I likewise respect Dean Lin''s authority. I also happen to think that she has navigated these sorts of difficult situations with grace and integrity. I only write to you with the hopes that you might consider this perspective in rendering your decision—it is not an uncommon one within these halls.
Thank you for your time, and I hope that you are staying warm!
Sincerely, Charlie Cheon Show less
他发在youtube的关于学校里面的一件事情而发给LAW SCHOOL DEAN的letter。关于对保守派教授的不尊重，而作出的有理有据的申诉。读下来还是挺有逻辑的。
川川和川宝这两个叫法都让我哭笑不得
youtube 给我推这个黑人女孩。我看看版上的左派敢不敢外貌羞辱
借口，😄，你可以不看只听
主要是希望老川整治下烙印。太猖獗了。
现在这形势，留学生根本没机会留下来。我室友cs phd今年已经觉得海龟了。
再让拜登哈里斯胡闹下去，搞出台海战争，就不是被骂China virus这么轻了。
川宝，其实还是带点滑稽的可爱的
因为有的人看观点，有的人看外貌也不是问题啊。我会去听他的观点，但是他的外形和表情真的让人非常难受。实话实说没啥不可以。
哈？你在想啥？
看了开头就没法儿看了… 学校里典型的drama king，我同届有个白女就这样，被我们骂死。
哈哈姐上台 估计烙印来的更多。不过还要继续放非移 中国人可以非移进来
最twisted 的地方是他觉得white supremacist 不是个事儿，觉醒派不应该老揪着。
其实他自己也可以把学校到处都贴上anti-woke的小标语嘛，没人拦着他。估计他这个性格做派学校里也没啥人理他。
其实国外也有领袖崇拜只是民主教育比较深入。 一直觉得星球大战前传很有预言性。 民主的太久了人们就厌倦其低效，开始期待一个高效的领袖人物，真成帝国后又开始反抗。。。
吸毒最严重的州是个红州。而且红州都纷纷立法dei不包括种族性别但包括农村穷人了，未来红州的dei就算盛行也应该是农村白人和西裔拿dei了。话说红州关于dei立法都进行几年了，大家为啥对dei的理解还停留在旧版本？
为啥你觉得川上台就不会有台海战争？和党里面反华死硬派一群群的
万斯不就是靠DEI 上了耶鲁法学院？
不过Trump supporters 最擅长的就是这个，自己享受过的好处不愿意其他人享受。比如著名大法官汤玛斯靠DEI 上了大学成为最高大法官，特别反对DEI.
不知你怎么得出的吸毒最严重是红州？红州大麻都禁止，不像兰州大麻店都开到学校门口了。DEI都是对URM优待，那里会对穷人DEI？你试试你去找工作，说你穷看会不会被照顾？但如果是黑人，肯定是可以被照顾的。红州的DEI就是奥巴马后才有的，现在正在逐步取消（大学里面已经取消了）。
“万斯不就是靠DEI 上了耶鲁法学院”. 你有证据吗？你有Vance的GPA吗？有他的LSAT吗？哪一项证明他成绩差靠DEI进的？
万斯是上过战场的老兵，享受这种拿自己命换来的DEI天经地义
那叫gi bill不叫dei
除了人身攻击 还有啥招吗
没错 这世界真是黑白颠倒 猪党都把制度破坏成啥样了 眼睛瞎心也瞎
必须是 而且他们要的是结果平等 一般这种都是喜欢不劳而获的
喊川普独裁的 有脑子吗 你看到哪个独裁者被媒体天天骂的 独裁者第一个要素就是控制媒体 川普独裁个屁啊 天天被猪党控制的媒体骂成屎 别再人云亦云 被媒体牵着鼻子走了
左派可不就这样吗 人身攻击加扣帽子 至于逻辑和理想思维 不存在的
独裁不是一天之内就练成的，上一次做总统，他算是没有准备，没有把整个政府清洗一通，但是他每次讲话痛骂媒体，把媒体本有的监督功能消耗殆尽，这就为下一次上任打下基础。同时那个project2025（不要告诉我那个计划与川普无关，川普跟这个计划划清界限，甚至这个计划下架的唯一原因，是因为媒体和民主党分析和揭露了这个计划会导致独裁，不等于他们会真正放弃这个计划），完全为独裁画下了蓝图。
这话说的，川普没能独裁是他不想吗，是被制度限制了，别急再来四年，给你把高院宪法都改改，独裁指日可待
你是不是觉得富人家上藤校也是靠DEI？😄 只要不是中产家庭都是靠DEI？ 至于JD Vance，貌似是GI Bill cover了他的law school学费，这个是参军的人可以申请的。
看一个人一个党派，不能看他说了啥要看他做了啥：民主党最独裁，说让拜登下台就下台，哪怕装装样子做个投票啥的，都不装了。
吸毒的定义不是大麻好吧？吸毒的定义是白粉那种。这十几年很多吸毒的都不是因为大麻上瘾的，而是止痛药引起的上瘾，一发不可收拾，这个在红州特别严重
好像川普上台就可以整治第二夫人的同胞似的
如果言论自由就是woke mob，就请不要自称支持言论自由
和马应龙是一丘之貉
拜登自己推选，把自己的选票都清空了，哈里斯凭自己的能力说服了那些delegates，把选票给了她，有问题？
他都马上30, 不是小孩。
快速翻了下他其他视频，讲到mental health challenge, 他有anxiety之类。反正给人怒气冲冲感觉，听不下去。
他的布置非常简单（都接近潦草了），美国国旗上挂个亚洲美女，他的红t是oversized的。这一点都不符合他law School的背景。个人形象是他的brand，做YouTube有这么多人看呢，他未来雇主不会看吗？ 他的视频剪辑很多，尤其在开头部分，他向左上得凝视和嘴角的抽搐貌似不能受他自己控制。他的argument并没有一个law School graduate 应该有的深度。他年纪23，4岁的话还可能是因为对社会观察不足，要快30的话，个人觉得他的mental health challenge 还是比较大的。
靠DEI 进耶鲁不是坏事啊，现在他成为VP 候选人也证明耶鲁有眼光。你们怎么说得跟作弊一样是耻辱？
不是潦草是low… 一看就是母单solo 问题是投trump更加不利于这种底层男脱单
提到好几次在韩国餐馆打工 (not there is anything wrong with that), 可能想表达他也是working class?
前10名里红州多吧。
川普想在美国这种已经比较健全的民主制度下搞独裁毕竟不是一件容易的事，但是川普已经很大一部分成功了，至少在他的支持者中间。
首先是痛骂媒体，把所有的媒体都说成是民主党控制的，把自己装扮成受害者，这样可以disable 媒体的监督功能。
然后是在选举结果公布后拒不承认选举结果，直到January 6th 发动他的支持者胁迫Pence改变选举结果，被正直的 pence 拒绝后支持者更是叫着要吊死Pence. 本人历史知识比较缺乏，请问美国历史上还有哪位总统像他这样竞选失败后，拒不退位的？请问这不是想独裁是什么？更不用说Project 2025了。
这个楼里面很多回复都针对别人的外貌说三道四，显得非常浅薄和刻薄。不妨回家看看自己的亚裔孩子长啥样，举止是否奇怪。这个speaker 在周围的ABC里面既不奇怪，也不丑陋。很多回帖不能逻辑上反驳别人的观点，没有意识到视频男生学业有成，逻辑清晰，而是攻击别人长相，真是low啊。
要不先去纠正一下你的川主子？
low到不忍直视。一个个还所谓左派，评价起他人别说政治正确了，连基本的decency都不要。 想象他们这些恶毒评价，要是出自川普，或者白人，他们自己会作何反应？
他视频里表情比较特别，有眼睛的都能注意到。我只是说他不太像是故意的而已。 20来岁的青年人，我见的很多了，也聊的比较多。普通年轻人的举止，我还是有数的。
人家就是长得好看而且public speaking强啊 长眼了吗
上过什么战场 他是军队的采访人员 media officer
所以这些人跟trump没啥区别
你这自说自话的就给人定性dei 了。 他进yale 不适应是因为他的hillbilly 背景，很多其他人觉得理所当然的事情他不了解，像个outsider, 不是他成绩不合格好吧 对你们左派，靠dei当然不以为耻反以为荣了，可惜支持meritocracy 的大多数人不这么认为
你管这叫逻辑清晰？你家儿子屋里挂国旗美女？这人明显就是择偶食物链最底层 （左派不吭声右派直接告诉他）拿政治观点博出位。一个亚裔丑男川粉 这多奇葩啊 你被惊艳了 他目的达到了。