请不要传谣了： https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-katie-johnson-allegations-sexual-assault-case-dismissed-1921051 A viral post on social media is circulating a court document with allegations of sexual assault against former president Donald Trump made in a legal filing that was dismissed almost a decade ago. The post alleges that Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for this year's presidential election, "forced" young girls to "perform lesbian sex acts." It has amassed more than 17 millions views on X, formerly Twitter, since Monday, and has been shared more than 34,000 times. Some X users appeared to believe that the document is a recent filing. The post was shared after about 150 pages of transcripts related to a 2006 grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's rape and sex trafficking of teenagers was released to the public on Monday. However, the document included in the X post isn't connected to those papers, but actually comes from a lawsuit filed in the months leading up to the 2016 election by an anonymous plaintiff using the name "Katie Johnson." That lawsuit, filed in federal court in Riverside, California, in April 2016, named Trump and Epstein, the late convicted sex offender, as defendants. It claimed the men held Johnson as a "sex slave" in 1994 when she was 13 and forced her to perform sex acts. A judge dismissed the case in May that year, ruling that the complaint didn't raise valid claims under federal law, Politico reported at the time. Another version of the lawsuit was filed in June, but reportedly withdrawn months later. A third version of the suit—with the plaintiff going by "Jane Doe"—was filed in September 2016, accusing Trump of rape. That suit was also dropped months later. Trump's accuser had been expected to appear at a news conference in early November 2016, but her attorney, Lis Bloom, said she had received threats and was too afraid to show up. Doe's attorney, Thomas Meagher, then filed a notice to dismiss the case, without providing an explanation. The woman hasn't been heard from since. Alan Garten, Trump's then-lawyer, dismissed the woman's allegations as "categorically untrue" at the time. "It is completely frivolous. It is baseless. It is irresponsible," Garten told Politico. "I won't even discuss the merits because it gives it credibility that it doesn't deserve." A Trump spokesperson has been contacted for comment via email.
法庭文件怎么来的？ Viral post on social media?现在编造个什么东西放到社交媒体似乎很容易？ 看川普的几个子女都像是正经人家的孩子，如果爹是恋童癖，孩子不会受到丝毫影响？我是说家教这回事。反观拜登老头，闻小姑娘头发等等的鬼照那么多，看看他儿子亨特，就知道不奇怪。川普的孩子看着没有这样的，他三个老婆，几个孩子在这方面都没有出格报道。所以我对这个报道还是存疑吧先
Bigridge 发表于 2024-07-04 16:35 法庭文件怎么来的？ Viral post on social media?现在编造个什么东西放到社交媒体似乎很容易？ 看川普的几个子女都像是正经人家的孩子，如果爹是恋童癖，孩子不会受到丝毫影响？我是说家教这回事。反观拜登老头，闻小姑娘头发等等的鬼照那么多，看看他儿子亨特，就知道不奇怪。川普的孩子看着没有这样的，他三个老婆，几个孩子在这方面都没有出格报道。所以我对这个报道还是存疑吧先
我帖子说的是法庭文件的内容 你在这扯什么viral post。我不知道你指的什么post，但是你”辟谣”之前能不能读一下法庭文件的证人证词和通话记录？ 你贴那个“新闻”，并没有否认法庭文件里面任何指控。 反而你这个发言捕风捉影颠倒黑白有点太明显了 Biden就因为年龄比trump老了3岁，被主流媒体口诛笔伐。但凡Biden这方面有一点问题，估计NYT要把这个放头版头条一个月了 你指控Biden那些捕风捉影编造的东西和under path and penalty of perjury 下证人证词相比简直不值一提 你非要捕风捉影 OK我随手给你找几个trump当众亲吻小女孩的你好好看看
Bigridge 发表于 2024-07-04 16:35 法庭文件怎么来的？ Viral post on social media?现在编造个什么东西放到社交媒体似乎很容易？ 看川普的几个子女都像是正经人家的孩子，如果爹是恋童癖，孩子不会受到丝毫影响？我是说家教这回事。反观拜登老头，闻小姑娘头发等等的鬼照那么多，看看他儿子亨特，就知道不奇怪。川普的孩子看着没有这样的，他三个老婆，几个孩子在这方面都没有出格报道。所以我对这个报道还是存疑吧先
AlexW 发表于 2024-07-04 16:21 请不要传谣了： https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-katie-johnson-allegations-sexual-assault-case-dismissed-1921051 A viral post on social media is circulating a court document with allegations of sexual assault against former president Donald Trump made in a legal filing that was dismissed almost a decade ago. The post alleges that Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for this year's presidential election, "forced" young girls to "perform lesbian sex acts." It has amassed more than 17 millions views on X, formerly Twitter, since Monday, and has been shared more than 34,000 times. Some X users appeared to believe that the document is a recent filing. The post was shared after about 150 pages of transcripts related to a 2006 grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's rape and sex trafficking of teenagers was released to the public on Monday. However, the document included in the X post isn't connected to those papers, but actually comes from a lawsuit filed in the months leading up to the 2016 election by an anonymous plaintiff using the name "Katie Johnson." That lawsuit, filed in federal court in Riverside, California, in April 2016, named Trump and Epstein, the late convicted sex offender, as defendants. It claimed the men held Johnson as a "sex slave" in 1994 when she was 13 and forced her to perform sex acts. A judge dismissed the case in May that year, ruling that the complaint didn't raise valid claims under federal law, Politico reported at the time. Another version of the lawsuit was filed in June, but reportedly withdrawn months later. A third version of the suit—with the plaintiff going by "Jane Doe"—was filed in September 2016, accusing Trump of rape. That suit was also dropped months later. Trump's accuser had been expected to appear at a news conference in early November 2016, but her attorney, Lis Bloom, said she had received threats and was too afraid to show up. Doe's attorney, Thomas Meagher, then filed a notice to dismiss the case, without providing an explanation. The woman hasn't been heard from since. Alan Garten, Trump's then-lawyer, dismissed the woman's allegations as "categorically untrue" at the time. "It is completely frivolous. It is baseless. It is irresponsible," Garten told Politico. "I won't even discuss the merits because it gives it credibility that it doesn't deserve." A Trump spokesperson has been contacted for comment via email.
这周公布的法庭文件原文：
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24785612-epstein-transcripts
这么大的事情 唯一深度报道法庭文件具体内容的英文媒体只有BBC和印度媒体 美国主流媒体一起哑巴了 为什么呢？我分析两个原因 1 主流媒体幕后老板已经下决心要让美国纳粹化独裁化了。一定力推trump和纳粹党上台。你看这几天主流媒体以NYT和CN N为首，一致集中火力攻击Biden年龄 看来Biden太完美了，除了年龄别的没有办法攻击。想一下如果这周萝莉岛法庭文件里面揭露的是Biden强奸男女幼童若干名，你觉得媒体会怎么攻击？ 2 也有一部分原因是鬼都怕恶人。trump今天公开说，上台后要处决说他坏话的记者。现在有共和党高院无限豁免判决护体，他这个就不仅仅是威胁了。记者们第一线接触这些，自然清楚trump再次上台后真能干出杀他们头的事情。 你如果是那个记者，你敢把你名字签到那个揭露他萝莉岛罪行的报道上吗？ 显然还是骂Biden太老了安全的多啊！不就是个工作吗，犯不上为了真像去和自己脑袋过不去
评价一句：这群巨富阶层真会玩，而且真是有钱玩呢
而且男女通吃啊？连小男孩也吃？
法庭文件我都贴了
你贴哪里假的证据啊？
真是一张嘴，张口就撒谎
MAGA是邪教你不知道吗？
恐怕把自己女儿献给教主都是很正常的 还打趴下呢
法庭文件自己去看不行吗？
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24785612-epstein-transcripts
你看了恋童癖trump的法庭文件，得出来的结论就是这个？！
而且trump可不是只强奸小女孩啊。你看它的和解赔款里面有两个小男孩的名字
就和那些神父和教父一样，难怪那么多教会支持一个恋童癖
他们也希望自己的所做所为被自己的信徒们认可
更正一下。又看了一下法庭文件，是3个小男孩
trump这点还是公正的，男女平等，哪边都不能拉下
这些有没有证据，能不能把这个垃圾送进监狱呢？
不过其他人的信息不公布却只公布某某人的的确说不过去
我觉得都是政治把柄被某些人/机关拿住了
大家都知道去萝莉岛是干什么去的 谁也不用装
这些都是法庭的证据 可惜那个女孩一家被死亡威胁了
这些难道不是重罪吗，为什么他没事儿呢？ 这些只是指控还是真的证据确凿，我实在无法想象在美国如果证据确凿他还能安然无恙，就算是总统也该被抓起来啊。
被死亡威胁然后就不告了？ 政府都不管吗？ 都说美国法治健全，这是健全个啥啊。
问bill barr啊
前几天stormy daniels的interview中有说道她这几年的颠沛流离，她女儿的安全非常有问题
从火星刚回来吧？
给你更新一下，共和党最高法院说了trump犯任任何法律豁免
你看纽约已经定罪的34宗重罪，目前判决不也被迫推迟了吗？
Welcome back to earth!
你以为国王犯法与庶民同罪呢？
哦最高法院刚说了，国王有无限豁免权
Welcome to earth
哪里假了，
平时不关心这个垃圾的新闻。刚看了这些法庭文件，真被恶心到了。这种畜生选出来当总统，真想骂脏话了
主流媒体对这个一句话没报道
都是外国媒体报道的
主流媒体都在骂Biden太老了呢
你就知道主流媒体都是可疑的在保护谁
你这发言和trump是一个模式啊
我哪里哪句话说trump是这个案子defendant了？你能不能问问GPT让他帮你翻译一下你贴这个新闻里面具体内容呢？
我都把你帖那个新闻里面提到的法庭文件PDF贴到主帖子里了，你看过了吗，读懂了吗？没读过你凭什颠倒黑白混淆视听？
这是这两天刚解封的法庭文件，你再仔细读读再再下结论
主流媒体有人说，Biden当政我上电视曝光的时间比trump在台上的时候少多了。 现在各大媒体的老板都是gop，包括cnn
我都把法庭文件PDF贴到主贴里了
highlight也截屏了，然而不妨碍床粉在回帖里继续喊着“谎言，胡说！”
这些人行为也体现了大环境：真像不重要。谁嗓门最大，送给最蛮横野蛮，谁就有话语权。
为啥美国主流媒体这两天安静的要命，只是不停的攻击Biden年龄？因为trump说了，谁敢写他不好的调查新闻，他上台就用最高法院给的绝对豁免权处决记者
所谓鬼都怕恶人
我记得以前都是川普这边痛骂主流媒体的，奇怪什么时候主流媒体帮着川普了？
而且，最开始爱坡斯坦案子出来的时候，我记得的是克林顿是常客，后来他不是死在监狱里了吗？这都很久的案子了，怎么突然爆出川普来了？是不是因为竞选总统，眼看着拜登辩论不行，党内也出现劝退声浪，然后出来的幺蛾子。。。
对啊，要爆就都把所有名单都爆出来，干嘛只爆一个人？这双标太赤裸裸了。
你说的那些都是bots的misinformation。trump集团为了混淆视听，转移矛盾制造出来的混乱信息。这个是纳粹党戈贝尔宣传机器方法手册里面很重要的一条
一般人，没有仔细跟踪每一个原始法庭文件记录，很容易被搞晕乎
事实是这周公布了当年的法庭文件，里面没有Clinton屁事，倒是trump出现过很多次，有多个目击证人各个角度证词证据链佐证的
Epstein当时是死在trump台上时候司法部监狱里的。他死了，自然不可能有公开庭审展示这些证据，让这些证人上庭佐证了
看了这些法庭文件，很好理解trump为什么一定要让Epstein灭口
，媒体不报道，但是可以自己看法庭解封文件。
A viral post on social media is circulating a court document with allegations of sexual assault against former president Donald Trump made in a legal filing that was dismissed almost a decade ago.
The post alleges that Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for this year's presidential election, "forced" young girls to "perform lesbian sex acts." It has amassed more than 17 millions views on X, formerly Twitter, since Monday, and has been shared more than 34,000 times.
Some X users appeared to believe that the document is a recent filing. The post was shared after about 150 pages of transcripts related to a 2006 grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's rape and sex trafficking of teenagers was released to the public on Monday.
However, the document included in the X post isn't connected to those papers, but actually comes from a lawsuit filed in the months leading up to the 2016 election by an anonymous plaintiff using the name "Katie Johnson."
That lawsuit, filed in federal court in Riverside, California, in April 2016, named Trump and Epstein, the late convicted sex offender, as defendants. It claimed the men held Johnson as a "sex slave" in 1994 when she was 13 and forced her to perform sex acts.
A judge dismissed the case in May that year, ruling that the complaint didn't raise valid claims under federal law, Politico reported at the time.
Another version of the lawsuit was filed in June, but reportedly withdrawn months later. A third version of the suit—with the plaintiff going by "Jane Doe"—was filed in September 2016, accusing Trump of rape. That suit was also dropped months later.
Trump's accuser had been expected to appear at a news conference in early November 2016, but her attorney, Lis Bloom, said she had received threats and was too afraid to show up. Doe's attorney, Thomas Meagher, then filed a notice to dismiss the case, without providing an explanation. The woman hasn't been heard from since.
Alan Garten, Trump's then-lawyer, dismissed the woman's allegations as "categorically untrue" at the time. "It is completely frivolous. It is baseless. It is irresponsible," Garten told Politico. "I won't even discuss the merits because it gives it credibility that it doesn't deserve."
A Trump spokesperson has been contacted for comment via email.
全部法庭文件我原文PDF都在主贴里贴了
你指控别人动机不纯之前能不能自己睁开眼睛看看再指控？
你看看文件里有没有trump的恶行描述。同理，文件里没有的（比如没有Biden你让别人凭空捏造一个出来吗？）
这么大的事情
唯一深度报道法庭文件具体内容的英文媒体只有BBC和印度媒体
美国主流媒体一起哑巴了
为什么呢？我分析两个原因
1 主流媒体幕后老板已经下决心要让美国纳粹化独裁化了。一定力推trump和纳粹党上台。你看这几天主流媒体以NYT和CN N为首，一致集中火力攻击Biden年龄
看来Biden太完美了，除了年龄别的没有办法攻击。想一下如果这周萝莉岛法庭文件里面揭露的是Biden强奸男女幼童若干名，你觉得媒体会怎么攻击？
2 也有一部分愿意上鬼都怕恶人。trump今天公开说，上台后药处决说他坏话的记者。现在有共和党高院无限豁免判决护体，他这个就不仅仅是威胁了。记者们第一线接触这些，自然清楚trump能干出杀他们头的事情。
你如果是那个记者，你敢把你名字签到那个揭露他萝莉岛罪行的报道上吗？
显然还是骂Biden太老了安全的多啊！
我帖子说的是法庭文件的内容
你在这扯什么viral post。我不知道你指的什么post，但是你”辟谣”之前能不能读一下法庭文件的证人证词和通话记录？
你贴那个“新闻”，并没有否认法庭文件里面任何指控。
反而你这个发言捕风捉影颠倒黑白有点太明显了
Biden就因为年龄比trump老了3岁，被主流媒体口诛笔伐。但凡Biden这方面有一点问题，估计NYT要把这个放头版头条一个月了
你指控Biden那些捕风捉影编造的东西和under path and penalty of perjury 下证人证词相比简直不值一提
你非要捕风捉影 OK我随手给你找几个trump当众亲吻小女孩的你好好看看
看来Biden太完美了，除了年龄别的没有办法攻击。想一下如果这周萝莉岛法庭文件里面揭露的是Biden强奸男女幼童若干名，你觉得媒体会怎么攻击？
一看你说这些就不奇怪了，就知道你是哪头儿的了，笑而不语
来 喜欢捕风捉影的你 你仔细看看trump亲小女孩嘴的视频
我是哪头的？
我是facts这头的
你说说我的道理逻辑哪点有问题，直接指出来不需要辩论不过就来人身攻击
一搜一大堆你喜欢的
喜欢捕风捉影而蔑视法庭文件的你，要不要找个Biden和Epstein在萝莉岛的合影证明一下你的观点？
废话。作为家里有小娃的家长，我特别痛恨恋童癖强奸儿童的强奸犯
你呢？
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/epstein-trump-young-girl-photo/
往前翻 看我周一写的仔细解读共和党最高法院的判决
长话短说，回答你问题，它可以强奸萝莉，然后禁止调查就可以了。不准调查不准立案，不就等于可以合法pedo吗
这个程序，完全符合最高法院判决 （具体法理分析去看我那个原帖里面关于他可以合法的控制司法部所有调查和立案的那段引用最高法院判决原话）
除非证明他猥亵儿童是总统的official act
去看我周一分析贴
怎么定义official最终解释权在那6个共和党“法官”手里。不需要定规pedo强奸幼童是否是official act。人家法官已经说了，总统有权停职任何调查和起诉，可以任意压制证据（就是把证据化为机密文件）
这个方面，共和党“法官”想的想当周全的，几乎无懈可击
re。没有必要让自己丢credit。 trump满嘴谎言是因为他的选民不在乎。如果反trump的也不讲事实，那跟trump有什么区别？
是有很大的风险。基本同意你的判断，美国现在是想走独裁。 但你无法改变这个趋势，因为很多人认为这是对抗中国和普京的办法，至少要试一试。虽然我觉得很蠢。国情文化不一样，这么干后果和代价是什么无法预知
首先你仔细看法庭文件截屏了吗？Newsweek一个已经被卖了几次的不入流网络媒体你就当作证据而不自己去看法庭文件！
第二，回答你问题，哪怕我说错了（并没有）区别是一个送你进焚尸炉，一个保护你不要进焚尸炉。
如果那些人因为对抗中国和普金支持trump我只能说智商欠费了
这么多证据，trump就是普金的狗啊。要把欧洲拱手送给普金。亚洲拱手送给xi
退回美洲集中力量搞女人子宫
你引用的原文真恶心
我同意你他们智商欠费。但你也不要太生气了
楼主我给你说说我知道的。。。我一直在这个论坛上多多少少的透露一些。。。这个世界不会变好，有能力自保为主。曾经扭转过乾坤的人已经后悔了，现在能量在全方位的从很多层面撤出。。。独裁就独裁，实在不行走人，很多东西是共业所致，个人能力有限，做到问心无愧即可。
具体能量撤出到什么时候，会导致什么结果没人知道。我能说的是，单纯从业力角度分析，华人在美国很有可能会被抢一波，但具体什么时候以什么形式我不知道。因为天下没有免费的午餐，抢了国内人的血汗钱，跑到哪里也没用，最后必然会被抢。老实在美国读书打工的不用担心，你没抢过别人的，自然不用担心自己被抢。
川普当选算是冤亲债主要讨债。四年前有人已经为华人挡过一次了，这次不会再挡。我这么说算是泄露天机，但泄露不泄露的也只能这样。不想被讨债那一开始就别欠别人的。。。能量再大也填不了自己作死的坑。。。
走人？去火星吗？
这个只能看情况了。。。美国也不是铁板一块，全国有至少一半的人不支持纳粹和gop。也许最后会分裂，也许会衰落。
个人来讲也管不了那么多，尽量多做点好事，随机应变即可。熬过这次震荡也许还会有点幸福稳定的时光。
哈哈哈 那只能红州蓝州都置产，华人强项嘛
那这个没人知道了。。。每个人有每个人的命数。自己管好自己。
谢谢你写了这么多
你这么说我倒是有点宽心了，从来没做过坏事，所以心里很坦然。
你说的也对，美国这么大的国家，纳粹党和trump就算真的按希特勒的指南做，恐怕也不一定就一定能达到它们幻想的那个效果。分裂是不可避免的，但是不可能不抵抗一下就让纳粹党横行的
哪里有什么狼来了
trump和纳粹党的所作所为从来都是比最糟糕的预测更离谱更极端
你说这周这个判决，你想象到美国独立200多年之后又重新加冕个皇帝出来吗？
小心别为别人背业就可以了。我就干过这蠢事现在也只能一点点弥补。。。
以前国内各种运动文革整了那么多人，没收了那么多人的财产，他们必然要追讨。有人就傻乎乎的替国内挡了一部分，结果最后被整得很惨。华人四年前关键时刻也有人出手相助了，不然不会是拜登。。。当时华人川粉多么嚣张，白给了他们四年平静的时光。现在我的看法是冤有头债有主，既然这么喜欢川普和种族主义者，那就成全他们。。。一般人少参与这些事情，自己播种自己收割，自己尽量保护好自己即可。
这群变态为什么连小男孩也不放过？这有什么意思？