还需要参议院批准，但作为国防授权法案的一部分，极大概率通过。 我乡下邻居转给我的，他上周还去看了DJI经销商的T50农业无人机演示，四乡八里去了老多人围观，现在大概都要黄掉了。极大利好美国国内的无人机制造商，因为DJI之外全是小杂鱼，它被封杀后，市场是空白的等着大家来填空。 https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/DJI-drone-ban-passes-in-U-S-House/5-2731165/ The United States House of Representatives passed a ban on the future sale of DJI drones in the U.S. on Friday, making the DJI ban more likely than not. The "Countering CCP Drones Act" is part of the United States'''' 2025 National Defense Authorization Act (FY25 NDAA), a major piece of yearly legislation allotting defense spending for the coming year. Drone maker DJI is based in China and controls over 70% of the world''''s drone market share, a combination that threatens U.S. lawmakers. As we first reported in April, 6% of DJI stock lies in the hands of Chinese state-owned businesses, which has led to fears of Chinese government backdoors, national security risks, and other fears of Chinese surveillance using the company''''s drones. And of course, there lies the more real concern for U.S. lawmakers that DJI''''s success would continue to strengthen the Chinese economy. Elise Stefanik, the Republican representative from New York who sponsors the anti-DJI legislation, said of the drones, "DJI presents an unacceptable national security risk, and it is past time that drones made by Communist China are removed from America." Of course, this unacceptable risk has not seemed to faze the U.S. military and police complex, which generally favors use of the drones in law enforcement. DJI products have also been used in the Russian war against Ukraine, a use-case U.S. lawmakers fear though DJI has denounced all military use of its drones. The Countering CCP Drones Act, along with a scattering of other pet laws and culture war staples, is buried within the folds of this year''''s National Defense Authorization Act. The NDAA must be passed every year, though some political theater may delay its passage, and both houses of the United States Congress (the House of Representatives and the Senate) have moved the spending bill through its early phases. The House has fully passed the bill, including the Countering CCP Drones Act, and now we wait for the Senate to pass its version, so the two can be combined and signed into law by President Biden. The current state of legislation would not prohibit the use of already purchased DJI drones in the United States, only the sale of DJI products in the U.S. Doing so would eliminate the most popular and highest-end drones used in the United States. The bill, while popular in Congress, still has a chance of being stopped. Concerned U.S. residents who disagree with the bill should contact their U.S. Senators and ask for the Countering CCP Drones Act to be dropped from the NDAA. While not as direct an attack on China as some moves associated with the U.S.-China trade war over semiconductors, the DJI ban would follow a tradition of tariffs and bans against successful Chinese companies in the U.S. Most bans affect the most commercially successful companies and entities from operation in the U.S., though lawmakers claim the goal is safety rather than a trade conflict. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently argued, "What we''''re focused on is only the most sensitive technology that could pose a threat to our security. We''''re not focused on cutting off trade, or for that matter containing or holding back China."
哎你别说，已经有了: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/05/01/china-data-propaganda-aspi-report/ Report: China’s propaganda units harvest data from overseas tech firms 里面《原神》就赫然在列……
mtwash 发表于 2024-06-17 15:22 还需要参议院批准，但作为国防授权法案的一部分，极大概率通过。 我乡下邻居转给我的，他上周还去看了DJI经销商的T50农业无人机演示，四乡八里去了老多人围观，现在大概都要黄掉了。极大利好美国国内的无人机制造商，因为DJI之外全是小杂鱼，它被封杀后，市场是空白的等着大家来填空。 https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/DJI-drone-ban-passes-in-U-S-House/5-2731165/ The United States House of Representatives passed a ban on the future sale of DJI drones in the U.S. on Friday, making the DJI ban more likely than not. The "Countering CCP Drones Act" is part of the United States'''' 2025 National Defense Authorization Act (FY25 NDAA), a major piece of yearly legislation allotting defense spending for the coming year. Drone maker DJI is based in China and controls over 70% of the world''''s drone market share, a combination that threatens U.S. lawmakers. As we first reported in April, 6% of DJI stock lies in the hands of Chinese state-owned businesses, which has led to fears of Chinese government backdoors, national security risks, and other fears of Chinese surveillance using the company''''s drones. And of course, there lies the more real concern for U.S. lawmakers that DJI''''s success would continue to strengthen the Chinese economy. Elise Stefanik, the Republican representative from New York who sponsors the anti-DJI legislation, said of the drones, "DJI presents an unacceptable national security risk, and it is past time that drones made by Communist China are removed from America." Of course, this unacceptable risk has not seemed to faze the U.S. military and police complex, which generally favors use of the drones in law enforcement. DJI products have also been used in the Russian war against Ukraine, a use-case U.S. lawmakers fear though DJI has denounced all military use of its drones. The Countering CCP Drones Act, along with a scattering of other pet laws and culture war staples, is buried within the folds of this year''''s National Defense Authorization Act. The NDAA must be passed every year, though some political theater may delay its passage, and both houses of the United States Congress (the House of Representatives and the Senate) have moved the spending bill through its early phases. The House has fully passed the bill, including the Countering CCP Drones Act, and now we wait for the Senate to pass its version, so the two can be combined and signed into law by President Biden. The current state of legislation would not prohibit the use of already purchased DJI drones in the United States, only the sale of DJI products in the U.S. Doing so would eliminate the most popular and highest-end drones used in the United States. The bill, while popular in Congress, still has a chance of being stopped. Concerned U.S. residents who disagree with the bill should contact their U.S. Senators and ask for the Countering CCP Drones Act to be dropped from the NDAA. While not as direct an attack on China as some moves associated with the U.S.-China trade war over semiconductors, the DJI ban would follow a tradition of tariffs and bans against successful Chinese companies in the U.S. Most bans affect the most commercially successful companies and entities from operation in the U.S., though lawmakers claim the goal is safety rather than a trade conflict. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently argued, "What we''''re focused on is only the most sensitive technology that could pose a threat to our security. We''''re not focused on cutting off trade, or for that matter containing or holding back China."
我乡下邻居转给我的，他上周还去看了DJI经销商的T50农业无人机演示，四乡八里去了老多人围观，现在大概都要黄掉了。极大利好美国国内的无人机制造商，因为DJI之外全是小杂鱼，它被封杀后，市场是空白的等着大家来填空。
https://www.ar15.com/forums/General/DJI-drone-ban-passes-in-U-S-House/5-2731165/
The United States House of Representatives passed a ban on the future sale of DJI drones in the U.S. on Friday, making the DJI ban more likely than not. The "Countering CCP Drones Act" is part of the United States'''' 2025 National Defense Authorization Act (FY25 NDAA), a major piece of yearly legislation allotting defense spending for the coming year.
Drone maker DJI is based in China and controls over 70% of the world''''s drone market share, a combination that threatens U.S. lawmakers. As we first reported in April, 6% of DJI stock lies in the hands of Chinese state-owned businesses, which has led to fears of Chinese government backdoors, national security risks, and other fears of Chinese surveillance using the company''''s drones. And of course, there lies the more real concern for U.S. lawmakers that DJI''''s success would continue to strengthen the Chinese economy.
Elise Stefanik, the Republican representative from New York who sponsors the anti-DJI legislation, said of the drones, "DJI presents an unacceptable national security risk, and it is past time that drones made by Communist China are removed from America." Of course, this unacceptable risk has not seemed to faze the U.S. military and police complex, which generally favors use of the drones in law enforcement. DJI products have also been used in the Russian war against Ukraine, a use-case U.S. lawmakers fear though DJI has denounced all military use of its drones.
The Countering CCP Drones Act, along with a scattering of other pet laws and culture war staples, is buried within the folds of this year''''s National Defense Authorization Act. The NDAA must be passed every year, though some political theater may delay its passage, and both houses of the United States Congress (the House of Representatives and the Senate) have moved the spending bill through its early phases. The House has fully passed the bill, including the Countering CCP Drones Act, and now we wait for the Senate to pass its version, so the two can be combined and signed into law by President Biden.
The current state of legislation would not prohibit the use of already purchased DJI drones in the United States, only the sale of DJI products in the U.S. Doing so would eliminate the most popular and highest-end drones used in the United States. The bill, while popular in Congress, still has a chance of being stopped. Concerned U.S. residents who disagree with the bill should contact their U.S. Senators and ask for the Countering CCP Drones Act to be dropped from the NDAA.
While not as direct an attack on China as some moves associated with the U.S.-China trade war over semiconductors, the DJI ban would follow a tradition of tariffs and bans against successful Chinese companies in the U.S. Most bans affect the most commercially successful companies and entities from operation in the U.S., though lawmakers claim the goal is safety rather than a trade conflict. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently argued, "What we''''re focused on is only the most sensitive technology that could pose a threat to our security. We''''re not focused on cutting off trade, or for that matter containing or holding back China."
三十年河东三十年河西，现在都反过来了
哈哈哈哈哈哈 真的假的。哎。不过美国想闭关锁国也很难啊。现代人有网络，信息是锁不住的。
下一步大概率原神这种游戏都会因为国家安全问题而被封杀
在美国其他说客可以大行其道。中国的不可以。
你说的太对了。 独裁专制国家的富裕强大肯定对世界造成威胁。 就如同二战之前德国日本强大给世界带来莫大灾难一样。
有啥准备， DJI牛逼的是飞控， 而不是部件， 部件很多都是日本美国产品，当然有自己的
现在美国已经有公司ｃｏｐｙ DJI的算法，就等着DJI被ban 之后就开始侵权销售
看来你这俨然已经准备好，可以告美国公司然后发一笔横财啊。
以后把无人机飞到美国参众两院还有大法官的官邸，拍下他们男盗女娼的丑态百出。
屁用没有，你以为他们没花钱？现在只要加上China一词，啥都能通过。
买一只dji1000刀，ban了。 现在军队是靠租的，一个月就算2000刀也很合理吧？服务费用得算进去，另外老爷们辛辛苦苦开的公司总不能亏本吧？
总结，还是税太好收了。
太naive了，一句national security神挡杀神佛挡杀佛，不要拿法律当挡箭牌，两院分分钟可以通过法律dji/hw/任何中国公司的专利无效
凡事都拿法律当挡箭牌，还是比，不要用法律当挡箭牌，高级一些。
不对吧,
日本80年代是民主国家啊..
80年代的美国媒体,包括电视,针对日本充满了敌意
把日本宣传成了敌人
DJI现在生意根本忙不过来.
乌克兰和俄罗斯才是DJI无人机的大客户,
而且不太需要大疆给他们提供售后
re, 有朋友联系大疆想帮他哥哥（东欧小国）咨询一个大几百万美元的订单， 人家根本没理他
东欧小国联系大疆,
基本上都是乌克兰的单子,转运到乌克兰的
捷克？
民主自由的英国，殖民奴役全球，到处搞种族灭绝 民主自由的美国，靠屠杀进行野蛮扩张，把全球当成自家后院，随意侵略颠覆轰炸其他国家 民主自由的以色列，正在忙着搞种族屠杀
所以你想说啥？
高级在哪里？妓女vs婊子？
涉中法案米帝两院白宫一条龙服务，一天搞N条涉中法案不是梦，而且可以完全不要脸。。中国好歹还要顾及舆情热搜还要维稳，中国的p民也难缠多了，啥事都要要个说法。米国顺民多洗脑彻底，更何况凡涉中的话题根本就不需要理由
韭菜要圣旨？现在给它写一个。
人家一碗水端平，不搞双标，要点赞， lol
美国所谓的国家安全就是资本家和议员的安全 对于普通老百姓来说能用上更好的产品才是最大的安全
也不能这么说，美国这种半殖民地半封建的宗教国家，也还是对人类做了一些贡献。
好耳熟：宁要资本主义的草，也不要共产主义的苗
真的，这两天我手机推了几个报道，一个是墨西哥有几个厂商会贴牌大疆，另外一个是美国自己的几家无人机公司核心部件也是大疆的，好像走的是当年陈进打磨芯片的路子
中国有好多公司做专用无人机，几十万不比大疆差，看过一家农用无人机，做得也很厉害，和大疆竞争抢南美的订单
我鳖哪有这么小的气量。
我鳖最大的优点就是能忍，唾脸自干；这次老习不是明说了吗：老美就是想引诱他打台湾，他就是不上当。
主要贡献是提供 F1 签证 + H1B 一条龙服务
嗯， 我也刷过打农药的视频， 唉， 小时候俺还在玉米地里打过药能， 叶子拉人， 难受死了。
哎你别说，已经有了:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/05/01/china-data-propaganda-aspi-report/
Report: China’s propaganda units harvest data from overseas tech firms 里面《原神》就赫然在列……
农用无人机的门槛相对比较低，因为农业无人机速度慢，对动力要求低；避障的需求小，对AI的要求低；控制的距离近，所以对图传通信的要求低。乌克兰自己战前就有农业无人机公司，但无法拿去打仗——DJI的图传系统的传输距离十倍于乌克兰无人机，而且特别稳定可靠。
哈哈，这是我今天跟乡下房子的邻居聊天后了解到的，以前还真没关心过农业无人机。他想买一台喷洒无人机来用，刚刚去看了DJI演示，结果要封了。
DJI的运货无人机Flycart 30才是真家伙，酬载30公斤的情况下可以飞18公里，控制器通信距离20公里，飞行速度可以达到每小时70公里。最机智的一个特征是可以多个操作员在不同地区操作。
以前乌克兰俄罗斯能买到的商业无人机酬载只有10公斤，装一枚火箭弹差不多了。现在可以装30到40公斤的装置，就可以装上小口径无后座力空对地导弹，后方操作员把导弹装好后从后方起飞，然后飞到前线，由工事里的士兵接手操控，精确打击自己想要打击的目标。
以前陆战中密接支持（Close Support），是前方报坐标，后方的导弹、飞机和大炮炸坐标，前方只能看着；现在进入新的时代了，后方送无人机带着导弹过来，无人机自带摄像头，前方战士接管后自己在看视频调整如何攻击。乌克兰和俄罗斯现在在海外和深圳搜刮这种DJI的无人机。
美国警察和救灾组织很多都在用DJI无人机
老习的话你也信 有老美智库分析老习性格，其中一条就是，当面发誓保证南海诸岛不会军事化，然后，就不可说了
老共要动手就是准备好了。
填岛是胡景涛时候的事情了吧
我查了一下，南海填海造岛是从2013年开始的，大部分都是14和15年造的。我对习收复台湾还是寄予厚望的，觉得这人ready前能忍，ready后出手果断不拖泥带水。
那以后岂不是墨西哥变成北美的香港 最新最好的东西都在墨西哥 美国人都无比的向往墨西哥
南海周边不弄一下，越菲这些会得寸进尺。所以国家利益为上，哪能只听美国欧洲的。
禁大江还需要专门立个法吗？脱裤子放屁，直接危害国家安全就禁了
这都多少年的老谣言了，还在这里鬼扯
中国保证南海诸岛不军事化是有前提的，就是美军停止在南海的无理骚扰 结果美国完全没理，甚至进一步加大所谓的freedom of navigation行动，那么中国也就自然需要进行军事化，不然难道还要赤手空拳的面对全副武装的美国军舰？？
中国几千年世界老大，也没像美国到处跨洋打仗。不理解说这种话的人啥心态，美国做的看不见，还没发生的就在这里扣帽子。
去掉大疆机身上的商标，contractor们倒几次手，趁着部门换掉大疆的机会，又可以从政府采购中大捞一笔