The United States letter to the ICC Office of the Prosecutor, basically threatening not only the prosecutor but the prosecutor’s FAMILY if they issue warrants for Israeli war crimes, like an old Mafia organisation.
🇮🇱Israel Lobby Paid 12 members of Congress $6,337,803 who issued a letter threatening the International Criminal Court (ICC), its members & their families if ICC charges🇮🇱for War Crimes.
Israel 🇮🇱 prime minister @netanyahu in Holocaust Remembrance Day:
“In the Holocaust, no nation came to our aid. Today again, we face enemies bent on our destruction. If Israel is forced to stand alone, Israel will stand alone. We will defeat our enemies. NEVER AGAIN IS NOW.” pic.twitter.com/mCI2N9Aowj — Dr. Eli David (@DrEliDavid) May 5, 2024
你们就不能离开华人网自己学习一下。真是不知死啊。这里真都是走线的啊。带路的啊。真的可以举报给fbi把这里一锅端了。 这里是法案原文。 https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6090/text 118th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6090AN ACT To provide for the consideration of a definition of antisemitism set forth by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education programs or activities, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1.SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the “Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023”. SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that— (1) title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance; (2) while such title does not cover discrimination based solely on religion, individuals who face discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics do not lose protection under such title for also being members of a group that share a common religion; (3) discrimination against Jews may give rise to a violation of such title when the discrimination is based on race, color, or national origin, which can include discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics; (4) it is the policy of the United States to enforce such title against prohibited forms of discrimination rooted in antisemitism as vigorously as against all other forms of discrimination prohibited by such title; and (5) as noted in the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism issued by the White House on May 25, 2023, it is critical to— (A) increase awareness and understanding of antisemitism, including its threat to America; (B) improve safety and security for Jewish communities; (C) reverse the normalization of antisemitism and counter antisemitic discrimination; and (D) expand communication and collaboration between communities. SEC. 3. FINDINGS. Congress finds the following: (1) Antisemitism is on the rise in the United States and is impacting Jewish students in K–12 schools, colleges, and universities. (2) The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (referred to in this Act as the “IHRA”) Working Definition of Antisemitism is a vital tool which helps individuals understand and identify the various manifestations of antisemitism. (3) On December 11, 2019, Executive Order 13899 extended protections against discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to individuals subjected to antisemitism on college and university campuses and tasked Federal agencies to consider the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when enforcing title VI of such Act. (4) Since 2018, the Department of Education has used the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when investigating violations of that title VI. (5) The use of alternative definitions of antisemitism impairs enforcement efforts by adding multiple standards and may fail to identify many of the modern manifestations of antisemitism. (6) The White House released the first-ever United States National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism on May 25, 2023, making clear that the fight against this hate is a national, bipartisan priority that must be successfully conducted through a whole-of-government-and-society approach. SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Act, the term “definition of antisemitism”— (1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and (2) includes the “[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism” identified in the IHRA definition. SEC. 5. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) on the basis of race, color, or national origin, based on an individual’s actual or perceived shared Jewish ancestry or Jewish ethnic characteristics, the Department of Education shall take into consideration the definition of antisemitism as part of the Department’s assessment of whether the practice was motivated by antisemitic intent. SEC. 6. OTHER RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. (a) General Rule Of Construction.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed— (1) to expand the authority of the Secretary of Education; (2) to alter the standards pursuant to which the Department of Education makes a determination that harassing conduct amounts to actionable discrimination; or (3) to diminish or infringe upon the rights protected under any other provision of law that is in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act. (b) Constitutional Protections.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2024. Attest:
Clerk. 118th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6090AN ACT To provide for the consideration of a definition of antisemitism set forth by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education programs or activities, and for other purposes.
反犹的定义 SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Act, the term “definition of antisemitism”— (1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and (2) includes the “[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism” identified in the IHRA definition.
https://www.state.gov/defining-antisemitism/ 节选一下 Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to: Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion. Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions. Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews. Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust. Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations. Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation. Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis. Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
dpdpdp 发表于 2024-05-07 00:50 https://www.state.gov/defining-antisemitism/ 节选一下 Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to: Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion. Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions. Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews. Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust. Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations. Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation. Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis. Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
dpdpdp 发表于 2024-05-07 00:48 你们就不能离开华人网自己学习一下。真是不知死啊。这里真都是走线的啊。带路的啊。真的可以举报给fbi把这里一锅端了。 这里是法案原文。 https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6090/text 118th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6090AN ACT To provide for the consideration of a definition of antisemitism set forth by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education programs or activities, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1.SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the “Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023”. SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that— (1) title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance; (2) while such title does not cover discrimination based solely on religion, individuals who face discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics do not lose protection under such title for also being members of a group that share a common religion; (3) discrimination against Jews may give rise to a violation of such title when the discrimination is based on race, color, or national origin, which can include discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics; (4) it is the policy of the United States to enforce such title against prohibited forms of discrimination rooted in antisemitism as vigorously as against all other forms of discrimination prohibited by such title; and (5) as noted in the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism issued by the White House on May 25, 2023, it is critical to— (A) increase awareness and understanding of antisemitism, including its threat to America; (B) improve safety and security for Jewish communities; (C) reverse the normalization of antisemitism and counter antisemitic discrimination; and (D) expand communication and collaboration between communities. SEC. 3. FINDINGS. Congress finds the following: (1) Antisemitism is on the rise in the United States and is impacting Jewish students in K–12 schools, colleges, and universities. (2) The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (referred to in this Act as the “IHRA”) Working Definition of Antisemitism is a vital tool which helps individuals understand and identify the various manifestations of antisemitism. (3) On December 11, 2019, Executive Order 13899 extended protections against discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to individuals subjected to antisemitism on college and university campuses and tasked Federal agencies to consider the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when enforcing title VI of such Act. (4) Since 2018, the Department of Education has used the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when investigating violations of that title VI. (5) The use of alternative definitions of antisemitism impairs enforcement efforts by adding multiple standards and may fail to identify many of the modern manifestations of antisemitism. (6) The White House released the first-ever United States National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism on May 25, 2023, making clear that the fight against this hate is a national, bipartisan priority that must be successfully conducted through a whole-of-government-and-society approach. SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Act, the term “definition of antisemitism”— (1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and (2) includes the “[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism” identified in the IHRA definition. SEC. 5. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) on the basis of race, color, or national origin, based on an individual’s actual or perceived shared Jewish ancestry or Jewish ethnic characteristics, the Department of Education shall take into consideration the definition of antisemitism as part of the Department’s assessment of whether the practice was motivated by antisemitic intent. SEC. 6. OTHER RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. (a) General Rule Of Construction.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed— (1) to expand the authority of the Secretary of Education; (2) to alter the standards pursuant to which the Department of Education makes a determination that harassing conduct amounts to actionable discrimination; or (3) to diminish or infringe upon the rights protected under any other provision of law that is in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act. (b) Constitutional Protections.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2024. Attest:
Clerk. 118th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6090AN ACT To provide for the consideration of a definition of antisemitism set forth by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education programs or activities, and for other purposes.
dpdpdp 发表于 2024-05-07 00:48 你们就不能离开华人网自己学习一下。真是不知死啊。这里真都是走线的啊。带路的啊。真的可以举报给fbi把这里一锅端了。 这里是法案原文。 https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6090/text 118th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6090AN ACT To provide for the consideration of a definition of antisemitism set forth by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education programs or activities, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1.SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the “Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023”. SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that— (1) title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance; (2) while such title does not cover discrimination based solely on religion, individuals who face discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics do not lose protection under such title for also being members of a group that share a common religion; (3) discrimination against Jews may give rise to a violation of such title when the discrimination is based on race, color, or national origin, which can include discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics; (4) it is the policy of the United States to enforce such title against prohibited forms of discrimination rooted in antisemitism as vigorously as against all other forms of discrimination prohibited by such title; and (5) as noted in the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism issued by the White House on May 25, 2023, it is critical to— (A) increase awareness and understanding of antisemitism, including its threat to America; (B) improve safety and security for Jewish communities; (C) reverse the normalization of antisemitism and counter antisemitic discrimination; and (D) expand communication and collaboration between communities. SEC. 3. FINDINGS. Congress finds the following: (1) Antisemitism is on the rise in the United States and is impacting Jewish students in K–12 schools, colleges, and universities. (2) The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (referred to in this Act as the “IHRA”) Working Definition of Antisemitism is a vital tool which helps individuals understand and identify the various manifestations of antisemitism. (3) On December 11, 2019, Executive Order 13899 extended protections against discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to individuals subjected to antisemitism on college and university campuses and tasked Federal agencies to consider the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when enforcing title VI of such Act. (4) Since 2018, the Department of Education has used the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when investigating violations of that title VI. (5) The use of alternative definitions of antisemitism impairs enforcement efforts by adding multiple standards and may fail to identify many of the modern manifestations of antisemitism. (6) The White House released the first-ever United States National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism on May 25, 2023, making clear that the fight against this hate is a national, bipartisan priority that must be successfully conducted through a whole-of-government-and-society approach. SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Act, the term “definition of antisemitism”— (1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and (2) includes the “[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism” identified in the IHRA definition. SEC. 5. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) on the basis of race, color, or national origin, based on an individual’s actual or perceived shared Jewish ancestry or Jewish ethnic characteristics, the Department of Education shall take into consideration the definition of antisemitism as part of the Department’s assessment of whether the practice was motivated by antisemitic intent. SEC. 6. OTHER RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. (a) General Rule Of Construction.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed— (1) to expand the authority of the Secretary of Education; (2) to alter the standards pursuant to which the Department of Education makes a determination that harassing conduct amounts to actionable discrimination; or (3) to diminish or infringe upon the rights protected under any other provision of law that is in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act. (b) Constitutional Protections.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2024. Attest:
Clerk. 118th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6090AN ACT To provide for the consideration of a definition of antisemitism set forth by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education programs or activities, and for other purposes.
🔥 最新回帖
所以说与神无关，还是人的罪性。
对，这也是个好例子。。。 只能说犹太人洗脑能力太强悍了。。
上次还有一堆人在那里扯啥割包皮的好处，也不看看全球除了美国以外，都是哪些国家在割。。。
我去过这种教会。好像洗脑的一样
疣汰金援的福音派在欧洲也大撒币，欧洲很多华人教会也沦为福音派了，教堂整修得气派，星期日中午免费的伙食非常丰富，这些人都变成了疣汰人的传声筒了。收买人心！
你看看美国割包皮的数量遥遥领先于欧洲各国，就知道犹太人的宣传是方方面面的。（摊手
🛋️ 沙发板凳
丑国+疣汰，地球之癌。
庆父不死，鲁难不已。 只要这两个邪恶魔鬼存在一天，全世界就一天别想过安生日子。
现在大家知道什么叫做"欲使其灭亡，必使其疯狂"了么？
不是跟好莱坞电影一样，反派为表演戏剧性而疯狂。
而是反派从来就人神共愤，大家敢怒不敢言。直到有一天错判了形式被人人喊打，从而宣告灭亡。
ICC或者ICJ（取决于你用什么语言），海牙国际法庭的缩写，也就是审判米洛舍维奇，通缉普京的那个正牌国际法庭。
前几天报道说海牙国际法庭检查了大量以色列战争罪行的证据，"有可能"要以战争罪行批捕内塔尼亚胡
好家伙捅了马蜂窝了，以色列跟共和党疯了一样骂街。
学习啦！多谢分享
反鱿法案如果真要计较，圣经也是违法的，总统按着圣经宣誓那就更违法了
参议院不是还没批准，总统也没签字呢，咋就成法律了？
那更搞笑了，以色列人不是说圣经就是他们的地契吗？
如果圣经反油了，那还能当地契么
以色列和共和党？？ 往以色列不断运军火扔钱炸加沙的是那个总统吧。真逗啊 到现在还没看见所有政客对以色列加沙态度基本一样？
喔，那就只能改变圣经的内容了，毕竟总统要拿圣经宣誓，美国人会配合的 lol
犯了哪条，给我们科普一下吧。。。
犹太人认同的是旧约而已。我不知道美国这些拿着新约圣经的教会跟着起啥哄。
以后岁月史书，这版上id又要用这个证明以色列是仁义之师。
衣冠禽兽。动手的，和为其辩护的。你们手上全是血。
圣经居然还能旧约新约的，合着圣经是可以随时改变的 lol
最新的"禁止反犹法案"。只要提到了以下内容，你就犯了反犹思想罪，可以因言获罪，不受第一修正案保护
注意，下面可不是我自己引申解读，而是法案原文里贴心的附上了下面这些"反犹言论示例"
我就说直接一点，这个法案一出，美国在意识形态上已经灭亡了。剩下的只是被异形寄生的躯壳而已
犹不只是掌控了美国的金融媒体文化财政，更是掌控了美国政府和司法，这都是事实，居然不能说
哦，我指责的是美国政客，合法不？
国际法庭。。。
那要看这个政客是否犹人或有家人是，或支持犹人的，如果占其中一条，你就是反犹
Re 犹太人根本不认耶稣
有个charity叫International Fellowship of Christians and Jews，早把基督徒和犹太人联系起来了,一家人呐。
到2010年6月，已经有114个国家加入了《国际刑事法院罗马规约》，成为国际刑事法院的成员国；另外有37个国家签署了该规约，但是并未得到各自国家立法机构的批准。值得注意的是，作为聯合國安全理事會常任理事國的中国、俄罗斯和美国，以及以色列，均未加入该规约。（其中，美国曾在2000年12月31日签署《罗马规约》，但在国会批准前取消签署。）
=====================
2020-09-23 史无前例！美国宣布制裁国际刑事法院首席检察官
美国国务卿蓬佩奥于当地时间9月2日发表正式声明，宣布对国际刑事法院首席检察官法图·本苏达（Fatou Bensouda）和另一位高级官员法基索·莫乔乔科（Phakiso Mochochoko）实施制裁。
此举的目的则是反击她们对美国军队可能在阿富汗犯下的战争罪行的调查，这也是迄今为止特朗普政府针对该机构采取的最激进的措施。
制裁包括但不限于冻结其在美资产，取消其签证，颁布旅行禁令，限制其美元交易以及任何为两人继续提供支持的个人及实体也将面临制裁风险。
蓬佩奥表示，美方的行动旨在保护美国人免受国际刑事法院“不公正、不合法的调查”，因为这些调查“对美国主权构成威胁”。
===============
2021年4月3日 美国决定取消对国际刑事法院官员的制裁
联合国秘书长古特雷斯今天通过发言人发表声明，对美国决定取消对国际刑事法院官员的制裁和签证限制表示欢迎。
美国总统拜登周五撤销了前任特朗普政府制裁国际刑事法院官员的行政命令。在国际刑事法院宣布就包括美国在内的阿富汗战争所有各方涉嫌犯下的战争罪开展调查后，特朗普政府发布了这道命令。
2020年6月11日的第13928号行政命令对国际刑事法院检察官本苏达（Fatou Bensouda）以及该法院管辖权、补充原则与合作司司长法基索·莫乔乔科（Phakiso Mochochoko）施加了经济制裁。
拜登政府同时终止了2019年针对某些国际刑事法院工作人员签证限制的另一项政策。
美国国务卿布林肯（Anthony J. Blinken）在一份声明中说：“这些决定反映了我们的评估，即所采取的措施不当和无效。”
秘书长发言人杜加里克今天在声明中表示，在欢迎美国的这一决定时，秘书长指出，国际刑事法院“在加强对国际罪行的问责方面发挥着重要作用”。
准备重新接触 设在荷兰海牙的国际刑事法院负责起诉国际社会关注的最严重罪行，即种族灭绝罪、战争罪、危害人类罪和侵略罪。
国际刑事法院根据《罗马规约》于1998年7月成立，目前已有120多个国家签署了该条约。美国不是该条约的缔约国。
国际刑事法院也在今天发表声明，欢迎华盛顿的决定。
声明说：“法院铭记美国传统上为国际刑事司法事业做出了重要贡献。”
“法院随时准备与美国重新接触，以继续在相互尊重和建设性参与基础上的传统。”
美国 是 以色列的殖民地。
美国福音派基督徒因为要实现上帝的预言，用以色列复国来佐证耶稣基督就是救世主弥赛亚，自然也就不遗余力的插手
版上这么多基督徒，能不能透露一下你们的教会怎么谈论这件事？真的很好奇
我的猜测是，在神和人间的正义之间，自然是选择跟神站在一起。乌撒好心的伸手扶起将倾的约柜，被上帝击杀，是否正义？人间的正义跟神相比不重要，根本不值一提，对吗？
有钱能使磨推鬼而已。为了点臭钱出卖灵魂
他们自以为是上帝的选民，其实是撒旦的跟随者而已
谴责以色列，就是谴责美国 敢制裁以色列，美国就制裁海牙国际法庭法官和他们全家。。
亲儿子也不过如此了，真是叹为观止。。。
私以为下一个被开刀，像巴勒斯坦人一样的，就是美国本土人自己了，包括你我。
美国早就血流成河了，这么多年来每年源源不断给人家输血，人有免费医疗，免费大学，各种福利，喝着你的血吃着你的肉，再时不时以穆斯林的名义来几次恐袭，送你们的儿子上前线为人家打仗
以前以为美国全世界插管吸血，原来管是美国插的，血是吸进以色列的肚子。不仅如此，现在美国不惜在自己身上扎管子，以供主子能吸饱吸足。
118th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6090 AN ACT To provide for the consideration of a definition of antisemitism set forth by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education programs or activities, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the “Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023”. SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that— (1) title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance;
(2) while such title does not cover discrimination based solely on religion, individuals who face discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics do not lose protection under such title for also being members of a group that share a common religion; (3) discrimination against Jews may give rise to a violation of such title when the discrimination is based on race, color, or national origin, which can include discrimination based on actual or perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics;
(4) it is the policy of the United States to enforce such title against prohibited forms of discrimination rooted in antisemitism as vigorously as against all other forms of discrimination prohibited by such title; and (5) as noted in the U.S. National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism issued by the White House on May 25, 2023, it is critical to— (A) increase awareness and understanding of antisemitism, including its threat to America; (B) improve safety and security for Jewish communities;
(C) reverse the normalization of antisemitism and counter antisemitic discrimination; and (D) expand communication and collaboration between communities. SEC. 3. FINDINGS. Congress finds the following:
(1) Antisemitism is on the rise in the United States and is impacting Jewish students in K–12 schools, colleges, and universities. (2) The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (referred to in this Act as the “IHRA”) Working Definition of Antisemitism is a vital tool which helps individuals understand and identify the various manifestations of antisemitism.
(3) On December 11, 2019, Executive Order 13899 extended protections against discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to individuals subjected to antisemitism on college and university campuses and tasked Federal agencies to consider the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when enforcing title VI of such Act. (4) Since 2018, the Department of Education has used the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism when investigating violations of that title VI.
(5) The use of alternative definitions of antisemitism impairs enforcement efforts by adding multiple standards and may fail to identify many of the modern manifestations of antisemitism. (6) The White House released the first-ever United States National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism on May 25, 2023, making clear that the fight against this hate is a national, bipartisan priority that must be successfully conducted through a whole-of-government-and-society approach. SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Act, the term “definition of antisemitism”—
(1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and (2) includes the “[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism” identified in the IHRA definition. SEC. 5. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) on the basis of race, color, or national origin, based on an individual’s actual or perceived shared Jewish ancestry or Jewish ethnic characteristics, the Department of Education shall take into consideration the definition of antisemitism as part of the Department’s assessment of whether the practice was motivated by antisemitic intent.
SEC. 6. OTHER RULES OF CONSTRUCTION. (a) General Rule Of Construction.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed— (1) to expand the authority of the Secretary of Education; (2) to alter the standards pursuant to which the Department of Education makes a determination that harassing conduct amounts to actionable discrimination; or
(3) to diminish or infringe upon the rights protected under any other provision of law that is in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act. (b) Constitutional Protections.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2024. Attest:
Clerk. 118th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6090 AN ACT To provide for the consideration of a definition of antisemitism set forth by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance for the enforcement of Federal antidiscrimination laws concerning education programs or activities, and for other purposes.
For purposes of this Act, the term “definition of antisemitism”— (1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and
(2) includes the “[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism” identified in the IHRA definition.
当年还说要捐款感谢上海，上海领导好开心。结果一致到现在也没看见一分钱的捐款
内塔尼亚胡这么搞，真的是不管拜登的选情了。也可能就是为了配合川普上位，毕竟共和党更狂热支持以色列
王祖贤罪
翻译一下，就是说任何犹太人和以色列不好的，哪怕是事实，你就死定了。
白灯还是副总统的时候就和内不对付。私怨已久吧。
绝大多数亲儿子都差得远了。。。。。。。。。
旧约还有古兰经的一部分就是犹太人的讨拉经 只是后来都加入了反犹太人的内容 可想而知犹太人历史上多讨人厌
不能代表美国，但有资格提案啊。总统国会如被某势力挟持，提案通过就成法律了。法律框架下做什么都行。
合法移民幸幸苦苦纳税，医保贵的要死，非法移民和难民屁股一抬就享受医疗，教育全部免费，绿教生而不养，全民买单，一天到晚就念那个古兰经，也不是生产，一个劲的生孩子，搞恐袭，拿女人当牲口，这样的反人类文明还是少一点比较好
居然成了走线大本营，难怪一边倒的支持龙虾党，死了美国再走线去别的地方呗
瞧这狗仗人势的模样
宗教影响。 以后估计不信基督教都得是一个下场。 所以伊斯兰教也是得存在， 平衡一下。图里的loser 卢比奥，Ted, 这一群人都不要选。 极右分子
他是在反讽
基督教，几千年的反犹传统，新约圣经上乌泱泱的反犹言论。。。 但美国反犹法律厉害的地方，就是把基督教都给包括进去了
所以说美国被犹太人控制的这叫一个彻底。。。
我所知道的几个教会没有任何以教会方出面的谈论。按照新闻美国有数得出的几个基督教团体支持以色列，但是大量的基督徒是支持和平。所以不要以偏概全。
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/04/30/christians-us-peacemakers-gaza-war/73456593007/
基督徒是可以有自己的政治立场的，至于教会，大多数是秉承政教分开的原则。当然，有若干害群之马也正常，人的罪性啊。
乌撒的事，需要对历史了解一些才能明白里面的意思。
所以美国就玩这种外交游戏？一说就是几个议员自己的意思，佩洛西的个人访问，然后别的国家就是独裁，有个风吹草动就是领袖意志？
普通人讲的圣经（即天主-基督-东正那边的）本来就是旧约和新约的结合体。
但是美国几千万福音派基督徒是以色列的死忠啊。。。 这和欧洲基督教几千年反犹传统是截然相反的。。
明显是最近几十年犹太刻意洗脑操纵的结果
所以说这种变化很有意思。。
以色列复国，美国的支持者就是福音派教会，就是把川普扶上去的反堕胎神棍，人数可不在少数，这帖子里出来威胁的这几位议员哪一位不是满嘴上帝的LOL， 你只能代表你自己看到的几个教会，代表不了别的吧。
耶教的旧约是剽窃犹太教的经书，新约才是他们自己的，耶教严格来说就是犹太教的一个异端，比母教做大了而已，本质其实没什么不同，驱逐屠杀原住民的时候也是心安理得的认为新大陆是上帝赐予他们滴。
GOP 州里的教会都是政教合一，问过好几个牧师，回答都是一致的。中国在他们眼里就是 demon possessed country.
虽然都是信耶稣的，不过教派之间并不相同，美国是福音派的起源地和大本营，是亚伯拉罕三教各个教派里传教最凶猛的，他们对所谓福音传遍世界传回耶路撒冷是有执念的，心心念念想要耶酥再临，世界末日大审判，所以这可能只是机缘巧合，题外话总觉得满脑子把神话当现实的人已经挺不正常了，满脑子期待世界末日的真心有病。
Bingo. 我圈子里的基督徒也大部分强烈支持以色列，论点论据都是以色列官方的talking points, 到现在还说以色列是受害者，周围都是敌对国家，这些平民都是哈马斯的人肉盾牌，collateral dammage
没什么剽窃不剽窃的，犹太人自己都不遵行旧约，他们真正信的是Talmud
二战时死了70-80million non-jews, 为什么只强调6million jews? 他们的命比别人的命值钱？ 斯大林（犹太人）杀死饿死上6千万俄罗斯人，犹太人应该给这些人赔偿啊，为啥教科书都不提一下
旧约圣经，是犹太圣经的一个子集
基督教传播全球几千年都没这变化。。。 美国刚建国的时候也没这样，美国本土演化的基督教分支是摩门教。。
但偏偏就最近几十年，美国的福音派开始崛起，变成以色列的死忠。。
我不是要搞阴谋论，但这背后的变化和推动力，想想就很有意思。。。
因为这是教学例子， 提醒大家前人怎么处理鱿鱼，警告大家以后要杀的更狠些
我问过我一个信教的华人朋友是不是她去的教会成员都支持以色列，她保持了沉默。沉默即默认...... 她所在的教会全是白人
不仅最近，历史上的宗教改革 背后基本上都有犹太人的影子
三十年河东三十年河西，今日美帝对中国所表现的不耐烦，就是因为感受到威胁来了，霸权的末日也将到。
你看看美国割包皮的数量遥遥领先于欧洲各国，就知道犹太人的宣传是方方面面的。（摊手
疣汰金援的福音派在欧洲也大撒币，欧洲很多华人教会也沦为福音派了，教堂整修得气派，星期日中午免费的伙食非常丰富，这些人都变成了疣汰人的传声筒了。收买人心！