楼主自己的原文里已经说了，检测到的量属于痕量，量微小到以至于检测结果本身都在阳性和阴性之间漂移。所以国际反兴奋剂组织做了不处分的结论。靠标题带风向是没用的。然后纽约时报反诘的武器是检测到的量小，可能是检测的时间是用药周期的末期，停药已久。可纽约时报不想说的部分是，飞行药检的时间是多次和随机的。。。 WADA said “the contamination scenario was further supported” by the low concentrations of the drug and the fluctuation of test results between positive and negative.
还是你的原文： Federal investigators have taken steps in recent weeks to learn more about what occurred. A spokesman for the F.B.I. declined to comment. FBI是learn，不是probe 你带风向带得太厉害了
THE CONTAMINATION OF THE SAMPLES In CHINADA’s original report to WADA, which was obtained by both the NY Times and ARD, investigators traced the 23 positive tests back to when the athletes were all staying at the same hotel during the Chinese Long Course Invitational, held in Shijiazhuang City from December 31st, 2020 to January 3rd, 2021. Investigators “found traces of trimetazidine in the extractor hood, on spice containers and in the drain,” in the hotel’s kitchen ARD reported, which was echoed in the NY Times report. According to both news agencies, the report compiled by investigators “offered no evidence of how the drug got there, despite enlisting the help of China’s national police. But they [investigators] concluded that the swimmers had unwittingly ingested small amounts.” Per the NY Times, the initial report shows that 60 tests were conducted on 39 swimmers—the top two swimmers in each event as well as other selected athletes. In a statement made after both reports were published, WADA said they were notified in June 2021 of CHINADA’s original decision. After conducting their own review, which included reviewing the original case file and collecting additional research from independent experts, WADA “concluded that it was not in a position to disprove the possibility that contamination was the source of TMZ and it was compatible with the analytical data in the file.” Professor Olivier Rabin, WADA Senior Director, Science and Medicine shed more light on WADA’s investigation, sharing that the contamination finding was supported by “consistently low concentrations of TMZ as well as no doping pattern with several athletes presenting multiple samples collected over the course of several days which fluctuated between negative and positive (and vice versa).” As such, both CHINADA and WADA concluded that the athletes were not at fault. WADA acknowledged in their statement that they were not able to conduct on an on-site investigation due to the COVID-19 protocols in place at the time. Independent experts consulted by the NY Times did not agree with the idea that low concentrations of TMZ solely support the theory that athletes ingested the TMZ unknowingly. The experts pointed out that there could be other reasons for the low levels, including being at the “end of the excretion period for the drug.” This does not mean that the theory provided by CHINADA is false, but rather that it is not the only possibility. While the experts rejected the idea that the theory was the only possibility, they did not agree with each other on whether contamination was the most likely cause. DISPUTE AMONG ANTI-DOPING AGENCIES While WADA did not dispute CHINADA’s findings and “considered that an appeal was not warranted,” other anti-doping agencies like the International Testing Agency (ITA) and the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) disagreed. The ITA is a Swiss-based group formed in 2018 which was created to manage anti-doping programs independently from governing organizations. They raised issues with WADA in 2022 over how the samples were reported. The ITA told the NY Times its own investigation “remained ongoing.” The NY Times reported that “the results of the tests in Shijiazhuang were not reported to the computer management system that tracks all testing of athletes until March 15, 2021, two and a half months later. CHINADA said that WADA had allowed it to freeze the tests for a month after they were collected because of the pandemic.” After review, WADA concluded that “proper procedures had been followed and there was no evidence of wrong-doing.” It’s not unusual to freeze samples; the ITA itself is allowed to keep Olympic samples for up to 10 years after collection and recently began retesting samples from the 2016 Rio Olympics. However, the NY Times states precedent has been set any positive test for TMZ “[prompts] an immediate temporary suspension except in the rarest circumstances—including the one China offered,” that athletes were unaware they were ingesting the banned substance. With that temporary suspension typically comes public disclosure, neither of which happened in this case. Both the NY Times and ARD cite the Kamila Valieva case from the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics as an example for the way that WADA has handled these cases in the past. Valieva, a Russian figure skater, tested positive for TMZ and blamed contaminated food. Russian anti-doping authorities cleared Valieva to compete but WADA appealed that decision. Ultimately, Valieva was handed a four-year ban. Precedent has been set in the pool as well. Sun Yangwas banned for three months in 2014 after testing positive for TMZ. Madisyn Coxwas initially given a two-year ban for testing positive for the substance. That ban was reduced to six-months after she traced the positive test back to a batch of contaminated vitamins, supporting her claim that she accidentally ingested the substance. ON PUBLIC DISCLOSURE Emails obtained by the NY Times between a legal official at CHINADA and a “counterpart at the world swimming association” show that the possibility of public disclosure was very much on CHINADA’s mind. As reported by the NY Times, an email dated March 15, 2021—the same day the positive test were input into the computer management system—“cited existing rules and asked that ‘in order to protect athletes’ privacy and cooperate with the investigation, please keep athletes’ information and the case strictly confidential until it is publicly disclosed by CHINADA.’” Other anti-doping agencies take issue with the way that public disclosure was handled in this case as well. Travis T. Tygart, CEO of USADA, called the situation “‘a devastating stab in the back of clean athletes.’” He continued, “‘all of those with dirty hands in burying these positives and suppressing the voices of courageous whistle-blowers must be held accountable to the fullest extent of rules and law.’” In the past, Tygart has had a different take on the public disclosure of positive tests. In 2019 after 90-year-old American cyclist Carl Grove was stripped of a world record after testing positive for epitrenbolone, which he blamed on contaminated meat. Tygart told the NY Times then that “he believed that ‘no fault’ cases like when tainted food, water, or medicine is ingested accidentally, should not be a violation or be publicly announced.’”
又是一个不读自己贴的原文的： consistently low concentrations of TMZ as well as no doping pattern with several athletes presenting multiple samples collected over the course of several days which fluctuated between negative and positive (and vice versa). WADA说得狠清楚了，因为是consistently的低检出量，所以认可这是无意的污染，而不是纽约时报所怀疑的用药末期距离用药时间点过久。
您这种说法和做人的道理是一样的，一个人的 reputation 和 track records 是非常重要的，国家也是。比如说下面这个例子 Beijing half marathon winners stripped of medals after African trio let Chinese runner win. https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/19/china/china-beijing-half-marathon-winners-revoked-intl-hnk/index.html
应该学那种全体得哮喘合法吃药的，比较符合主流价值标准
3金2银估计保不住了
楼主自己的原文里已经说了，检测到的量属于痕量，量微小到以至于检测结果本身都在阳性和阴性之间漂移。所以国际反兴奋剂组织做了不处分的结论。靠标题带风向是没用的。然后纽约时报反诘的武器是检测到的量小，可能是检测的时间是用药周期的末期，停药已久。可纽约时报不想说的部分是，飞行药检的时间是多次和随机的。。。
WADA said “the contamination scenario was further supported” by the low concentrations of the drug and the fluctuation of test results between positive and negative.
对，好像是入住的酒店有问题。检测出来的兴奋剂含量很低，就是美国奥委会不依不饶说有可能是很早之前服用的所以还有残留。
别洗了，请给出你说的证据出处， 这事一直被盖住。 23 个人同时出现和孙杨一样的问题， 你怎么解释。这次和俄罗斯一样， FBI按照美国法律已经介入。 最好笑的还是你这句， “按照中国的解释”。让人怀疑智商。 按照他们的解释，是不是新冠就不存在呀
随便一搜就有呀。
2021年举行的东京奥运会前，曾有23名中国游泳运动员药检呈阳性，但是世界反兴奋剂机构等管理部门接受了中国官方调查的结论，认定这些选手是在不知情情况下摄入违禁品，因此决定允许这些选手参赛，其中并有人在比赛中获得包括金牌在内的奖牌。
还是你的原文： Federal investigators have taken steps in recent weeks to learn more about what occurred. A spokesman for the F.B.I. declined to comment.
FBI是learn，不是probe
你带风向带得太厉害了
美国媒体现在还有信用度吗？早就爆表了吧
所以可以信的媒體是？？？
也有其他运动员因为contamination这个理由而没有被禁赛过。
所以就是具体问题具体分析喽。在这个问题上，既然相关权威机构做了决定了，那么咱们非专业人士还非要去挑战这决定？
当然想做点这种挑战，不是不可以，但这就是简单的屁股决定脑袋喽。就是因为想/不想找茬，所以找茬/不找茬。
那必须是自由時報对不对
又是一个不读自己贴的原文的： consistently low concentrations of TMZ as well as no doping pattern with several athletes presenting multiple samples collected over the course of several days which fluctuated between negative and positive (and vice versa).
WADA说得狠清楚了，因为是consistently的低检出量，所以认可这是无意的污染，而不是纽约时报所怀疑的用药末期距离用药时间点过久。
---------------------------------
据了解，2021年1月在河北省石家庄市正定县举行的全国游泳争霸赛中，中国反兴奋剂中心实施了兴奋剂检查。结果显示，有运动员的样本呈极低浓度的曲美他嗪阳性。中国反兴奋剂中心第一时间从各方面全方位展开深入细致调查。
根据调查结果，结合兴奋剂检查、检测等相关证据，中国反兴奋剂中心认定所涉运动员没有故意使用违禁物质，阳性也不是使用药品、营养品等因素导致的，而是在参加此次赛事期间，在完全不知情的情况下摄入了受到曲美他嗪污染的食物导致。因此中国反兴奋剂中心依照有关规定判定所涉运动员在此事件中均无过错或无疏忽，决定对其不按照兴奋剂违规处理
中国反兴奋剂中心表示，在此事件的调查处理过程中，中国反兴奋剂中心向WADA和世界泳联及时通报调查进展，并提供了调查证据、处理决定和全部案卷材料。WADA对本案进行了充分审查，认为无法反驳曲美他嗪来自污染的可能性，案卷材料中的检测数据也符合污染可能，应认定运动员无过错或无疏忽。根据相关规定，为保护运动员的合法权益，不按兴奋剂违规处理且相关方未对案件提起上诉，处理结果不对外公布。
WADA在20日的声明中表示，一些媒体对中国游泳运动员曲美他嗪实验室检测阳性进行了有误导性和潜在诽谤性质的报道。
WADA说，中国反兴奋剂中心2021年6月完整上报了这一事件，WADA按照惯例收集事件完整资料以及目前尚未公布的曲美他嗪相关科研信息，同时咨询独立科研专家对污染结论以及低剂量的曲美他嗪是否可能在游泳比赛中对运动员有益进行测试。
WADA指出，科研人员和外部法律顾问进行长达数周的审查后认为无法反驳曲美他嗪来源于污染的可能性，这一结论也和资料中的分析数据相符。同时鉴于污染造成阳性，运动员没有被认定有过错，所以WADA认为没有理由对中国反兴奋剂中心的决定提出上诉。
WADA科学与医学部主管拉宾表示，WADA科学部甚至从制药企业那里寻找曲美他嗪的新药代动力学和代谢信息，对包括曲美他嗪低剂量的兴奋剂策略等几个假设进行测试，最终得出结论认为曲美他嗪检出浓度一直很低，且几名运动员在几天内采集的多例样本检测结果在阴性和阳性之间波动，没有形成使用兴奋剂的模式，集合这些因素进一步支持了污染这一结论的可能性。
为了公开透明，WADA随后将调查结果通报了多个调查方，其中包括国际检测机构（ITA）。
WADA还提到，美国反兴奋剂机构（USADA）在2023年4月给他们发邮件称收到某消息源爆料，说有人掩盖曲美他嗪阳性事件。
“这一信息显然有误，因为在（USADA所称的爆料）将近两年前，这一事件就由中国反兴奋剂中心上报并得出结论，WADA和世界泳联已进行详尽审查。”WADA在声明中说。
不光很低，而且多次检测，有时可以检测出很低，有时检测不出
我覺得是可能有疑問，但是不能證明。以前的列子就是有疑問就ban了。直到查明原因才解除ban的。
中国游泳队今年在世锦赛上碾压美国澳大利亚，其中而且是跳水游泳全面开花
马上奥运会了，新一轮造势泼污水也该开始了。白人不造谣我还不习惯呢
游泳项目奖牌榜
就是屁股决定脑袋啦。
权威机构都认定没问题了。对这个结论，不是说不能反对，但总要有个理由为啥你对权威机构的结论不认同吧？要说“我就是要事实的真相”，这个很难让人信服。。。
比如，要是中国运动员被权威机构禁赛，你说我不信，要求再调查 - 这个理由很简单吧 - 表达对自己喜欢的运动员的支持。
但要是中国运动员被权威机构宣布没有问题，你说我不信，要求再调查。。。这个一般就只能理解成是基于针对中国运动员的恶意了。
我记得东京奥运会，大家对体操小黑女都寄予厚望，期望她横扫，结果发挥的很不好，还从平衡木掉下来了，后来说是她用的药被日本海关禁止入境，好像那个药是可以让人集中注意力的，但是她说自己有哮喘
根本不是东京奥运会查出来的，而是之前中国国内比赛自检结果。这种痕量报告，不管按照什么标准都不可能禁赛。只是中国奥委会主动报告给wada以免有人造谣。wada也确实认为没有问题。
但是没想到白皮如此下作。5年以后把本来没有新闻价值的旧档案接上一个完全相反的标题，继续泼污水
还有lz这兴奋的小脸，吃屎都吃不上热乎的，啧啧。
二极管真的很讨厌，就不能实事求是吗。菲尔普斯没fail 过任何test，也不在WADA持证吃药的名单上，单纯为黑而造谣的真的很没意思。
必须是ccav
赞一下画面感
今非昔比了，美国奥委会这些小动作估计已经没啥大用了。体育科技中国赶上来了，也就只有在下面干嚎暗示几句而已。
你认为他没有就没有？扯。 WADA认为没有，B啥呢？
老伎俩。
那你为啥认为他有？有任何证据吗？
华人网
你把楼主的脸抽烂了。
Poopyface里的poopy是poop的意思那种？真的不怕回头这些poop喷你自己脸上？
菲尔普斯承认吸毒道歉 最伟大奥运选手陷入危机 2009年02月03日06:22
史上最伟大的奥运选手、美国人迈克尔·菲尔普斯正在经历着人生中一个难挨的艰难时刻。2月1日，英国小报《世界新闻报》爆出了他吸食大麻的照片。此事让这位曾经14次获得奥运冠军的天才游泳运动员一夜之间声名而他辉煌的游泳运动生涯将因此走向何方，也成为众人关注的焦点。□大麻，大麻烦大约半年前的北京奥运会上，在“水立方”泳池中上下翻飞的“飞鱼”菲尔普斯，创造了世界运动史上绝无仅有的奇迹——他一人独得8枚奥运金牌，一大把“金镶玉”满满当当地挂在胸前，映衬着他刚满23岁的年轻脸庞。算上之前在雅典拿到的6枚金牌，菲尔普斯以自己的14枚金牌，成为奥运史上最伟大的选手。那时候，鲜衣怒马的菲尔普斯是何等意气风发，而媒体对他的追捧也达到了登峰造极的地步。他的每一个动作都被暴露在闪光灯之下，他的身材、体征甚至食谱都被公之于众。几乎所有人都相信，他是世界上最接近于鱼的人，是不世出的罕见天才，泳池中永远的“神”。 然而，神话的碎裂是如此地突然。《世界新闻报》的一组图片，彻底颠覆了这位美国英雄的公众形象。这组照片拍摄于2008年11月6日，当时菲尔普斯在南卡罗来纳大学参加朋友的一个派对，有人拍到了菲尔普斯用一支玻璃“烟枪”吞云吐雾吸食大麻的形象。据一位目击者称，“飞鱼”显然不是一个生手，“他吸烟枪就像在游泳池中游泳一样自然。” 这组图片带来的杀伤力可谓非常巨大。一时间，这位身披无限光环的英雄少年，一改健康阳光的成功人士形象，变成了放纵、骄狂的花花大少。更有媒体随即翻出旧账，说他在北京奥运之后不思进取，生活作风腐化堕落，流连于声色犬马中等种种负面消息，更令菲尔普斯的处境雪上加霜。大麻，成了他的大麻烦。 “飞鱼”致歉 据《世界新闻报》刊载，菲尔普斯在东窗事发之前，曾经一度试图贿赂该报，阻止他们发布这一消息。他的经纪人伯克斯海姆承诺，可以让菲尔普斯在《世界新闻报》上开设专栏，甚至让菲尔普斯的赞助商向该报投放广告。但是，一切斡旋最终没能阻止这则爆炸性新闻的面世。 消息爆出之后，菲尔普斯坦然接受了这一现实。北京时间2月2日，菲尔普斯发表个人声明，在第一时间正式就吸毒事件道歉。菲尔普斯在声明中表示，这是一件“让人遗憾的事情，自己感到很抱歉”，同时声称“我向大众和我的泳迷保证这件事绝对不会再发生”。最令菲尔普斯难过的是，自己的家人承担了很大的压力。他表示，自己从来没有见到母亲这么沮丧过。 菲尔普斯的母亲黛比，一直以自己的儿子为自豪。少年时的菲尔普斯曾经患有多动症，但是黛比坚持培养这个看上去不太安静的儿子，并把他塑造成体育界的天才。事发后黛比对儿子的行为感到极度失望，面对媒体的镜头落下了伤心的眼泪。而他的教练鲍曼则表示，菲尔普斯做了一件傻事，但是他认为菲尔普斯感到后悔之后，应该会安心回到训练中来，“我时刻欢迎他回来”。 金牌不会收回 根据世界反兴奋剂机构2009年的最新规定，服用禁药将遭遇长达四年的禁赛。这是否意味着，菲尔普斯已经无缘四年后的伦敦奥运会，而他光辉灿烂的运动生涯，就此画上了终止符？ 答案显然不是这样的。据美国方面的消息，世界反兴奋剂机构已经表态，不会对菲尔普斯进行禁赛方面的处罚。因为菲尔普斯吸食大麻的时间在休赛期，而非比赛期间。按照规定，反兴奋剂规定只在运动员比赛时间生效，在运动员的业余时间内，并不限制他们的行为。而在之前的比赛期中，菲尔普斯的药检一切合格，所以他所获得的14枚金牌也不会被收回。 同时，美国奥委会也暂时没有公布对菲尔普斯的处罚结果。在美国奥委会针对此事发表的声明中，并没有提到对他的处罚问题。声明中称，对菲尔普斯的行为感到非常失望：“菲尔普斯一直都是美国公民的榜样……但是他却未能履行自己应尽的责任和义务。但我们相信菲尔普斯以后一定会痛改前非，我们完全可以期待这个伟大的奥运冠军继续创造辉煌。” 不过，虽然暂时逃过了处罚，菲尔普斯同样会为自己的轻率行为付出代价。在此之后，菲尔普斯的人气和商业价值急剧下跌，广告商们将会对这位金童“另眼相看”，减少对菲尔普斯的投资。据说，这一负面新闻将会让菲尔普斯损失高达数百万美元的“学费”。
重复一下前面一位层主贴的：
这23个运动员的检测结果不是在东京奥运会查出来的，是在之前中国自己举办的运动会查出来的，还是中国自己主动报告的，不是被别人查出来自己狡辩啥的。
换句话说， 不是世界或者国际反兴奋剂组织的飞行检查的结果。和其它的包括孙扬那次完全没有可比性。
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/O9YL04v-J5U?si=J3gAre6FhFo1frKf
没有 你智商有问题，难道不知道这个世界媒体只要是人报道的新闻，都是带着自己的意识在里面的
呵呵，自己主动报告？？骗三岁小孩子哟。瞒不过去而已。能瞒过去的话，死人都无所谓。还实验室污染呢，骗谁呢？送第三方再做一次好了。
您这种说法和做人的道理是一样的，一个人的 reputation 和 track records 是非常重要的，国家也是。比如说下面这个例子
Beijing half marathon winners stripped of medals after African trio let Chinese runner win.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/19/china/china-beijing-half-marathon-winners-revoked-intl-hnk/index.html
人家是带着任务来的，造谣是本职工作 它们也挺勇敢的，也不怕生儿子没屁眼