What is the penalty for lying to immigration in Australia? Section 234 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) prescribes a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison for a person who provides false documents, or false or misleading information, relating to non-citizens.24 Nov 2021 根据澳洲法律，在移民材料上面撒谎 可以判入监 10年。 1. 孙维 填的出生日期 有问题，明显撒谎。 2 孙维 是靠假结婚获得澳洲 永居的。她跟谢飞宇一直居住在一起。她跟那个假结婚的老头婚姻存续期间，生的孩子是谢飞宇的。 建议大家给议员打电话，把孙维送进澳洲监狱呆 10年吧。既然她在中国没受到惩罚，让她在澳洲监狱呆着终老吧。 After a person acquires Citizenship A person can acquire their Citizenship by descent or by conferral. Suppose the decision-maker becomes aware that the person has provided false information after acquiring the Citizenship. In that case, the decision-maker will consider whether to revoke the Citizenship or not. The decision-maker will decide this by going back to the time when the person applied for the Citizenship. In other words, if the decision-maker was aware that the person had given false information at the time of the application, then what would have been the decision at that time. Let’s say that the decision-maker decided that the application outcome would be different, such as refusing the application. Then the matter will be referred to the Citizenship Operation Section in the department. What will happen next? Suppose a decision-maker identifies information that suggests that an offence has or may have been committed, by a person who already has a Citizenship. In that case, the decision-maker will contact another internal team in the department, known as the Citizenship Operations Section for advice and assistance. The Citizenship Operations Section will then assess the information and forward it to the Border Watch Allegations and Referral Team (BWART). Then BWART will conduct another investigation about the alleged offence. During this investigation it will determine whether to revoke the Citizenship of the person. If decided, then as explained below the Minister has the power to revoke a person Citizenship even after they had it. Simultaneously as mentioned above, the department will consider all relevant factors before prosecuting the person as well. As said, as per section 34 of the Citizenship Act, the Minister can revoke a person’s Citizenship, either acquired by descent or conferral. This would happen, if the Minister identified through the investigations that the person has committed an offence under section 50 of the Citizenship Act. The Minister will send a notice in writing. In this notice, the Minister will include the date when the person needs to surrender their Citizenship. The usual time frame is 28 days after the day the Minister sent the notice. If a person receives a notice of surrender of their Citizenship, the person must do it. Failure to surrender the Citizenship is an offence under section 38 of the Citizenship Act with a heavy penalty. If the Minister revokes the Citizenship, then the person ceases to be an Australian Citizen at the time of the revocation. Also, it is important to note that if the person has a child, then, unfortunately, the child’s Citizenship will also be revoked. 根据澳洲法律，如果获得公民身份的人被确定有不法行为，公民身份可以撤销，其孩子的公民身份同样被注销。 澳洲政府有充足理由遣返 孙维，另外，因为她的偷税行为，澳洲政府可以直接没收她的非法财产。
What is the penalty for lying to immigration in Australia? Section 234 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) prescribes a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison for a person who provides false documents, or false or misleading information, relating to non-citizens.24 Nov 2021 根据澳洲法律，在移民材料上面撒谎 可以判入监 10年。 1. 孙维 填的出生日期 有问题，明显撒谎。 2 孙维 是靠假结婚获得澳洲 永居的。她跟谢飞宇一直居住在一起。她跟那个假结婚的老头婚姻存续期间，生的孩子是谢飞宇的。 建议大家给议员打电话，把孙维送进澳洲监狱呆 10年吧。既然她在中国没受到惩罚，让她在澳洲监狱呆着终老吧。 After a person acquires Citizenship A person can acquire their Citizenship by descent or by conferral. Suppose the decision-maker becomes aware that the person has provided false information after acquiring the Citizenship. In that case, the decision-maker will consider whether to revoke the Citizenship or not. The decision-maker will decide this by going back to the time when the person applied for the Citizenship. In other words, if the decision-maker was aware that the person had given false information at the time of the application, then what would have been the decision at that time. Let’s say that the decision-maker decided that the application outcome would be different, such as refusing the application. Then the matter will be referred to the Citizenship Operation Section in the department. What will happen next? Suppose a decision-maker identifies information that suggests that an offence has or may have been committed, by a person who already has a Citizenship. In that case, the decision-maker will contact another internal team in the department, known as the Citizenship Operations Section for advice and assistance. The Citizenship Operations Section will then assess the information and forward it to the Border Watch Allegations and Referral Team (BWART). Then BWART will conduct another investigation about the alleged offence. During this investigation it will determine whether to revoke the Citizenship of the person. If decided, then as explained below the Minister has the power to revoke a person Citizenship even after they had it. Simultaneously as mentioned above, the department will consider all relevant factors before prosecuting the person as well. As said, as per section 34 of the Citizenship Act, the Minister can revoke a person’s Citizenship, either acquired by descent or conferral. This would happen, if the Minister identified through the investigations that the person has committed an offence under section 50 of the Citizenship Act. The Minister will send a notice in writing. In this notice, the Minister will include the date when the person needs to surrender their Citizenship. The usual time frame is 28 days after the day the Minister sent the notice. If a person receives a notice of surrender of their Citizenship, the person must do it. Failure to surrender the Citizenship is an offence under section 38 of the Citizenship Act with a heavy penalty. If the Minister revokes the Citizenship, then the person ceases to be an Australian Citizen at the time of the revocation. Also, it is important to note that if the person has a child, then, unfortunately, the child’s Citizenship will also be revoked. 根据澳洲法律，如果获得公民身份的人被确定有不法行为，公民身份可以撤销，其孩子的公民身份同样被注销。 澳洲政府有充足理由遣返 孙维，另外，因为她的偷税行为，澳洲政府可以直接没收她的非法财产。 一笑而过吗 发表于 2024-01-27 22:26
What is the penalty for lying to immigration in Australia? Section 234 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) prescribes a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison for a person who provides false documents, or false or misleading information, relating to non-citizens.24 Nov 2021 根据澳洲法律，在移民材料上面撒谎 可以判入监 10年。 1. 孙维 填的出生日期 有问题，明显撒谎。 2 孙维 是靠假结婚获得澳洲 永居的。她跟谢飞宇一直居住在一起。她跟那个假结婚的老头婚姻存续期间，生的孩子是谢飞宇的。 建议大家给议员打电话，把孙维送进澳洲监狱呆 10年吧。既然她在中国没受到惩罚，让她在澳洲监狱呆着终老吧。 After a person acquires Citizenship A person can acquire their Citizenship by descent or by conferral. Suppose the decision-maker becomes aware that the person has provided false information after acquiring the Citizenship. In that case, the decision-maker will consider whether to revoke the Citizenship or not. The decision-maker will decide this by going back to the time when the person applied for the Citizenship. In other words, if the decision-maker was aware that the person had given false information at the time of the application, then what would have been the decision at that time. Let’s say that the decision-maker decided that the application outcome would be different, such as refusing the application. Then the matter will be referred to the Citizenship Operation Section in the department. What will happen next? Suppose a decision-maker identifies information that suggests that an offence has or may have been committed, by a person who already has a Citizenship. In that case, the decision-maker will contact another internal team in the department, known as the Citizenship Operations Section for advice and assistance. The Citizenship Operations Section will then assess the information and forward it to the Border Watch Allegations and Referral Team (BWART). Then BWART will conduct another investigation about the alleged offence. During this investigation it will determine whether to revoke the Citizenship of the person. If decided, then as explained below the Minister has the power to revoke a person Citizenship even after they had it. Simultaneously as mentioned above, the department will consider all relevant factors before prosecuting the person as well. As said, as per section 34 of the Citizenship Act, the Minister can revoke a person’s Citizenship, either acquired by descent or conferral. This would happen, if the Minister identified through the investigations that the person has committed an offence under section 50 of the Citizenship Act. The Minister will send a notice in writing. In this notice, the Minister will include the date when the person needs to surrender their Citizenship. The usual time frame is 28 days after the day the Minister sent the notice. If a person receives a notice of surrender of their Citizenship, the person must do it. Failure to surrender the Citizenship is an offence under section 38 of the Citizenship Act with a heavy penalty. If the Minister revokes the Citizenship, then the person ceases to be an Australian Citizen at the time of the revocation. Also, it is important to note that if the person has a child, then, unfortunately, the child’s Citizenship will also be revoked. 根据澳洲法律，如果获得公民身份的人被确定有不法行为，公民身份可以撤销，其孩子的公民身份同样被注销。 澳洲政府有充足理由遣返 孙维，另外，因为她的偷税行为，澳洲政府可以直接没收她的非法财产。 一笑而过吗 发表于 2024-01-27 22:26
但Sun-在中国被称为孙维-被指隐藏一个黑暗的秘密。在90年代中，作为中国最高级高校的一名化学学生，她是一起最严重罪案的疑犯。
她室友朱令漂亮和受欢迎，突然神秘病了。她有严重腹痛，没胃口，这些症状一开始让医生不知所措。
然后朱令开始脱发，几个月后，她再次病倒，严重腿疼和头晕。在1995年初，症状在数周内加剧，她脸部肌肉严重变形，她说话几乎没有人听得懂。
95年3月20日，她昏迷了。
一名同学说：“朱令真的是一个令人羡慕的年轻女孩，很对方面都展示出色的才华。她在孙维所在的乐队弹奏七弦古琴。
“朱令的音乐天赋，学术成就和出色的体育能力无疑让她鹤立鸡群。”
正当朱令1995年3月躺在北京协和医院插着管时，医生做了很多检查，但都没有结果。她在清华的朋友从中国少数网络端口之一的网站发了国际求救。这样中国历史上最大规模之一的公民科学家侦查运动展开了。
当时90年代中在美国国务院当医生的John Aldis马上就被这宗谜案吸引了，他说：“太难以置信了，英文写的有点差，这是绝望的。”
“我马上就被这起案件吸引了，很兴奋。他问了一名工友，后者马上怀疑一件事：是铊。
在堪培拉，病理家Ted Macarthur 也深信是铊。这些医生的意见最终迫使中国专家进行测试，他们在朱令血液、脑脊液、指甲和头发里找到高含量的铊。
铊是一种有毒的重金属，无色无味，一般用来老鼠药里。
50岁的朱令最终不敌脑瘤而去世后的几个礼拜，全球寻求公义的力量终于找到了孙维。她是20年来投铊毒案的主要疑犯。
《周末澳洲人》曝光了孙维住在史提芬港地区。十年前来到澳洲后她就在那里买卖房子。
两年前夫妻两人决定从“边远的”Booral 53公顷农场搬到节奏较快的史提芬港地区的Salamander Bay。
他们在找一个更有社交的生活方式，今年他们的女儿要上幼儿园，他们要为她找到更多的选择给她提供最好的。
在他们出租房广告中，他们说喜欢游泳，划船，到史提芬港不同的海滩，骑自行车到鱼市场买新鲜生蚝，在码头看塘鹅。
投毒案的披露震惊了当地群众。有的人形容孙维“真的很活泼善良”和“大方和温暖”。
朋友和熟人怎么也想不通这名爱交朋友的有钱街坊会与朱令下毒案有关。朱令中毒后只能用轮椅，几乎失明，她父母不得不把食物切碎亲自喂她，她身体残疾如此严重，她的精神年龄只有六岁小孩那样。
一名熟知孙维的妇女说：“几乎跟电影情节一样，特别是在湾区，你不会经常听到这个戏剧性的故事。肯定会让人感到有问题。”
在铊被确认是毒的源头后，她就否认指控并且一直否认到今日。她这礼拜没有回应记者的问题。
史提芬港当地群众在网上搜索这起无缘无故牵涉到他们社区的罪案。公民警察在脸书出现，一名当地人建议说如果有人看见孙维就马上打000。这个帖子很快就被删了。
史提芬港一名当地群众说：“你越深挖，瓜就越大。但话又说回来，你真的会找到真相吗？”
孙维和她老公谢飞宇从日本滑雪度假村发信息给朋友，让他们不要相信指控。
但当他们回澳洲时，他们几乎不会有机会过平静生活了。中国数百万人在监视孙维，他们的关系甚至延伸到史提芬港的静街。
“谁可以接触到她的茶？”
中国网民20年来不断挖掘朱令案的秘密。Aldis密切关注此案。他说：“用网络来做这个实在是令人难以置信的。目前已经是地动山摇了。”
“我所知的是有人把铊放在朱令的杯里，可能是茶或者咖啡，可能是身边的熟人。那么这个人是谁呢？谁可以在她喝茶的时候接触她的茶呢？”
在2018年，当孙维在澳洲过上好日子时，在地球另一半的美国马里兰州，美国地质学家Richard Ash正在对朱令父母偶然收集到的头发样本进行革命性测试。
Ash使用了通常用于分析沉积岩的质谱激光烧蚀技术来确定朱令是在数周的时间里中铊毒。也有一些证据显示铅中毒。我们用双面胶带把头发粘下来，沿着头发发射激光，我们知道激光沿着头发移动的速度与时间有关。
他由此得出的科学论文报告称：“头发以相对恒定的速度将血液中的重金属结合到角蛋白中。重金属沿毛干的分布情况通常与接触该元素的剂量和时间密切对应，因此代表一个长期记录，而这个记录 不受后期体内平衡或排泄影响。
Ash推测，铊一开始通过隐形眼镜进入受害者，随后在 1994 年末的几个月里“每隔几天”口服铊，频率越来越高，当时朱令完全秃头、视力丧失并出现症状 腹痛。 她回家后康复并返回学校，1995 年3月，她因神智不清、癫痫和抽搐入院，最终陷入昏迷。
由于科学家们的非凡国际合作，即后来的铊中毒远程医疗网络，朱令在中国最终获得了治疗普鲁士蓝的药物。 Aldis在中央情报局驻北京的一位朋友的帮助下，亲手向朱治疗的医院递交了一封信，要求紧急使用解毒剂。 药用了后，朱令开始康复。但伤害不能逆转，她已经失忆。神经严重受损，永远不能走路。
回来澳洲，孙维将名字改成Jasmine Sun,甚至改了生日来隐瞒过去。但她逃不过中国网络侦探。朱令去年12月的去世令国际社会更想得到公义，因为中国的刑事调查已经没有进展，可能是因为孙维家庭与共产党的关系。在澳洲，对孙维的指控被转介到内政部。就目前来看，极不可能会有引渡，孙在中国受审的可能性也几乎没有。
但Aldis说孙维不能逃避问题，她不能逃避过去。
“朱令死后，所有事情都变得竭斯底里。我们不能依靠中国政府做点什么了，我想不到有其他办法。”
当孙维度假结束将会回史提芬港重新过上不再平静的生活。她将会试图修补邻里关系，但她知道中国网民不会让她过上安静生活的。
在北京，朱令的父亲仍然没有答案。去年他们在女儿葬礼上俯身亲吻她的时候，83岁朱明新和84岁吴承之看起来疲惫不堪，被击败，比实际年龄苍老。
追悼会上播放着广陵散，她1994年在北京音乐厅里演奏过这曲，当时她已经中毒了。
但朱令案仍然未解，公义可能永远不会来临。
朱令没有看到她的正义。
我希望在自己的有生之年可以看到朱令的正义。
朱令在中国没有得到正义，希望她在澳洲能得到一点正义 - 孙维能收到惩罚 - 她的签证作假，欺诈，洗钱，税务问题，大家都给澳洲政府写信，呼吁澳洲政府介入 替天行道。
你想让她在澳洲得到惩罚，估计不太可能，最后最多罚孙维一点钱了事，澳洲政府最喜欢钱了，孙维就是摇钱树，不会让她走，也不会让她坐牢的。澳洲，包括全世界和中国其实是一样的，有权有钱走遍天下，无权无钱寸步难行。
参看这篇报道： 希金斯强奸案：被告Bruce Lehrmann的指控将被撤销
这个案子的独特之处在于，被告是前总理老婆的表弟，他在国防部长的办公室里面把原告给强奸了。结果屁事没有。被告女朋友的星座都给扒出来了，但被告的爸妈都没有一个媒体敢曝光。 --------------------------------------------------- 二审对于希金斯(Brittany Higgins)精神影响的新医学证据预计会导致控制被撤销，审判不会进行。
首都领地公诉人Shane Drumgold 检阅材料后将与周五早上十点做出宣布。
他将会行使他的起诉斟酌权来撤销对被起诉性侵希金斯的男子Bruce Lehrmann。
在这个爆炸性决定做出之前，新的精神科医生说，再次审理强奸案会对希金斯女士的精神健康构成不可被接受的风险。
结果是，一直坚称自己无辜的前政治员工Lehrmann先生将不会再被起诉。
2019年三月在一个部长办公室里发生事件，Lehrmann先生 对强奸指控不认罪。
他的律师告诉首都领地高级法院说没有发生性行为并且谴责要检控他的决定。
一审在10月流审，原因是陪审员行为不当。本来定在2023年的二审不会继续。
Drumgold 先生今天早上在首都领地高级法院与Lehrmann先生的律师Steve Whybrow讨论。
新闻集团联系了他，他否认在终止此事上有任何最终决定。
他的办公室下午发表声明，通知媒体Drumgold 先生将会在周五早上十点举行记者招待会做出宣布。
他的办公室不肯确认宣布的内容。
然而，新闻集团确认公诉人将会行使检控斟酌权，宣布基于有力的新医学证据他不会继续这件案的审理，这些证据是关于二审对于希金斯女士精神健康的影响。
新的材料包括独立医学专家的意见，即此次起诉持续带来的伤害对希金斯女士的健康构成不能被接受的风险。
所以Drumgold 先生将会宣布，他已经做出决定，继续对主诉人精神健康带来严重风险的检控不符合公共利益。
这种惩罚 虽然不是最好的结果。但是，让孙 损失 总是大快人心的。
话说，签证 移民材料 作假 真是 应该坐牢的。澳洲政府 真的应该出手啊。没收财产 把孙送进监狱，对于澳洲政府来说，是一个又赚钱又赢面子的好事，不要错过了。
大家给澳洲政府写信吧。
孩子会长大的，我们看到的一切她女儿也会看到，她怎么向女儿解释？
我也希望我的有生之年可以看到
一：孙维和谢飞宇属于假离婚！那个波兰犹太老头，和孙维是假结婚，目的是让孙维尽快入籍澳洲，两个孩子都是谢飞宇的 二：孙维和谢飞宇在澳洲有多处房产，都是以皮包公司(他俩各50%股份)进行操作，目的是逃避税收。 三：孙和谢是2015年初来澳洲的。之前传言孙曾移民美国，是假消息。孙长期被边控，无法出国。其国内财产，最后处理的是2017年的一家公司股份。 据了解，孙维目前居住在澳洲珀斯，与老公谢飞宇从事建材生意，还有房地产产业，两人生活的十分惬意，完全不会受到国内任何舆论的影响。
当年孙维为了尽快入籍澳洲，与前夫谢飞宇假离婚之后，又与那个波兰的犹太老头假结婚，孙维与谢飞宇至今都居住在一起，抚养着与谢飞宇生的两个孩子。 可以向税务局反馈，孙维与谢飞宇在澳洲的多处房产，以皮包公司两人各50%的股份来进行操作，目的是： 为了逃避澳洲的税收。
根据澳洲法律，在移民材料上面撒谎 可以判入监 10年。 1. 孙维 填的出生日期 有问题，明显撒谎。 2 孙维 是靠假结婚获得澳洲 永居的。她跟谢飞宇一直居住在一起。她跟那个假结婚的老头婚姻存续期间，生的孩子是谢飞宇的。
建议大家给议员打电话，把孙维送进澳洲监狱呆 10年吧。既然她在中国没受到惩罚，让她在澳洲监狱呆着终老吧。
After a person acquires Citizenship
A person can acquire their Citizenship by descent or by conferral. Suppose the decision-maker becomes aware that the person has provided false information after acquiring the Citizenship. In that case, the decision-maker will consider whether to revoke the Citizenship or not. The decision-maker will decide this by going back to the time when the person applied for the Citizenship. In other words, if the decision-maker was aware that the person had given false information at the time of the application, then what would have been the decision at that time. Let’s say that the decision-maker decided that the application outcome would be different, such as refusing the application. Then the matter will be referred to the Citizenship Operation Section in the department.
What will happen next?
Suppose a decision-maker identifies information that suggests that an offence has or may have been committed, by a person who already has a Citizenship. In that case, the decision-maker will contact another internal team in the department, known as the Citizenship Operations Section for advice and assistance. The Citizenship Operations Section will then assess the information and forward it to the Border Watch Allegations and Referral Team (BWART). Then BWART will conduct another investigation about the alleged offence. During this investigation it will determine whether to revoke the Citizenship of the person. If decided, then as explained below the Minister has the power to revoke a person Citizenship even after they had it. Simultaneously as mentioned above, the department will consider all relevant factors before prosecuting the person as well.
As said, as per section 34 of the Citizenship Act, the Minister can revoke a person’s Citizenship, either acquired by descent or conferral. This would happen, if the Minister identified through the investigations that the person has committed an offence under section 50 of the Citizenship Act. The Minister will send a notice in writing. In this notice, the Minister will include the date when the person needs to surrender their Citizenship. The usual time frame is 28 days after the day the Minister sent the notice. If a person receives a notice of surrender of their Citizenship, the person must do it. Failure to surrender the Citizenship is an offence under section 38 of the Citizenship Act with a heavy penalty. If the Minister revokes the Citizenship, then the person ceases to be an Australian Citizen at the time of the revocation. Also, it is important to note that if the person has a child, then, unfortunately, the child’s Citizenship will also be revoked.
根据澳洲法律，如果获得公民身份的人被确定有不法行为，公民身份可以撤销，其孩子的公民身份同样被注销。
澳洲政府有充足理由遣返 孙维，另外，因为她的偷税行为，澳洲政府可以直接没收她的非法财产。
想想，这个画面 很有意思啊！
这句话我不同意，至少在这个案子里，真相一定会大白。因为它是被背后的政治力量干扰的案件，当那个政治力量消失的时候，真相就会大白于天下。
此外，办案的经手人员也不是白痴，一定会有人私下留存证据。
或者办案人员也许可以等到活着把真相亲口讲出来的那一天。
赞这个！
背后的政治力量，已经于2022年11月30日死了
mark, up.
无论是轩逸，还是朱令
大家（中国人）要的不是正义，要的别人落难！！！
如果早上起来，没有死人的新闻，没有地震海啸飞机失事没有高校投毒杀人
这一整天就无所事事了
姥姥！！！
近代中国人太苦了
只有别人死亡，生病，灾难
自己心里才会舒坦一些
海外中国人更甚
远离之，没错！！！
驱逐出境 👍
我说国内同事比我们辛苦多了，老板说不辛苦，上海房子上千万呢
还问我漂亮丫头的房子多少钱了（试探性的），我不接话，老板不知道我是不是住漂亮丫头试探的
然后我说，上海同事通勤时间很长很辛苦的，而且房子没有学区，只有一套，上千万也没啥用啊
老板不以为然
人说看面相，我说要看谈话
对待同事也一样，老板从来不感谢，说是这些就是这些人应该做
理所当然的
然后突然莫名其妙对我说，你前老板对你真好啊，给了你RSU啊
尼玛，那是我前老板给的吗？今年double了，是你给的吗？
你都想方设法fire我，奖金，赔偿金，RSU，都想毁了
你这样穷凶极恶，不是公司文化，都把人当傻子了
清华男真是替天行道啊
她肯定不要孩子学中文。坚决反对的那种。