DEI opponents are using a 1866 Civil Rights law to challenge equity policies in the workplace 1 of 2 | File - Conservative activist Edward Blum speaks at a news conference in Washington, June 29, 2023. Blum is citing Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 to go after a venture capital fund called Fearless Fund, which invests in businesses owned by women of color. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana) BY ANNE D’INNOCENZIO AND ALEXANDRA OLSON Updated 8:35 AM EST, January 14, 2024 Share NEW YORK (AP) — Opponents of workplace diversity programs are increasingly banking on a section of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 to challenge equity policies as well as funding to minority-owned businesses. Section 1981 of the act was originally meant to protect formerly enslaved people — or Black people specifically — from economic exclusion. But now the American Alliance for Equal Rights — a group run by Edward Blum, the conservative activist who challenged affirmative action in higher education and won — is citing the section to go after a venture capital fund called the Fearless Fund, which invests in businesses owned by women of color. A federal appeals court temporarily blocked funding for Fearless Fund’s grant program as the case proceeds. Conservative activists have brought lawsuits using the 1981 section against other companies and institutions, including insurance company Progressive and pharmaceutical giant Pfizer. The cases are being monitored carefully as the battle over racial considerations shift to the workplace following the U.S. Supreme Court’s June ruling ending affirmative action in college admissions. While the 1981 statute had been used well before the latest affirmative action ruling to prove reverse discrimination, Alphonso David, Fearless Fund’s legal counsel who serves as president & CEO of The Global Black Economic Forum, said that there’s a “coordinated use of Section 1981 now that we did not see before.” READ MORE
BY ANNE D’INNOCENZIO AND ALEXANDRA OLSON Updated 8:35 AM EST, January 14, 2024 Share NEW YORK (AP) — Opponents of workplace diversity programs are increasingly banking on a section of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 to challenge equity policies as well as funding to minority-owned businesses. Section 1981 of the act was originally meant to protect formerly enslaved people — or Black people specifically — from economic exclusion. But now the American Alliance for Equal Rights — a group run by Edward Blum, the conservative activist who challenged affirmative action in higher education and won — is citing the section to go after a venture capital fund called the Fearless Fund, which invests in businesses owned by women of color. A federal appeals court temporarily blocked funding for Fearless Fund’s grant program as the case proceeds. Conservative activists have brought lawsuits using the 1981 section against other companies and institutions, including insurance company Progressive and pharmaceutical giant Pfizer. The cases are being monitored carefully as the battle over racial considerations shift to the workplace following the U.S. Supreme Court’s June ruling ending affirmative action in college admissions. While the 1981 statute had been used well before the latest affirmative action ruling to prove reverse discrimination, Alphonso David, Fearless Fund’s legal counsel who serves as president & CEO of The Global Black Economic Forum, said that there’s a “coordinated use of Section 1981 now that we did not see before.” READ MORE
把大学基数先弄稳。 dei 难道有什么亚女占优吗？白女 黑女 黑男都排在你前头，亚男更不要说了
那咋办？这也不搞，那也放弃，老中就自己龟缩起来搞内卷？你能卷出来几个？
很可能
没有结果公平的社会，用政府强制手段，造成所有人生活水平一致的结果，对于努力有心向上的人是不公平的。 只有机会平等，过程透明，才有可能达到公平的过程。 可是一旦有多余资源挹注在所谓弱势团体身上，就没有公平可言。 "弱势者”得到更多资源，”统治者”分配资源，最惨的就是中产，什么都得不到。
大学录取还有个分数可以参考，要低分不要高分。公司就是说黑人能力最合适，怎么证明？