https://www.abc27.com/business/press-releases/ein-presswire/592903395/lawsuit-alleges-gardasil-vaccine-killed-13-year-old-boy/ Merck has a long history of bringing controversial products to market, including Fosamax (a purported bone density drug that caused bone fractures) and Nuvaring (a birth control device associated with life-threatening blood clots and death). Merck’s most infamous drug is Vioxx, a pain medication the company had to pull from the market due to cardiovascular risks. Tens of thousands of patients filed lawsuits against Merck alleging they suffered heart attacks and other cardiovascular injuries as a result of ingesting the medication. The litigation revealed that Merck knew early on that Vioxx was linked to fatal cardiovascular adverse events but intentionally chose to conceal the risks from the public and medical community. Lawsuits accused Merck of orchestrating a scheme to downplay the severity of the risks, misrepresenting the results of its clinical trials, failing to undertake the clinical trials that would reveal risks, and blacklisting medical professionals who dared to publicly criticize the safety of Vioxx. Merck paid nearly $5 billion to settle the tens of thousands of Vioxx personal injury actions and an additional $1 billion to settle a securities class action. The company was also forced to pay $950 million in civil and criminal fines to the Department of Justice and other governmental entities as a result of various criminal activities Merck had engaged in with respect to Vioxx. Attorneys in the Gardasil litigation allege Merck has engaged in similar corporate malfeasance with its HPV vaccine. According to Merck’s marketing, Gardasil provides lifetime immunity to cervical and other HPV-associated cancers. Plaintiffs in the Gardasil litigation, however, say Merck’s marketing claim that Gardasil prevents cancer (not to mention lifetime immunity), is unproven. The allegations state that Gardasil may actually be more likely to cause cancer in those previously exposed to HPV than prevent it.
回复 50楼rureal的帖子 科研干得不就是这个？没有明显效果，FDA都通不过。你可以不信，我自己是搞科研的，我相信。 HPV vaccination works extremely well. HPV vaccine has the potential to prevent more than 90% of HPV-attributable cancers. Since HPV vaccination was first recommended in 2006, infections with HPV types that cause most HPV cancers and genital warts have dropped 88% among teen girls and 81% among young adult women.
回复 50楼rureal的帖子 科研干得不就是这个？没有明显效果，FDA都通不过。你可以不信，我自己是搞科研的，我相信。 HPV vaccination works extremely well. HPV vaccine has the potential to prevent more than 90% of HPV-attributable cancers. Since HPV vaccination was first recommended in 2006, infections with HPV types that cause most HPV cancers and genital warts have dropped 88% among teen girls and 81% among young adult women. serena 发表于 2023-10-27 22:17
回复 50楼rureal的帖子 科研干得不就是这个？没有明显效果，FDA都通不过。你可以不信，我自己是搞科研的，我相信。 HPV vaccination works extremely well. HPV vaccine has the potential to prevent more than 90% of HPV-attributable cancers. Since HPV vaccination was first recommended in 2006, infections with HPV types that cause most HPV cancers and genital warts have dropped 88% among teen girls and 81% among young adult women. serena 发表于 2023-10-27 22:17
again，没有任何地方说打了不得癌，没有任何地方说不打要得癌，更没有地方说打了出事的比不打得癌的少。 你这段说它works extremely well的，就是一堆春秋笔法的话术： -- has potential to prevent HPV-attributable cancers: 只有potential是吧？这个potential是防HPV-attributable的癌是吧？所以即使打的得癌的更多也不妨碍受害者没法打这句话的官司是吧？ -- infections with HPV types that cause most HPV cancers and genital warts have dropped: 只说某个型号的病毒感染减少，所以甚至不是得癌减少，甚至不是得warts减少， Again，打得人得癌也好得warts也好都不妨碍人家说人家减少了某个型号的病毒不是？ 而且Merck之前那导致骨折的Fosamax，导致血栓死亡的Nuvaring，导致心梗的Vioxx，是不是都是FDA通过的？你自己搞科研你信好了，但是既然搞科研就不要说假话，譬如“打疫苗出事的比不打得癌的少”是一句不折不扣的虚假陈词。 https://www.abc27.com/business/press-releases/ein-presswire/592903395/lawsuit-alleges-gardasil-vaccine-killed-13-year-old-boy/ Merck has a long history of bringing controversial products to market, including Fosamax (a purported bone density drug that caused bone fractures) and Nuvaring (a birth control device associated with life-threatening blood clots and death). Merck’s most infamous drug is Vioxx, a pain medication the company had to pull from the market due to cardiovascular risks. Tens of thousands of patients filed lawsuits against Merck alleging they suffered heart attacks and other cardiovascular injuries as a result of ingesting the medication. The litigation revealed that Merck knew early on that Vioxx was linked to fatal cardiovascular adverse events but intentionally chose to conceal the risks from the public and medical community. Lawsuits accused Merck of orchestrating a scheme to downplay the severity of the risks, misrepresenting the results of its clinical trials, failing to undertake the clinical trials that would reveal risks, and blacklisting medical professionals who dared to publicly criticize the safety of Vioxx. Merck paid nearly $5 billion to settle the tens of thousands of Vioxx personal injury actions and an additional $1 billion to settle a securities class action. The company was also forced to pay $950 million in civil and criminal fines to the Department of Justice and other governmental entities as a result of various criminal activities Merck had engaged in with respect to Vioxx. Attorneys in the Gardasil litigation allege Merck has engaged in similar corporate malfeasance with its HPV vaccine. According to Merck’s marketing, Gardasil provides lifetime immunity to cervical and other HPV-associated cancers. Plaintiffs in the Gardasil litigation, however, say Merck’s marketing claim that Gardasil prevents cancer (not to mention lifetime immunity), is unproven. The allegations state that Gardasil may actually be more likely to cause cancer in those previously exposed to HPV than prevent it.
你不是反疫苗吗？我就问你打没打Merck的hbv疫苗怎么了？我当然打疫苗，不光Merck的疫苗，别的公司证明有效的疫苗一样打。我知道生命科学对延长人类寿命提高生活质量的贡献。 hpv疫苗和hbv疫苗一样，减少的病例是有数据可查，前面cdc的数据贴给你了。你当看不见是你的事。 HPV vaccines are highly immunogenic. More than 98% of recipients develop an antibody response to HPV types included in the respective vaccines 1 month after completing a full vaccination series. How Well Do These Vaccines Work? HPV vaccination works extremely well. HPV vaccine has the potential to prevent more than 90% of HPV-attributable cancers. Since HPV vaccination was first recommended in 2006, infections with HPV types that cause most HPV cancers and genital warts have dropped 88% among teen girls and 81% among young adult women. Fewer teens and young adults are getting genital warts. HPV vaccination has also reduced the number of cases of precancers of the cervix in young women. The protection provided by HPV vaccines lasts a long time. People who received HPV vaccines were followed for at least about 12 years, and their protection against HPV has remained high with no evidence of decreasing over time.
你不是反疫苗吗？我就问你打没打Merck的hbv疫苗怎么了？我当然打疫苗，不光Merck的疫苗，别的公司证明有效的疫苗一样打。我知道生命科学对延长人类寿命提高生活质量的贡献。 hpv疫苗和hbv疫苗一样，减少的病例是有数据可查，前面cdc的数据贴给你了。你当看不见是你的事。 HPV vaccines are highly immunogenic. More than 98% of recipients develop an antibody response to HPV types included in the respective vaccines 1 month after completing a full vaccination series. How Well Do These Vaccines Work? HPV vaccination works extremely well. HPV vaccine has the potential to prevent more than 90% of HPV-attributable cancers. Since HPV vaccination was first recommended in 2006, infections with HPV types that cause most HPV cancers and genital warts have dropped 88% among teen girls and 81% among young adult women. Fewer teens and young adults are getting genital warts. HPV vaccination has also reduced the number of cases of precancers of the cervix in young women. The protection provided by HPV vaccines lasts a long time. People who received HPV vaccines were followed for at least about 12 years, and their protection against HPV has remained high with no evidence of decreasing over time.
🔥 最新回帖
打的人都认为管不了女儿的未来的性伴，然后还有被强奸的可能，一切都往最坏的可能想，但是打疫苗最坏的可能他们却不愿意想想。
会有这么严重的后果吗？我22岁大学毕业来美国打的，打之前和打之后都例假不正常，但也都有自己的规律就是两个月一次，十年内生了俩娃，用排卵试纸测出来准确的峰值后都是一次中，我没觉得疫苗对我有影响
很多下架的药物也是爱弗地嗯批准的😂。 按照你说的，你说伴侣固定没有必要打这个疫苗。 我可不可以邪e的引申一下？ 反过来说，如果性伴侣不是一个的话还是要打HPV？也就是说如果谁家给女儿打HPV，就是防备女儿长大以后lan交？！邪e不？！LOL当然这项意外收获的功能大家都不明说的吧……
各州不同吧，纽约的学校没听说学校组织打这个的。
不过这个不重要，保险都cover，我的顾虑主要是可能的副作用。
🛋️ 沙发板凳
我以前发过帖子咨询，反对的人很多。
我又是医学盲，越看越迷糊。
我觉得那些纯粹反疫苗的言论也不用考虑太多。人类是不断进化的，生理心理都是。不觉得完全organic的人就能长命百岁啊。差不多得了。
我还是喜欢在华人上多问问题的。
谁让我是科学盲，医学盲，技术盲，各种盲呢。
医学盲就听医生的，至少保证专业院校学过医拿到执照的。华人上给你指指点点打不打疫苗的，没几个是医生。
唯一可惜的是，你推崇的医学，对于疑难杂症，对于罕见病，对于感冒，都是呵呵。对于妇科病，也是呵呵，除了单一致病菌导致的感染、难产等。疫苗不是说不好，而是说过犹不及。什么病也只能靠疫苗了！疑难杂症罕见病上几万种，怎么都要打疫苗吗？！ 最神奇的是HPV就是防某种病毒的，原来单一致病菌这一招也呵呵了
男孩也应该打，男的也会感染，只是一般没啥症状而已。
疑难杂症有疫苗么？逻辑混乱……
还呵呵，医学呵呵了你有啥不呵呵方法么？
知道啊。男孩的选择度要大一些。我家老大打了，老二没有。
请教为什么男孩要纠结？
能把几个看上去的科学用词堆砌在一起，形成一段狗屁不通的话，就是所谓伪科学的伎俩了吧…..
网友们这人是真的不懂。
这才是正解，找真正懂的人打听。
呵呵😄
呵呵
这个送给你：（从covid那个帖子里选出来的一段，不是我说的。）
爱打疫苗的请自便，不要强迫别人打疫苗就好。
但是日渐增多的心脏病，超级癌症，运动员场上猝死的新闻，还是仔细想想打这个疫苗到底有什么意义？
有人素质低，说脏话了
这个送给你：（从covid那个帖子里选出来的一段，不是我说的。）
爱打疫苗的请自便，不要强迫别人打疫苗就好。
但是日渐增多的心脏病，超级癌症，运动员场上猝死的新闻，还是仔细想想打这个疫苗到底有什么意义？
男的即使携带病毒，发病率也要比女的小很多。如果自身有其他健康考虑，做两害相权取其轻的选择，是值得的。这是一种很基本的选择逻辑。特殊情况还是看个人吧。
这个送给你：（从covid那个帖子里选出来的一段，不是我说的。）
爱打疫苗的请自便，不要强迫别人打疫苗就好。
但是日渐增多的心脏病，超级癌症，运动员场上猝死的新闻，还是仔细想想打这个疫苗到底有什么意义？
我不懂医学 你懂 那请给出这个疫苗到底有没有引发别的疾病的可能性？引发过什么疾病？要发表的论文哦！ 还有，你懂医学，请给出这个疫苗的副作用！要有依据的数据哦 不要说一个都没有哦
Google: Oral sex and HPV related-cancer (e.g. HPV+ Head and neck cancer)
我也是大妈，我也打了。但根据医生的介绍，大妈打的作用肯定没有年轻时候打好。打的时候医生问我是不是要换partner了，隐含意思就是如果partner比较多，打一下还是比较好。如果老夫老妻也不准备离婚找其他人，打了也没有太大防护作用了
前几天别人发我一篇文章 可以参看一下
早就知道啊。看过的。不是说了吗，两害相权取其轻。个人的决定。
Merck has a long history of bringing controversial products to market, including Fosamax (a purported bone density drug that caused bone fractures) and Nuvaring (a birth control device associated with life-threatening blood clots and death).
Merck’s most infamous drug is Vioxx, a pain medication the company had to pull from the market due to cardiovascular risks. Tens of thousands of patients filed lawsuits against Merck alleging they suffered heart attacks and other cardiovascular injuries as a result of ingesting the medication.
The litigation revealed that Merck knew early on that Vioxx was linked to fatal cardiovascular adverse events but intentionally chose to conceal the risks from the public and medical community. Lawsuits accused Merck of orchestrating a scheme to downplay the severity of the risks, misrepresenting the results of its clinical trials, failing to undertake the clinical trials that would reveal risks, and blacklisting medical professionals who dared to publicly criticize the safety of Vioxx.
Merck paid nearly $5 billion to settle the tens of thousands of Vioxx personal injury actions and an additional $1 billion to settle a securities class action. The company was also forced to pay $950 million in civil and criminal fines to the Department of Justice and other governmental entities as a result of various criminal activities Merck had engaged in with respect to Vioxx.
Attorneys in the Gardasil litigation allege Merck has engaged in similar corporate malfeasance with its HPV vaccine.
According to Merck’s marketing, Gardasil provides lifetime immunity to cervical and other HPV-associated cancers. Plaintiffs in the Gardasil litigation, however, say Merck’s marketing claim that Gardasil prevents cancer (not to mention lifetime immunity), is unproven. The allegations state that Gardasil may actually be more likely to cause cancer in those previously exposed to HPV than prevent it.
打疫苗出事的比不打疫苗得癌死掉的少不知多少倍，所以打疫苗出事会上新闻，得了hpv就只是一个数字。就看你愿意选哪条路而已。
怎么知道打疫苗的不得癌？又怎么知道不打疫苗的得癌死掉？更怎么知道打疫苗出事的比不打疫苗得癌死掉的少？连Merck都没敢这么骗吧？
啊？我看说都是说26岁以下才建议打，意思难道不就是以上就没啥效果了吗
科研干得不就是这个？没有明显效果，FDA都通不过。你可以不信，我自己是搞科研的，我相信。
HPV vaccination works extremely well. HPV vaccine has the potential to prevent more than 90% of HPV-attributable cancers. Since HPV vaccination was first recommended in 2006, infections with HPV types that cause most HPV cancers and genital warts have dropped 88% among teen girls and 81% among young adult women.
你搞科研的应该知道效果那是由funding决定的，有钱就有效果。
你真的在美国吗？
again，没有任何地方说打了不得癌，没有任何地方说不打要得癌，更没有地方说打了出事的比不打得癌的少。
你这段说它works extremely well的，就是一堆春秋笔法的话术： -- has potential to prevent HPV-attributable cancers: 只有potential是吧？这个potential是防HPV-attributable的癌是吧？所以即使打的得癌的更多也不妨碍受害者没法打这句话的官司是吧？ -- infections with HPV types that cause most HPV cancers and genital warts have dropped: 只说某个型号的病毒感染减少，所以甚至不是得癌减少，甚至不是得warts减少， Again，打得人得癌也好得warts也好都不妨碍人家说人家减少了某个型号的病毒不是？
而且Merck之前那导致骨折的Fosamax，导致血栓死亡的Nuvaring，导致心梗的Vioxx，是不是都是FDA通过的？你自己搞科研你信好了，但是既然搞科研就不要说假话，譬如“打疫苗出事的比不打得癌的少”是一句不折不扣的虚假陈词。
https://www.abc27.com/business/press-releases/ein-presswire/592903395/lawsuit-alleges-gardasil-vaccine-killed-13-year-old-boy/
Merck has a long history of bringing controversial products to market, including Fosamax (a purported bone density drug that caused bone fractures) and Nuvaring (a birth control device associated with life-threatening blood clots and death).
Merck’s most infamous drug is Vioxx, a pain medication the company had to pull from the market due to cardiovascular risks. Tens of thousands of patients filed lawsuits against Merck alleging they suffered heart attacks and other cardiovascular injuries as a result of ingesting the medication.
The litigation revealed that Merck knew early on that Vioxx was linked to fatal cardiovascular adverse events but intentionally chose to conceal the risks from the public and medical community. Lawsuits accused Merck of orchestrating a scheme to downplay the severity of the risks, misrepresenting the results of its clinical trials, failing to undertake the clinical trials that would reveal risks, and blacklisting medical professionals who dared to publicly criticize the safety of Vioxx.
Merck paid nearly $5 billion to settle the tens of thousands of Vioxx personal injury actions and an additional $1 billion to settle a securities class action. The company was also forced to pay $950 million in civil and criminal fines to the Department of Justice and other governmental entities as a result of various criminal activities Merck had engaged in with respect to Vioxx.
Attorneys in the Gardasil litigation allege Merck has engaged in similar corporate malfeasance with its HPV vaccine.
According to Merck’s marketing, Gardasil provides lifetime immunity to cervical and other HPV-associated cancers. Plaintiffs in the Gardasil litigation, however, say Merck’s marketing claim that Gardasil prevents cancer (not to mention lifetime immunity), is unproven. The allegations state that Gardasil may actually be more likely to cause cancer in those previously exposed to HPV than prevent it.
因为我贴了一遍以后你回帖像是没看见一样，所以只好再给你看一遍。 你打过多少Merck的疫苗先给大家公布一下？我看不出你问的问题和本贴有什么关系，不过你要公布你自己的疫苗记录来证明你相信你喜欢打whatever company的疫苗我看看也无妨。
你这样随口造谣，真是很无耻！ 有时想想人和人差别真的很大。同样是活一辈子，有的人努力的研究疫苗救了无数人；有的人则不断的贬低着别人的成就，妄图用自己肮脏的思想把所有人都丑化到自己的水准。
那个人是典型的川粉阴谋论，和她较真儿没用！
你不是反疫苗吗？我就问你打没打Merck的hbv疫苗怎么了？我当然打疫苗，不光Merck的疫苗，别的公司证明有效的疫苗一样打。我知道生命科学对延长人类寿命提高生活质量的贡献。
hpv疫苗和hbv疫苗一样，减少的病例是有数据可查，前面cdc的数据贴给你了。你当看不见是你的事。
HPV vaccines are highly immunogenic. More than 98% of recipients develop an antibody response to HPV types included in the respective vaccines 1 month after completing a full vaccination series.
How Well Do These Vaccines Work? HPV vaccination works extremely well. HPV vaccine has the potential to prevent more than 90% of HPV-attributable cancers. Since HPV vaccination was first recommended in 2006, infections with HPV types that cause most HPV cancers and genital warts have dropped 88% among teen girls and 81% among young adult women. Fewer teens and young adults are getting genital warts. HPV vaccination has also reduced the number of cases of precancers of the cervix in young women. The protection provided by HPV vaccines lasts a long time. People who received HPV vaccines were followed for at least about 12 years, and their protection against HPV has remained high with no evidence of decreasing over time.
我只希望这种处处阴谋论反科学的人只影响自己，他们爱怎样就怎样得偿所愿。不要影响到楼主这种。
应该听科学家的，而不是医生的，医生是服从者，被教育服从各种行业标准规则等，服从才不会吃官司，大多医生是没有时间去研究专业论文的，都是行业协会怎么说就怎么做。
对你来说，喵喵是神圣不可侵犯的，你的整个生命的基础就建立在对疫苗的信仰上面。我很理解你。
随便你怎么说，其实一想到你们天天叫别人川粉的人都热衷于打疫苗，也就一点不生气了，反正不是你死就是我活呗，只要不强制都随便。
这里也有转载 https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/undeniable-toxic-ingredients-hpv-vaccines?utm_source= 我也是看了这个以后有了更深的了解。hpv疫苗是新冠疫苗发明之前最毒的疫苗。评论里面也有许多专业信息。
我重贴是因为你无视，拿什么有问题“FDA不会通过”以及“打了出事比不打得癌少”两个伪命题说事。 你重复贴你这么一段我已经分析过了的英文干嘛呢？
再说一遍，CDC的所谓数据说减少了某个型号的病毒，既没说减少了癌症也没说减少了warts；FDA通过的祸害人类的药品食品多了去了；打了出事的是事实，不打就会得癌不是，打了出事的比不打得癌的少是凭空捏造的假话。
因为生命科学对延长生命的贡献所以去打疫苗这个逻辑很高级，我完全支持你去打所有据说有效的疫苗。但是请尊重我贴来分享给楼主的事实。
白水喝多了都有坏处 你敢说你日常吃喝的 超市卖的东西都没有副作用吗？ paper里都明白着呢 所以你鸡蛋也别吃牛奶也别喝吧 至于医学 一直都是benefit vs risk的权衡 我很好奇 你吃中药不
因为即使药物上市了以后，药厂也会继续分析临床数据。
我问过医生这个问题，并不是年龄大了没用，而是在美国，默认你如果没有打，三十岁之前肯定感染过hpv。。。因为大家都很早就sexual active…对于咱们中国人，尤其很多人一直只有一个伴侣的，大概率一直没感染过，什么时候打都可以。
请问医生为什么不是科学家？ 我们的儿医经常看文献，回答我的问题都是用最近发表的临床数据做证据。 要知道药厂很多”科学家”都是有MD degree的
医学上，没有任何事情是“都是好处”，没有任何100%的事情
但是你不得不承认 这世上怕死的人占大多数- 三年来观察得出的结论
你是在感动自己吗？
天呐， 这话赶紧和国内的卫健委说说， 中国国内现在推这个疫苗， 中国人民本来生育率就不高，这下要断子绝孙了。
这一位说话都语无伦次了 你有病可千万不要去看医生
呵呵，反正你们这种脑子里全是各种阴谋论的人，是不会被任何东西感动的
“呵呵” 一般是文学修养不够不会用词时的万能用语， 或是说不出个所以然来时的语气助词。
手动赞
我也不知道你学过啥。 要说你学理工的吧，逻辑能力应该够格才对吧，但不象。 要是学文科的，至少得有能把话说通顺、意思表述明确的能力吧。
疫苗有效期多久？
最好是使用多的副作用小的
都问
会不会有些副作用已开始不知道，后面发现了。先打的就，，，，