日本核水可以拉到沙漠去倒吗?

l
luluaaa
楼主 (北美华人网)
说错了 轻拍哈。 海洋里那么多生物,倒海里肯定会影响深远。 沙漠里没人没水,拉去倒不会影响什么吧?为什么不去倒沙漠里呢?运输实现不了吗?
桃花朵朵
日本有沙漠吗,没有的话你要倒去哪里的沙漠,你觉得别的国家跟你一样傻?
l
laohua001
说错了 轻拍哈。 海洋里那么多生物,倒海里肯定会影响深远。 沙漠里没人没水,拉去倒不会影响什么吧?为什么不去倒沙漠里呢?运输实现不了吗?
luluaaa 发表于 2023-08-25 20:24

沙漠都是有主权的
那个国家会允许日本倾倒核污染水呢?
g
gokgs
洗洗睡吧, 我觉得海很大很大很大很大很大很大很大很大很大很大, 应该问题不大。
h
helloterran3
说错了 轻拍哈。 海洋里那么多生物,倒海里肯定会影响深远。 沙漠里没人没水,拉去倒不会影响什么吧?为什么不去倒沙漠里呢?运输实现不了吗?
luluaaa 发表于 2023-08-25 20:24

不是一直说处理的比自来水还干净。
那日本人一人一杯就喝完了嘛,还排放个屁。
当年苏联用核弹炸水库,苏联能源部长可是带头跳下去游泳的。
但是日本外长跳出来说核废水符合饮用标准,赵立坚要求日本外长喝一口他demo的核废水,没有一个人敢喝。
h
helloterran3
洗洗睡吧, 我觉得海很大很大很大很大很大很大很大很大很大很大, 应该问题不大。
gokgs 发表于 2023-08-25 20:28

我觉得大气层比海洋大好多倍。为什么白人天天叽歪碳排放问题?
m
mitao
周边也没沙漠呀,运哪儿去呢
m
miaka
不是一直说处理的比自来水还干净。
那日本人一人一杯就喝完了嘛,还排放个屁。
当年苏联用核弹炸水库,苏联能源部长可是带头跳下去游泳的。
但是日本外长跳出来说核废水符合饮用标准,赵立坚要求日本外长喝一口他demo的核废水,没有一个人敢喝。

helloterran3 发表于 2023-08-25 20:31

赵立坚真是顶流啊。没想到去了海洋司还有机会出来骂人。
t
tracylovebobo
排沙漠肯定比排还里好,但是日本没沙漠,其他国家不可能免费给它倒。倒海里不花钱,全世界买单。
l
llily
这么干净的水为什么不在日本国内冲马桶啊,多环保啊!
z
zhou.ucar
楼主说的虽然不现实,但是跟一种处理方式有类似的地方。 这种方法是蒸发法,加热核污水使其蒸发,绝大多数的污染物都留在最后,处理起来就容易多了。但是这样做成本比较高,日本政府和东电不愿意承担费用,所以没采用。
b
bluecrab
现在就看他家拿出来测试的水和实际排出去的是不是一回事了.
z
zhengxumaomao
这么干净的水为什么不在日本国内冲马桶啊,多环保啊!
llily 发表于 2023-08-25 21:11

冲马桶的水最终还是去大海了
t
teamwork
赵立坚真是顶流啊。没想到去了海洋司还有机会出来骂人。
miaka 发表于 2023-08-25 20:49

赵立坚又骂人了,有啥用呢
g
gokgs
https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/iaea-finds-japans-plans-to-release-treated-water-into-the-sea-at-fukushima-consistent-with-international-safety-standards
An International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safety review has concluded that Japan’s plans to release treated water stored at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station into the sea are consistent with IAEA Safety Standards. In a report formally presented by Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi to Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Tokyo today, the IAEA also said that the discharges of the treated water would have a negligible radiological impact to people and the environment. The report is the outcome of nearly two years of work by an IAEA Task Force made up of top specialists from within the Agency advised by internationally recognised nuclear safety experts from eleven countries. They reviewed Japan’s plans against IAEA Safety Standards which serve as a global reference for protecting people and the environment and contribute to a harmonized high level of safety worldwide. “Based on its comprehensive assessment, the IAEA has concluded that the approach and activities to the discharge of ALPS treated water taken by Japan are consistent with relevant international safety standards,” IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said in a foreword of the report. “Furthermore, the IAEA notes the controlled, gradual discharges of the treated water to the sea, as currently planned and assessed by TEPCO, would have a negligible radiological impact on people and the environment,” he added. After taking the decision in April 2021 to discharge the water stored at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station (FDNPS) into the sea, Japan requested the IAEA to conduct a detailed review of the safety related aspects of plan. IAEA Director General Grossi accepted Japan’s request and committed to be involved before, during, and after the water discharges. The water stored at the FDNPS has been treated through an Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS) to remove almost all radioactivity, aside from tritium. Before discharging, Japan will dilute the water to bring the tritium to below regulatory standards. Like elsewhere in the world, decisions related to nuclear safety are a national responsibility and Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) approved the plan in May. The IAEA’s review addressed all key safety elements of the water discharge plan in three major components: assessment of protection and safety; regulatory activities and processes; and independent sampling, data corroboration, and analysis. Over the past two years, the Task Force has conducted five review missions to Japan, published six technical reports, and met many times with the Japanese Government and Japan’s Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), the FDNPS operator, and analysed hundreds of pages of technical and regulatory documentation. Task Force members have also several times visited the site in eastern Japan to review discharge preparations there.  Director General Grossi said the report issued today “represent a significant milestone in the IAEA’s review” but that “our task is only just beginning”. “The IAEA will continue to provide transparency to the international community making it possible for all stakeholders to rely on verified fact and science to inform their understanding of this matter throughout the process,” he said. The IAEA‘s safety review will continue during the discharge phase. The Agency will also have a continuous on-site presence and provide live online monitoring on its website from the discharge facility.  “This will ensure the relevant international safety standards continue to be applied throughout the decades-long process laid out by the Government of Japan and TEPCO,” Director General Grossi said.
g
gokgs
看来确实问题不大, 当然小日本该骂还是该骂, 闲着也是闲着。 LOL
i
iheartglass
不是一直说处理的比自来水还干净。
那日本人一人一杯就喝完了嘛,还排放个屁。
当年苏联用核弹炸水库,苏联能源部长可是带头跳下去游泳的。
但是日本外长跳出来说核废水符合饮用标准,赵立坚要求日本外长喝一口他demo的核废水,没有一个人敢喝。

helloterran3 发表于 2023-08-25 20:31

苏联这是什么时候的事
l
luluaaa
日本有沙漠吗,没有的话你要倒去哪里的沙漠,你觉得别的国家跟你一样傻?
桃花朵朵 发表于 2023-08-25 20:26

你好聪明哦
l
luluaaa
沙漠都是有主权的
那个国家会允许日本倾倒核污染水呢?
laohua001 发表于 2023-08-25 20:26

我以为付钱付到一定多程度 可能有国家会同意的 反正沙漠也没有人 就是不知道从运输上来说可行不 不过日本应该也不想付钱去倒
l
laohua001
我以为付钱付到一定多程度 可能有国家会同意的 反正沙漠也没有人 就是不知道从运输上来说可行不 不过日本应该也不想付钱去倒
luluaaa 发表于 2023-08-25 22:10

日本要是愿意出钱,根本用不着运到沙漠,网上list了好多办法,就是花钱比到海里多而已。
l
luluaaa
排沙漠肯定比排还里好,但是日本没沙漠,其他国家不可能免费给它倒。倒海里不花钱,全世界买单。
tracylovebobo 发表于 2023-08-25 21:10

是的 就是它们不愿意减少对环境的伤害
l
luluaaa
楼主说的虽然不现实,但是跟一种处理方式有类似的地方。 这种方法是蒸发法,加热核污水使其蒸发,绝大多数的污染物都留在最后,处理起来就容易多了。但是这样做成本比较高,日本政府和东电不愿意承担费用,所以没采用。
zhou.ucar 发表于 2023-08-25 21:16

看网上也有日本人抗议的 看来他们对自己人也不在乎