纽约时报关于顶尖高校录取的最新文章

哈佛的研究，数据基于99-2015的录取情况，所以有点老。重点是除了legacy/recruited athlete之外， 私校的毕业生在同等学业成绩情况下，得到的非学业打分也普遍比公校毕业生高。所以造成这些顶尖学府里家长高收入的学生比例高。 不过有评论指出现在形势变化了，各大高校都在加大力度收穷学生。所以以后真正被挤压空间的还是中产娃。富裕学区的公高娃最吃亏

The biggest contributor was that admissions committees gave higher scores to students from private, nonreligious high schools. They were twice as likely to be admitted as similar students — those with the same SAT scores, race, gender and parental income — from public schools in high-income neighborhoods. A major factor was recommendations from guidance counselors and teachers at private high schools. 全文在此：https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/07/24/upshot/ivy-league-elite-college-admissions.html#commentsContainer

高校录取的主要对象第一看是毕业后给学校捐款的能力，第二是以后给学校带来的名声和影响力。

我其实很难相信学校能多招多少很穷的学生。家庭贫困但实力超群的是少数。藤校不是傻子，如果没实力又没有经济能力的进来只会拖后腿。他们非常清楚招什么样的学生才能保证自己一直处于领先地位。

我其实很难相信学校能多招多少很穷的学生。家庭贫困但实力超群的是少数。藤校不是傻子，如果没实力又没有经济能力的进来只会拖后腿。他们非常清楚招什么样的学生才能保证自己一直处于领先地位。
DolphinLin 发表于 2023-07-25 08:00

同意，很穷可以，但必须很会抢资源，拉赞助那种

阶层已固化 爬藤跳龙门 苦读成耗材 不如早躺平

不管私校公校，管理层政绩考核都有一项是看学生的diversity，在这个指挥棒下录取自然要看肤色，至于其它的看学生以后的捐款能力领导能力各种说辞都是幌子

回复 1楼roaming78的帖子
纽约时报最新研究图，上中产孩子录取最难

哈佛的研究，数据基于99-2015的录取情况，所以有点老。重点是除了legacy/recruited athlete之外， 私校的毕业生在同等学业成绩情况下，得到的非学业打分也普遍比公校毕业生高。所以造成这些顶尖学府里家长高收入的学生比例高。 不过有评论指出现在形势变化了，各大高校都在加大力度收穷学生。所以以后真正被挤压空间的还是中产娃。富裕学区的公高娃最吃亏
roaming78 发表于 2023-07-25 00:51

扎心了，富裕学区公高娃是华人娃的主体

70%-90%是多少钱啊

Pbs 7.24 也有报道

为什么富裕区的公高娃最吃亏？

回复 10楼Stella的帖子
看图30万左右得最难。穷人和极富的有优势。上中产挤到富人那档最难，上大学就被压制了

这个研究还证明了读藤校的确有金钱价值： The study, conducted by Raj Chetty of Harvard, David Deming of Harvard, and John Friedman of Brown University, looked at waitlisted students’ outcomes and showed that compared with attending one of America’s best public colleges, attending a member of what’s known as the “Ivy Plus” group—the Ivies plus Stanford, MIT, Duke, and the University of Chicago—increases a student’s chances of reaching the top of the earnings distribution at age 33 by 60 percent.

回复 3楼sea101的帖子
抓住核心了！

这个研究还证明了读藤校的确有金钱价值： The study, conducted by Raj Chetty of Harvard, David Deming of Harvard, and John Friedman of Brown University, looked at waitlisted students’ outcomes and showed that compared with attending one of America’s best public colleges, attending a member of what’s known as the “Ivy Plus” group—the Ivies plus Stanford, MIT, Duke, and the University of Chicago—increases a student’s chances of reaching the top of the earnings distribution at age 33 by 60 percent.
roaming78 发表于 2023-07-25 19:59

They compared students who were wait-listed and got in, with those who didn’t and attended another college instead. Consistent with previous research, they found that attending an Ivy instead of one of the top nine public flagships did not meaningfully increase graduates’ income, on average. However, it did increase a student’s predicted chance of earning in the top 1 percent to 19 percent, from 12 percent.

此文国内有个网友评论, 感觉是不是可以这样类比：在精英眼里，底层=老鼠，中产=上桌老鼠。上桌老鼠比老鼠讨厌多了。。。

阶级固化的需求吧。 上中产的孩子是最有可能跻身上层的群体，当然要大力度打压。