看看芝加哥的司法系统 又是kim foxx

妈妈快餐店被揍，发短信给儿子求助。儿子开枪击中嫌犯，嫌犯逃跑，儿子继续开枪追击，嫌犯死亡。妈妈还指示儿子对快餐店员开枪。随后母子离开现场，几天后自首。被控谋杀。 嫌犯有犯罪记录，母子记录清白。母亲有持枪证，儿子没有。 反转来了，母子被控谋杀入狱后，几天之内所有指控取消。出狱。 反转又来了，母亲现在向芝加哥政府发起诉讼，认为受到了不公正待遇。 别问，问就是天使。我个人认为不应无罪释放，起码是防卫过当，第一背后开枪，第二儿子没有持枪证，第三逃离犯罪现场。 但是我倒是希望母子胜诉。这个案例应该载入史册，因为法律上证明了过度防卫和背后开枪致死可以无罪。 链接如下
https://wgntv.com/news/chicago-news/mother-in-deadly-maxwell-street-express-shooting-expected-to-speak-after-charges-dropped/

这个妈妈是有FOID还是有CCL？

刚从芝加哥回来，以前我最喜欢的美国城市现在不像样子，晚上奇奇怪怪的人很多，晚上都不敢在街上走了。真是可惜。被那个疯子女市长搞成这样。

芝加哥人民的选择，这个城市一党制快一个世纪了，民主党take it for granted，共和党不愿花时间精力在那搞竞选。

这个妈妈是有FOID还是有CCL？
changheruhailiu 发表于 2023-06-27 15:25

Not sure Some details
Prosecutors said Hood (=Mom) texted her 14-year-old son, who was outside the restaurant, to come inside. Brown was shot in the back by the teen and then ran from the restaurant. Hood and her son, whose name was not released due to his age, followed Brown as Hood told the teen to continue shooting, prosecutors said. Brown was pronounced dead at the scene.
Once the shooting was over, Hood also told her son to shoot Brown's girlfriend who was egging on the argument she was having earlier. Hood tried to wrangle the gun away from her son, but he pushed her away, court documents said.

‘这个案例应该载入史册，因为法律上证明了过度防卫和背后开枪致死可以无罪。’
Only state superior courts, appellate courts and Supreme Court cases set precedents. This case was likely only at District Court level as your article stated, so until it advances to higher courts, there’s no precedent-setting value.

‘这个案例应该载入史册，因为法律上证明了过度防卫和背后开枪致死可以无罪。’
Only state superior courts, appellate courts and Supreme Court cases set precedents. This case was likely only at District Court level as your article stated, so until it advances to higher courts, there’s no precedent-setting value.
SAT 发表于 2023-06-27 16:36

背对着就不可以开枪了吗？ 真是开玩笑啊， 如果你们在枪战， 他向你开一枪， 然后背对着你， 在上子弹，你就不可以开枪了？ 等他上好了子弹向你开枪，你才可以还击？ 或他枪坏了， 走去车里拿枪， 再回来呢？ 反正最后能让人信服你自己的生命正受威胁就可以开枪。

‘这个案例应该载入史册，因为法律上证明了过度防卫和背后开枪致死可以无罪。’
Only state superior courts, appellate courts and Supreme Court cases set precedents. This case was likely only at District Court level as your article stated, so until it advances to higher courts, there’s no precedent-setting value.
SAT 发表于 2023-06-27 16:36

受教了，赞你。但是受害者一方肯定会上诉。这个案例还没结束。

背对着就不可以开枪了吗？ 真是开玩笑啊， 如果你们在枪战， 他向你开一枪， 然后背对着你， 在上子弹，你就不可以开枪了？ 等他上好了子弹向你开枪，你才可以还击？ 或他枪坏了， 走去车里拿枪， 再回来呢？ 反正最后能让人信服你自己的生命正受威胁就可以开枪。
bluegene123 发表于 2023-06-27 16:50

很遗憾我听到的很多案子都是，侵害方如果在逃离现场，你从背后开枪，大几率会被判定有罪

这个案子的关键不是怎么判，而是看肤色。如果是个白人或者华人，让小孩射杀另一个人，大家想想。