in Texas Class C Misdemeanor Theft Theft is a class C misdemeanor if the value of the stolen property or services is less than $100. The punishment for a class C misdemeanor includes a fine up to $500 but does not involve any jail time. Class B Misdemeanor Theft Theft is a class B misdemeanor if: the value of the stolen property or services is $100 or more but less than $750 the value of the stolen property is less than $100, and it''''s the defendant''''s second or subsequent theft offense, or the stolen property is a driver''''s license or another identification card. The punishment for a class B misdemeanor can include a fine of no more than $2,000, imprisonment for no more than 180 days, or both. Class A Misdemeanor Theft Theft is a class A misdemeanor if the value of the stolen property or services is $750 or more but less than $2,500. The punishment for a class A misdemeanor can include a fine of no more than $4,000, imprisonment for no more than one year, or both. State Jail Felony Theft Theft is a state jail felony if: the stolen property or services is valued at $2,500 or more but less than $30,000 the value of the stolen property is less than $2,500, and it''''s the defendant''''s third or subsequent theft offense the property is stolen from another person, a human corpse, or grave, or the stolen property is a firearm, an election ballot, or certain livestock or metals. The punishment for a state jail felony theft can include a fine of no more than $10,000, imprisonment ranging from 180 days to two years, or both. A state jail felony will bump up to a third-degree felony if the defendant used or exhibited a deadly weapon during the commission of the offense or had a previous felony conviction. Third-Degree Felony Theft Theft is a felony of the third degree if: the value of the stolen property or services is $30,000 or more but less than $150,000 the stolen property is certain types of livestock valued at less than $150,000, or the property is a controlled substance valued at less than $150,000 and was stolen from a commercial building where controlled substances are generally stored. The punishment for a third-degree felony is a fine of no more than $10,000, imprisonment ranging from two to ten years, or both. Second-Degree Felony Theft Theft is a felony of the second degree if: the value of the stolen property or services is $150,000 or more but less than $300,000, or the stolen property is an ATM or its contents valued at less than $300,000. The punishment for a second-degree felony is a fine of not more than $10,000, imprisonment ranging from two to 20 years, or both. First-Degree Felony Theft Theft is a felony of the first degree if the value of the stolen property or services is $300,000 or more. The punishment for a first-degree felony is a fine of not more than $10,000, imprisonment ranging from five to 99 years, or both. Enhanced Theft Penalties The penalty for a theft offense increases to the next offense level (for example, a third-degree felony goes up to second-degree felony) if any of the following are true: the stolen property was under the control of a public servant the stolen property was under the control of someone in a contract relationship the government the owner of the property was a person age 65 or older or a nonprofit organization the stolen property was under the control of a Medicare provider, or in committing the offense, the offender caused the fire alarm to go off or prevented it from going off. (Tex. Penal Code §§ 12.21 to 12.23, 12.32 to 12.35, 31.03, and 31.014 (2020).) Retail Theft (Shoplifting) Under Texas Law Retail theft (often called shoplifting) falls under the general theft laws, with criminal penalties based on the value of goods stolen (see above). An offender can also receive enhanced penalties for preventing or attempting to prevent a retail theft detector from going off or using a device that deactivates a retail theft detector. Finally, a person may be charged with a class A misdemeanor if they make or distribute a device that is used to deactivate a retail theft detector. (Tex. Penal Code §§ 31.03, 31.15, and 31.16 (2020).) singlemummy 发表于 2023-05-28 14:08
Last week, Martin County, Florida, released a list of dozens of books it had removed from school libraries, including 20 books by Jodi Picoult, nine books from James Patterson’s Maximum Ride series, and two books by Nobel Prize winner Toni Morrison. Some were removed from multiple locations, for a total of 92 book bans. It appears that the majority of these books were removed in response to a single objector in the district, a local leader with the group Moms For Liberty, who filed forms indicating that she did not actually read any of the books in question. Complaints erroneously stated that all of Jodi Picoult’s books are “adult romance,” and alleged that former National Ambassador for Young People’s Literature Jason Reynolds is “controversial.” John Green’s Looking for Alaska was targeted for being “depressing.” Send a letter to Martin County asking them to put books back on shelves. Picoult noted that one of her targeted books, The Storyteller, is a novel about the Holocaust that chronicles the growth of anti-Semitism and fascism in Nazi Germany. “There was a strange irony that a parent wanted this particular book removed, because it felt a bit like history repeating itself,” Picoult wrote in The Daily Beast. According to district officials, these complaints were heeded to comply with a directive from the Florida Department of Education to “err on the side of caution” when reviewing books, as part of the implementation of a new law, HB 1467. “The majority of the books that were targeted do not even have a kiss in them,” Picoult wrote. “What they do have, however, are issues like racism, abortion rights, gun control, gay rights, and other topics that encourage kids to think for themselves.” These are the 84 books banned in Martin County, Florida The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, Sherman Alexie All American Boys, Jason Reynolds Brendan Kiely Almost Perfect, Brian Katcher America, E.R. Frank The Art of Racing in the Rain, Garth Stein Ask The Passengers, A.S. King Beloved, Toni Morrison The Bluest Eye, Toni Morrison The Breakaways, Cathy G. Johnson The Carnival at the Bray, Jessie Ann Foley Change of Heart, Jodi Picoult A Court of Mist and Fury, Sarah J Maas A Court of Thorns and Roses, Sarah J Mass A Court of Wings and Ruin, Sarah J Maas Damsel Elana K Arnold Drama, Raina Telgemeier Empire of Storms, Sarah J Maas Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close,Jonathan Safran Foer Fade #2 (Wake Trilogy), Lisa McMann The Female of the Species, Mindy McGinnis Forever, Judy Blume The Freedom Writer’s Diary, Erin Gruwell Gabi (A Girl in Pieces), Isabel Quintero Ghost Boys, Jewell Parker Rhodes Go Ask Alice, Anonymous Handle with Care, Jodi Picoult The Handmaid’s Tale, Margaret Atwood The Hate U Give, Angie Thomas Heroine, Mindy McGinnis Hopeless, Colleen Hoover House Rules, Jodi Picoult I am Not your (Perfect) Mexican Daughter,Erika Sanchez Juliet Takes A Breath, Gabby Rivera Keeping Faith, Jodi Picoult Kingdom of Ash, Sarah J Maas The Kite Runner, Khaled Hosseini L8rG8r, Lauren Myracle Leaving Time, Jodi Picoult Life is Funny, E.R. Frank Living Dead Girl, Elizabeth Scott Lone Wolf, Jodi Picoult Looking for Alaska, John Green Losing Hope, Colleen Hoover The Lovely Bones, Alice Sebold Maximum Ride: Angel, James Patterson Maximum Ride: The Angel Experiment,James Patterson Maximum Ride: Fang, James Patterson Maximum Ride: The Final Warning, James Patterson Maximum Ride: Max, James Patterson Maximum Ride: Maximum Ride Forever,James Patterson Maximum Ride: Nevermore, James Patterson Maximum Ride: Saving the World & Other Extreme, James Patterson Maximum Ride: School’s Out Forever,James Patterson Me and Earl and the Dying Girl, Jesse Andrews Mercy Jodi Picoult Mighty Jack and the Goblin King, Ben Hatke Monday’s Not Coming, Tiffany D. Jackson More Happy Than Not, Adam Silvera My Sister’s Keeper, Jodi Picoult Nineteen Minutes, Jodi Picoult The Nowhere Girls, Amy Reed The Pact, Jodi Picoult Perfect Match, Jodi Picoult The Perks of Being a Wallflower, Stephen Chbosky Picture Perfect, Jodi Picoult Plain Truth, Jodi Picoult Ramona Blue, Julie Murphy Salem Falls, Jodi Picoult Second Glance, Jodi Picoult Shine, Lauren Myracle Sing You Home, Jodi Picoult Sold, Patricia McCormick Songs of a Humpback Whale, Jodi Picoult Speak, Laurie Halse Anderson (English copy, graphic novel, Chinese translation, video) Stamped: Racism, Antiracism and You,Jason Reynolds The Storyteller, Jodi Picoult The Tenth Circle, Jodi Picoult Thirteen Reasons Why, Jay Asher Tower of Dawn #6 (Throne of Glass series),Sarah J. Maas The Truth About Alice, Jennifer Mathieu Unravel Me, Tahereh Mafi Vanishing Acts, Jodi Picoult Where I End & You Begin, Preston Norton Wicked: Life & Times of the Wicked Witch of the West, Gregory Maguire https://pen.org/these-books-are-banned-in-martin-county-florida/
Last week, Martin County, Florida, released a list of dozens of books it had removed from school libraries, including 20 books by Jodi Picoult, nine books from James Patterson’s Maximum Ride series, and two books by Nobel Prize winner Toni Morrison. Some were removed from multiple locations, for a total of 92 book bans. It appears that the majority of these books were removed in response to a single objector in the district, a local leader with the group Moms For Liberty, who filed forms indicating that she did not actually read any of the books in question. Complaints erroneously stated that all of Jodi Picoult’s books are “adult romance,” and alleged that former National Ambassador for Young People’s Literature Jason Reynolds is “controversial.” John Green’s Looking for Alaska was targeted for being “depressing.” Send a letter to Martin County asking them to put books back on shelves. Picoult noted that one of her targeted books, The Storyteller, is a novel about the Holocaust that chronicles the growth of anti-Semitism and fascism in Nazi Germany. “There was a strange irony that a parent wanted this particular book removed, because it felt a bit like history repeating itself,” Picoult wrote in The Daily Beast. According to district officials, these complaints were heeded to comply with a directive from the Florida Department of Education to “err on the side of caution” when reviewing books, as part of the implementation of a new law, HB 1467. “The majority of the books that were targeted do not even have a kiss in them,” Picoult wrote. “What they do have, however, are issues like racism, abortion rights, gun control, gay rights, and other topics that encourage kids to think for themselves.” These are the 84 books banned in Martin County, Florida The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian, Sherman Alexie All American Boys, Jason Reynolds Brendan Kiely Almost Perfect, Brian Katcher America, E.R. Frank The Art of Racing in the Rain, Garth Stein Ask The Passengers, A.S. King Beloved, Toni Morrison The Bluest Eye, Toni Morrison The Breakaways, Cathy G. Johnson The Carnival at the Bray, Jessie Ann Foley Change of Heart, Jodi Picoult A Court of Mist and Fury, Sarah J Maas A Court of Thorns and Roses, Sarah J Mass A Court of Wings and Ruin, Sarah J Maas Damsel Elana K Arnold Drama, Raina Telgemeier Empire of Storms, Sarah J Maas Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close,Jonathan Safran Foer Fade #2 (Wake Trilogy), Lisa McMann The Female of the Species, Mindy McGinnis Forever, Judy Blume The Freedom Writer’s Diary, Erin Gruwell Gabi (A Girl in Pieces), Isabel Quintero Ghost Boys, Jewell Parker Rhodes Go Ask Alice, Anonymous Handle with Care, Jodi Picoult The Handmaid’s Tale, Margaret Atwood The Hate U Give, Angie Thomas Heroine, Mindy McGinnis Hopeless, Colleen Hoover House Rules, Jodi Picoult I am Not your (Perfect) Mexican Daughter,Erika Sanchez Juliet Takes A Breath, Gabby Rivera Keeping Faith, Jodi Picoult Kingdom of Ash, Sarah J Maas The Kite Runner, Khaled Hosseini L8rG8r, Lauren Myracle Leaving Time, Jodi Picoult Life is Funny, E.R. Frank Living Dead Girl, Elizabeth Scott Lone Wolf, Jodi Picoult Looking for Alaska, John Green Losing Hope, Colleen Hoover The Lovely Bones, Alice Sebold Maximum Ride: Angel, James Patterson Maximum Ride: The Angel Experiment,James Patterson Maximum Ride: Fang, James Patterson Maximum Ride: The Final Warning, James Patterson Maximum Ride: Max, James Patterson Maximum Ride: Maximum Ride Forever,James Patterson Maximum Ride: Nevermore, James Patterson Maximum Ride: Saving the World & Other Extreme, James Patterson Maximum Ride: School’s Out Forever,James Patterson Me and Earl and the Dying Girl, Jesse Andrews Mercy Jodi Picoult Mighty Jack and the Goblin King, Ben Hatke Monday’s Not Coming, Tiffany D. Jackson More Happy Than Not, Adam Silvera My Sister’s Keeper, Jodi Picoult Nineteen Minutes, Jodi Picoult The Nowhere Girls, Amy Reed The Pact, Jodi Picoult Perfect Match, Jodi Picoult The Perks of Being a Wallflower, Stephen Chbosky Picture Perfect, Jodi Picoult Plain Truth, Jodi Picoult Ramona Blue, Julie Murphy Salem Falls, Jodi Picoult Second Glance, Jodi Picoult Shine, Lauren Myracle Sing You Home, Jodi Picoult Sold, Patricia McCormick Songs of a Humpback Whale, Jodi Picoult Speak, Laurie Halse Anderson (English copy, graphic novel, Chinese translation, video) Stamped: Racism, Antiracism and You,Jason Reynolds The Storyteller, Jodi Picoult The Tenth Circle, Jodi Picoult Thirteen Reasons Why, Jay Asher Tower of Dawn #6 (Throne of Glass series),Sarah J. Maas The Truth About Alice, Jennifer Mathieu Unravel Me, Tahereh Mafi Vanishing Acts, Jodi Picoult Where I End & You Begin, Preston Norton Wicked: Life & Times of the Wicked Witch of the West, Gregory Maguire https://pen.org/these-books-are-banned-in-martin-county-florida/ 落地无声 发表于 2023-05-29 11:39
有意思的不是，It appears that the majority of these books were removed in response to a single objector in the district, a local leader with the group Moms For Liberty, who filed forms indicating that she did not actually read any of the books in question.
有意思的不是，It appears that the majority of these books were removed in response to a single objector in the district, a local leader with the group Moms For Liberty, who filed forms indicating that she did not actually read any of the books in question. 落地无声 发表于 2023-05-29 11:48
有意思的不是，It appears that the majority of these books were removed in response to a single objector in the district, a local leader with the group Moms For Liberty, who filed forms indicating that she did not actually read any of the books in question. 落地无声 发表于 2023-05-29 11:48
一次次的选举说明，公投和民意也不是说就不会被蒙蔽利用的，监狱的花费的确是明明白白很容易说服人，这个法例的出发点是有其道理的，但是，就像最近读到的三番现状的文章说，The city often seemed to operate like an incompetent parent, confusing compassion and permissiveness, unable to maintain boundaries, producing the exact opposite result of what it claimed to want. 这个法例的具体实施造成了认知混乱，就是人可以到Whole Foods购物车堆满，然后大摇大摆出门不付钱，警察不可以拘捕，店家阻拦是自负风险，既然没有后果，做一次的人，可以再犯，没有做的人，见状也会被影响，什么是是非，什么是对错，整个社会都会困惑，风气就渐渐败坏。类似的，什么给毒虫提供清洁针头，集中吸毒的地方不要扩散，都是好像实际出发，实则高估了人性，古人说，勿以恶小而为之，是有警示的
一次次的选举说明，公投和民意也不是说就不会被蒙蔽利用的，监狱的花费的确是明明白白很容易说服人，这个法例的出发点是有其道理的，但是，就像最近读到的三番现状的文章说，The city often seemed to operate like an incompetent parent, confusing compassion and permissiveness, unable to maintain boundaries, producing the exact opposite result of what it claimed to want. 这个法例的具体实施造成了认知混乱，就是人可以到Whole Foods购物车堆满，然后大摇大摆出门不付钱，警察不可以拘捕，店家阻拦是自负风险，既然没有后果，做一次的人，可以再犯，没有做的人，见状也会被影响，什么是是非，什么是对错，整个社会都会困惑，风气就渐渐败坏。类似的，什么给毒虫提供清洁针头，集中吸毒的地方不要扩散，都是好像实际出发，实则高估了人性，古人说，勿以恶小而为之，是有警示的 yangbuhui 发表于 2023-05-29 19:04
说得其他州警察好像就会为了1000$执法一样 你到其它城市报案试试看 看看你被偷了/抢了1000$ 警察管不管
赞。
赞啥呀 德州也一样不管的
如果关个犯人一天要这么多，不应该检讨一下这个监狱体制是不是有问题，对犯人太仁慈了？或者太腐败
普通人还需要劳动来赚取基本的生活费，犯人为什么不可以做些创收性的劳动？
犯人有劳动但是是自愿的，薪水也非常低，中国现在也没有劳改了吧？另外治安日下和底层越来越穷有关，十几年前谁会想到三番会满地流浪汉，Waikiki海滩上都有帐篷。而各州设立轻罪标准也是因为没办法应付庞大的开销，美国的监狱收费标准远超外面是个问题，一个犯人最少需要花费纳税人数万，一个犯人看病监狱外现金几百，里面要翻最少十倍，都是我们的税金。层层的贪腐也是大问题，比方加州为了安置流浪汉花了几百亿一年，问题流浪汉不减反增，钱也完全不知道花到哪里去了，和德州难民营一天一个人花销五百住笼子里差不多，都被和政府有关系的合同赚去了，底层得不到安置继续偷抢，恶性循环。然后普通老百姓就开始左左右右互相指责🤣
没错，所谓的基因造成的LGBTQ根本就是人群中的极少数，并且这个比例应该一直保持大体稳定。而现在这二十多年来自认为是LGBTQ的年轻人群大幅度增长，难道是人群中发生了大规模的基因变异？根本原因就是社会环境的影响，根本不是什么天生的基因问题。
关监狱的人难道不应该强迫劳动，自己负责自己的开销吗？ 现在变成进监狱就是靠人养，当然不合理。
楼主说的意思，主要就是告诉大伙儿，这事在很多州都是这样，也就是说，在美国这是常态，所以加州在这事上没任何特殊性。
如果要反驳，还是针对这个说事才有意义。比如，你能说明这个在美国不是常态，其他地方绝大多数都不是这样。。。
加州有没有特殊性，只要不瞎应该都很容易看出来吧
您不会以为人人都把加州当啥似的去整天研究吧？
咱一般人谁没事研究加州或者其他各地，谁偷了什么东西是不是一定会被警察抓？一定不会被抓？还是有多大可能被抓？
您研究过？那请不要现google，直接给个美国各州这个问题上被抓几率的统计？不用准确数字，大概的就行？
反正我没研究过。所以我不直接支持或者反驳楼主这类论点，就是看热闹而已。我看到谁说的可能事实不充分或者逻辑有问题，可能会说一下而已。
最大的逻辑问题就在楼主啊，光谈是不是犯罪，避而不谈警察管不管。
如果关监狱的人可以强迫劳动，那么政府就有更强的动力抓人进监狱
他没有谈的问题，有啥逻辑问题？他有什么结论需要谈这个问题才能解决么？
比如，假设你认为加州警察不管，那这与楼主说的有矛盾么？
你重读一遍lz的帖子看看矛盾不矛盾
我不觉得矛盾。楼主的主题是“纠正一下对加州偷$950 不算犯罪的理解”。他谈的也是对这个说法的解释。
其中对警察管不管的解释是：“那么对涉嫌轻罪的个人，警察真的就不管吗？ 警察有权逮捕涉嫌轻罪的个人。虽然轻罪通常被认为不如重罪严重，但执法人员仍然可以在此类案件中实施逮捕。因轻罪而逮捕某人的决定取决于多种因素。。。。“
这里面有哪里说死了警察就是该管？该不管？加州警察就是会管？就是不会管？明明都没说死，怎么做都是可以的。
所在这个问题上的任何正常观点（除非，比如，您就认为警察根本管不着，只要管，就是违法），都与他说的不矛盾。
您要觉得有矛盾，请具体说说。毕竟，我说不矛盾，不能代表您的看法，对不？
如果是这个内容我的确觉得可以ban, 但我很怀疑，被禁的那么多书里，有几本是这样的。不要选择性选样，不是学校里教育LGBT内容的都是这样的。把所有的书都禁了，用一些最极端的书来做自己正确证据，是法西斯的一贯手法。
你可以贴几本你觉得不该禁的，大家看看是不是禁错了，而不是在没有任何事实基础上直接喊法西斯，这种行为才更像法西斯
美国的警察非常不规范, 垃圾很多, 需要全国的正规化培训.
你去试试就知道了, 警察是不是在边上拍视频.哈哈, 类似这些人说美国对非法移民比对合法移民好, 你自己把护照撕了, 要变非法移民还不容易吗?
楼上有同学说要“大家看看是不是禁错了”。
我不谈禁错了没有，我只就这个“大家看看“谈几句啊。。。
这里面有一个挺有意思的点，那就是，“大家”是不是都读过这些书？反正我是没读过。那么判断一本书是不是“禁错了”，是不是需要（至少大略上）每页都读过（否则作者在某一页埋个雷，你没看到，那不惨了？）。。。
这种事“大家”能做到么？
所以才说，某些人挑几页特别的东西出来说事，这个伎俩才有其市场啊。。。因为反对禁的人，很难做到这么有煽动性的事（毕竟不能把一本书所有的书页都贴出来证明这书没有任何问题吧？就算不触犯版权问题，就算有这个精力贴，大伙儿也没那精力看啊）。
监狱变成了某些人的牟利系统.某地检察官和法官合作把青少年投入监狱, 监狱拿补贴. 美国的警察, 监狱系统太烂了.
有意思的不是，It appears that the majority of these books were removed in response to a single objector in the district, a local leader with the group Moms For Liberty, who filed forms indicating that she did not actually read any of the books in question.
ban书背后的真实的想法是把神棍那套书记弄到学校去.呵呵, 人家为了这个还在持之以恒努力着呢.
更有意思的是，你这句话在那篇长文中的被关注度，一定远远小于楼上某位同学贴的那几页的被关注度。
所以才说，他那个，是能吸引眼球煽动人群的伎俩。你这个，不够级别。。。
首先这个禁书名单是整个florida还是某个学区。禁书到底不对，还是禁书的process有问题。你argue的是禁书程序有问题，不够公开透明以及合理，还是你对所有禁书行为都批判？
这些“都快哭了” 的 人，到时候转头继续选猪党市长，然后任命猪党Sheriff, DA， 继续把罪犯放回街上。。。
俩字 -- 活该！
谁跟你说这事在很多州都一样？你知道警察抓罪犯，罪犯转头就被放出来，是会报复警察的。警察不抓，除了不想浪费力气，浪费时间，也是为了保护自己。
民众不报案也是同样的道理。因为报了案，要么不抓，抓了被放出来，放出来就会来报复，谁敢报案？
你说很多州一样。举个例子啊？除了几个大兰州，哪个州也是抓了就能放，放了还出来报复报案者，报复警察。
大兰州DA这副德行，别说其他州，就是这些大兰州也是最近5年的事情。
你要没研究过，上Youtube随便搜加州零元购的视频啊。再搜纽约随机伤害人的视频啊。然后再搜搜德州，佛州的，蒙大拿有没有类似的视频就知道了。
你为什么不谈谈不想想警察为什么不管呢？
政府抓人要看法律的。法院和政府行政机构是分开独立的。美国三权分立在州也是如此的。法院和警察局可不是一个系统的。
德州不管，any evidence？德州怎么没有大面积零元购？在德州偷东西，抢东西，大摇大摆进商店拿东西，跟加州一样毫无后果？any evidence?
你这是撒谎知道吗？
加州不是号称越来越有钱吗？怎么治安越来越差？加州还越来越兰，税更多，benefit budget也越来越多。如今治安这结果说不过去啊。照道理如今的加州在一系列民主党推行的政策以后，至少应该比过去更好才对。
明明就是一系列政策都是错误的。非不承认。说东指西。可是仔细分析，一堆漏洞。
搞不懂的这些人都是平时喜欢看微信文的，喜欢各种群里转爆眼球的无知无聊小文的，而且传粉居多。重点是这些人英文媒体英文文章几乎不看，跟文盲差不多
大家关心的目的就是以加州为鉴，看到后果，别被自己州的蓝色政治人物给蒙蔽了。如果傻傻的，自己州也会变成加州现如今这个样子。
同学，看清楚我的帖子。
我可没有说很多州都一样。我是说，楼主的意思显然是很多州都一样（他举的那些例子显然是这个目的），所以反驳他要从这个角度入手。楼上那位的逻辑不合理。
比如您这些反驳以及问题，该对楼主去说，而不是对我说。我并没有表示我认为楼主的结论一定成立。
想支持或者反对楼主观点的人可以研究你说的这些。
我前面谈的是这里某些同学的反驳缺乏逻辑。这个，只需要看清楚他们的帖子就够了。
大家斗个嘴而已，乐趣在于斗嘴的过程，不在于自己真正选择了啥。
只用脚投票，不来这里说道说道的人，自然没啥好争的。
但喜欢来这儿说道说道自个儿的道理的人，肯定不仅满足于用脚投票。
不是政治小白，是屁股歪歪。。。
一次次的选举说明，公投和民意也不是说就不会被蒙蔽利用的，监狱的花费的确是明明白白很容易说服人，这个法例的出发点是有其道理的，但是，就像最近读到的三番现状的文章说，The city often seemed to operate like an incompetent parent, confusing compassion and permissiveness, unable to maintain boundaries, producing the exact opposite result of what it claimed to want. 这个法例的具体实施造成了认知混乱，就是人可以到Whole Foods购物车堆满，然后大摇大摆出门不付钱，警察不可以拘捕，店家阻拦是自负风险，既然没有后果，做一次的人，可以再犯，没有做的人，见状也会被影响，什么是是非，什么是对错，整个社会都会困惑，风气就渐渐败坏。类似的，什么给毒虫提供清洁针头，集中吸毒的地方不要扩散，都是好像实际出发，实则高估了人性，古人说，勿以恶小而为之，是有警示的
除了confusing，还有政客的态度也是一大助推力，比如这个
逻辑没学好。你手里本来就有3个苹果，非法移民手里一个都没有，政府从你手里拿走一个，给非法移民一个苹果。那政府对谁更好？是看你手上总共有多少来比较？？
你这种张口就来，随便给结论，没有证据。谁信你呀？你谁呀？