你这个 没有英文消息 没有任何英文报道 4月1日，德国国防部长皮斯托留斯 说是要给乌克兰送160辆坦克 German defense minister: NATO countries to send total of 160 tanks to Ukraine.NATO countries plan to send two battalions of German Leopard-2 battle tanks and four battalions of Leopard-1 tanks to Ukraine, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius told Die Welt on April 1.
英文消息都是德国要继续增加军援130亿美元 给乌克兰 https://www.rferl.org/a/germany-ukraine-military-support-russia-war/32340550.html The German government has agreed to send an additional 12 billion euros ($13 billion) worth of military support to Ukraine. The Budget Committee of the German Bundestag gave the green light on March 29 for the unbudgeted expenditure.
回复 19楼Rosaryhouse的帖子 Pistorius rejected further arms deliveries to Ukraine from the Bundeswehr stocks beyond the announced commtments. "To put it bluntly, like other nations, we have a limited inventory. As federal defence minister, I cannot give everything away," he said. 所以我说是要钱的做法。 至于到底未来如何，谁也不知道。 我指出你，是因为你不调查研究，就指不实，这个就是屁股决定脑子，不像美华博士硕士的，或者美华就是如此？哈哈。
你这个 没有英文消息 没有任何英文报道 4月1日，德国国防部长皮斯托留斯 说是要给乌克兰送160辆坦克 German defense minister: NATO countries to send total of 160 tanks to Ukraine.NATO countries plan to send two battalions of German Leopard-2 battle tanks and four battalions of Leopard-1 tanks to Ukraine, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius told Die Welt on April 1.
谁说没有英文报道的，这儿就有，不过不是现在的，是去年8月的报道 Germany’s military stocks are not enough to send more weapons to Ukraine https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/-germany-s-military-stocks-are-not-enough-to-send-more-weapons-to-ukraine-/2669092
德国的举动在于和俄乌冲突和与此相关的经济危机推开距离，我甚至不奇怪她加入人民币贸易结算，因为经济的本质力量来源于物质生产和消费。 美元现在的实质就是credit，就和大家从银行里做line of credit是一样的，给出去没有问题，花也没有问题，但是付不起利息就有问题。现状严重的问题是这个credit超发了，拜登政府全球军事行动正在加速威胁这个credit的validity和继续存在的经济基础。这些钱都是债务，一旦必须转为现金偿付，就是货币贬值，所谓现在的通货膨胀，本质其实是货币贬值。大家看到现在股票高升，或许可以延缓市场上流动的美元剧烈增加引起的通货膨胀，但是一旦出现金融机构资不抵债或者现金断裂不能偿债，就会引起金融危机。现在的国际形式是，美元作为储备货币已经被越来越多的经济大国降级或者放弃，因为只有金子才是真实的现金货币，而本币交易是金本位为基础的以生产产品的供求关系为主导的。从这个角度上来看，未来5-10年也许是美元最后的黄金期，这个时期美国以美元计算的GDP继续高升，国内工资水平和物价水平同时上升，然后物价水平反噬工资水平的上升，主要经济国家的美元储备和美债继续下降；这个时候的美国贫富差距剧烈增加，中产阶级工资水平和购买力跟不上通货膨胀而贫困化。如果这个局面不能得到控制，美国国内社会和经济矛盾将会进一步恶化，直到几十年后发生分裂或者革命。要缓解这个局面，美国可以改变货币政策，从全球撤回驻军，重新把美元的定价和金价绑定，短时间内股市和资产投资的收益会降低，工资水平会下降，但是会稳定物价，刺激国内经济生产，使靠福利生存的贫穷阶层转为生产力。简而言之，就是美国需要进行经济改革了，这样，美国就会重新获得继续发展的动力。可惜的是，这个改革和既得利益的资本家和政治投机者的利益相矛盾，因为他们都是寄生虫，在美国肥沃的肌体上寄生和繁殖，使美国变得贫瘠和没有活力。所以，在美国继续生活，就要注意获得物质实体财富，比如黄金和农地，而不是股票和存款。如果有能力对外国进行投资，热点区域就是东亚和东南亚这个区域，因为这个区域中国会越来越具有军事上的绝对优势，而且在经济上对这个区域的国际分工具有支配权。
谁说没有英文报道的，这儿就有，不过不是现在的，是去年8月的报道 Germany’s military stocks are not enough to send more weapons to Ukraine https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/-germany-s-military-stocks-are-not-enough-to-send-more-weapons-to-ukraine-/2669092 trends 发表于 2023-04-02 13:12
Are you serious??？ 楼住能否来澄清一下， 真的就是用去年 8月份的新闻，在这里挖坑？？ 这有点过分了
比你搞笑的没几个了 Three charts that show why Trump thinks NATO is a bad deal PUBLISHED TUE, DEC 3 20196:21 AM ESTUPDATED TUE, DEC 3 201910:06 AM EST David Reid @DAVYREID73
Share Article via Email KEY POINTS Heads of state and government are meeting in the U.K. this week for the 70th anniversary of the military alliance NATO. The amount of money that member states each spend on defense is a contentious issue. Turkish action in northern Syria is also creating stress between the allies. The NATO summit celebrates its 70th birthday in London this week but some of the main attendees aren’t quite in the party mood. The biggest guest, President Donald Trump, has traveled to the U.K. capital to attend the meeting and join other heads of state in marking the alliance’s seven decades in existence. Trump has repeatedly said the U.S. provides too much cash for NATO, spending big on maintaining missile defense systems across Europe and positioning 65,000 troops within the continent. On Tuesday, Trump issued another broadside, this time accusing Germany of not paying its fair share on defense. A withdrawal of the U.S. from NATO would effectively destroy it with one stroke, and while nothing official has ever been said, several reports suggest Trump has considered ending U.S. involvement. NATO itself estimates that as a percentage of GDP, the U.S. will far outstrip the spending of any other member country in 2019. In 2014, all NATO members agreed to increase their defense spending to 2% of gross domestic product by 2024. As of June 2019, NATO data estimated that only seven of its 29 members — including the U.S. — are estimated to spend 2% or more of their annual GDP on defense this year. On Monday, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg defended the spending of member nations. “On spending, NATO allies are now really stepping up and delivering more that they have done for many, many years,” he told CNBC’s Hadley Gamble in London. Stoltenberg said non-U.S. NATO allies, i.e. Europe plus Canada, are on target to add more than $400 billion to their defense budgets by 2024. “That’s unprecedented and will make NATO stronger,” he added. Should that additional spending materialize, it will bring the combined spending of all the NATO allies to around par with the current U.S. outlay alone based on GDP. NATO’s earliest incarnation was a 1947 agreement between France and the U.K. to help each other in the event of any attack from Germany or the Soviet Union. This expanded into a military alliance that included the U.S.. In 1949, member countries put their signature to the North Atlantic Treaty for the first time. Its relevance and popularity has ebbed and flowed. In 1966, France, under President Charles de Gaulle, left NATO’s military structure, doubting the organization’s might against any invasion from the Soviet Union. Full membership by France was restored only in 2009 and just 10 years later, current French leader Emmanuel Macron is again doubting the alliance. Macron has said NATO is experiencing “brain death” because of pressure to reform from Trump and unpredictable military action from Turkey. Macron has said the Turkish invasion of Syria is a threat to NATO’s battle against the Islamic State. In an angry response, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Macron himself was suffering from “brain death” and he was showing disrespect and hubris by questioning Turkish action. “You know how to show off, but you cannot even properly pay for NATO. You are a novice,” Erdogan reportedly said. NATO’s Stoltenberg said Monday that while the members have often had different opinions, history shows that “we have always been able to agree around our core task to protect and defend each other.” As Trump, Macron and Erdogan meet, this week will provide a stern test of that theory.
Trump has repeatedly said the U.S. provides too much cash for NATO, spending big on maintaining missile defense systems across Europe and positioning 65,000 troops within the continent. On Tuesday, Trump issued another broadside, this time accusing Germany of not paying its fair share on defense.
Trump has repeatedly said the U.S. provides too much cash for NATO, spending big on maintaining missile defense systems across Europe and positioning 65,000 troops within the continent. On Tuesday, Trump issued another broadside, this time accusing Germany of not paying its fair share on defense. ggings 发表于 2023-04-02 23:11
很好笑啊。2023赶英超美。 Russia’s economy may continue to shrink in 2023. Its GDP is forecast to decline by 5.6% in the worst-case scenario (OECD) or by 3.3% according to the World Bank. The IMF expects slight growth in 2023 (0.3%). 估计也就看了一个IMF估计的best scenario, 其他机构包括世界银行的估计就不看了。
德国上周曾向乌克兰移交了18辆“豹2”主战坦克。
这钱留在美国国内修修铁路不好吗？还能少出两次轨
德国这也太坏了吧? 把人推上房然后把梯子撤了
俄罗斯有粮有油，还开着中国这个大后门，一时半会儿且倒不了呢
美国推的，欧洲干嘛想打仗。
当初疫情初期特朗普以集体团购拿优惠的名义委任他女婿全权负责抗疫物资的采购，结果这犹太女婿拿到物资让各州搞竞标，价高者得。说好的团购优惠呢？逼得各州偷偷摸摸自己直接拍飞机从国外抢购物资，还得防着CIA，FBI，不然就是破坏团购要充公的
你这个 没有英文消息 没有任何英文报道 4月1日，德国国防部长皮斯托留斯 说是要给乌克兰送160辆坦克
German defense minister: NATO countries to send total of 160 tanks to Ukraine.NATO countries plan to send two battalions of German Leopard-2 battle tanks and four battalions of Leopard-1 tanks to Ukraine, German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius told Die Welt on April 1.
查一下不就是知道是怎么回事了？ GOOGLE很难吗？ 两条新闻综合， 就是德国，马上运这么多，这些是承诺。但今后，BUDGET 限制，今后不准备运超过已经许诺的武器。合情合理，要钱的做法。
英文消息都是德国要继续增加军援130亿美元 给乌克兰
https://www.rferl.org/a/germany-ukraine-military-support-russia-war/32340550.html
The German government has agreed to send an additional 12 billion euros ($13 billion) worth of military support to Ukraine. The Budget Committee of the German Bundestag gave the green light on March 29 for the unbudgeted expenditure.
美国支援乌克兰的钱70-80%都直接去了美国军火商的口袋，乌克兰拿不到多少
大家怎么人家说啥都信呢？哈哈哈。乐死我了。
《经济学人》原本预计俄国经济2020年萎缩10%~15。
实际下降2.3%。
2023年鹅国经济成长预期还要高于欧美
lol
其实说起来，普京闪击乌克兰失败vs美国制裁俄国失败，可能后者的丢脸程度要大十倍。毕竟大家骂俄国军队是个纸老虎，已经骂了20年了。但是之前可从来没有人骂美国国务院是个纸老虎呢
不知道为什么，大妈们可以选择性的无视美国制裁俄国失败
你都把敌对国家踢出swift了，结果敌对国家几乎毫发无损。这让其他小兄弟看了怎么想？
"只要有中国兜底，跟美国闹翻没什么大不了。"
this is pretty good for easing inflation in US. LOL
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/germanys-military-gaps-cannot-be-fully-bridged-by-2030-defence-minister-2023-04-01/
看了整片原文 我的理解是 不是不给武器 是首先要把自己的武器库充满了 然后再给 与budget没有关系 猜德国国防部长主要意思是 要美国松绑 让德国大量生产进攻型武器
就是， 给了两辆坦克就是武器库空了， 貌似德国还没有美国枪友车库里的武器多， 哈哈。
这些破新闻一看就不靠谱。
Pistorius rejected further arms deliveries to Ukraine from the Bundeswehr stocks beyond the announced commtments. "To put it bluntly, like other nations, we have a limited inventory. As federal defence minister, I cannot give everything away," he said.
所以我说是要钱的做法。 至于到底未来如何，谁也不知道。 我指出你，是因为你不调查研究，就指不实，这个就是屁股决定脑子，不像美华博士硕士的，或者美华就是如此？哈哈。
是的
买成了武器，
你以为，乌克兰士兵拿着钱，在阵地上砸俄军么？？
一口气 18 枚海马斯，
这都是钱，洛马的海马斯生产线 扩容，增加产量，
这也是实战检验了产品的质量，不仅仅供俄乌战场，
其他国家也要
https://twitter.com/seamalaya/status/1641991765262495745?s=46&t=h07xK5JS3BhsMnzw8iNOSQ
感觉是早晚的事， 二战的影响不至于到几百年。美国也在江河日下， 自身难保。
扩充点军备不是什么大事。 拥核大概是大事。
愿意看简中新闻的是傻，转发无来源简中新闻的是坏。
Germany’s military stocks are not enough to send more weapons to Ukraine
https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/-germany-s-military-stocks-are-not-enough-to-send-more-weapons-to-ukraine-/2669092
Are you serious??？
楼住能否来澄清一下，
真的就是用去年 8月份的新闻，在这里挖坑？？
这有点过分了
德国，法国，西班牙一直都不积极，现在捷克也表示没有能力军事援助了，东欧那几个小国家也说自己没家底了。瑞士军事中立，奥地利也中立，北欧几个国家更是看热闹，连乌克兰难民都不收！还剩下几个国家？
就剩下英国和美国了。这次俄乌战争也看出来了，北约根本就没什么团队精神和真正的战斗力，吹的比谁都厉害了，真要要出钱，要死人了，都让大哥美国第一个顶上。
英国祸害整个欧洲的时候，直接抹掉就行了么？
各有各的利益属于正常。人如此国家也一样 要只有一种声音的团结一致只有制度优势的专制可以做到
吵吵闹闹是每件事情都会伴随的过程。吵不吵不重要看最后做什么最重要。不团结一致的确是自由世界的软肋，所以必须碾压性的优势才能赢过专制。
哈哈哈哈哈
真够搞笑的
比你搞笑的没几个了
Three charts that show why Trump thinks NATO is a bad deal
PUBLISHED TUE, DEC 3 20196:21 AM ESTUPDATED TUE, DEC 3 201910:06 AM EST
Share Article via Email KEY POINTS Heads of state and government are meeting in the U.K. this week for the 70th anniversary of the military alliance NATO. The amount of money that member states each spend on defense is a contentious issue. Turkish action in northern Syria is also creating stress between the allies.
The NATO summit celebrates its 70th birthday in London this week but some of the main attendees aren’t quite in the party mood.
The biggest guest, President Donald Trump, has traveled to the U.K. capital to attend the meeting and join other heads of state in marking the alliance’s seven decades in existence.
Trump has repeatedly said the U.S. provides too much cash for NATO, spending big on maintaining missile defense systems across Europe and positioning 65,000 troops within the continent. On Tuesday, Trump issued another broadside, this time accusing Germany of not paying its fair share on defense. A withdrawal of the U.S. from NATO would effectively destroy it with one stroke, and while nothing official has ever been said, several reports suggest Trump has considered ending U.S. involvement. NATO itself estimates that as a percentage of GDP, the U.S. will far outstrip the spending of any other member country in 2019.
In 2014, all NATO members agreed to increase their defense spending to 2% of gross domestic product by 2024.
As of June 2019, NATO data estimated that only seven of its 29 members — including the U.S. — are estimated to spend 2% or more of their annual GDP on defense this year. On Monday, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg defended the spending of member nations. “On spending, NATO allies are now really stepping up and delivering more that they have done for many, many years,” he told CNBC’s Hadley Gamble in London. Stoltenberg said non-U.S. NATO allies, i.e. Europe plus Canada, are on target to add more than $400 billion to their defense budgets by 2024. “That’s unprecedented and will make NATO stronger,” he added. Should that additional spending materialize, it will bring the combined spending of all the NATO allies to around par with the current U.S. outlay alone based on GDP.
NATO’s earliest incarnation was a 1947 agreement between France and the U.K. to help each other in the event of any attack from Germany or the Soviet Union. This expanded into a military alliance that included the U.S.. In 1949, member countries put their signature to the North Atlantic Treaty for the first time. Its relevance and popularity has ebbed and flowed. In 1966, France, under President Charles de Gaulle, left NATO’s military structure, doubting the organization’s might against any invasion from the Soviet Union. Full membership by France was restored only in 2009 and just 10 years later, current French leader Emmanuel Macron is again doubting the alliance. Macron has said NATO is experiencing “brain death” because of pressure to reform from Trump and unpredictable military action from Turkey.
Macron has said the Turkish invasion of Syria is a threat to NATO’s battle against the Islamic State. In an angry response, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Macron himself was suffering from “brain death” and he was showing disrespect and hubris by questioning Turkish action. “You know how to show off, but you cannot even properly pay for NATO. You are a novice,” Erdogan reportedly said. NATO’s Stoltenberg said Monday that while the members have often had different opinions, history shows that “we have always been able to agree around our core task to protect and defend each other.” As Trump, Macron and Erdogan meet, this week will provide a stern test of that theory.
不准确 军火支持当然是给本国军工企业，韩国军工企业也有订单啊 美国还有经济支持。
德国现在已经缓过神了，再盼着俄罗斯赢继续喝俄罗斯坐大生意那是不可能的了 继续绥靖的话，德国在欧洲的领导力急剧下降；虽然谈不到边缘化，但是讲话就不会有人听。 德国再不站出来，美国就会加大武装东欧，到时候德国怎么办？ 现在有消息美国会给波兰20架F22. 波兰有了F22 在欧洲横着走。 德国这种国家，技术和经济实力强大，被美国说两下没事，被波兰以后指着鼻子骂，成何体统。
德国唯一的出路，就是在目前军事援助乌克兰和战后重建，发挥比美国更大的作用，才能继续当欧洲老大。
：）
比美国更大的作用
没有可能
TRUMP 这种神经病，最好还是消停一下；再瞎折腾，得判无期。
2019年国际刑事法院提出立案调查美军的战争罪行。2020年6月11日美国总统川普签署13928行政令，对国际刑事法院，海牙律师、调查员以及提供战争罪行的记者经济制裁和撤销旅行签证。川普政府所做的行为彻底蔑视践踏国际秩序。
TRUMP这种才是美国的掘墓人。他能理解NATO是干嘛的吗
德国尽可能发挥领导力吧。 靠猥琐发育，不想承担责任，那就靠边站。
很好笑啊。2023赶英超美。
Russia’s economy may continue to shrink in 2023. Its GDP is forecast to decline by 5.6% in the worst-case scenario (OECD) or by 3.3% according to the World Bank. The IMF expects slight growth in 2023 (0.3%).
估计也就看了一个IMF估计的best scenario, 其他机构包括世界银行的估计就不看了。
英国是美国生父， 美与加拿大是兄弟， 历史上诸多纠纷， 但生死关键是走在一起的。
我主张，各个国家集体拥核。
真活不下去了，就发射核武器，大家一起死。这样，这些军工复合体，才能歇菜。
生父。。。。。。。。