回复 1楼jeso1的帖子 Not clear about video, but know that it can vary hugely depending on what your goal is. The requirements on PC, memory, video card, display and finally the software itself can cost a fortune, let alone huge amount of time and energy. For static photos, the benchmark is PS, although both pro and casual users are accusing Adobe ripping off for decades, more so in the era of subscription-based model. Again, depending on your need, very capable PS alternatives exist for years. Remember seeing some detail introductions on one from DPR several years ago but forgot the name (costing $100+). Do some research and you can definitely find a suitable one. Also, LR and PS are actually very different softwares, so find the type that fits your processing habits.
有什么其他好的软件推荐。
达芬奇和lightroom
Not clear about video, but know that it can vary hugely depending on what your goal is. The requirements on PC, memory, video card, display and finally the software itself can cost a fortune, let alone huge amount of time and energy.
For static photos, the benchmark is PS, although both pro and casual users are accusing Adobe ripping off for decades, more so in the era of subscription-based model.
Again, depending on your need, very capable PS alternatives exist for years. Remember seeing some detail introductions on one from DPR several years ago but forgot the name (costing $100+). Do some research and you can definitely find a suitable one.
Also, LR and PS are actually very different softwares, so find the type that fits your processing habits.