德国外长在联合国大会上驳斥中方指控西方在乌克兰问题上火上浇油的说法。她说得很有力 “她问:"我们到底为什么要这样做?"并补充说:"我们不想要这场战争。我们没有选择这场战争。她说,她的政府 "宁愿把我们所有的精力和金钱都集中在修复我们的学校、应对气候危机和加强社会正义上",并补充说:"事实是,如果俄罗斯停止战斗,战争就会结束,如果乌克兰停止这场战斗,乌克兰就会结束。" The deputy Chinese envoy to the UN, Dai Bing, insisted the west was worsening the situation by arming Ukraine, saying: “Adding fuel to the fire will only exacerbate tensions”. His remarks provoked Baerbock into a powerful rebuttal rejecting his claim that the west was indulging in military spending at the expense of other priorities more important to ordinary people. She asked: “Why on earth would we do that?”, adding: “We did not want this war. We did not choose this war.” She said her government “would much rather focus every bit of our energy and money in fixing our schools, in fighting the climate crisis and strengthening social justice”, adding: “The truth is that if Russia stops fighting, the war will end, If Ukraine stops this fighting, Ukraine ends.”
...She asked: “Why on earth would we do that?”, adding: “We did not want this war. We did not choose this war.” She said her government “would much rather focus every bit of our energy and money in fixing our schools, in fighting the climate crisis and strengthening social justice”, adding: “The truth is that if Russia stops fighting, the war will end, If Ukraine stops this fighting, Ukraine ends.”... The issue isn''t Germany. It is not up to Germany if they want the war to stop or not. It is US that is leading the entire effort from NATO to pour fuel on this fire. That is the point China tried to make.
德国外长在联合国大会上驳斥中方指控西方在乌克兰问题上火上浇油的说法。她说得很有力 “她问:"我们到底为什么要这样做?"并补充说:"我们不想要这场战争。我们没有选择这场战争。她说,她的政府 "宁愿把我们所有的精力和金钱都集中在修复我们的学校、应对气候危机和加强社会正义上",并补充说:"事实是,如果俄罗斯停止战斗,战争就会结束,如果乌克兰停止这场战斗,乌克兰就会结束。" The deputy Chinese envoy to the UN, Dai Bing, insisted the west was worsening the situation by arming Ukraine, saying: “Adding fuel to the fire will only exacerbate tensions”. His remarks provoked Baerbock into a powerful rebuttal rejecting his claim that the west was indulging in military spending at the expense of other priorities more important to ordinary people. She asked: “Why on earth would we do that?”, adding: “We did not want this war. We did not choose this war.” She said her government “would much rather focus every bit of our energy and money in fixing our schools, in fighting the climate crisis and strengthening social justice”, adding: “The truth is that if Russia stops fighting, the war will end, If Ukraine stops this fighting, Ukraine ends.” lyksj 发表于 2023-02-23 17:15
德国外长在联合国大会上驳斥中方指控西方在乌克兰问题上火上浇油的说法。她说得很有力 “她问:"我们到底为什么要这样做?"并补充说:"我们不想要这场战争。我们没有选择这场战争。她说,她的政府 "宁愿把我们所有的精力和金钱都集中在修复我们的学校、应对气候危机和加强社会正义上",并补充说:"事实是,如果俄罗斯停止战斗,战争就会结束,如果乌克兰停止这场战斗,乌克兰就会结束。" The deputy Chinese envoy to the UN, Dai Bing, insisted the west was worsening the situation by arming Ukraine, saying: “Adding fuel to the fire will only exacerbate tensions”. His remarks provoked Baerbock into a powerful rebuttal rejecting his claim that the west was indulging in military spending at the expense of other priorities more important to ordinary people. She asked: “Why on earth would we do that?”, adding: “We did not want this war. We did not choose this war.” She said her government “would much rather focus every bit of our energy and money in fixing our schools, in fighting the climate crisis and strengthening social justice”, adding: “The truth is that if Russia stops fighting, the war will end, If Ukraine stops this fighting, Ukraine ends.” lyksj 发表于 2023-02-23 17:15
“The truth is that if Russia stops fighting, the war will end, If Ukraine stops this fighting, Ukraine ends.” That‘s utterly false. YSYNG 发表于 2023-02-23 18:10
“她问:"我们到底为什么要这样做?"并补充说:"我们不想要这场战争。我们没有选择这场战争。她说,她的政府 "宁愿把我们所有的精力和金钱都集中在修复我们的学校、应对气候危机和加强社会正义上",并补充说:"事实是,如果俄罗斯停止战斗,战争就会结束,如果乌克兰停止这场战斗,乌克兰就会结束。"
The deputy Chinese envoy to the UN, Dai Bing, insisted the west was worsening the situation by arming Ukraine, saying: “Adding fuel to the fire will only exacerbate tensions”.
His remarks provoked Baerbock into a powerful rebuttal rejecting his claim that the west was indulging in military spending at the expense of other priorities more important to ordinary people.
She asked: “Why on earth would we do that?”, adding: “We did not want this war. We did not choose this war.” She said her government “would much rather focus every bit of our energy and money in fixing our schools, in fighting the climate crisis and strengthening social justice”, adding: “The truth is that if Russia stops fighting, the war will end, If Ukraine stops this fighting, Ukraine ends.”
德外长用了chatgpt?
The issue isn''t Germany. It is not up to Germany if they want the war to stop or not. It is US that is leading the entire effort from NATO to pour fuel on this fire. That is the point China tried to make.
That‘s utterly false.
你是没选择战争,但是你选择不断东扩。本来华约消失,北约这种军事集团就该消失的。不但不消失,还变本加厉的扩张,早晚到这一步。所以德国也别装小白兔
要不是当年美国二战中火上浇油,中国人现在都是说日语的
清朝统治了那么多年,搞得满语都消失了
华约消失 但俄罗斯没有消失 现在倒是快了
俄罗斯没消失,但是当时舔西方舔的可亲了,啥都往上靠,恨不得穿一条裤子,其实一直到这次战争前还幻想和西方穿一条裤子。你犯得着直接扩张到人家家门口吗
法律上来说,你也不能说因为你感觉你邻居威胁了你,所以你就能打上门去把邻居揍一顿吧。现实里这样做,是法盲,是会坐牢受惩罚的。
对, 360度那位
当年要不是美国提供了日本9成以上的战争物资,日本搞不好根本没能力侵华。。
是的
特别是她英文发言的原话听起来很有力
发觉这些政客胡扯还总有人买账。 如果乌克兰停战乌克兰完了的可能性有没有,废话,当然有。 但是如果乌克兰不停战,一样有完了的可能性。 其他可能包括,如果乌克兰停战,战争结束。如果乌克兰不停战,俄罗斯跟乌克兰都完了。如果乌克兰不停战而战争升级,德国完了,欧洲完了。如果乌克兰不停战,美军中国加入世界大战,全部完蛋。 就不能耿直点,直接说我们不能让乌克兰停战?不然我们亏钱
这场战争难道不是毛子发起的。毛子停战退回到战前的状况,战争立马结束。
美国发声明签条约,保证北约永远不接纳乌克兰,永远不接纳俄罗斯周边国家成为新的成员国,战争一样可以立马结束。。。
事实是毛子发动战争前,北约拒绝了二毛子的加入申请
忘了2008和2014俄罗斯干啥了? 欧洲一帮怂货,觉得这次不能再忍了。 就这么简单。
到现在还有人帮俄罗斯辩护,丧心病狂。中国政府也是这么干的,还指责西方政府拱火,所以现在国际上讲话如放屁。
哈哈 so true
德国可以选择不支援乌克兰的。 扭扭捏捏半年还是支持了。
事实是原本在2022年一年内,北约就安排了20场以上的联合军事演习,装备和军事教导组都在不断流入乌克兰。。
北约就是毒瘤, 害人害己。
把俄罗斯换成美国, 把 20年 换成 50 年, 同样成立?
一个破气球都能闹腾出这么大动静,要是美国的管道被炸,后果不敢想象
原来就是她 长得不错
台湾那是自找毁灭 管美国毛事
面对普京燃起的熊熊战火,各国都按自己对火情的评估,支援相应的“灭火器”。随着战火转向乌东地区,美国、英国、荷兰等国陆续支援乌克兰的远程榴弹炮火箭炮,类似远距离喷射的消防车,继续灭火。支援乌克兰武器扑灭俄军燃起的战火,相当于支援乌克兰消防设备,是火上浇水,咋被曲解成“火上浇油”了呢?难道支援乌克兰大量白布做白旗,方便乌克兰投降才叫雪中送炭?
不是台湾的错。背后的主子逼的。
所以日本在甲午海战里的战舰也一定是美国赞助的了?还是再往上倒,丰城秀吉侵略朝鲜的部队一定也是美国武装的了?
没有逻辑吧,为啥只说乌克兰停战?是乌克兰想打的吗?
联合军事演习和支持乌克兰都是为了增强这些受俄罗斯威胁的国家的自卫能力。
言而总之,总而言之,有侵略别国传统的国家不是别人,正是俄罗斯。合着你们觉得俄罗斯“感到威胁”就可以堂而皇之入侵别国,而别国“感到威胁”增强军事实力保护自己就成罪过了?
Cannot agree more!
不是没有逻辑,而是没有是非。
美国炸之前跟德国沟通过吧,给了啥好处不知道
正确!最根本的问题是他们认为乌克兰应该臣服于邻国的强权,乌克兰没有挑选自己朋友的权利。这场战争是俄罗斯发起的,不是乌克兰的责任,不是北约的责任,更不是美国的责任。就算北约东扩包括了乌克兰,只要乌克兰是自愿加入的,俄罗斯就没有权利用武力入侵乌克兰。
乌克兰作为一个主权国家,想加入什么组织,俄罗斯管得着吗?
Then tell us what is your "truth"?
这问题你该问美国,当初为啥为了古巴差点拉整个人类陪葬
也该问美国,为啥这些年来颠覆了那么多其他国家的政权
不是吧,应该是信这个德国外长的话的更傻
弯弯有福了,来自美国爸爸的爱: destruction with love from 米国
讲乌克兰你扯什么美国。美国本来就是世界最邪恶国家,这不代表俄罗斯不邪恶,不代表俄罗斯入侵乌克兰就是对的。所以一个坏蛋跑去弱者邻居家打砸抢,弱者邻居投奔另一个坏蛋就不可以,一定要被打死或者被打服才行?这世界上不就是坏蛋A拉帮结派揍坏蛋B拉帮结派么,扯什么正义的大旗呢。黑社会A和黑社会B乌克兰想投靠谁都是他的自由,投靠了A被B打,A要是袖手旁观以后还能招到小弟么?都是出来混的,装什么白莲花。
对么,既然这世界没啥狗屁正义,都是利益和拳头。。 既然都承认这些,那这里有些人从道德角度批判俄罗斯不是有病么?
乌克兰自然可以投靠北约,俄罗斯自然也可以因为乌克兰的行为而出兵,双方都是为了各自的利益,这不是很合理么。。
东扩不东扩,加入的国家是自主国家,又不是俄罗斯的附属国?为什么不能?
哪里的数据?日本为什么会偷袭珍珠港?你以为日本真的蠢到要同美国宣战?
没有确实证据,一切靠别人说而猜想
新浪看了一眼,在报道这个,但没报道美军增兵台湾
有谁说过“俄罗斯不该有任何反应”了? 有反应当然应该, 但反应到入侵别的主权国家, 发动战争, 那就是俄罗斯又傻又坏了。 杀人者被判刑, 没错吧? 甭管挑起杀人的原因是什么, 法律就是会惩罚杀人者。