买房买地是trade,是用货币资产换另一种资产。侵犯私有财产权跟trade没有关系。不能说不让你trade就是侵犯你的私有财产权。 先反驳一下这条,Civil Rights Act of 1866 明确了买卖财产的权利。这里用词是公民,打官司就要再运用Equal Protection Clause,正如1952年加州最高法院判例 Fujii v. California Be it enacted . . . , That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens, of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding. https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/historic-document-library/detail/civil-rights-act-of-1866-april-9-1866-an-act-to-protect-all-persons-in-the-united-states-in-their-civil-rights-and-furnish-the-means-of-their-vindication
买房买地是trade,是用货币资产换另一种资产。侵犯私有财产权跟trade没有关系。不能说不让你trade就是侵犯你的私有财产权。 先反驳一下这条,Civil Rights Act of 1866 明确了买卖财产的权利。这里用词是公民,打官司就要再运用Equal Protection Clause,正如1952年加州最高法院判例 Fujii v. California Be it enacted . . . , That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens, of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding. https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/historic-document-library/detail/civil-rights-act-of-1866-april-9-1866-an-act-to-protect-all-persons-in-the-united-states-in-their-civil-rights-and-furnish-the-means-of-their-vindication
中国的房子限购不要太普遍,也没见哪个中国人搬出宪法来说中国政府违宪,说侵犯了其财产权。上海不让外地人买房,上海市政府就侵犯外地人的财产权了?
中国人就需要有中国这样的强权政府,美国对你nice,有一点点不如意就吹鼻子瞪眼睛。
买房买地是trade,是用货币资产换另一种资产。侵犯私有财产权跟trade没有关系。不能说不让你trade就是侵犯你的私有财产权。
本大叔在美国有多个房产,所以房价涨可以推高本大叔的资产总额,这点对本大叔没有坏处。
但人力成本增加,本大叔公司的payroll大幅增长,到了一定threshold本大叔就要考虑裁员。如果所有的公司都因为人力成本增加而裁员的话,经济就不行了。所以本大叔举双手赞成德州的Abbott巡抚!希望其它州也跟进。
想买房子,可以,先证明你是美国想要的人,先拿到绿卡再说。你如果不是美国想要的人,美国不是你的家,不让你买房天经地义,你先考虑一下上海让不让你买房再来唧唧歪歪德州的政策!
本大叔fully expect这下面会有很多loser跟帖骂人,你们这种素质所以是loser,你们这些loser还是滚回中国去,考虑下辈子投个好胎吧!LOL!
傻逼是你爸妈的错,出来显眼就是你的错了。
你现在搞的不让俄罗斯买,让乌克兰买是啥意思
绿卡也不可以买 很多人绿卡十几年 就是为了回国看父母方便不入籍
出来现眼娱乐大众,有啥错?
要不出来现眼,难不成大伙儿还能单开一贴怼他?现在不是正好么。。。
这个不好, 赤果果。
得州也不让那四国的绿卡买
这个法案不是出于经济原因,而是政治方面
想买呼吸,可以,先证明你是美国想要的人,先拿到绿卡再说。你如果不是美国想要的人,美国不是你的家,不让你呼吸天经地义!
说实话还真没仔细读过中国宪法。里面有对财产权的保护吗?
那当年土改公私合营算啥呢?
多么愚蠢的人才会认为他是为了保护德州房价?
对不同国家的人不同对待,这已经是外交范畴的东西了,一个州搞这个,明显有违宪之嫌。
不过也可以理解,某些美国人眼里,美国就是全世界。某些德州人眼里,德州就是一个国家。
政府公然违反传染病防疫法。 入户消杀有没有法律依据? 强制方舱有没有法律依据? 河南省给储户发放红码有没有法律依据?
国内知法犯法的事情太多了, 买不买房反而不那么重要了。
你说为啥?
嗯 ,就是情商欠费的一些人。 可以理解。 大概率楼主也是个川粉, 总觉得 chinese virus 跟自己没关系
这倒 不完全是,很多政策 有上海户口的 和 没有户口的 是 两样的
他自己就是一个满嘴喷脏话哗众取宠的人,自己找骂,求仁得仁呗。
我本来也不知道这些人后来怎么样了。今天看到楼主,才知道原来他们都在网上发帖比贱呢
中国是地域歧视, 不是人种歧视, 德州明显是人种歧视。
跟你爹妈说生个嘴巴干净的后代,如果你爹妈嘴巴也不干净的话,那跟你祖父母外祖父母说生个嘴巴干净的后代。不然你们全家到处丢脸实在难堪呀。
回去跟你爹妈说生个有出息的后代,不要做卢瑟,赖在美国不走,人家不卖你房子,还唧唧歪歪,像祥林嫂一样没点出息。
你可以不来美国,美国政府没有求你来美国。你来美国不就是想为了赚钱吗?记住,给你钱的人永远有upper hand。你不爽,滚回中国去,没人会挽留你。
这一点本大叔同意,不能限制有绿卡的买房。
你有本事拿到美国护照再说,你一个外国人没有必要替美国人考虑这些事情。中国有句古话,皇帝不急太监急。
买房买地是trade,是用货币资产换另一种资产。侵犯私有财产权跟trade没有关系。不能说不让你trade就是侵犯你的私有财产权。
先反驳一下这条,Civil Rights Act of 1866 明确了买卖财产的权利。这里用词是公民,打官司就要再运用Equal Protection Clause,正如1952年加州最高法院判例 Fujii v. California
Be it enacted . . . , That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens, of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding.
https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/historic-document-library/detail/civil-rights-act-of-1866-april-9-1866-an-act-to-protect-all-persons-in-the-united-states-in-their-civil-rights-and-furnish-the-means-of-their-vindication
在上海只要工作交社保,买房的政策和上海户口是一样的
拿钱发帖者死
这个“区别对待”明显属于联邦政府的权力哦。。。
当然你要觉得德州就是宇宙,爱怎么偷抢本属于美国的权力都无所谓,那当然也随您。。。
我不是你老爸,你没必要知道我是谁,你只要知道你父母是谁就可以了,回去跟你爹妈说生个有出息的后代,不要做卢瑟,赖在美国不走,人家不卖你房子,还唧唧歪歪,像祥林嫂一样没点出息。
是吗?那么中国政府可以告德州违宪 不过我很怀疑你的说法,因为美国州在管理州内commerce的权力很像一个小国家
真是可笑,
先用Equal Protection Clause替 guantanamo bay关的那些人打一下官司,LOL!
感觉不像种族歧视吧,俄罗斯是白人,中朝是黄人,但日韩也是黄人
是大国博弈