这个总结的好鹅毛狂轰滥炸就是疯子被激怒后的穷凶极恶滥发脾气:“This is not therefore a new war-winning strategy but a sociopath’s tantrum." 周二已经收到部分德国air defense system. Ukraine also received on Tuesday the first of four IRIS-T air defence systems promised by Germany, a German defence ministry source said, confirming a report by Der Spiegel magazine. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/why-russias-missiles-ukraine-have-limited-impact-2022-10-11/ Explainer: Why Russia's missiles on Ukraine have limited impact Peter Graff7:44 AM PDT LONDON, Oct 11 (Reuters) - Russia's biggest air strikes against Ukraine since the start of the war killed at least 19 people, drove thousands of Ukrainians back into air raid shelters and knocked out electricity in hundreds of towns and villages. The strikes - denounced in the West for deliberately hitting civilian targets - have been hailed by hawks in Moscow as a turning point that demonstrates Russia's resolve in what it calls its "special military operation" in Ukraine. Advertisement · Scroll to continue But Western military analysts say the strikes came at a staggering cost, depleted a dwindling supply of long-range missiles, hit no major military targets and are unlikely to change the course of a war going badly for Moscow. Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com "Russia lacks the missiles to mount attacks of this sort often, as it is running out of stocks and the Ukrainians are claiming a high success rate in intercepting many of those already used," wrote Lawrence Freedman, emeritus professor of war studies at King's College London. "This is not therefore a new war-winning strategy but a sociopath’s tantrum." HOW ARE THE ATTACKS PORTRAYED IN RUSSIA? President Vladimir Putin described the strikes as a response to what he called terrorist attacks by Ukraine, including a blast on Sunday that damaged Russia's bridge to Crimea, which it built after annexing the peninsula it seized in 2014. Hawks in Russia had been demanding for weeks that Putin escalate the conflict, and many of them hailed Monday's attacks. Advertisement · Scroll to continue Ramzan Kadyrov, the Putin loyalist leader of Russia's Chechnya region who had lately called for military commanders to be sacked, said he was now 100% behind the strategy. Margarita Simonyan, head of RT, Russia's state-run overseas media channel, said Moscow had been waiting for the perfect time to demonstrate its strength. Quoting a proverb, she tweeted: "A Russian harnesses his horses slowly but drives them quickly." Dmitry Medvedev, deputy head of Putin's advisory security council, said Russia would now be able to widen its objectives: "The goal of our future actions, in my view, should be the complete dismantling of the political regime of Ukraine." CAN RUSSIA KEEP THIS UP? Ukraine says Russia fired 83 cruise missiles on Monday and that it shot down at least 43 of them. Moscow says it fired more than 70 and all its targets were hit. Both sides say the attack was on a huge scale, unseen at least since Russia's initial wave of air strikes on the first night of the war in February. Each Kalibr cruise missile is estimated to cost more than $6.5 million, meaning Moscow fired around half a billion dollars worth of missiles in a single day. Western military analysts have no firm figures for how many missiles Russia has left, but for months have pointed to indicators suggesting the supply is limited. As far back as July, Joseph Dempsey and Douglas Barrie of the International Institute for Strategic Studies noted that Russia was increasingly using anti-ship missiles to strike targets on the ground. This "suggests that Moscow is having to muster its remaining conventionally armed land attack cruise missile resources more carefully," they wrote. CAN UKRAINE PROTECT ITSELF? President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said securing more air defences for Ukraine is his number one priority. Western leaders including U.S. President Joe Biden have promised more systems, though it takes time to deliver them. Ukraine now relies on Soviet-era air defence systems such as the S-300. Washington promised several months ago to send its sophisticated NASAMS system and said on Tuesday it was speeding up the shipment after saying in late September that delivery was still around two months away. Ukraine also received on Tuesday the first of four IRIS-T air defence systems promised by Germany, a German defence ministry source said, confirming a report by Der Spiegel magazine. In practice, military experts say Ukraine will probably never be able to defend its entire land area - the second largest in Europe after Russia itself - from attacks on scattered low-priority targets. Air defences, such as the U.S. Patriot missile system, are designed mainly to protect specific, high priority targets. Others can provide broader protection but over a comparatively small area, such as Israel's vaunted "Iron Dome" system which protects a country around one twentieth the size of Ukraine. "Bottom line: Just like it was difficult to stop Saddam from launching SCUDs, and as much as we want to help Ukraine, it's challenging to completely counter all Putin's war crimes that unfortunately include launching missile strikes against civilian targets," tweeted Mark Hertling, a former commander of U.S. land forces in Europe. Still, Monday's attacks appear to show that Ukraine is already far from defenceless. While Kyiv's claim to have shot down more than half of the missiles is impossible to verify, Russia did not hit any targets with the highest strategic value, such as leadership buildings in the capital, which are likely to have been best protected. WHAT'S NEXT? Russia still faces the same strategic difficulties it did before Monday's attacks: demoralised and poorly equipped forces spread along a 1,000-km frontline, with long supply lines vulnerable to Ukrainian attacks. Russia's initial advantages, above all the massive firepower of its artillery, allowed it to destroy and capture cities in May-July. But since September, its artillery-heavy forces have proven a poor match for defending occupied territory from mobile and increasingly well-equipped Ukrainian units. Moscow still lacks control over Ukrainian air space, which would allow for the intensive strikes by jet and helicopter that helped it defeat rebels in Syria and Chechnya. Ben Hodges, another former commander of U.S. ground forces in Europe, said that despite Monday's attacks, Ukraine still appeared to have "irreversible momentum" on the battlefield. "Russia's logistics system is exhausted and no Russian wants to fight in Putin's war in Ukraine," he tweeted. Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com Editing by Mark Heinrich Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/11/world/europe/russia-missiles-weapons-stockpile.html Here’s what Russia’s attacks may indicate about its weapons stockpile. Oct. 11, 2022Updated 2:41 p.m. ET A Russian rocket serves as a reminder of the relentless bombardment of Kharkiv, Ukraine.Ivor Prickett for The New York Times The Russian missile and drone attacks that killed at least 19 people across Ukraine on Monday were traumatic and wide-ranging, but they were not as deadly as they could have been, in the context of a war that has included widespread civilian killing. That has renewed questions over the quality of Russia’s weapons and about the capacity of its forces to carry out President Vladimir V. Putin’s military designs. Ian Storey, a senior fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore, said it could be a sign that Russia’s guided missiles are not very effective, or that it is running short of precision munitions. Most of the missiles targeted energy and other civilian services, in what Mr. Putin said was retaliation for a blast on Russia’s bridge to occupied Crimea. “Perhaps it was Putin’s way of sending a warning shot across Ukraine’s bow: If you attack our infrastructure, we will ramp up attacks on your cities,” Mr. Storey said. But he and other experts acknowledged that much about Russia’s weapons arsenal remains unclear. Here is some of what we know: Russia may be running low on sophisticated missiles. Many of Russia’s attacks — increasingly aimed at civilian targets — have been long-range strikes that used outdated, unguided and imprecise missiles, including some from the Soviet era. Ukrainian, Western and Russian analysts have said that the attacks appear to suggest that Russia is running low on its most sophisticated weapons. Western intelligence officials say that Russia used up many of its most accurate weapons, including cruise missiles and certain ballistic missiles, in the early days of the invasion. Russia’s arms industry has long relied heavily on imported electronic parts. As a result, analysts say, sanctions and export controls appear to have limited the Kremlin’s ability to restock its supplies, leaving it to rely more on unguided munitions. Experts said that by using dozens of precision missiles against civilian targets, Russia would have fewer to use on the battlefield as it faces Ukrainian counteroffensives in the east and south. “Given how they are strapped in terms of resources and military materiel, it is unlikely that Russia can maintain the combat tempo it exhibited on Monday,” said Ridzwan Rahmat, the principal defense analyst at Janes, based in Singapore. It is increasingly turning to Iran and North Korea for supplies. Russia has been buying military drones from Iran and, according to intelligence sources, artillery shells and rockets from North Korea. Analysts see both developments as a further sign that sanctions have hampered Russia’s military supply lines. Iran has confirmed that a drone deal with Russia was part of a military agreement that predated the war, and Iranian-made drones have been spotted in the skies above Ukraine more frequently. Ukraine’s military said that of the 24 drones Russia used in the attacks on Monday, more than half were Iranian. Ukrainian soldiers have said that the Iranian drones — which carry a payload of about 80 pounds and are self-destructing — are effective battlefield weapons. There is no hard evidence of Russia having purchased North Korean weapons, Mr. Storey said. But if true, he added, “it’s a sign of desperation.” Russia’s nuclear weapons remain a threat, though it’s unclear whether the Kremlin will use them. Russia has a large supply of tactical nuclear weapons — probably about 2,000, far more than the roughly 100 that NATO has positioned around Europe. In recent weeks, Mr. Putin has raised the prospect of using nuclear weapons to hold onto his tenuous territorial gains in Ukraine. Whether he actually would use them despite the huge risks — both to Ukraine and to Russia and the wider region — is another story. Senior U.S. officials say they have not seen any evidence in recent days of Russia’s moving its nuclear assets. And on Monday, Dmitri S. Peskov, the Kremlin’s spokesman, dismissed speculation that Russia would use nuclear weapons in response to the Crimea attack as “completely incorrect.” Russian missiles have been vulnerable to Ukrainian air defenses. The relatively low casualty toll on Monday, Mr. Storey said, was partly a result of Ukraine’s ability to shoot down some Russian missiles using air defenses that have remained largely intact throughout the war. As of Tuesday, Ukraine’s Defense Ministry said that its forces had shot down about 300 Russian cruise missiles since February. It was not possible to confirm that tally. The total number of Russian missiles fired during the war is believed to be in the thousands. Lara Jakes contributed reporting.
中央社基辅12日综合外电报导 2022-10-12 12:43
乌克兰能源部长哈鲁申科(Herman Halushchenko)告诉美国有线电视新闻网(CNN),俄罗斯10日和11日连续对乌克兰发动飞弹攻击,境内30%能源基础设施被击中。
全乌克兰境内目前已经开始停电限电了(下图)!!!! 这才连续轰炸了2天,听说新上任督战的那个俄罗斯屠夫将军要连着炸10天再决定是不是继续。彻底他妈的疯了!
🔥 最新回帖
還是得看 剩上 願意給 普丁 多少錢
说实话,我现在已经很怀疑普京到底疯没疯,他和过去已经是判若两人了,可能一步错步步错,没疯也逼疯了。
不要说什么扔核弹这样笼统的话,要看怎么扔。我在前几天的帖子里提过了,核弹这个东西和化学武器,生物武器是一样的,用好了加分,用不好会反噬。 首先,世界上不和美欧站一起的国家,除了白俄朝鲜,没有人公开说支持俄罗斯打乌克兰吧?甭管真假,都是呼吁和谈,谴责美欧供火对不对?那么如果欧美不动俄罗斯先扔了核弹,这些国家啥反应可以预见吧? 第二,战术核武器杀伤有限,那么俄罗斯会面临一个往哪扔的问题。扔前线吗?自己人怎么办,扔乌冬城市吗?以后还要不要动员伪军了?扔乌克兰大城市炸老百姓吗?我觉得普京没到那个凶悍程度。所以最佳使用方式是在乌军后方对着乌军大集团集结地来一下子,但是就俄罗斯的情报水平我觉得乌军不会给这个机会。 第三,一旦使用核弹,西方不一定会下场(如果局限在战术核弹一两次西方肯定不会下场),但是会武器加码。那么普京要考虑是核弹炸死的乌军多还是被加码武器打死的俄军多。 最后,核弹是一个标志,这个标志引起的轰动比核弹本身起到的作用要大得多。普京没疯,炮灰还很多,他不会不考虑后果。
普京不是假仁假义, 他是觉着将来能控制乌克兰局势,推一个亲俄的领导人上台。 这种情况下不能把乌克兰人打得太狠,否则仇恨太深
现在完全是破罐子破摔,先砸烂了再说了
🛋️ 沙发板凳
这时候不要说风凉话了,快点把反导系统特快到了!
这么急?是不是你住在乌克兰? 当初炸桥的时候是不是也赶去和邮票合影了?
现在乌克兰电力不够用,把出口到波兰的电力给停掉了,没想到波兰丝毫不同情,不忍让,坚决要乌克兰恢复电力供应,否则会有制裁措施。
比较难办,冬天还没来呢。
哈哈, 好玩, 看欧盟怎么过冬。 乌克兰不听话, 是不是波兰也可以轰炸它?
Calm down man!
反导系统是万能药? 窃不以为然。
昨天最新的新闻,俄罗斯高精确导弹的库存是:一天打1000发,可以连着打6个月。
你哪来的消息说没库存了?
给个链接吧。鹅毛导弹还有180,000发? 我刚才google了一下,三四月份就说已经用掉一半了。
你仔细看看你自己贴的新闻说的什么再讨论吧。
求仁得仁,你急什么
所以开战后通过突袭在四个方向取得的进展已经被乌克兰完全收复了两个(基辅周围、哈尔科夫周围),也舍不得多用些高精确的导弹? 死了几千士兵要征召30万人(一期)的世界第二军事强国。
我在查新闻,也在补充链接。 你把可靠的新闻也贴出来呗。
这个总结的好鹅毛狂轰滥炸就是疯子被激怒后的穷凶极恶滥发脾气:“This is not therefore a new war-winning strategy but a sociopath’s tantrum." 周二已经收到部分德国air defense system. Ukraine also received on Tuesday the first of four IRIS-T air defence systems promised by Germany, a German defence ministry source said, confirming a report by Der Spiegel magazine.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/why-russias-missiles-ukraine-have-limited-impact-2022-10-11/
Explainer: Why Russia's missiles on Ukraine have limited impact Peter Graff7:44 AM PDT
Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com
"Russia lacks the missiles to mount attacks of this sort often, as it is running out of stocks and the Ukrainians are claiming a high success rate in intercepting many of those already used," wrote Lawrence Freedman, emeritus professor of war studies at King's College London. "This is not therefore a new war-winning strategy but a sociopath’s tantrum." HOW ARE THE ATTACKS PORTRAYED IN RUSSIA? President Vladimir Putin described the strikes as a response to what he called terrorist attacks by Ukraine, including a blast on Sunday that damaged Russia's bridge to Crimea, which it built after annexing the peninsula it seized in 2014. Hawks in Russia had been demanding for weeks that Putin escalate the conflict, and many of them hailed Monday's attacks. Advertisement · Scroll to continue Ramzan Kadyrov, the Putin loyalist leader of Russia's Chechnya region who had lately called for military commanders to be sacked, said he was now 100% behind the strategy. Margarita Simonyan, head of RT, Russia's state-run overseas media channel, said Moscow had been waiting for the perfect time to demonstrate its strength. Quoting a proverb, she tweeted: "A Russian harnesses his horses slowly but drives them quickly." Dmitry Medvedev, deputy head of Putin's advisory security council, said Russia would now be able to widen its objectives: "The goal of our future actions, in my view, should be the complete dismantling of the political regime of Ukraine." CAN RUSSIA KEEP THIS UP? Ukraine says Russia fired 83 cruise missiles on Monday and that it shot down at least 43 of them. Moscow says it fired more than 70 and all its targets were hit. Both sides say the attack was on a huge scale, unseen at least since Russia's initial wave of air strikes on the first night of the war in February. Each Kalibr cruise missile is estimated to cost more than $6.5 million, meaning Moscow fired around half a billion dollars worth of missiles in a single day. Western military analysts have no firm figures for how many missiles Russia has left, but for months have pointed to indicators suggesting the supply is limited. As far back as July, Joseph Dempsey and Douglas Barrie of the International Institute for Strategic Studies noted that Russia was increasingly using anti-ship missiles to strike targets on the ground. This "suggests that Moscow is having to muster its remaining conventionally armed land attack cruise missile resources more carefully," they wrote. CAN UKRAINE PROTECT ITSELF? President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said securing more air defences for Ukraine is his number one priority. Western leaders including U.S. President Joe Biden have promised more systems, though it takes time to deliver them. Ukraine now relies on Soviet-era air defence systems such as the S-300. Washington promised several months ago to send its sophisticated NASAMS system and said on Tuesday it was speeding up the shipment after saying in late September that delivery was still around two months away. Ukraine also received on Tuesday the first of four IRIS-T air defence systems promised by Germany, a German defence ministry source said, confirming a report by Der Spiegel magazine. In practice, military experts say Ukraine will probably never be able to defend its entire land area - the second largest in Europe after Russia itself - from attacks on scattered low-priority targets. Air defences, such as the U.S. Patriot missile system, are designed mainly to protect specific, high priority targets. Others can provide broader protection but over a comparatively small area, such as Israel's vaunted "Iron Dome" system which protects a country around one twentieth the size of Ukraine. "Bottom line: Just like it was difficult to stop Saddam from launching SCUDs, and as much as we want to help Ukraine, it's challenging to completely counter all Putin's war crimes that unfortunately include launching missile strikes against civilian targets," tweeted Mark Hertling, a former commander of U.S. land forces in Europe. Still, Monday's attacks appear to show that Ukraine is already far from defenceless. While Kyiv's claim to have shot down more than half of the missiles is impossible to verify, Russia did not hit any targets with the highest strategic value, such as leadership buildings in the capital, which are likely to have been best protected. WHAT'S NEXT? Russia still faces the same strategic difficulties it did before Monday's attacks: demoralised and poorly equipped forces spread along a 1,000-km frontline, with long supply lines vulnerable to Ukrainian attacks. Russia's initial advantages, above all the massive firepower of its artillery, allowed it to destroy and capture cities in May-July. But since September, its artillery-heavy forces have proven a poor match for defending occupied territory from mobile and increasingly well-equipped Ukrainian units. Moscow still lacks control over Ukrainian air space, which would allow for the intensive strikes by jet and helicopter that helped it defeat rebels in Syria and Chechnya. Ben Hodges, another former commander of U.S. ground forces in Europe, said that despite Monday's attacks, Ukraine still appeared to have "irreversible momentum" on the battlefield. "Russia's logistics system is exhausted and no Russian wants to fight in Putin's war in Ukraine," he tweeted.
Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com
Editing by Mark Heinrich Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
资讯频道
俄军导弹够用不?
枢密院十号 10-12 01:37
俄乌冲突中的一个诡异情况是,基本掌握制空权的俄空天军,虽然在乌克兰附近拥有数百架各式战机,但平均每日仅出动不到100架次,完全没有能将制空权转化为战场优势,对于乌军数量不多的中远程防空导弹也没有能有效压制。这种拉垮的表现,导致俄军战术飞机无法效仿北约作战模式,利用战机在数十公里外——足以躲开乌军数量众多的单兵防空导弹打击距离——发射相对廉价的激光制导或卫星制导滑翔炸弹进行大规模轰炸,而只能单独依靠俄军战略轰炸机从安全的里海上空发射远程巡航导弹,打击少量有限的高价值目标。 事实上,过于依赖价值昂贵的远程导弹,这也是之前俄军没有大规模打击乌克兰基础设施的重要原因之一,而只能优先打击军事目标。可以预料的是,随着先进远程导弹的快速消耗,俄罗斯的这种报复性打击强度会逐步降低,未来的焦点可能会重回战场。
听着就不像真的,给个link
一个蠢, 一个坏, 真是没办法。
确实没办法,接着交税给美帝就好了。
伥后面的鬼要让他跳让他打
底气就是北约会不停的给他们送钱送物器
美国剧本就不是打死俄罗斯,这样欧洲就大一统了。让他们相互内耗才是美国要的。
俄就等着这个冬天了,如果是个极端的寒冷的冬天就更好了。俄罗斯已经准备冬天在北极进行高爆实验,造成北极局部温度不稳定,驱动极地斡旋南下,欧洲凛冬将至。
反导是保护美国的,不是乌克兰。
北约没那么团结,除非你说的北约只包括美国波兰,其他国家都没那么积极,加上经济危机自顾不暇
怎么会有这么多?真的吗?
你住在平行宇宙吧。
北约的目标是东西德模式,保证北约50年之内有活干
也可以硬气点,不交税嘛。
哇,这个高级。哪个中文自媒体的脑洞?
这太缺德了
只要美国和北约支持乌克兰就够了。其他欧洲国家不捣乱就行了。但是好像北欧国家对俄也很硬。尤其是刚想加入北约的芬兰和瑞典。 拜登至少还要在台上再干两年呢。看俄罗斯能不能撑到那时候。并且美国民意支持乌克兰的高达70%。到时候总统选举如果拜登打乌克兰牌,说共和党通俄,会把乌克兰卖给俄罗斯。到时候共和党估计又凉凉了。
哈哈哈哈哈,真是嘴炮无极限。
从开战到现在俄罗斯一共打了1300导弹,还包括没有精度的。。总耗资75亿美元。
我老人家帮你算一下啊,每天1000个高精度,至少是80亿,六个月一共180天,也就是打掉一万亿美元。俄罗斯年景最好的时候2021,GDP也就一万五千亿美圆。。。。你嘴炮一开,俄罗斯大半年GDP没了。
哈哈哈哈哈。你真信啊?
确实,白等这个呆子太 evil 了
俄罗斯所有各种型号的导弹 普通的 高精确 短程 远程的 总共才5000多枚
他靠谱不靠谱不知道,你这也不靠谱,你把市场价当成自己国家国有军工厂自供给价,不是瞎扯淡么。
你这更是瞎扯淡了, 你知道俄罗斯核弹头有多少吗? 光核弹头都公认6000多枚,实际估计过万了。
你觉得导弹可能只有5000多枚吗?
智商啊!!!!!
比不上晋凉玻尿酸邪恶。
俄罗斯因为被断了芯片和零件,已经生产不出来新的导弹了,只能打库存的,扔掉一颗少一颗,看还能扔多久。而北约这边的库存还多得很。北约也就才支持了乌克兰几套海马斯而已。 北约肯定会继续支持乌克兰防导弹系统的。这样俄罗斯扔得越多越被去军事化了。
德国的导弹防御系统 一安装 估计俄罗斯导弹就基本上全部被拦截了
生产不出新的导弹来了。。。。。。你这认知能力,真服了。你是自己不知道,还是想当然,还是心里清楚但骗大家不知道?
你看看梅德韦杰夫昨天视察俄罗斯导弹军工厂的新闻,看看是怎么一车间一车间生产导弹的很难吗?
https://weibo.com/1659893422/M9lkOBiLk
你和板上大妈正经讨论军事这就是你欺负人了 她们基本上就是军事盲,特别好忽悠的那种
不给的结果就是德国这样,今天被炸天然气管道,明天被割电缆
但凡有点常识,都不会,都不敢那么大言不惭。
这么多导弹你留着,你让死在莱曼死亡公路上一千五百多俄军在泉下怎么看? 当初这些俄军可是想屠宰场一样被吴军屠杀,半点精确制导的支援都没有
沒問題
剩上給錢 無上限
A倫就一千億美元 你想想B 倫 C 倫 該多少
大妈们还说 乌克兰的电站俄罗斯没有技术炸咧 进化成薛定谔电站了吧
这应该是把手榴弹和燃烧瓶也算成高精确导弹了
送武器有可能,送钱你想多了
现在的军援 基本上都是钱打到军火商手里,军火商把新武器送到波兰等欧洲国家, 然后欧洲人把淘汰的垃圾丢给乌克兰人, 然后乌克兰人在自己的土地上炸响武器
政客收获眼球 军火商收获金钱 欧洲国家跟新换代 乌克兰收获废墟一片
场面实在爽爽爽
俄罗斯疯没疯不确定
天天喊俄军马上崩的大妈,又疯了一个
那位大妈还特别爱掺乎政治军事话题,充分暴露她的智障。她真的相信冯妇说的:大鹅是拆了洗衣机的芯片做武器的。
台湾是个岛,只要围一圈封锁起来什么都不做,2个月就完了
剩上給了 普丁一千億美元
收穫了????
沒用啊
軍用設施有自己另外的輩分
民用的 三個月就修回去了 二戰後的經驗
先考慮考慮
上海人喝的來自海上的水 怎麼辦啊
圍一圈就是一圈 靶材
想想 莫斯科號
台灣的熊三 不比 北極星差
是啊,真的是教科书式的经验。根本不用登陆,炸电厂,水库,油站,大桥,铁路,外加海上封锁。夏天最热的时候10天差不多了。
摆拍谁不会啊?真有那么多用之不竭的导弹为啥之前前线战场节节败退,死那么多俄国士兵?被海马斯炸得晕头转向?填了那么多俄国士兵的命? 从开战到现在,俄罗斯的导弹打了一千多发了,除了偶尔炸几个军火库外,大多数都是炸剧院,学校,商场。炸死多少乌克兰平民了?或许是故意的,或许是精准度太低。
我几个月前就预测过了。这场战争会变成下一个阿富汗战争。战争会长期化。输赢最后肯定能分出来的。那就是俄罗斯会输。长期受到经济制裁加上前线不断死人。最后俄罗斯内部会乱的。一个小小的阿富汗都能把强大的苏联搞解体,更别说乌克兰了。 乌克兰这边虽然经济状况也不会好到哪里去,前线也会一直死人。但是因为是保家卫国的战争所以会一直坚持下去。何况还有欧美的持续输血。当年中国那么困难的情况下抗日都抗了8年,现在乌克兰比那时候情况好多了。 近现代以来,任何侵略国家最后都会失败的。没有特例。
不要做这个梦 打仗不是做游戏
认为还没有到那个时候
这种水平的话 还是不要谈论军事政治了
突然想到会不会乌克兰战后分成东西乌克兰
确信别人不会炸弹扔进中南海?
真那么容易打,大大会等到现在?
你就让这些粉红军事家继续他们的梦想呗。 反正放军上一次动用重武器实战是1989年在北京, 我看大概率下一轮重装突击还是用在韭菜身上。
以色列算不算例外? 另外假设A国在B国侵略10年,B国最后顽强抵抗,然后A撤走了。这种情况我认为A还是赢了。就是迟到的正义,不叫正义,持续的侵略对侵略者来说就是胜利,除非侵略者本国反过来被入侵。
太仁慈了, 宁可死几百上千自己的兵, 也不用导弹… 是太抠门了还是有难言之隐?
两个月?稍微有点儿常识吧。国姓爷也是用围的河南人还挺了一年多的。
当年是没空军也没有国际舆论的前提下。
导弹不太好使, 没法精确命中运动中的乌军单位, 而且被拦截的概率大。 所以拿不设防, 不能移动的民用设施撒气呗。 我猜北约的应对无非就算先升级防空, 如果效果不好, 就升级乌军远程打击能力, 对等还击一下呗
怕给俄罗斯借口用核弹吧,另外,乌克兰对俄罗斯的领土也没野心,这一点两国是不对等的
嗯, 乌军应该不太敢真的攻击饿本土,然后给俄军用战术核弹的机会啊。
不是没有野心, 是根本没有能力啊,号称欧洲军事第二, 一打就显了原形, 太悲催了。基本连像样的还手能力都没有。 有能力向莫斯科发一阵导弹试试?战争马上就变了。
当然, 毛子也暴露了实力, 不过打乌克兰看来还是错错有余。
普大帝眼看着毛子的战场情势越来越不利,就孤注一掷地想靠大面积攻击民用目标来动摇乌克兰方面的战斗意志。但这可能适得其反,欧美已经开始支援更多更远程的火箭导弹和防空系统,这会让毛子的滥炸效果更差,代价更大;同时自己国内的军民目标受到更多攻击。
怎么封锁?米国的船要送石油进去,运芯片出来,你打还是不打?打了,就不是什么都不做
另外真让你封锁两个月造成人道主义危机,全世界吐的唾沫都能把你淹死,估计朝鲜都不好意思站中国一边
不打,派渔船围堵,挡住航线。
中国需要钱发展芯片产业,有人买当然卖了。
以色列是阿拉伯国家先动手的。只是他自卫能力太强,反倒夺取更多的地盘了。不是主动出击的就不叫侵略。 你举的例子当然是A国输了。比如说苏联解体,美国在阿富汗白白浪费了几千亿美元,日本战后投降。现在俄罗斯比他们还要更惨,因为俄罗斯要一直承受着经济制裁。
对。一旦开战就没有疯狂和对错可言,只有战胜国和战败国。
马斯克是对的,谈判和停战才对乌克兰好。
川普也是对的,他任内没有反动一场战争,还导致了北朝鲜和中东的短暂和平。