觉得医生都是为了孩子利益着想的过来看看，到底背后是谁的利益？ Consider the University of California at San Francisco Hospital. Supposedly, it is one of the best in the world. UCSF, despite its august reputation, is not even trying to behave responsibly with children who are being convinced by TikTok they should change their sex. So, a new trend comes along propelled by social media. It didn't exist before at scale. Now it does. Rather than pausing and asking, "What is this and how can we help the children?" They blow right past it. UCSF Hospital's current guidance for treating so-called transgender youth is this. We got this right from their website, "As youth are transitioning at increasingly younger ages, genital surgery is being performed on a case- by-case basis more frequently in minors." Genital surgery on children -- this is a very big step. It's irreversible. So, you wonder, what is the medical basis for this? Well, a few sentences later, UCSF hospital admits that there is no medical basis. Instead, "In the absence of solid evidence, providers often must rely on the expert opinions of innovators and thought leaders in the field." So, UCSF is conducting genital surgeries on minors based on "thought leaders in the field." What does that mean? Well, it means the Human Rights Campaign is in favor of it. It means activists are pushing it. It means there is no scientific data to justify it.
Consider the University of California at San Francisco Hospital. Supposedly, it is one of the best in the world. UCSF, despite its august reputation, is not even trying to behave responsibly with children who are being convinced by TikTok they should change their sex.
So, a new trend comes along propelled by social media. It didn't exist before at scale. Now it does. Rather than pausing and asking, "What is this and how can we help the children?" They blow right past it. UCSF Hospital's current guidance for treating so-called transgender youth is this. We got this right from their website, "As youth are transitioning at increasingly younger ages, genital surgery is being performed on a case- by-case basis more frequently in minors."
Genital surgery on children -- this is a very big step. It's irreversible. So, you wonder, what is the medical basis for this? Well, a few sentences later, UCSF hospital admits that there is no medical basis. Instead, "In the absence of solid evidence, providers often must rely on the expert opinions of innovators and thought leaders in the field."
So, UCSF is conducting genital surgeries on minors based on "thought leaders in the field." What does that mean? Well, it means the Human Rights Campaign is in favor of it. It means activists are pushing it. It means there is no scientific data to justify it.
早说了十年了 美国医疗机构就是最大最邪恶最残忍的黑社会
不想父母知道可以理解，但是不让父母知道就不对了，父母是监护人，有权知道孩子在经历什么，否则父母怎么照顾孩子？让父母知道不代表给了父母决定权，比如如果有个小孩想打胎，父母就算知道也不应该有权阻止，但这和不让父母知道是两回事，不让父母知道孩子的健康状况是绝对错误的 小孩子不懂事的，如果不让父母有知情权的话，十几岁的小孩如果在外面被性侵了，特别是被熟人性侵了，怀孕了，自己就偷偷打了胎，就让这事结束了，性侵罪犯不承担任何法律责任，接着去性侵其他人，这个孩子背着一生的心理创伤，而家长一无所知，合理嘛？简直就是扯jb淡，不好意思爆粗口了，但这个政策本身就是个垃圾
米帝它妈的一查出来就是医生教练好几百地干坏事，， 整个国家就是畜生。
非常同意。赞👍
法律规定21岁才能喝酒的话，父母就应该有孩子的知情权决定权到21岁。
说实话，13岁真是小孩子啊.