话说 wikipedia 上面说很多著名大学的教授都对此书有积极的评价，批评的人里面（没贴过来）提到名字的几个基本都是不出名大学的。。这当然不排除美国/西方人有偏见，或者像张母亲文中说的有些学者拿了日本人的钱替日本说话，但是“批评”这个事，就事论事，任何值得一提的学术著作都会有同行进行评价，批评是很正常的事。 Acclaim The Rape of Nanking sold more than half a million copies when it was first published in the US, and according to The New York Times, received general critical acclaim.[31] The book remained on the New York Times' Best Seller list for 10 weeks and sold more than 125,000 copies in four months.[13] Several leading historians said they believe that Chang’s revelation of Japanese wartime crimes and the country’s postwar attempts to cover up and distort history will help raise public awareness of the incident.[32] Iris Chang became an instant celebrity in the US:[33] she was awarded honorary degrees;[34] invited to give lectures and to discuss the Nanking Massacre on shows such as Good Morning America, Nightline, and The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer; profiled by The New York Times; and was featured on the cover of Reader's Digest.[12] Moreover, Hillary Clinton invited her to the White House; U.S. historian Stephen Ambrose described her as "maybe the best young historian we've got;"[33] and the Organization of Chinese Americans named her National Woman of the Year.[34] The book's popularity prompted a lengthy book tour, with Chang visiting 65 cities in over a year and a half.[5] The book also received praise from news media. The Wall Street Journal wrote that it was the "first comprehensive examination of the destruction of this Chinese imperial city," and that Chang "skillfully excavated from oblivion the terrible events that took place." The Atlantic Monthly described the book as "a crushing indictment of the Japanese army's behavior." The Chicago Tribune called it "a powerful new work of history and moral inquiry" and stated that "Chang takes great care to establish an accurate accounting of the dimensions of the violence." The Philadelphia Inquirer wrote that it was a "compelling account of a horrendous episode that, until recently, has been largely forgotten."[35] According to William C. Kirby, Professor of History at Harvard University, Chang "shows more clearly than any previous account just what [the Japanese] did," and that she "draws connections between the slaughter in Europe and in Asia of millions of innocents during World War II."[3] Ross Terrill, an associate in research at the Fairbank Center for East Asian Research at Harvard,[36] wrote that the book is "scholarly, an exciting investigation and a work of passion."[37] Beatrice S. Bartlett, Emeritus Professor of History at Yale University,[38] wrote, "Iris Chang's research on the Nanking holocaust yields a new and expanded telling of this World War II atrocity and reflects thorough research."[37] Frederic Wakeman, director of the Institute of East Asian Studies at the University of California, Berkeley, wrote that the book was "Heartbreaking ... An utterly compelling book. The descriptions of the atrocities raise fundamental questions not only about imperial Japanese militarism but the psychology of the torturers, rapists, and murderers."[37]
司马南老师就精明，看形势不对，马上先在自媒体公布自己绝对不会自杀，如果意外发生，一定是他杀。
我也不信她是自杀的
毛泽东的夫人不就是被关到监狱里“自杀”的，你不信又能怎样？
张纯如是英雄，华人的英雄，世界上所以有良知的人的英雄
是不是死了的华人就是好的额。。。。
你也可以写书啊
名利双收。
而且张纯如是在美国被迫害死的吧 不是在日本吧
我觉得华人大妈真心精神分裂啊。。 张这事其实说明了美国多么黑暗。
看看张的真实死因：
实际上，张纯如的《南京大屠杀》在获得巨大声誉的同时，在历史“准确性”等方面也受到了来自西方历史学界的批评。 “1998年10月10日，纯如受邀出席了在伊利诺伊大学校园内举行的‘东方战争罪行’主题研讨大会，并担任组委成员。会上，伊利诺伊大学的一位历史教授抨击了纯如的书，这令所有人都非常吃惊。”张盈盈告诉时代周报记者，这位伊利诺伊大学的历史教授并不是唯一一位抨击《南京大屠杀》的西方学者，“批评纯如的书的历史教授还有不少。” 约克大学的加拿大研究会主席约书亚·A·福杰撰文认为，《南京大屠杀》一书存在“严重瑕疵”以及“充满了错误和轻率的解释”。他认为这本书在张纯如试图解释为何大屠杀会发生时就“开始崩溃”：她反复地对她认为是“导致了大屠杀的几个世纪以来局限的历史产物”的“日本精神”作出评判。福杰认为张纯如的问题在于她“缺少作为一个历史学家的训练”。 获得过普利策奖的斯坦福大学教授大卫·M·肯尼迪也指出，“这本书的主旨在于指责和义愤，而不是分析和理解。尽管义愤是对南京大屠杀在道德上应有的反应，但在理智上却是不足的”。 来自华盛顿与李大学的历史系教授罗杰·B·吉恩斯则把张纯如的书当做是“不完全的历史”，并批评她缺乏对这一主题的经验：“在写这一可怕的事件的时候，张纯如努力地想要将它描述成是未经证实的亚洲浩劫。不幸的是，她削弱了她自己的论据，她忽视了关于这一事件的日文和英文的丰富资源。这致使她犯了一些错误，例如大大地夸大了南京当时的人口，以及不加判断地就使用了远东军事法庭和当时中国对于被杀平民和士兵的统计。” 记者提摩西·M·凯利形容张纯如的书显示出“粗心大意、马虎和历史错误”，他还批评张纯如“缺乏对细节的注意力”。最后，他指控张纯如抄袭大卫•伯尔格米尼所著的《日本的帝国主义阴谋》的图文。 《洛杉矶时报》的索尼•埃夫隆警告说，就张纯如的著作所进行的激烈争吵给西方人留下了“日本很少描写南京大屠杀”的错误印象，实际上，日本国立国会图书馆至少有42本关于南京大屠杀以及日本在战时所犯罪行的著作，其中21本是在对日本的战时罪行进行自由调查后写下的。此外，埃夫隆还注意到，年老的日本士兵出版回忆录、发表演讲和接受采访的人数在上升，他们叙述在战时所犯下的或者亲眼见证的罪行。在日本政府长期的强制否认之后，日本中学的教科书现在承认南京大屠杀是真实的。 与大篇幅描写日本政界、学界对张纯如《南京大屠杀》的批评不同，张盈盈的回忆录并没有太多谈及西方历史学界对该书的批评，只用了“纯如的书受到了美国历史学家的一致好评，并受到全世界华人社会的尊敬”来过渡，她认为来自日本的批评属于诋毁。不过，张盈盈向时代周报回应，女儿的《南京大屠杀》正是因为畅销而受到多方关注，而“任何作品都会存在争议”。
张纯如的死跟我儿子被谋杀一样的， 就是在美国华人只有被谋杀的权利， 没有发表自己任何意见的权力 你敢说话， 就是该死 就要你闭嘴。 美国才是赤果果的法西斯社会。
同年8月，她在路易斯维尔采访，住进一家旅店，认为“前台的服务生看着她的表情很可疑，还与另外一个后来频频注视她窗户的人交谈”。她随即给母亲打电话，怀疑房间里安装了窃听器，电视里播放的恐怖画面都是真的，是有些人故意放来吓唬她的。第二日，她被送入当地医院精神病病房。随后，家人积极为纯如寻找治疗精神疾病的专家，而在医生的指导下，她开始服用抗精神病药物Risperdal。后因情况加重，她服用的药物从Risperdal被换为相对较新的同类抗精神病药物Abilify，并增加了抗抑郁药Celexa。医生还建议张纯如住进疗养院，被她本人拒绝。 “纯如听了之后立即表示反对。我能理解她对那种所谓专门针对‘精神病患者’的疗养机构的不信任。她以前听说过许多关于政府将不同政见者投入精神病院迫害致死的事例。我无法责怪她的多疑。”张盈盈说。 张盈盈坚持认为，女儿开枪自杀与药物的副作用有关。“我们现在知道了，Abilify的网站上警告说，这种药物‘可能影响你的判断力、思想或运动能力’，以及诸如增加自杀风险、嗜睡、焦虑和肌肉僵直等副作用。而Celexa的网站上则警告说，可能导致自杀、焦虑和静坐不能（一种与自毁或侵犯性举动相关的危险症状）。”获得哈佛大学生物化学博士学位的张盈盈为女儿的自杀找到了一些外在原因。 “其实纯如是反对吃药的，她从来没有信任过医生。现在回想起来，当然觉得是非常可惜。吃了这些药以后，会变得非常暴力。女孩子用手枪，想想可不可能？纯如以前从来没有碰过枪，在我们作为母女相识相知的这么多年里，纯如一直十分坚强无畏，从来没有考虑过以自杀逃避。”不过，张盈盈告诉时代周报记者，他们并不会因此对医生提出诉讼，“我在书里提到的医生也用了A和B来代替，毕竟他们的处方是严格按照规定开的。”
台湾抵抗日本的都被杀光了。抵抗者的头堆积如山 网上有照片
现在都是阿祖自愿的后代
愿纯如安息！她的墓地就在湾区 Gate of Heaven https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/LOS-ALTOS-600-mourn-death-of-best-selling-2671098.php
戴锦华对这个问题的完美解释
系统提示：若遇到视频无法播放请点击下方链接
https://www.youtube.com/embed/8u7VyU1s-lo?showinfo=0
突发疾病怎么样?
其实就是中国没有机会打回去。如果像德国和苏联互相狠狠地捅了一刀，倒可以平心静气地讨论了。中国因为没有机会自己报仇，这口气是放不下的。揪着别人的后代要求承担战争责任基本无法避免。那也别想有多客观的讨论了。
我有一次跟一个韩国朋友聊，韩国朋友说，历史上中国侵略了朝鲜（韩国）八百多次，你们道歉了吗？我才想到我们作为一个大国，对周边国家（比如朝鲜，越南这些我们“侵略“多次的地方）的感受是习惯性地轻视或者忽略的。现在当我们的感受被轻视的时候我们就很愤怒，但我们是否能保证自己从此也能善待他人呢？多半也做不到。
但是导致她精神疾病的，大量的接触负面资料一定是一个重大因素。她确实是个英雄。我最近在查考义和团杀传教士都感觉精神要抑郁了，这还只是几百人的死亡。具体杀戮的细节实在看着都痛苦。
讲的真好。可以想象到，说这个事件没有特殊性，不值得写。张纯如很不容易。
虽然这种说法有一定道理，可是如果真得是以牙还牙，以眼还眼就太丛林社会了，也背离了当今法治社会的精神。
理想情况是无论是早年的中国政府或者当下的日本认识到自己犯下的错误并深切悔改，以避免之后发生类似的错误。而不是寻找各种歪理为自己掩饰开脱，后患无穷。
另外，很敬佩张纯如，希望她能安息。
法理不外乎人情。最终人还是按着情感走。不会说法制社会就怎么样了。现在美国那么多判案，顶多也就是个程序正义但结果都很不正义。
丛林社会只要人存在就一直如此啊，美国怎么打的伊拉克，伊拉克搜出一丁点大杀伤力武器了？
Acclaim The Rape of Nanking sold more than half a million copies when it was first published in the US, and according to The New York Times, received general critical acclaim.[31] The book remained on the New York Times' Best Seller list for 10 weeks and sold more than 125,000 copies in four months.[13] Several leading historians said they believe that Chang’s revelation of Japanese wartime crimes and the country’s postwar attempts to cover up and distort history will help raise public awareness of the incident.[32] Iris Chang became an instant celebrity in the US:[33] she was awarded honorary degrees;[34] invited to give lectures and to discuss the Nanking Massacre on shows such as Good Morning America, Nightline, and The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer; profiled by The New York Times; and was featured on the cover of Reader's Digest.[12] Moreover, Hillary Clinton invited her to the White House; U.S. historian Stephen Ambrose described her as "maybe the best young historian we've got;"[33] and the Organization of Chinese Americans named her National Woman of the Year.[34] The book's popularity prompted a lengthy book tour, with Chang visiting 65 cities in over a year and a half.[5] The book also received praise from news media. The Wall Street Journal wrote that it was the "first comprehensive examination of the destruction of this Chinese imperial city," and that Chang "skillfully excavated from oblivion the terrible events that took place." The Atlantic Monthly described the book as "a crushing indictment of the Japanese army's behavior." The Chicago Tribune called it "a powerful new work of history and moral inquiry" and stated that "Chang takes great care to establish an accurate accounting of the dimensions of the violence." The Philadelphia Inquirer wrote that it was a "compelling account of a horrendous episode that, until recently, has been largely forgotten."[35] According to William C. Kirby, Professor of History at Harvard University, Chang "shows more clearly than any previous account just what [the Japanese] did," and that she "draws connections between the slaughter in Europe and in Asia of millions of innocents during World War II."[3] Ross Terrill, an associate in research at the Fairbank Center for East Asian Research at Harvard,[36] wrote that the book is "scholarly, an exciting investigation and a work of passion."[37] Beatrice S. Bartlett, Emeritus Professor of History at Yale University,[38] wrote, "Iris Chang's research on the Nanking holocaust yields a new and expanded telling of this World War II atrocity and reflects thorough research."[37] Frederic Wakeman, director of the Institute of East Asian Studies at the University of California, Berkeley, wrote that the book was "Heartbreaking ... An utterly compelling book. The descriptions of the atrocities raise fundamental questions not only about imperial Japanese militarism but the psychology of the torturers, rapists, and murderers."[37]
我觉得那些批评也挺对的。就是证据和训练的问题。但这个也不用放在心上。就像你说的，哪有没有批评的学术著作？
把司马南和张纯如比，你脑子里进翔了吧，那货一分不值，哪个傻子会打他的注意，一个跳梁小丑
张纯如和司马南都是中华民族最优秀的代表。你悲愤没用。
江青是假释后死的，是不是被自杀就很难说了。
司马南最近是不是出事了？