Toxicokinetics No toxicokinetic studies have been performed with the vaccine. This is consistent with WHO guidelines on the nonclinical evaluation of vaccines (WHO 2005). Genotoxicity No genotoxicity studies are planned for BNT162b2, as the components of all vaccine constructs are lipids and RNA that are not expected to have genotoxic potential (WHO, 2005). Carcinogenicity Carcinogenicity studies with BNT162b2 have not been conducted as the components of all vaccine constructs are lipids and RNA that are not expected to have carcinogenic or tumorigenic potential. Carcinogenicity testing is generally not considered necessary to support the development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005). Reproductive and developmental toxicity Fertility and early embryonic development and embryofoetal development In the general toxicity studies, macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of male and female reproductive tissues showed no evidence of toxicity. A combined fertility and developmental study (including teratogenicity and postnatal investigations) in rats is ongoing. Prenatal and postnatal development, including maternal function No such studies have been done. Studies in which the offspring (juvenile animals) are dosed and/or further evaluated No such studies have been done. Local tolerance No such studies have been done. The assessments made as part of the general toxicity study should suffice and a separate study is not needed. Other toxicity studies No such studies have been done.
这是假消息，昨天刚在bbc看到, 这是false vaccine claims，就不要到处散布了 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-62739554 NHS says the vaccine is both safe and strongly recommended for this group. NHS说疫苗对于孕妇和哺乳都是安全的，强烈建议。 The misleading claim came from a now out-of-date document from 2020. 那个误导人的消息是2020的过时文档
这是假消息，昨天刚在bbc看到, 这是false vaccine claims，就不要到处散布了 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-62739554 NHS says the vaccine is both safe and strongly recommended for this group. NHS说疫苗对于孕妇和哺乳都是安全的，强烈建议。 The misleading claim came from a now out-of-date document from 2020. 那个误导人的消息是2020的过时文档 sbwlys 发表于 2022-09-02 05:14
这是假消息，昨天刚在bbc看到, 这是false vaccine claims，就不要到处散布了 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-62739554 NHS says the vaccine is both safe and strongly recommended for this group. NHS说疫苗对于孕妇和哺乳都是安全的，强烈建议。 The misleading claim came from a now out-of-date document from 2020. 那个误导人的消息是2020的过时文档 sbwlys 发表于 2022-09-02 05:14
这是假消息，昨天刚在bbc看到, 这是false vaccine claims，就不要到处散布了 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-62739554 NHS says the vaccine is both safe and strongly recommended for this group. NHS说疫苗对于孕妇和哺乳都是安全的，强烈建议。 The misleading claim came from a now out-of-date document from 2020. 那个误导人的消息是2020的过时文档 sbwlys 发表于 2022-09-02 05:14
所有的都说得过去，没经验，没数据，但一开始强制就太缺德了
Genotoxicity No genotoxicity studies are planned for BNT162b2, as the components of all vaccine constructs are lipids and RNA that are not expected to have genotoxic potential (WHO, 2005).
Carcinogenicity Carcinogenicity studies with BNT162b2 have not been conducted as the components of all vaccine constructs are lipids and RNA that are not expected to have carcinogenic or tumorigenic potential. Carcinogenicity testing is generally not considered necessary to support the development and licensure of vaccine products for infectious diseases (WHO, 2005).
Reproductive and developmental toxicity Fertility and early embryonic development and embryofoetal development In the general toxicity studies, macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of male and female reproductive tissues showed no evidence of toxicity.
A combined fertility and developmental study (including teratogenicity and postnatal investigations) in rats is ongoing.
Prenatal and postnatal development, including maternal function No such studies have been done.
Studies in which the offspring (juvenile animals) are dosed and/or further evaluated No such studies have been done.
Local tolerance No such studies have been done. The assessments made as part of the general toxicity study should suffice and a separate study is not needed.
Other toxicity studies No such studies have been done.
孕妇有几个疫苗要打，有一个好像是dtap还是啥？并没有说都不能打
加州的猪党议员刚通过了法律，要punish doctors who spread covid misinformation 你品，你细品。由谁来定义什么是covid misinformation? CDC在covid最初不让戴口罩是不是misinformation？在covid这两年多里，CDC FDA给过多少misinformation? 科学本身是一个发现truth的过程，很多事情都需要验证，需要时间，科学对于很多事情的看法也是不断发展变化的。人类多少次推翻自己之前的认知。他们居然要punish。这是不是就等同于当初烧死哥白尼的愚昧？
从国内学的不信谣不传谣？哈哈哈，果然是解放区
历史一直在重复。可惜很多人就是想不明白
影响最大的是第一和第二个trimester. JAMA 那篇论文里的数据就说明问题了
我在第一个trimester得了covid，发烧两天，其他的倒还好，是不是和打了疫苗一样有影响？
我那时候就是这么想呢 万一有影响 第三个trimester风险最小。
我有一个国内朋友特别相信疫苗 鼓励大家打疫苗 说对孕妇也不会有问题什么的 结果 自己打完疫苗不久发现怀孕 再没多久发现胎停。也不知道她自己有没有怀疑是疫苗
真理部的现实版
我都有些后怕 我是第二针半年后才敢要的孩子
别再打了，孩子也不要再打。 以后遇事多长个心眼。 bless
Pfizer和Moderna的疫苗主要副作用是LNP载体，这个被发现在mRNA release了以后，LNP会在很多人体器官高浓度集结，包括子宫，心肌等 你得了COVID，也只是你自己身体产生抗体，并没有LNP产生，所以副作用没有疫苗大
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-62739554
NHS says the vaccine is both safe and strongly recommended for this group. NHS说疫苗对于孕妇和哺乳都是安全的，强烈建议。 The misleading claim came from a now out-of-date document from 2020. 那个误导人的消息是2020的过时文档
过时？敢不敢说里面的数据有问题？过时是个什么鬼？应该那时候舆论控制还没那么严有真相流出来吧 真相可不是食物 没有保质期
另外 你这么相信主媒 那就祝你好运了
都在，不出声了而已。 劝人别打苗的牺牲了一大票，我都牺牲3个ID了，刚注册个新的偶尔回来闲逛
华人大妈不也是吗？版上经常有华人大妈现身说法，说自己打了根本没事
说并不是因为有concern只是数据不够多。所以根本没有说有什么危险
赞
NHS说安全就安全？一个从来没做出来任何东西的技术，突然短期搞出个疫苗就说对孕妇百分百安全，我家三年级小学生都不相信。
我直觉这丫是辉瑞摩德纳sales，有强烈利益关系。。。
我就是这种情况，打完第三针疫苗一个月后怀孕，9周时胎停。目前备孕中，不会再打疫苗。
好像前段时间有个小浣熊还出来科学分析鼓励打加强针来着？？
小浣熊支持的是针对后来变种的加强针，不过好像也说年轻人低风险人群也不是很需要加强针。新冠变异这么快，很难像最早那个疫苗要走一整套程序，但是就那样现在看也不够，还要赶时间，结果就有了八只老鼠的ba5疫苗。。。
等你打完小浣熊又会出来说你不需要，然后推销再下一款booster
都去了隔壁帖子批判川普法西斯主义了，小浣熊也在那里
她估计被封过不止一个号了吧，没有email可以再注册了
所以你不得不感慨 有些人被骗真的是有原因的 到现在还被骗的真的不值得同情
说起这个也是诡异的很
孕妇不能打减活疫苗，打重组或者灭活疫苗没问题，比如TDap和流感，能给新生儿一些保护。mRNA疫苗所知有限，不敢妄论。
是的，以前我一直说LNP是最危险和未知的，以前的疫苗从来没有这个，LNP是使mRNA疫苗成为可能的关键，它就是微小脂壳，不可降解（就是用来保护mRNA不被破坏的），不像有机入侵者能被免疫破坏消灭，唯一希望就是somehow被排出体外，但大概率不可能完全排出，要知道一针就有40billion那么多！在体内各器官可以永久聚集，带来的健康后果可怕，所以做和推mRNA的够黑，敢打mRNA的都是勇士