+1 想起了那个高中都没读完的众议员的推 Twitter users mocked first-term Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) on Friday over a tweet in which she argued that defending the U.S. Constitution “doesn’t mean trying to rewrite the parts you don’t like.”
were quick to point out to the gun rights advocate the many changes that have been ratified to the Constitution since it became the country’s official legal framework in 1788. According to the Philadelphia nonprofit the National Constitution Center, the constitution as first drafted in 1787 did not include the first 10 Amendments, also known as the Bill of Rights. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/539638-boebert-mocked-for-constitution-tweet/amp/
不过基本上无解，因为根本原因是第二修正案，很难改变。
说真的，每次看到说什么二修不可更改的我都觉得特别讽刺
第二“修正案”不能更改🤣
理论上可以改，不过非常难，要好多州同意才行。几乎没有人能领导起来。
我觉的这是宪法的大bug, 没法自我修复。
那怎么办 人人不发声？
+1 想起了那个高中都没读完的众议员的推
Twitter users mocked first-term Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) on Friday over a tweet in which she argued that defending the U.S. Constitution “doesn’t mean trying to rewrite the parts you don’t like.”
were quick to point out to the gun rights advocate the many changes that have been ratified to the Constitution since it became the country’s official legal framework in 1788. According to the Philadelphia nonprofit the National Constitution Center, the constitution as first drafted in 1787 did not include the first 10 Amendments, also known as the Bill of Rights. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/539638-boebert-mocked-for-constitution-tweet/amp/
只需要一个最高法院的判例就够了。
现在对二修的解读都是heller vs dc定下来的。也就是所谓第二修正案是保护普通人持枪权。
在那之前，一般把第二修正案里头的民兵解读为国民警卫队，或者战争时候才有的国民后备役。
只要新出一个判例，把这个案子给推翻就好了。
虽然我也很恨德州州长，但是我不会把这次事件归罪于他 发声没错，但是利用悲剧事件激发民众同情心来拉票比较恶心
欧洲，日本甚至中国为什么鲜有类似事件？
高等法院现在保守派占多数，可能性几天乎为零了。
原来Vegas shooting以后，NPR采访民主党的支持者，他们说一听见要禁枪，马上去买了几把枪。
我觉得这种重大事件判之前会有leak，枪支还跟堕胎不一样，谁敢禁枪谁恐怕就会被暗杀，这是大蛋糕。
这种mass shooting的罪犯都是亡命之徒，就是拉人陪葬的，怎么惩罚？株连九族？
你去问问民主党或者共和党大佬，谁家没有枪？只想控别人不想控自己怎么可能实行？
远远比这复杂的多得多，照你这说法现在民主党在台上不是可以想办法禁枪了么？世界上只有美国把拥枪写进了宪法，这个是死结没法推翻
是阿， 其实就是说要流多少无辜人的鲜血， 这跟抗疫一模一样的， 你不抗疫， 就死人呗， 死了一百多万了， 又有多少屁民认为美国抗疫是失败的呢？
枪支杀了多少无辜的生命， 又有多少人认为该禁枪呢？ 愚民太多， 狡猾善变的政客太多， 普通人只能流血。
应当是民主党要收所有人的枪，共和党要给所有人发枪，都解决不了问题。