"《外交政策》：去全球化的代价究竟有多高昂？"

Q 【编译/观察者网 王濛】近日，美国杂志《外交政策》刊发一篇名为“去全球化的代价有多高昂”的文章。全球疫情爆发以及俄乌冲突等背景下，鼓吹去全球化的声音又开始涌现，《外交政策》分析警告逆全球化本身具有高昂代价和潜在危险，去全球化有可能将未来世界变得更贫穷，更缺乏创新，更分裂，更易发生冲突。
https://www.guancha.cn/internation/2022_05_07_638685.shtml UQ

Q Ethical Dilemmas (Moral Dilemmas). Definition and Examples of Ethical Dilemmas

https://discover.hubpages.com/entertainment/Ethical-Dilemmas-Moral-Dilemmas-with-Examples UQ

Q Less American In reality, as scholars Heather Berry, Mauro F. Guillén, and Arun S. Hendi report in a study cited by Brooks, “over the last half century, nation-states in the global system have not evolved significantly closer (or more similar) to one another along a number of dimensions”. Globalisation has not led to Americanisation.
https://www.afr.com/markets/equity-markets/globalisation-isn-t-dead-it-s-just-not-american-any-more-20220508-p5ajiu
Globalisation isn’t dead, it’s just not American any more Our world is becoming more interconnected but driven by new forces. UQ