今天看到new Yorker 这篇详细报道。FBI 真是错杀一千不放过1个。陶峰遇到疯子学生也是倒霉…… 不知道有人了解他的近况么？ https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/03/21/have-chinese-spies-infiltrated-american-campuses/amp the wake of Tao’s arrest, the China Initiative seemed to have found its footing. In an interview with Politico, Demers urged U.S. Attorneys’ offices to pursue at least one or two cases a year, which was taken as a de-facto expectation, if not a quota. The cases might be complex, Demers noted, but “we wanted to signal to the U.S. Attorneys that we understood that, and nonetheless we wanted them to focus their resources on this, and that we were going to approve these charges.” Unfortunately, there did not seem to be enough industrial espionage to go around, and individuals couldn’t be prosecuted for Chinese affiliations alone. The Tao charges seemed to contrive a path forward; according to the Wall Street Journal, senior D.O.J. officials believed that the indictment represented a “potential blueprint for prosecuting talent program participants without having to produce evidence of intellectual property theft.” They could charge cases on the technicalities of funding disclosure while making it clear that the underlying moral crime was one of dual loyalty.
不知道有人了解他的近况么？
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/03/21/have-chinese-spies-infiltrated-american-campuses/amp
the wake of Tao’s arrest, the China Initiative seemed to have found its footing. In an interview with Politico, Demers urged U.S. Attorneys’ offices to pursue at least one or two cases a year, which was taken as a de-facto expectation, if not a quota. The cases might be complex, Demers noted, but “we wanted to signal to the U.S. Attorneys that we understood that, and nonetheless we wanted them to focus their resources on this, and that we were going to approve these charges.” Unfortunately, there did not seem to be enough industrial espionage to go around, and individuals couldn’t be prosecuted for Chinese affiliations alone. The Tao charges seemed to contrive a path forward; according to the Wall Street Journal, senior D.O.J. officials believed that the indictment represented a “potential blueprint for prosecuting talent program participants without having to produce evidence of intellectual property theft.” They could charge cases on the technicalities of funding disclosure while making it clear that the underlying moral crime was one of dual loyalty.