Pfizer's COVID vaccine is just 12% effective in preventing Omicron infection in children aged five to 11, new study reveals - so why ARE health officials pushing parents to get their kids shots? tinystar01 发表于 2022-03-01 11:57
Pfizer's COVID vaccine is just 12% effective in preventing Omicron infection in children aged five to 11, new study reveals - so why ARE health officials pushing parents to get their kids shots? tinystar01 发表于 2022-03-01 11:57
回复 1楼falcon1的帖子 我家孩子一针都没打。即使现在口罩令解除了，她一直戴口罩。和她关系好的几个朋友也一直戴口罩。 但学校case还挺多的，school bus上也有。我怀疑她说不定早就自然免疫了。 无论儿医心里怎么想，口头上肯定会让打疫苗，他们没必要冒着吃官司，丢工作的风险啊。 为了躲避儿医的追命催，可能今年会skip annual check up. 至于为啥不打疫苗，我就不说了，避免吵架。只能说to the best my knowledge...当然，也有可能我是错的。
DID YOU KNOW in pediatric clinical trials for Pf!zer''s Covid-19 genetic vaccine used to justify emergency approval for kids: 1. There were ZERO cases of severe COVID-19 and ZERO COVID-19 deaths in both groups, placebo and vaccination. 2. The longest they studied each group of children was ONLY 2 months. 3. There were ONLY 3,109 children in the vaccine group and ONLY 1,538 in the placebo group, a much smaller cohort than the Adult trial. 4. None of the children in the trial previously had COVID-19. 5. There are two follow-up studies on heart problems that have NOT yet been completed.
Knowing this ASK yourself: 1. HOW do we know the genetic vaccine is effective if no one in the study got severe COVID-19? 2. HOW do we know the genetic vaccine is safe for children long-term? 3. HOW can we make generalizations about the entire population of children from such a small study? 4. HOW do we know children won’t develop heart problems especially those already exposed to the virus?
DID YOU KNOW in pediatric clinical trials for Pf!zer''s Covid-19 genetic vaccine used to justify emergency approval for kids: 1. There were ZERO cases of severe COVID-19 and ZERO COVID-19 deaths in both groups, placebo and vaccination. 2. The longest they studied each group of children was ONLY 2 months. 3. There were ONLY 3,109 children in the vaccine group and ONLY 1,538 in the placebo group, a much smaller cohort than the Adult trial. 4. None of the children in the trial previously had COVID-19. 5. There are two follow-up studies on heart problems that have NOT yet been completed.
Knowing this ASK yourself: 1. HOW do we know the genetic vaccine is effective if no one in the study got severe COVID-19? 2. HOW do we know the genetic vaccine is safe for children long-term? 3. HOW can we make generalizations about the entire population of children from such a small study? 4. HOW do we know children won’t develop heart problems especially those already exposed to the virus? suruma 发表于 2022-03-01 23:34
小孩实验怎么做 本来treated vs 安慰剂组就都没有重症 怎么得出防重症的结论的 Banana723 发表于 2022-03-01 14:01
本来小孩疫苗防重症的数据就不够，large margins of error. The vaccine’s effectiveness against hospitalization declined to 73 percent from 85 percent in the older children. In the younger children, effectiveness dropped to 48 percent from 100 percent. But because few children were hospitalized, these estimates have wide margins of error. The numbers for protection from infection are more reliable. Vaccine effectiveness against infection in the older children decreased to 51 percent from 66 percent. But in the younger children, it dropped sharply to just 12 percent from 68 percent.
来了，今天新鲜出炉的数据。第三十页开始，光是列副作用的名字，整整列了八页纸😓 https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
受过高等教育的一大群人这两年集体丢失了逻辑思考能力
生产的疫苗不用的话过期就得扔掉了
这句话都是错误的 Cdc早就说了打不打毒量是一样的，也不防传染
昨晚新闻里说了有效率很低。我觉得没给娃打是正确的
一样，小孩子不打算给打
我们早就mask optional了。孩子一直戴口罩就行。我娃学校的亚洲孩子很多戴kf94
我家孩子一针都没打。即使现在口罩令解除了，她一直戴口罩。和她关系好的几个朋友也一直戴口罩。 但学校case还挺多的，school bus上也有。我怀疑她说不定早就自然免疫了。 无论儿医心里怎么想，口头上肯定会让打疫苗，他们没必要冒着吃官司，丢工作的风险啊。 为了躲避儿医的追命催，可能今年会skip annual check up.
至于为啥不打疫苗，我就不说了，避免吵架。只能说to the best my knowledge...当然，也有可能我是错的。
你这个医生不错，就怕打了反应大还死活不承认的
这个一直都有，可以看一下dopesick
疫苗党的逻辑永远都是这么的感人
那些这时候还考虑给孩子打毒疫苗的家长也是奇葩了。打开网络随手查一查，毒疫苗有效性及其有限但短期负面效应太多太多了，长期负效应谁都不知道。今天公布的辉瑞疫苗文件还不足够叫醒沉睡的绵羊？？？
1. There were ZERO cases of severe COVID-19 and ZERO COVID-19 deaths in both groups, placebo and vaccination.
2. The longest they studied each group of children was ONLY 2 months.
3. There were ONLY 3,109 children in the vaccine group and ONLY 1,538 in the placebo group, a much smaller cohort than the Adult trial.
4. None of the children in the trial previously had COVID-19.
5. There are two follow-up studies on heart problems that have NOT yet been completed.
Knowing this ASK yourself:
1. HOW do we know the genetic vaccine is effective if no one in the study got severe COVID-19?
2. HOW do we know the genetic vaccine is safe for children long-term?
3. HOW can we make generalizations about the entire population of children from such a small study?
4. HOW do we know children won’t develop heart problems especially those already exposed to the virus?
反正就是小孩儿得了这个新冠到底会有怎么样长期短期后遗症还不知道，这个疫苗对小孩儿有没有什么长期短期的副作用也不清楚，但是疫苗目前不防传染，也不知道防不防重症，最后连抓阄都找不到依据
本来小孩疫苗防重症的数据就不够，large margins of error.
The vaccine’s effectiveness against hospitalization declined to 73 percent from 85 percent in the older children. In the younger children, effectiveness dropped to 48 percent from 100 percent. But because few children were hospitalized, these estimates have wide margins of error.
The numbers for protection from infection are more reliable. Vaccine effectiveness against infection in the older children decreased to 51 percent from 66 percent. But in the younger children, it dropped sharply to just 12 percent from 68 percent.
现在风向变了2，3个月前这么说在这被拍死。不过顶住压力。我也没打我去年年底还一个阳性人一个屋子待过 也没事
真是太恶心了，modern day segregation
OMG. How old are your kids? Sounds crazy.
有没有思考能力和受教育程度关系没那么大，和个人的成长经历更有关系。 天天新闻炒的都是opinion，还不是那么多人信的死去活来的。
为什么呢？大人的vaccine injury很多都造成不能正常生活工作了，大人的健康也很重要啊，直接关系到孩子的生活质量
这是哪里啊？你们当地没有lawsuit filed吗？我们这里有两个counties被served，第二天口气就变了，一周内所有policies全rescind。