Pfizer's COVID vaccine is just 12% effective in preventing Omicron infection in children aged five to 11, new study reveals - so why ARE health officials pushing parents to get their kids shots?
Pfizer''s COVID vaccine is just 12% effective in preventing Omicron infection in children aged five to 11, new study reveals - so why ARE health officials pushing parents to get their kids shots? tinystar01 发表于 2022-03-01 11:57
Pfizer's COVID vaccine is just 12% effective in preventing Omicron infection in children aged five to 11, new study reveals - so why ARE health officials pushing parents to get their kids shots? tinystar01 发表于 2022-03-01 11:57
啥没变,明明有下降:12月初到一月底: VE against hospitalization declined changed from 85% (95% CI: 63%, 95%) to 73% (95% CI: 53%, 87%) for children 12-17 years, and from 100% (95% CI: -189%, 100%) to 48% (95% CI: -12%, 75%) for those 5-11 years.
全国的fully vaccinated:About 64.9% of the U.S. population is fully vaccinated, according to the CDC. This includes about 57.4% of 12- to 17-year-olds and 25.3% of children ages 5-11, CDC data show.
Pfizer's COVID vaccine is just 12% effective in preventing Omicron infection in children aged five to 11, new study reveals - so why ARE health officials pushing parents to get their kids shots? tinystar01 发表于 2022-03-01 11:57
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/02/28/covid-cases-nationwide/ A study of blood samples from the CDC estimated that 58 percent of children have antibodies from a coronavirus infection. (Kathryn Gamble/Bloomberg News)
Researchers from the New York State Department of Health found the ability of the vaccine to protect children who got the lowest dose — kids ages 5 to 11 — from catching the virus dropped the most, falling from 68% to just 12%. 12岁以上的有效率也在下降
🔥 最新回帖
这是哪里啊?你们当地没有lawsuit filed吗?我们这里有两个counties被served,第二天口气就变了,一周内所有policies全rescind。
为什么呢?大人的vaccine injury很多都造成不能正常生活工作了,大人的健康也很重要啊,直接关系到孩子的生活质量
🛋️ 沙发板凳
PS 大农村,2020 in person。现在mask optional。
所以说美国开始走下坡路了 药厂与政府勾结了!
啥叫开始阿,老早就一家了
只是对确诊的保护率低了,对重症和死亡的保护率没有变。当然,你可以说,我孩子很健康,得了也不会重症或死亡,也对,看你愿意不愿意堵了
你要问别人打没打,肯定有打了的,有没打的。如果看全国这个年龄段孩子的疫苗数据,肯定是没打的多。看我们这里最谨慎深蓝区的数据,打了的比50%多一点点。
打或不打都是自己做决定,自己承担后果。
同款
啥没变,明明有下降:12月初到一月底:
VE against hospitalization declined changed from 85% (95% CI: 63%, 95%) to 73% (95% CI: 53%, 87%) for children 12-17 years, and from 100% (95% CI: -189%, 100%) to 48% (95% CI: -12%, 75%) for those 5-11 years.
打了疫苗就不会传染别人? 我这是time travel到一年以前了吧?
还是有点担心 万一娃得了 就算好得快 症状轻 还是会有长期后遗症风险?
这个结果不是现在才出来吗?
这句话的逻辑问题。认为疫苗有用,所以即使小孩本身不需要打疫苗,但是还是要打疫苗来保护大人。但是既然疫苗有用,大人自己打了疫苗不就结了,为什么还需要给孩子打疫苗来保护大人?
纽约二月中旬要求两针了,我家是打了一针,室内什么地方都不能去,最后只好去对面NJ的mall玩了一下。但刚回家一周,这个规定好像又取消了。。。。。。
楼主,我孩子不到五岁,所以还不能打。但我回帖是想告诉你,我打完booster以后跟你症状是一样的,疲劳,心悸,头晕,都害怕开车了,持续了两三个月。
赞逻辑清晰
A study of blood samples from the CDC estimated that 58 percent of children have antibodies from a coronavirus infection. (Kathryn Gamble/Bloomberg News)
多大的娃?健康状况?
赞 疫苗教都是神逻辑
这个也太吓人了。。。
大人去年响应政府号召缺心眼两针也就下去了,发现疫情还是照旧至少新闻这么讲。 再想想没必要再折腾自己孩子了。
不过这个事情没啥好从众吧。自己拿主意如果造成生活不方便只能自己扛着。
层主自己被工作单位逼着打,只打了一针强生,使使劲儿把booster逃了。
两个小孩都没打。谁敢逼我家娃打,先把他踢出去,再去大街上举牌子。
楼主,你家娃真可怜。
这才是最扯淡的。Covid出来两年多,如果自身没有什么大问题,得了新冠到底是没症状,轻症或者重症基本就属于看运气。不知道一个人感染了病毒会不会重症,怎么知道这个疫苗能防这个人得重症呢😂
有重症和死亡的保护率数据的链接么?疫苗和无疫苗5-12岁组比较。
👍
感染了没得重症的都傻乎乎感谢疫苗,你看前一阵子那些政客的连续表态。根本说不清,没打疫苗大部分人也是轻症吧,打了疫苗有副作用的也只能自己扛着。打疫苗是主动承受可能的副作用,不打做好防护 感染概率+感染得重症的概率也挺低的吧。总之选择打不打都是靠运气,愿赌服输。
一直上学的呀!只是下周开始要mask optional 了。所以焦虑!
貌似n年前的说法是,还没有孩子们能打的疫苗,所以大人打了之后保护孩子们?还记得圈儿里的打完疫苗,都发了些号召打疫苗的帖子,颇有些你大人不打疫苗就对不起没有疫苗保护的孩子们。
其实没打疫苗,一是我对自己体质很有信心,二是觉得疫苗出的太仓促总有疑虑,三是抱着一切按自然法则。
你自己已经打疫苗打出这么多问题了,还要孩子去打???