看来学生教职员工的请愿还是有些作用？其实一周2次测试也是很恶心人的，尤其鼻子捅得很深的那种，但是有选择总比没有强。而且不要求远程工作的教员和90天内感染过新冠的人员遵循这个规则说明还没太丧心病狂，学生网课的不清楚。 “Anyone who is eligible for a booster and has not met the requirement by Jan. 31 will be out of compliance and required to test twice a week by PCR at one of Cornell’s surveillance sites. This requirement will not be in place for staff who are fully remote or for those who have tested positive for COVID-19 in the last 90 days.” https://covid.cornell.edu/updates/20220121-faculty-staff-booster.cfm
看来学生教职员工的请愿还是有些作用？其实一周2次测试也是很恶心人的，尤其鼻子捅得很深的那种，但是有选择总比没有强。而且不要求远程工作的教员和90天内感染过新冠的人员遵循这个规则说明还没太丧心病狂，学生网课的不清楚。 “Anyone who is eligible for a booster and has not met the requirement by Jan. 31 will be out of compliance and required to test twice a week by PCR at one of Cornell’s surveillance sites. This requirement will not be in place for staff who are fully remote or for those who have tested positive for COVID-19 in the last 90 days.” https://covid.cornell.edu/updates/20220121-faculty-staff-booster.cfm CoolTeeth 发表于 2022-01-25 08:40
这是十二月二十一日的要求： https://covid.cornell.edu/updates/20212112-booster-requirement.cfm Because the Omicron variant spreads so readily among vaccinated individuals, and booster vaccinations markedly increase immunity directed against the variant, Cornell will require all students, faculty, and staff to have a COVID-19 vaccine and booster as part of comprehensive vaccination against this virus. The booster requirement must be met by January 31, or 30 days after you become eligible, and proof of booster must be uploaded to the Daily Check. Those not in compliance will be subject to appropriate action.
回复 6楼veryseablue的帖子 “Those not in compliance will be subject to appropriate action.” 这是跟现在的政策一样？当然了，如果你认为appropriate action 里暗含了一周测2次这个选择那当我没说。。。我很好奇那时候会有几个人认为这appropriate action 指的不是惩罚而是不打疫苗的话会给其他选择。
“Anyone who is eligible for a booster and has not met the requirement by Jan. 31 will be out of compliance and required to test twice a week by PCR at one of Cornell’s surveillance sites. This requirement will not be in place for staff who are fully remote or for those who have tested positive for COVID-19 in the last 90 days.”
https://covid.cornell.edu/updates/20220121-faculty-staff-booster.cfm
https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2022-01532.pdf
多了一个选择，总比强制打好一点。
可以提供一下以前规定的链接吗？如果以前就这样为何这么多人签名反对强制加强针？
这是十二月二十一日的要求： https://covid.cornell.edu/updates/20212112-booster-requirement.cfm
Because the Omicron variant spreads so readily among vaccinated individuals, and booster vaccinations markedly increase immunity directed against the variant, Cornell will require all students, faculty, and staff to have a COVID-19 vaccine and booster as part of comprehensive vaccination against this virus. The booster requirement must be met by January 31, or 30 days after you become eligible, and proof of booster must be uploaded to the Daily Check. Those not in compliance will be subject to appropriate action.
“Those not in compliance will be subject to appropriate action.” 这是跟现在的政策一样？当然了，如果你认为appropriate action 里暗含了一周测2次这个选择那当我没说。。。我很好奇那时候会有几个人认为这appropriate action 指的不是惩罚而是不打疫苗的话会给其他选择。