回复 8楼的帖子 So is background incidence. Actually, the number of background incidence is more likely to be undervalued. Because the parents are more likely to pay attention to their children after the vaccination. So, I would say the actual number of excess events is LESS than 4.3 cases per million 2nd shots for 5-11 males, were there any bias of this sort.
Dr. Robert Malone asks a leading pediatric cardiologist about the risks of the COVID vaccine in children.
“We may have an increase in sudden death associated with myocarditis from kids just playing on the field.” pic.twitter.com/vJIXNWM3av — Mythinformed MKE (@MythinformedMKE) January 5, 2022
"background incidence"
就算比正常的高，也是百万分之几的比例。从女生的得病比background 低，假设不打针是百万分之二，说明比率是不超过一倍。
你想多了，聪明人通病。我的理解是每1百万个打第二针的5到11岁男孩会比不打多出4. 3个心肌炎案例
这个数据是minimum 前提是所有出症状的人都在这个系统报道了。现实很可能大量低估了。
应该用随机抽样验证
So is background incidence. Actually, the number of background incidence is more likely to be undervalued. Because the parents are more likely to pay attention to their children after the vaccination.
So, I would say the actual number of excess events is LESS than 4.3 cases per million 2nd shots for 5-11 males, were there any bias of this sort.
是的。约了第一针5周后第二针，不推迟了
其实很多人犹豫不仅是因为这些短期数据暂时没有，更多是因为中期和长期数据完全缺失，这个新的技术用于现在的难治的病，那没办法必须上，安全性是次要的，命更重要，只要有钱。但是在这个病毒上没有长期安全数据，谁知道以后怎么样
Long covid倒是有数据
看个头，打完时间越久，有问题可能性越小。
https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html
成人shingles 疫苗6个月内都有。有问题也说和疫苗无关的还少么
谁也不能打包票说安全性 反过来 为了挣钱 少说一点bad cases的情况也不是没有
这小孩半年就死了
楼主赶紧带孩子去打第二针，不然感染了就惨了，long covid
他五月份打的成人量？可能确实有点多。
不是不防感染吗