之前看到有帖子关于 Date 白人的，关于亚女嫁白男的，想到网上好多人说推孩子上好大学，以后有好的 Network，有好的资源，能入上流社会，想问一下这种说法有多少可信度，我的理解是别人（白人）一个圈子的，怎么会让你一个亚裔混进去，就是算别人有好的资源为啥不给自己人会给你一个外族裔，是不是觉得都能象 Kate 一样上个贵族学校就可以当王妃了？目前经常看到的是好多亚裔上了藤校，感觉人真不少，但是没有听说过这些藤校毕业的亚裔，有多少混进了上流社会的。另外想说一下，我想讨论的不是公司招外族裔的员工。
之前看到有帖子关于 Date 白人的，关于亚女嫁白男的，想到网上好多人说推孩子上好大学，以后有好的 Network，有好的资源，能入上流社会，想问一下这种说法有多少可信度，我的理解是别人（白人）一个圈子的，怎么会让你一个亚裔混进去，就是算别人有好的资源为啥不给自己人会给你一个外族裔，是不是觉得都能象 Kate 一样上个贵族学校就可以当王妃了？目前经常看到的是好多亚裔上了藤校，感觉人真不少，但是没有听说过这些藤校毕业的亚裔，有多少混进了上流社会的。另外想说一下，我想讨论的不是公司招外族裔的员工。 LeapFrog 发表于 2021-12-05 13:11
在耶鲁法当教授算不算进入上流社会？参与过占领华尔街的 出身平民的人类学家David Graeber在被耶鲁deny tenure之后写过如下评论： It is difficult to exaggerate the importance of social class. I was told by one ally at Yale that my problem was that owing to my proletarian background and general comportment, I was considered “unclubbable.” That is, if one is not from a professional-managerial background, one can be accepted by one’s “betters,” but only if one makes it clear such acceptance is one’s highest life aspiration. Otherwise, ideas or actions that among the well-born would likely be treated as amusing peccadillos—such as an embrace of anti-authoritarian politics—will be considered to disqualify one from academic life entirely.
别动不动就想‘上流社会’， 在好大学，你也不一定遇得到他们
圈子很重要，贫民混上流社会需要内心强大 婚姻是很好的途径，要有文迪姐那种强大内心
就是啊。自己是精英，你的圈子就是上层社会。自己不是，你就是混在这些人里，人还是瞧不起你。最多还是回自己的圈子炫耀炫耀，有啥意义？
在耶鲁法当教授算不算进入上流社会？参与过占领华尔街的 出身平民的人类学家David Graeber在被耶鲁deny tenure之后写过如下评论：
It is difficult to exaggerate the importance of social class. I was told by one ally at Yale that my problem was that owing to my proletarian background and general comportment, I was considered “unclubbable.” That is, if one is not from a professional-managerial background, one can be accepted by one’s “betters,” but only if one makes it clear such acceptance is one’s highest life aspiration. Otherwise, ideas or actions that among the well-born would likely be treated as amusing peccadillos—such as an embrace of anti-authoritarian politics—will be considered to disqualify one from academic life entirely.