总结就是CDC引用的说mRNA 疫苗不会造成孕妇流产的科研文章里观察的孕妇都是第三孕期的但是CDC却认为这结论也适用于孕早期。而这些科研人员发现mRNA疫苗让孕早期流产的风险会增加7-8倍。 Abstract The use of mRNA vaccines in pregnancy is now generally considered safe for protection against COVID-19 in countries such as New Zealand, USA, and Australia. However, the influential CDC- sponsored article by Shimabukuro et al. (2021) used to support this idea, on closer inspection, provides little assurance, particularly for those exposed in early pregnancy. The study presents falsely reassuring statistics related to the risk of spontaneous abortion in early pregnancy, since the majority of women in the calculation were exposed to the mRNA product after the outcome period was defined (20 weeks’ gestation). In this article, we draw attention to these errors and recalculate the risk of this outcome based on the cohort that was exposed to the vaccine before 20 weeks’ gestation. Our re-analysis indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion 7 to 8 times higher than the original authors’ results (p < 0.001) and the typical average for pregnancy loss during this time period. In light of these findings, key policy decisions have been made using unreliable and questionable data. We conclude that the claims made using these data on the safety of exposure of women in early pregnancy to mRNA-based vaccines to prevent COVID-19 are unwarranted and recommend that those policy decisions be revisited. 文章链接file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/77/07/6EF95D19-5C7D-4EF3-A421-7452DF274525/adf864_2bd97450072f4364a65e5cf1d7384dd4.pdf
Abstract
The use of mRNA vaccines in pregnancy is now generally considered safe for protection against COVID-19 in countries such as New Zealand, USA, and Australia. However, the influential CDC- sponsored article by Shimabukuro et al. (2021) used to support this idea, on closer inspection, provides little assurance, particularly for those exposed in early pregnancy. The study presents falsely reassuring statistics related to the risk of spontaneous abortion in early pregnancy, since the majority of women in the calculation were exposed to the mRNA product after the outcome period was defined (20 weeks’ gestation).
In this article, we draw attention to these errors and recalculate the risk of this outcome based on the cohort that was exposed to the vaccine before 20 weeks’ gestation. Our re-analysis indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion 7 to 8 times higher than the original authors’ results (p < 0.001) and the typical average for pregnancy loss during this time period. In light of these findings, key policy decisions have been made using unreliable and questionable data. We conclude that the claims made using these data on the safety of exposure of women in early pregnancy to mRNA-based vaccines to prevent COVID-19 are unwarranted and recommend that those policy decisions be revisited.
文章链接file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/77/07/6EF95D19-5C7D-4EF3-A421-7452DF274525/adf864_2bd97450072f4364a65e5cf1d7384dd4.pdf
恭喜你有个靠谱的OB。之前鲜花版有孕早期的妹妹询问要不要打疫苗，好几个人说自己打了没事让她去打，我就回复说你们没事不代表她也没事啊，你们建议她去打出事了你们负责吗？