怕什么。疫苗不但能防新冠，还能防其他病呢。 CNN的新闻，最新研究成果。 (CNN)People who got Covid-19 vaccines were not only less likely to die from the virus, but they were less likely to die from any cause over the following months, researchers reported Friday.
"Bancel said he expects people over age 50 will need annual COVID-19 booster shots starting in 2023 because protection against the virus wanes over time. Some experts say it is unclear if boosters are broadly needed." 一开始大家不就有这个打算吗？最差的估计是每年两针（6个月一针）。这个病毒不可能消失，只能跟流感疫苗一样，不停打补丁。 有补丁打就不错了。如果mRNA技术不存在，传统灭活技术要10-20年才能做出有效无毒疫苗。别的不说，本版没准都要有人要去世。
怕什么。疫苗不但能防新冠，还能防其他病呢。 CNN的新闻，最新研究成果。 (CNN)People who got Covid-19 vaccines were not only less likely to die from the virus, but they were less likely to die from any cause over the following months, researchers reported Friday. hangel4 发表于 2021-10-27 13:26
CNN的新闻，最新研究成果。 (CNN)People who got Covid-19 vaccines were not only less likely to die from the virus, but they were less likely to die from any cause over the following months, researchers reported Friday.
一开始大家不就有这个打算吗？最差的估计是每年两针（6个月一针）。这个病毒不可能消失，只能跟流感疫苗一样，不停打补丁。
有补丁打就不错了。如果mRNA技术不存在，传统灭活技术要10-20年才能做出有效无毒疫苗。别的不说，本版没准都要有人要去世。
只要不强制 嘿嘿 看现在这架势 可能性很小
没准儿过一段就说40岁也要每年都打了。
40 is the new 50!
好吧 跑路的速度要加快
没读第二句？是否“broadly needed”尚不清楚。等几个月弄清楚了，会发现可不就是“broadly needed”嘛。
赞心细 这个broadly needed为啥总是那一小撮人决定 而不是我们广泛的群众自己？
现在明摆着就是要剥夺你“取其轻”的权利，下一步就是剥夺你“两害相权”的权利了，什么效果，取什么选择，都是权威说了算
这是competing risk 的意思吗
没打的也别整天跳出来做无辜小白兔状，爱打不打