Surprising exactly no one who’s been paying attention, in a 17-0 vote yesterday (1 abstaining) the FDA magically approved the Pfizer injection for kids aged 5 to 11 years old. Bllliiiiing! Presto! During the discussion before the vote, one of the members, Dr. Eric Rubin, admitted they have NO IDEA whether the shots are safe for kids or not. “We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it,” Rubin said during the hearing. “That’s just the way it goes.” That’s just the way it goes! Oh well! They were baffled; there’s just NO OTHER WAY to find out of the drugs are safe except by injecting kids with it. It’s simple. Another member, Dr. Cody Meissner, expressed profound concern about the decision. He said that the risk/reward ratio just wasn’t there. He said it wasn’t clear that the injections would reduce infections. He also worried publicly that it would lead to mandates for school kids, saying it would be “an error at this time, until we get more information.” Of course it will lead to school jab mandates. Still, Meissner voted in favor of the jabs. It’s NOT rigged. Why would you even think that. Eggs and omelets, as Comrade Stalin used to say. Eggs and omelets.
Have you had your booster yet? Because if not, you may be falling behind. Yesterday the CDC prepared the way for a FOURTH shot, saying “moderately to severely immunocompromised” folks might need it. You never know. After an August study from Johns Hopkins showed that injected immunocompromised folks were a staggering 485 times more likely to be hospitalized and die — and far more likely to transmit the virus to others than healthy injected people — the CDC recommended the first booster, which it called a “third dose.” Now the CDC is suggesting that a fourth dose might be necessary for people in that category. But the CDC’s website has some conflicting information. “A person should not receive more than three mRNA vaccine doses,” it says, for example. And it says, “There is limited information about the risks of receiving an additional dose of vaccine, and the safety, efficacy, and benefit of additional doses of COVID-19 vaccine in immunocompromised people continues to be evaluated.” Well. As Dr. Rubin always says, there’s no just no other way to find out about how safe the injections are until we start giving them to people. So. Jabs away. Link: [COVID-19 Vaccines for Moderately to Severely Immunocompromised People | CDC](https://tinyurl.com/3x6f9csy)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/former-cdc-director-robert-redfield-claims-40-deaths-cases-maryland-fully-vaccinated/ Former CDC Director Robert Redfield Claims More Than 40% COVID-19 Deaths in Maryland Were Fully Vaccinated 防重症防死亡的谎言也要破了吧
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/former-cdc-director-robert-redfield-claims-40-deaths-cases-maryland-fully-vaccinated/ Former CDC Director Robert Redfield Claims More Than 40% COVID-19 Deaths in Maryland Were Fully Vaccinated 防重症防死亡的谎言也要破了吧 你我对面不相识 发表于 2021-10-27 12:17
🔥 最新回帖
所以以后也不要想什么推迟退休多拿养老金啥的，早退休早享受吧，谁知道以后的事呢。。。
🛋️ 沙发板凳
哈哈哈。腹鳍我服了你了
那哪行，就是要保护他们。如果没用了肯定是打的不够
That’s just the way it goes! Oh well! They were baffled; there’s just NO OTHER WAY to find out of the drugs are safe except by injecting kids with it. It’s simple.
Another member, Dr. Cody Meissner, expressed profound concern about the decision. He said that the risk/reward ratio just wasn’t there. He said it wasn’t clear that the injections would reduce infections. He also worried publicly that it would lead to mandates for school kids, saying it would be “an error at this time, until we get more information.” Of course it will lead to school jab mandates. Still, Meissner voted in favor of the jabs.
It’s NOT rigged. Why would you even think that.
Eggs and omelets, as Comrade Stalin used to say. Eggs and omelets.
Have you had your booster yet? Because if not, you may be falling behind. Yesterday the CDC prepared the way for a FOURTH shot, saying “moderately to severely immunocompromised” folks might need it. You never know.
After an August study from Johns Hopkins showed that injected immunocompromised folks were a staggering 485 times more likely to be hospitalized and die — and far more likely to transmit the virus to others than healthy injected people — the CDC recommended the first booster, which it called a “third dose.”
Now the CDC is suggesting that a fourth dose might be necessary for people in that category. But the CDC’s website has some conflicting information. “A person should not receive more than three mRNA vaccine doses,” it says, for example. And it says, “There is limited information about the risks of receiving an additional dose of vaccine, and the safety, efficacy, and benefit of additional doses of COVID-19 vaccine in immunocompromised people continues to be evaluated.”
Well. As Dr. Rubin always says, there’s no just no other way to find out about how safe the injections are until we start giving them to people. So. Jabs away.
Link: [COVID-19 Vaccines for Moderately to Severely Immunocompromised People | CDC](https://tinyurl.com/3x6f9csy)
一直打到老人和有基础病的人要不死光要不成为钢铁战士。彻底解决美国养老金和医疗这两座大山。
我觉得就是透支他们仅存得免疫力
一个70老头吃伟哥有用吗？
现在这劲头， 一年一针好像不够， 这不到一年都快四针了。
像Colin Powell那样得了骨髓瘤，化疗完以后B细胞基本上死光，一个抗体都分泌不出来，一天给他打一针也是没用的
据说有些免疫缺失的还多打，最后打出了一点抗体，非常开心。估计没两天又wane掉了
Former CDC Director Robert Redfield Claims More Than 40% COVID-19 Deaths in Maryland Were Fully Vaccinated 防重症防死亡的谎言也要破了吧
我本来以为就像流感一样一年一针。或者干脆合并了。这可好。
live free （high）or die
我记得很早就在宣传合并针了
难道我穿越了
月针
哈哈，so high
疫苗不阻断传染，病毒就会不断适应打过疫苗的人体，不断逃逸
很有可能某些国家本来就没想过要彻底清除这病毒
隔壁楼里贴的哈佛某实验室九月份的文章说了大规模打疫苗和受新冠肆虐是稍稍正相关的
以疫苗为主导的抗疫的危害其实大家都知道
所以为了保护如Colin Powell那样的领袖人物，全社会一天打一针比较靠谱，大伙儿赶紧分泌出抗体的汪洋大海，包围在领袖们周围。
估计可以赶超的
索性像dune里面一样 搞一种职业 让这种职业的人专门打疫苗分泌抗体 保护需要保护的人
各取所需
我们不需要额外抗体的这些也不用没事来一针
哪天想不干了 躺平了 也多一个做“抗体分泌者”的option
这个回复太有才了👍
一天一针，每天出门前打一针，不得病还管饱儿
索性随身携带点滴吧 随时随地产生抗体
国内的孩子要不要打呢？
😂😂😂
很早我就看到一个资深疫苗专家顶着压力出来呼吁 不要在大流行的时候大规模打疫苗 这样只会给疫苗造成生存压力 会让疫苗往不利于人类的方向进化 无异于大型养蛊 没人听啊！
大佬们投下去的钱总得回本吧
p民牺牲一下打点毒疫苗不算啥 我们有饭吃就该感恩戴德了
刚出第二针的时候也有人问会不会有第3/4针
唉！最可怕的难道不是最后一群健康的人都给打到各种后遗症了吗？
大家是提醒不要去打吧 对于免疫低下的人来说 可能打了比不打还糟
马里兰成人疫苗接种率早已经超过80%，随着接种率的提高，Fully Vaccinated的死亡率，住院率会越来越高。
如果100%的人都打疫苗了，最后死的是不是100%都是fully vaccinated的了？
你说呢
前段时间多数人都没打疫苗的时候，新闻说住院都是没打疫苗的时候，让大家赶紧去打。现在多数人打了疫苗，就说整体基数大，当然数值高。为啥不用同一个逻辑来解释呢。
因为说不通？？
所以我们要怎么知道到底有没有用呢
。。。and go on and on
是我说的，我的原话是：
不要在大流行的时候大规模打疫苗 这样只会给病毒造成生存压力，让人类死亡人数下降，不利于地球实现无人化，不利于解决人口过剩的问题。
原因很简单，疫苗的防感染率没有宣传的那么好。但如果告诉大家，就说不通为什么疫苗不那么好还需要强制打。
To hide one lie, a thousand lies are needed
immunocomprised也分程度的，严重的immunocomprised在这个非常时期在家呆呆不行吗？怎么就侵犯人权了？如今有外卖快递，在家一个星期一个月根本不是问题，何况好多人住大房子带游泳池。。。
我看的是一个一个多小时的视频 是个老头 貌似你跟他说的一样
我在想可不可以一下子打打光 不要这样一会儿一针
精准到开始领退休金的时候挂
我要坚持着做最后一批uncompromised的人。stay covid vaccine virgin.
我也觉得 反正早晚得强制挂
我好像还没有
近些年都不怎么打
你一年内打的吗？4针？
新鲜出炉的Nature 论文，支持你的说法。相信主流相信科学的苗友们读一读吧
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41423-021-00779-5
据说集齐四个突变就可以召唤神龙（逃逸）
这样的人周围很多的，人家这是相信科学相信政府。
😂
期待ing
正在路上。
你不用怕，不说你们是超人吗。。。superhuman immunity
打过疫苗的去测个免疫血检吧。这个医生总结了两点：1. 检测者的免疫系统内部开始攻击自身 2. 对外的防护开始大大消减，很可能会导致breakthrough infection https://trusttheq.com/dr-nathan-thompson-my-jaw-dropped-when-i-tested-someones-immune-system-after-the-2nd-jab/ 这个视频最开始在youtube，现在已经被删了。当然我希望这一切都是假的，但是可以要求自己去测一下免疫系统，看看自己打过疫苗是不是有这样的问题。 现阶段有太多解释不清和未知的东西，唯一能做的就是尽可能保护好自己，不管打没打疫苗都是。
太保守了。这一年四针的速度，iPhone拍马都赶不上
然而猪媒们对此集体眼瞎绝口不提。而一旦有没打or没打全生病/住院/死亡的例子，马上连续N天头版刷屏，瞧这版上不就是么。