回复 11楼glashow的帖子 这是你说的猪媒要的结果吧？ “Pullen said other reports that will be presented in detail Friday have not been leaked and that "anomalies" found in voting records are vast enough to cast doubt on the final vote count — despite the hand recount's confirmation of the result.” - NPR
回复 11楼glashow的帖子 这是你说的猪媒要的结果吧？ “Pullen said other reports that will be presented in detail Friday have not been leaked and that "anomalies" found in voting records are vast enough to cast doubt on the final vote count — despite the hand recount''''s confirmation of the result.” - NPR NCSWIC 发表于 2021-09-24 14:20
回复 40楼glashow的帖子 你说的真对，你这个发了很多papers 的人连audit 的重点是什么都没搞清楚就跟着主流媒体瞎high，然后理解能力更是奇葩到令人叹为观止，难怪PhD 会被人说成是permanent head damage，就是拜你这种人所赐 The purpose of an audit is not to report the total ballots cast -- it's to determine how many are real and how many are fraudulent In the case of Arizona, that's already at least 50,000 identified as suspect
回复 40楼glashow的帖子 你说的真对，你这个发了很多papers 的人连audit 的重点是什么都没搞清楚就跟着主流媒体瞎high，然后理解能力更是奇葩到令人叹为观止，难怪PhD 会被人说成是permanent head damage，就是拜你这种人所赐 The purpose of an audit is not to report the total ballots cast -- it's to determine how many are real and how many are fraudulent In the case of Arizona, that's already at least 50,000 identified as suspect NCSWIC 发表于 2021-09-24 15:04
我又随便翻了lz发的第三个报告的第 71/90 页，看到了这个。。。 CISA outlines the necessity for software and patch management within election systems. Specifically, CISA states “Failure to deploy patches in a timely manner can make an organization a target of opportunity, even for less sophisticated actors, increasing the risk of compromise.” It is clear that there was no established program to patch the operating system or even update the antivirus definitions. Neither the operating system nor the antivirus had been patched or updated since August 2019 (the date of the installation of the Democracy Suite). The county released a statement that they were prohibited from updating the operating system,that had they done so it would have invalidated the certification issued by the Voter Assistance Commission (VAC) for the Dominion software. This statement is contradicted by the County’s own actions following the installation of the Dominion software. Contrary to the claims that updating items on the election systems would invalidate the certification of the election system by the EAC, forensic analysis revealed that after the installation of the Dominion software in August 2019, 4 EXE packages were created, 45 EXE packages were updated and/or modified, 377 Dynamic Link Libraries (DLL) were created, and 1053 Dynamic Link Libraries were modified on the EMS server. If updating the operating system with patches and updating the antivirus definition file would have invalidated the voting certification, then the county had already invalidated the certification prior to the general election of 2020. Neither security audit contracted by Maricopa County noted these findings in their report.
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21068477/20210919-maricopa-county-forensic-audit-volume-i-executive-summary.pdf https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21068485/20210830-maricopa-county-forensic-audit-volume-ii-methodology-and-operations.pdf https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21068486/20210919-maricopa-county-forensic_audit-volume-iii-results-details.pdf
把draft report称盗版是新剧本吗？？？
不是AZ官网上挂着的不知道哪里来的我不能称之为盗版？
lol。。。
你确定你有phd么？还是说是个从来没有发过paper的phd？
给你科普下paper没正式publish前都叫draft，即使是审稿通过后，交由publisher production，作者最后确认定稿前的文件上都会打上draft字样。。。
Volume 3挺好玩的，可以一读，这结果基本就是各打五十大板。。。
5.1节，明面结果是川傻的票越数越少。。。
6.3节，暗面的结果是mail in ballot存在争议，迫于现在没有相关法律，下不为例。。。
川傻会拿着这结果当宝贝么？？？师母已呆。。。
我反正见识了猪媒的无耻。有时候一件正确的事，到了它那的描述就是先摆30个错误、再一笔带过一个正确、然后剩下的69个批判。厉害吧。
it does not matter。。。
猪党猪霉根本不在乎正确错误。。。
猪党猪霉只在乎结果，结果就是毛腿是总统，作弊只要没有hard evidence，who cares？？？
20年以前的大选猪党一公交车一公交车往投票站拉人又不是没有过。。。
这是你说的猪媒要的结果吧？
“Pullen said other reports that will be presented in detail Friday have not been leaked and that "anomalies" found in voting records are vast enough to cast doubt on the final vote count — despite the hand recount's confirmation of the result.” - NPR
人家的paper 没上线的时候好歹是完整的而且有明确来源，没peer review 之前也是在官网上公布的，你这个是个什么玩意儿？
lol。。。
你有兴趣去读读volume 3就行了嘛，提示下第六节。。。还在找菲克牛死扯淡？？？
不对，你想读正式版，那到时做个读书笔记看看draft和正式版相差多少。。。
ps：npr属于msm嘛，是菲克牛死么？？？原来你冷牙齿只摘抄对你言论有利的菲克牛死？？？
我看你已经状似癫狂了
那个猪媒疯狂spin的表应该是手工点票baseline，而这个马里科帕县已经做过一次，想要通过简单重数“点”出败灯做票，是比较难的。关键在那个critical condition, 那些票，光这一个县已经可以翻几次盘。这里缺失的一个数据点是，这些问题票投给了谁，在这个leak里是没有的。今天看点应该就在这里，如果audit给不了这个数据，影响也就了了。要是都投了JB，妥妥翻盘
你不是喜欢引用主流媒体吗？我引用里边的一段给你看看，否则你只字不提这一段。
paper没peer review前在官网公布？？？
你确定你发过paper么？？？冷牙齿你这完全暴露了嘛。。。
你这phd看来连paper都没发过。。。
怪不得不敢和我合写论文。。。lmao
呵呵，发在正经网站上的preprint 的论文多的去了。
我的确只发过2篇论文，一篇读硕士发的一篇博士时发的，因为我志不在academia
lol。。。
你这孩子真是逻辑理解能力堪忧呵，你那样论断volume 3里的第五节第六节都有，我之前的source就给出了，你非要扯那是msm。。。
preprint算官网？？？
你冷牙齿说的多错的多呵，我完全知道你的底细了，别装了，看来真是连paper都没发过。。。
那么这么重要的一段话你为何只字不提呢？只说数出来没问题？
总比你这个什么破网站更可靠一点吧？
对，我没发过，你果然牛逼，上下嘴唇一碰就把人家发过的论文取消了。
arxiv的地位真不高。。。
没有peer review过就挂arxiv基本上就是被秒拒自嗨的文章，懂？？？
下次吹牛前记好了。。。
我那四个source里就有原始文件，发了你不看，扯淡npr的一段话？？？
你确定你真的逻辑理解能力没问题么？？？
你只要发过peer review的paper，不管几流杂志就应该知道这点。。。
嗯，你这个文件网站跟Arxiv 是一个级别的对吧？
但是你一直说的都是数据没问题已经定论了不是吗？你有提过还有重要数据 leak 的文件没有吗？你这种跟主流媒体断章取义有啥区别？
这是你的理解。。。
歇了吧，我看你这水平也就这样了，peer review paper都没有发过还在扯淡，话说一流phd项目，不可能一片文章就让你毕业吧。。。
你找出我说过这话么？？？
你看来阅读理解能力也不行了。。。
你一句话就把别人发过文章的事实抹掉了，你果然跟左棍们没有区别，不调查不研究直接否认，你应该去CNN做顾问。
我也从来没有说过我的博士program 是一流的。
你开的另外那个楼是说的啥？你是老年痴呆了吗这么健忘，呵呵
lol。。。一篇文章的phd，话说你明白peer review怎么操作么？referee审稿时需要给出哪些建议？？？
你应该仔细去去读读，加强下你的阅读理解水平。。。
原来你那个楼说结果出来了还是川普输了不是那个意思啊？你阅读不行原来写作也词不达意，呵呵
你发的这个盗版文件需要peer review 吗？你扯这些没用的有啥意思？
美国很多博士program 的确不要求发表很多论文就能毕业你连这个都不知道？
lol。。。
你这已经put words in my mouth，那楼在那里呢，仔细去读读吧。。。
盗版与draft都搞不清，你这一篇paper的phd还是歇了吧。。。
ps，你不清楚peer review过程就不清楚，没必要扯别的。。。
你那个楼啥意思大家都看着呢
我说的是你这个是draft 的盗版，你这理解能力是怎么拿到博士学位的？我也在好奇
lol。。。
有phd与没phd看的不一样呵，
有phd发过很多paper的和有phd只发过一篇没有peer review paper的也看的不一样。。。
lol。。。
那不得等正式报告出来再下结论么。。。
你这一篇paper的phd一点都不严谨嘛。。。
话说你那篇paper没有被peer review过吧，还在装聋作哑的。。。
你说的真对，你这个发了很多papers 的人连audit 的重点是什么都没搞清楚就跟着主流媒体瞎high，然后理解能力更是奇葩到令人叹为观止，难怪PhD 会被人说成是permanent head damage，就是拜你这种人所赐
The purpose of an audit is not to report the total ballots cast -- it's to determine how many are real and how many are fraudulent In the case of Arizona, that's already at least 50,000 identified as suspect
你不是要急着下结论吗？咋突然现在又改主意了？呵呵
是的，我的paper 没被peer review 过，你说没有就没有，有也没有，你开心了吗？呵呵
lol。。。
你的逻辑理解能力真的很堪忧哦，还在拼命google，找出这么一段。。。你去读读我这贴9楼写的。。。
lol。。。
你这孩子这么喜欢put words in别人的mouth么？？？还是说逻辑理解能力真的堪忧。。。
lol。。。
别这样哦，你的paper有没有被peer review过，只要看你清不清楚peer review的过程，但你显然不清楚呵，所以很容易得出结论，这逻辑清晰么？？？
我已经告诉你你的结论是错误的，但是你不信，我能咋办？呵呵
lol。。。
原来debate with referee只要“告诉”就行了。。。
ps，告诉别人他的结论是错的，却没有任何backup evidence，这peer review的过程挺牛的。。。
你那个楼第一层你就开始问如果审计结果证明啥做弊都没有川粉们要咋办？你这是中立的态度？你为何不问如果证明有问题左棍们该咋办？你的偏向性还不够明显？
lol。。。
继续阅读理解。。。
真是闲得慌吗？
哦，我自己不知道自己的论文有没有peer review？所以你认为的才是事实？我这个当事人说的是假的？你太厉害了，佩服佩服。
lol。。。
你连referee审稿时该提什么建议都说不清，那还谈什么呢？？？只要发过peer review的paper门清吧。。。
我今天因为跟他掰扯已经耽误工作了，我也是，居然在这种人身上浪费时间。
我的稿子是别人审的，我没审过，不知道不是很正常吗？我不想再搭理你了，简直就是个深井冰
lol。。。
这理由也能成立？？？挖坑给你跳，你真跳？？？
你写paper时就得注意referee可能要提的建议，都是一样的，懂？？？
ps：自己没有经历，使劲意淫的算什么类型的深井冰？？？
话说这贴是你主动冲进来扔给我个npr新闻来支持你的理论吧，那你怎么会怕耽误工作呢。。。
CISA outlines the necessity for software and patch management within election systems. Specifically, CISA states “Failure to deploy patches in a timely manner can make an organization a target of opportunity, even for less sophisticated actors, increasing the risk of compromise.” It is clear that there was no established program to patch the operating system or even update the antivirus definitions. Neither the operating system nor the antivirus had been patched or updated since August 2019 (the date of the installation of the Democracy Suite). The county released a statement that they were prohibited from updating the operating system, that had they done so it would have invalidated the certification issued by the Voter Assistance Commission (VAC) for the Dominion software. This statement is contradicted by the County’s own actions following the installation of the Dominion software. Contrary to the claims that updating items on the election systems would invalidate the certification of the election system by the EAC, forensic analysis revealed that after the installation of the Dominion software in August 2019, 4 EXE packages were created, 45 EXE packages were updated and/or modified, 377 Dynamic Link Libraries (DLL) were created, and 1053 Dynamic Link Libraries were modified on the EMS server. If updating the operating system with patches and updating the antivirus definition file would have invalidated the voting certification, then the county had already invalidated the certification prior to the general election of 2020. Neither security audit contracted by Maricopa County noted these findings in their report.
结论有超出我这条回复么？？？
这不就是volume 3的内容拿出来讲么？？？
马县官网summary
https://azsos.gov/sites/default/files/2020.11.23-Maricopa-General_Election_Canvass_Summary.pdf
https://www.azsenaterepublicans.com/letter-to-the-ag
az senate给az ag的信。。。
各打五十大板，下不为例。。。lol