你看看报道的计算方式，“The CDC reported 6,587 Covid-19 breakthrough cases as of July 26, including 6,239 hospitalizations and 1,263 deaths. At that time, more than 163 million people in the United States were fully vaccinated against Covid-19.”---没错误啊
你看看报道的计算方式，“The CDC reported 6,587 Covid-19 breakthrough cases as of July 26, including 6,239 hospitalizations and 1,263 deaths. At that time, more than 163 million people in the United States were fully vaccinated against Covid-19.”---没错误啊 chuhehanjie 发表于 2021-08-10 00:55
楼主的算术对还是层主的算术对？ It is too bad to be wrong. 看来楼主英文与算术都没有过关？ 还是不用太急否定疫苗比较妥当。
你看看报道的计算方式，“The CDC reported 6,587 Covid-19 breakthrough cases as of July 26, including 6,239 hospitalizations and 1,263 deaths. At that time, more than 163 million people in the United States were fully vaccinated against Covid-19.”---没错误啊 chuhehanjie 发表于 2021-08-10 00:55
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/31/health/fully-vaccinated-people-breakthrough-hospitalization-death/index.html
一句话来评论现在的猪妹：they just cannot get enough of the 9's!
你说的对，看走眼了。
第一反应是，这么假的数据怎么可能有正经出处。果真，cdc快赶上cnn的水平了。。。
牛，一共5个9，十万里挑一。 如果10万个人感染，那其中只有一个是打了疫苗的。
你要佩服新闻工作者的是，该用绝对比率的时候就用绝对比率，该提相对保护率的时候就说相对保护率。哪边9多说哪个，非常地专业。
楼主的算术对还是层主的算术对？ It is too bad to be wrong. 看来楼主英文与算术都没有过关？ 还是不用太急否定疫苗比较妥当。
无误的算式就一定有意义吗？那cnn干嘛不头版头条天天发1+1=2呢？
基于瑞辉95%保护率的数据，我给大家如法炮制一条新闻：
在4.5万名实验者中，大约一半打了placebo一半打了疫苗。其中placebo组162人确诊，疫苗组8人确诊。测试表明不打疫苗的人群99.3%没有感染。
下午有人发的EU在investigate mRNA副作用的贴是被完全删掉了吗？
晕 这位mm也被封了？