FRI JUL 30, 2021 / 8:07 AM EDT Exclusive-U.S. regulator freezes Chinese company IPOs over risk disclosures -sources Echo Wang, Scott Murdoch and Kane Wu FILE PHOTO: The seal of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is seen at their headquarters in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 12, 2021. REUTERS/ANDREW KELLY/FILE PHOTO/FILE PHOTO (Reuters) - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has stopped processing registrations of U.S. initial public offerings (IPOs) and other sales of securities by Chinese companies while it crafts new guidance for disclosing to investors the risk of a new regulatory crackdown by Beijing, according to people familiar with the matter.
STATEMENT ON INVESTOR PROTECTION RELATED TO RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN CHINA SEC Chair Gary Gensler July 30, 2021 Recently, the government of the People’s Republic of China provided new guidance to and placed restrictions on China-based companies raising capital offshore, including through associated offshore shell companies. These developments include government-led cybersecurity reviews of certain companies raising capital through offshore entities. This is relevant to U.S. investors. In a number of sectors in China, companies are not allowed to have foreign ownership and cannot directly list on exchanges outside of China. To raise money on such exchanges, many China-based operating companies are structured as Variable Interest Entities (VIEs). In such an arrangement, a China-based operating company typically establishes an offshore shell company in another jurisdiction, such as the Cayman Islands, to issue stock to public shareholders. That shell company enters into service and other contracts with the China-based operating company, then issues shares on a foreign exchange, like the New York Stock Exchange. While the shell company has no equity ownership in the China-based operating company, for accounting purposes the shell company is able to consolidate the operating company into its financial statements. For U.S. investors, this arrangement creates “exposure” to the China-based operating company, though only through a series of service contracts and other contracts. To be clear, though, neither the investors in the shell company’s stock, nor the offshore shell company itself, has stock ownership in the China-based operating company. I worry that average investors may not realize that they hold stock in a shell company rather than a China-based operating company. In light of the recent developments in China and the overall risks with the China-based VIE structure, I have asked staff to seek certain disclosures from offshore issuers associated with China-based operating companies before their registration statements will be declared effective. In particular, I have asked staff to ensure that these issuers prominently and clearly disclose: That investors are not buying shares of a China-based operating company but instead are buying shares of a shell company issuer that maintains service agreements with the associated operating company. Thus, the business description of the issuer should clearly distinguish the description of the shell company’s management services from the description of the China-based operating company; That the China-based operating company, the shell company issuer, and investors face uncertainty about future actions by the government of China that could significantly affect the operating company’s financial performance and the enforceability of the contractual arrangements; and Detailed financial information, including quantitative metrics, so that investors can understand the financial relationship between the VIE and the issuer. Additionally, for all China-based operating companies seeking to register securities with the SEC, either directly or through a shell company, I have asked staff to ensure that these issuers prominently and clearly disclose: Whether the operating company and the issuer, when applicable, received or were denied permission from Chinese authorities to list on U.S. exchanges; the risks that such approval could be denied or rescinded; and a duty to disclose if approval was rescinded; and That the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, which requires that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) be permitted to inspect the issuer’s public accounting firm within three years, may result in the delisting of the operating company in the future if the PCAOB is unable to inspect the firm. In addition to this specific guidance, we will continue to hold all companies to the securities laws’ high standards for complete and accurate disclosure. Further, I also have asked staff to engage in targeted additional reviews of filings for companies with significant China-based operations. I believe these changes will enhance the overall quality of disclosure in registration statements of offshore issuers that have affiliations with China-based operating companies. This work builds on the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance’s previous guidance on disclosure considerations for companies based in or with significant operations in China. I believe such disclosures are crucial to informed investment decision-making and are at the heart of the SEC’s mandate to protect investors in U.S. capital markets. 所以就是增加disclosure而已。。 问题了增加了就有人看吗？
STATEMENT ON INVESTOR PROTECTION RELATED TO RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN CHINA SEC Chair Gary Gensler July 30, 2021 Recently, the government of the People’s Republic of China provided new guidance to and placed restrictions on China-based companies raising capital offshore, including through associated offshore shell companies. These developments include government-led cybersecurity reviews of certain companies raising capital through offshore entities. This is relevant to U.S. investors. In a number of sectors in China, companies are not allowed to have foreign ownership and cannot directly list on exchanges outside of China. To raise money on such exchanges, many China-based operating companies are structured as Variable Interest Entities (VIEs). In such an arrangement, a China-based operating company typically establishes an offshore shell company in another jurisdiction, such as the Cayman Islands, to issue stock to public shareholders. That shell company enters into service and other contracts with the China-based operating company, then issues shares on a foreign exchange, like the New York Stock Exchange. While the shell company has no equity ownership in the China-based operating company, for accounting purposes the shell company is able to consolidate the operating company into its financial statements. For U.S. investors, this arrangement creates “exposure” to the China-based operating company, though only through a series of service contracts and other contracts. To be clear, though, neither the investors in the shell company’s stock, nor the offshore shell company itself, has stock ownership in the China-based operating company. I worry that average investors may not realize that they hold stock in a shell company rather than a China-based operating company. In light of the recent developments in China and the overall risks with the China-based VIE structure, I have asked staff to seek certain disclosures from offshore issuers associated with China-based operating companies before their registration statements will be declared effective. In particular, I have asked staff to ensure that these issuers prominently and clearly disclose: That investors are not buying shares of a China-based operating company but instead are buying shares of a shell company issuer that maintains service agreements with the associated operating company. Thus, the business description of the issuer should clearly distinguish the description of the shell company’s management services from the description of the China-based operating company; That the China-based operating company, the shell company issuer, and investors face uncertainty about future actions by the government of China that could significantly affect the operating company’s financial performance and the enforceability of the contractual arrangements; and Detailed financial information, including quantitative metrics, so that investors can understand the financial relationship between the VIE and the issuer. Additionally, for all China-based operating companies seeking to register securities with the SEC, either directly or through a shell company, I have asked staff to ensure that these issuers prominently and clearly disclose: Whether the operating company and the issuer, when applicable, received or were denied permission from Chinese authorities to list on U.S. exchanges; the risks that such approval could be denied or rescinded; and a duty to disclose if approval was rescinded; and That the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, which requires that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) be permitted to inspect the issuer’s public accounting firm within three years, may result in the delisting of the operating company in the future if the PCAOB is unable to inspect the firm. In addition to this specific guidance, we will continue to hold all companies to the securities laws’ high standards for complete and accurate disclosure. Further, I also have asked staff to engage in targeted additional reviews of filings for companies with significant China-based operations. I believe these changes will enhance the overall quality of disclosure in registration statements of offshore issuers that have affiliations with China-based operating companies. This work builds on the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance’s previous guidance on disclosure considerations for companies based in or with significant operations in China. I believe such disclosures are crucial to informed investment decision-making and are at the heart of the SEC’s mandate to protect investors in U.S. capital markets. Namama 发表于 2021-07-30 12:04
来，这是楼主引用的新闻原文： (Reuters) - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has stopped processing registrations of U.S. initial public offerings (IPOs) and other sales of securities by Chinese companies while it crafts new guidance for disclosing to investors the risk of a new regulatory crackdown by Beijing, according to people familiar with the matter. 麻烦您给翻译一下，看看是不是楼主的“美国证监会SEC冻结处理中国公司赴美IPO申请”的标题？
回复 37楼yanzi2012的帖子 The SEC has asked companies not to submit any registrations for the issuance of securities until it gives them specific guidance on how to disclose the risks they face in China, the sources said. It was not immediately clear how long this would take. 要等美国出guidance才能submit registration, 这个guidance有可能明天就出，也有可能三四年，还有可能就不出了，牌在SEC手里，看情况想怎么弄怎么弄呗
来，这是楼主引用的新闻原文： (Reuters) - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has stopped processing registrations of U.S. initial public offerings (IPOs) and other sales of securities by Chinese companies while it crafts new guidance for disclosing to investors the risk of a new regulatory crackdown by Beijing, according to people familiar with the matter. 麻烦您给翻译一下，看看是不是楼主的“美国证监会SEC冻结处理中国公司赴美IPO申请”的标题？
FRI JUL 30, 2021 / 8:07 AM EDT Exclusive-U.S. regulator freezes Chinese company IPOs over risk disclosures -sources Echo Wang, Scott Murdoch and Kane Wu
(Reuters) - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has stopped processing registrations of U.S. initial public offerings (IPOs) and other sales of securities by Chinese companies while it crafts new guidance for disclosing to investors the risk of a new regulatory crackdown by Beijing, according to people familiar with the matter.
按这个速度，最坏情况下，8月份病毒起源报告出炉（酝酿背景气氛），然后包子再在香港加加速（香港议会正式批准国安法之类），美国用香港为突破口减弱银行往来，那就真的金融脱钩了。
最后金融系统的目标大概是冷战时美苏的样子，i.e.，没有样子（美元在北约内循环，卢布在华约内循环）。
监管风暴引发市场震荡后，中国开始安抚跨国银行和投资者
中国已采取行动缓解投资者对政府整顿上市公司的担忧，据知情人士称，一位高层监管人员私下告诉一些跨国金融企业，中国政府未来在推出政策前会考虑市场影响。
中国已采取行动缓解投资者对政府整顿上市公司的担忧，据知情人士透露，中国证券监管部门私下告诉跨国金融企业，中国政府未来在推出政策前会考虑市场影响。
知情人士说，周三晚间，中国证监会副主席方星海与包括高盛集团(Goldman Sachs Group Inc., GS)和瑞银集团(UBS Group)在内的跨国银行以及部分投资公司的代表进行了会谈，证监会主席易会满也出席了在北京召开的这次闭门会议。
会谈结束以及官方媒体发表一系列看法乐观的文章后，在纽约和香港上市的中国科技公司股票跳涨，帮助拉动大盘走高，收复了近期急剧下跌造成的部分失地。
知情人士称，方星海告诉与会者，中国最近对教培、互联网金融和其他一些行业的公司实施的监管整顿是为了解决这些行业存在的问题，帮助其以合理的方式发展；方星海还指出，中国无意和全球市场脱钩，特别是与美国脱钩。
抛售势头也波及上海和深圳股市，并导致人民币兑美元汇率走软。 阿里巴巴等在美上市中国科技公司的美国存托凭证(ADR)在周三纽约交易时段收复了部分失地。标普/纽约梅隆中国精选ADR指数(S&P/BNY Mellon China Select ADR Index)上涨了8.3%，是2008年11月以来最大单日百分比涨幅。许多在香港上市的股票周四上午也强劲反弹，美团和腾讯均上涨约8%。
周二，国务院副总理刘鹤出席一个中小企业高峰论坛时表示，中国正在努力平衡发展和安全。他称，这样做意味着保护竞争和消费者，这将对中小企业有利。一些分析人士认为，这一信息表明中国并没有试图压制民营部门。
据知情人士透露，方星海周三告诉与会者，中国未来将以更谨慎的方式推出新政策，避免市场剧烈波动，他还表示将让市场有更多时间消化新消息。方星海说，监管机构还将考虑其政策对上市公司的影响。
上述知情人士称，方星海表示，政府正在审查所谓的可变利益实体，但政府认为可变利益实体是中国公司参与全球市场的一个必要和重要的组成部分。许多中国公司利用可变利益实体这种结构在海外筹集资金。
知情人士说，方星海还提到中共希望保护民营企业和国际投资者的利益，中国政府正计划出台更多政策吸引外国投资。
近日，一些海外投资者对中国针对校外培训行业实施的新规表示失望。中国官媒上周末公布的新规事实上将迫使所有营利性教培机构出局。受此影响，新东方教育科技（集团）公司(New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc., EDU)和其他在美国上市的教培企业损失了大部分市值。
官方媒体新华社在周三晚间的一篇文章中说，行业监管政策有利于中国长远发展，中国对外开放的坚定决心没有改变。
这篇文章承认，市场担心未来中国企业赴境外上市的政策是否存在变数。但文章指出：“证监会对企业选择上市地持开放态度，支持企业根据自身发展需要作出选择。”
其他官方新闻媒体谈到了国内投资者的关切。《证券时报》称，此番下跌一定程度上反映了部分资金对政策的误读，短期震荡不改A股长期向好前景。 中国人民大学重阳金融研究院高级研究员刘志勤说，中央政府对市场的大幅波动感到担忧，证监会正代表中央政府进行沟通。刘志勤曾任瑞士苏黎世州银行(Zurcher Kantonalbank)北京代表处首席代表。
不过，他说这并不一定意味着中国政府立场的全面改变。 刘志勤表示，短期内，一些中国政府机构执行政策的方式较难扭转。他说，不少部门近来更愿意采取宁左勿右的政策，这到了可能干扰资本市场的程度，这是很危险的。
非也，花街在中概上被套，这样下去要大亏而已。
想多了，美元这么印下去就没有金融脱钩的可能。。。
美元只有外流买到商品才是变废为宝的法门，否则留美帝国内那通胀要上天了，美帝可没有厉害国式的房价蓄水池能吸收超发的货币。。。
证监会有过“一律禁止xx省份公司上市”？没有吧。
美国目前最亲共的就是华尔街的一部分。现在这部分也熄火了。而且熄火之后，上来对着中共就是一个大耳瓜子。
不过华尔街这么小心也对。别听现在中共内部一些技术派官僚怎么打圆场。他们说话不管用。说话管用的只有一个人：包子。这次打击美股公司这么狠，说明包子personally惦记上这帮吃里扒外的二五眼。打不着美国人，难道还打不着美股上市的自家孩子？
包子这个人心胸狭窄，牙呲必报，胆薄色厉。只要他的咸猪手够得到的地方被他惦记上了，早晚会被他整死。跟毛泽东整知识分子一个德行：从50年代起打两板子给个枣，最后忍到60年代一锅端。
而且花街还没办法抓。例如一个中国人在中国开户买美股，这人同时又是参与制定教育部政策的家伙，或者提前拿到内部消息，你sec难道还能抓得到他？
以前有钱赚的时候华尔街装瞎而已
香港白手套接到消息 “上头这几天要搞补习班，让你们short一short美股教育板块，注意多搞几个账户，别被察觉了” 脱钩也能赚钱啊 :)
只有中国能做商品？东南亚，拉美，印度都能做好吗，个个都等着承接中低生产链呢，人工低，人口又年轻，小国还好控制
那得先建立完整产业链再考虑金融脱钩。。。
川傻一味加关税完全不考虑扶植这些国家建立完整产业链，到目前的情形根本没有脱钩的可能。。。
PS：就产业链转移问题，川傻加关税时厉害国就有策略了，那就是中资入场东南亚各国，广东无数小老板跑越南设厂挣大钱，这条线盘活后，厉害国都不要美元开路了，东南亚直接人民币资产开路了。。。
再ps：金融脱钩就必须有严格排除中资（无论美元或人民币）的类tpp协议，全世界站队，跟着美帝老大哥还是厉害国，这玩意儿不搞定根本不会金融脱钩。。。
去其他国家开厂可以， 可是国内失业怎么办， 总不可能把工人都运过去吧
看把你激动的,至于这么上蹿下跳么
那得看产业链转移比例，川傻加关税时问题不大。。。
如果你要讨论大脱钩，那是另一个故事了。。。
2) 金融全球化， SEC这种举动其实根本没有意义
SEC Chair Gary Gensler July 30, 2021 Recently, the government of the People’s Republic of China provided new guidance to and placed restrictions on China-based companies raising capital offshore, including through associated offshore shell companies. These developments include government-led cybersecurity reviews of certain companies raising capital through offshore entities. This is relevant to U.S. investors. In a number of sectors in China, companies are not allowed to have foreign ownership and cannot directly list on exchanges outside of China. To raise money on such exchanges, many China-based operating companies are structured as Variable Interest Entities (VIEs). In such an arrangement, a China-based operating company typically establishes an offshore shell company in another jurisdiction, such as the Cayman Islands, to issue stock to public shareholders. That shell company enters into service and other contracts with the China-based operating company, then issues shares on a foreign exchange, like the New York Stock Exchange. While the shell company has no equity ownership in the China-based operating company, for accounting purposes the shell company is able to consolidate the operating company into its financial statements.
For U.S. investors, this arrangement creates “exposure” to the China-based operating company, though only through a series of service contracts and other contracts. To be clear, though, neither the investors in the shell company’s stock, nor the offshore shell company itself, has stock ownership in the China-based operating company. I worry that average investors may not realize that they hold stock in a shell company rather than a China-based operating company.
In light of the recent developments in China and the overall risks with the China-based VIE structure, I have asked staff to seek certain disclosures from offshore issuers associated with China-based operating companies before their registration statements will be declared effective. In particular, I have asked staff to ensure that these issuers prominently and clearly disclose: That investors are not buying shares of a China-based operating company but instead are buying shares of a shell company issuer that maintains service agreements with the associated operating company. Thus, the business description of the issuer should clearly distinguish the description of the shell company’s management services from the description of the China-based operating company; That the China-based operating company, the shell company issuer, and investors face uncertainty about future actions by the government of China that could significantly affect the operating company’s financial performance and the enforceability of the contractual arrangements; and Detailed financial information, including quantitative metrics, so that investors can understand the financial relationship between the VIE and the issuer. Additionally, for all China-based operating companies seeking to register securities with the SEC, either directly or through a shell company, I have asked staff to ensure that these issuers prominently and clearly disclose: Whether the operating company and the issuer, when applicable, received or were denied permission from Chinese authorities to list on U.S. exchanges; the risks that such approval could be denied or rescinded; and a duty to disclose if approval was rescinded; and That the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, which requires that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) be permitted to inspect the issuer’s public accounting firm within three years, may result in the delisting of the operating company in the future if the PCAOB is unable to inspect the firm. In addition to this specific guidance, we will continue to hold all companies to the securities laws’ high standards for complete and accurate disclosure. Further, I also have asked staff to engage in targeted additional reviews of filings for companies with significant China-based operations. I believe these changes will enhance the overall quality of disclosure in registration statements of offshore issuers that have affiliations with China-based operating companies. This work builds on the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance’s previous guidance on disclosure considerations for companies based in or with significant operations in China. I believe such disclosures are crucial to informed investment decision-making and are at the heart of the SEC’s mandate to protect investors in U.S. capital markets.
所以就是增加disclosure而已。。 问题了增加了就有人看吗？
didi上市三天被猛扇一耳光。 团灭教培。 整顿互联网企业。
三招一出，华尔街终于受不了了？
你的解读是什么呀我想知道
美国股市就是蓄水池啊，和中国房市一样。
1）具体操作上， 无非就是确保上市文件里提到几个disclosure，比如说VIE架构的解释。。
问题是，大型机构投资者，本来就很清楚啥是VIE 绝大多数retail investor，上市文件里那几十页的legal disclosure，你哪怕解释再多东西也没人看。。
所以纯粹就是政治操作。。。。
2）从大方向来看，金融早就全球化了，这种操作根本没啥意义。。
上市地点真正有区别的，现在无非就是A股和海外，因为中国市场本身有资本管制，国外资本进不去。。 但只要在国外市场。。企业不管是纽约，香港，伦敦，新加坡上市，背后的代表美国资本进行国际投资的那些机构投资者不还是blackrock, fidelity那几家，一样那点机构，一样那点钱，一样的那几家承销投行，甚至一样找那几家律师行。。具体法律文件上稍微有点不同，有毛区别。。
股市当蓄水池能和房市比？稳定性差的一踏糊涂。。。
美帝这波房市高涨后，要引起次贷危机的可能性很大，到时股市里的热钱往哪里跑？
你还挺positive的 我私信你一个消息
虽然现在中企不被美国金融监管待见，也不能乱传递新闻呀！
来，这是楼主引用的新闻原文： (Reuters) - The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has stopped processing registrations of U.S. initial public offerings (IPOs) and other sales of securities by Chinese companies while it crafts new guidance for disclosing to investors the risk of a new regulatory crackdown by Beijing, according to people familiar with the matter. 麻烦您给翻译一下，看看是不是楼主的“美国证监会SEC冻结处理中国公司赴美IPO申请”的标题？
The SEC has asked companies not to submit any registrations for the issuance of securities until it gives them specific guidance on how to disclose the risks they face in China, the sources said. It was not immediately clear how long this would take. 要等美国出guidance才能submit registration, 这个guidance有可能明天就出，也有可能三四年，还有可能就不出了，牌在SEC手里，看情况想怎么弄怎么弄呗
你没把新闻读完吧，你在美国么？哪个新闻网都可以看到完整的原文：
"The SEC has asked companies not to submit any registrations for the issuance of securities until it gives them specific guidance on how to disclose the risks they face in China, the sources said. It was not immediately clear how long this would take."
https://www.reuters.com/article/sec-ipo-china/exclusive-us-regulator-freezes-chinese-company-ipos-over-risk-disclosures-sources-idUSL4N2P50QH
对于韭菜来说，这是再好不过的消息 再加上一个比特币等电子货币实现跨境流动
一旦有竞争就有套利空间
是呀，完整的新闻就是楼主标题里的意思呀！ 是有人说楼主标题党，才说让那人翻译看看的。
哈，你们这两个ID 都是 yan开头，我看花了还以为是同一人。
中国公司不仅政治风险极大，而且造假成风，各种营收造假，审计公司根本查不出来， SEC允许这些公司来美国上市圈钱不是坑人么，
早就应该把所有中国公司都delist
等中囯外資商品製造業外移到他囯 脫勾完成 金融脱钩水到渠成
供应链不行
美国不仅要把中国公司赶走，更重要的是把那些人格分裂，赖在美国舔共舔专制骂美国的粉蛆们赶走，这些人不仅无耻虚伪让人恶心，而且是美国社会的定时炸弹，留这些人将来会给美国造成极大损失
只要工厂转移，供应链分分钟的事情，中国以前也没有供应链，外企以来马上建立起来
分分钟的事，那美资早动手了。。。
知道美资进入厉害国后，厉害国的供应链花了多少年建立的么？
完全不是。lz就是标题党
sec的意思是我们需要中国公司提供新的disclosure。这个。disclosure流程我们先确定一下。在此之前你们先等等
楼上所谓“一个流程拖三年”来脱钩是纯扯淡，对sec的工作方式连常识都没有。可能是刚从国内出来的，思维还带着党国的惯性。
逻辑堪忧，美资当年能在一穷二白的厉害国建立供应链，现在当然也能在其他国家建立，只会更容易
没懂，好在哪里？
lmao。。。
轮子建立供应链只要上下嘴一碰，那是相当容易。。。
厉害国加入WTO之前供应链在哪里？欧美人民不吃不喝了？ 现在无论关税还是人权问题，利润最大的美欧市场做的就是提高中国产品的准入门槛，没有了买家，中国这么大供应链做出来的商品去赚亚非拉人民的钱，那利润可真微薄，能不能让厂工厂妹买上房子？听说现在工厂招工困难，不都去送外卖了么 再加上中国人口老龄化问题越来越严重，1980年改革开放的时候中国平均年龄22岁，美国30岁，今年七普中国平均年龄39岁，美国38岁，中国产业升级没有完成，就已经比美国还老 外部环境越加恶化，中国崛起窗口期已经过去了
你这种属于扫盲都已经救不了你。。。
你还是真的只能练功了。。
怎么你这么牛，SEC的意思就你一个人看出来了，连SEC的神态都想象得出来。
这段回复的结论我认同，但逻辑混乱，eco101也只能算及格水平，还没有理解全球化的经济理论。。。
要想知道问题的答案，我给你个tip，看看美元m1的时间曲线。。。
黑底白字英文原文就在一楼，看不懂还要各种瞎引申的都是政庇不成？考过寄托的不至于这么惨。
But these disclosure is forbidden by Chinese government for national security reasons.
So it is basically a freeze.
It is Obama government's policy.
你是不是英文理解有问题？还是中文理解也有问题？
中国政府不允许中概股进行这种disclosure? 开玩笑吗？
花街一向和dang一条裤子 这次居然下手了？有点不可思议 感觉还会继续相亲相爱好些年的故事居然分手了
中丐一下跌掉80% 那可都是钱啊
我也是最近才意识到版上有pops和pop
感觉算？还有熊猫和饭团外卖这另外两家
不算，SEC 针对的是所有实体在中国通过VIE结构在美国上市的公司。
早封就好了 根本没有预期性 滴滴这样的来毁人不倦
作为吃瓜群众，喜闻乐见黑心资本家被社会主义铁拳暴击 希望两大黑帮继续撕，千万别手软
真的是
还不是风险投资公司要cash out, 风险投资公司也以美国为主，所以还是资本家坑美国韭菜
这次黑心资本家孙正义就栽了
笑死，我不是轮子弱智你全家死光怎么样？
LOL, 舔共粉蛆一被打脸，就意淫别人是轮子来自我胜利，就这智商， 人家轮子比你们共蛆强太多了
还真把东盟当你们家后院了啊………………你看看搬厂出来这几年。柬埔寨把人的西港搞成网上赌场中心；缅甸现在如何了？看到缅甸人打出来的标语了么？马来西亚塞钱塞到纳吉布败选，然后这次在用疫苗坑死泰国和印尼。口碑好不好走出中文环境去本地人那里看看。本来东盟各国乐观一带一路有成....现在发现东山老虎吃人，西山老虎吃人还放火...
是的，我早觉得SEC操蛋的很，投资者都应该起诉它。按规定SEC可以调公司的财务来美国审查，但是中国规定公司财务报表等不得出境。SEC根本没有办法真的审查这些来美上市公司，只能指望审计公司，可是这些审计公司和中国公司之间猫腻也不少，出了公司本身的财务造假。现在被草狠了才想起来出规矩了，早有规矩他们睁一眼闭一眼
快走！走好不送。
互相撕，挺好。只要不买中丐股，就可以坐等吃瓜。
狼来了，这回是真的狼来了。