有没有人出来反驳一下?党这种背信弃义的做法如何解释?

WIBB
楼主 (北美华人网)
英国外相拉布 (Dominic Raab) 也在一份声明中表示,“香港当局强行关闭《苹果日报》是他们压制所有反对声音行动的一个令人不寒而栗的打击。比以往任何时候都更清楚的是,国安法正被用来限制自由和惩罚异议人士。”拉布在英国外交部的声明中表示,“很明显,《国家安全法》规定的权力被用作限制自由和惩罚异议的工具,而不是维持公共秩序。”他说,“中国政府在《英中联合声明》中承诺,保护香港的新闻自由和言论自由。中国政府必须信守承诺,并坚持承担其对自由的承诺。”
大内密探008
中国厉害了,不需要向英国这种小国解释,反正打不过。
粉墨小小小
那是历史文件😄中共现在装也不装了
C
Cleveland
楼主轮子 - 请问哪里领五毛?
d
duyang
loser才整天惦记着解释,民主明灯打着民主的旗号入侵阿富汗和伊拉克,现在觉得不是利益所在了,拍拍屁股走人,当初和他合作的政府包括雇员又没办法全部带走,留下的人只能自求多福了,希望塔利班能放过一条生路。现在的中国也是有样学样,以后这种事还多着呢,慢慢习惯
by88aa
英国不跟阿根廷讲道理,为什么跟中国讲道理呢。
EvenOdd
Q
Five reasons why we don"t have a free and independent press ... https://www.opendemocracy.net › opendemocracyuk
18 Apr 2019 — Britain"s press is controlled by the same networks of people as run ... as majority voting shareholders for most of the UK national newspapers, ...


Bibles and newspapers"would be banned under new hate ... https://www.thetimes.co.uk › article › bibles-and-newspap...
8 Nov 2020 — Books, bibles and newspapers would be seized and destroyed ... the chief executives of the Humanist Society of Scotland and Humanists UK, ... UQ
EvenOdd




USA vs Canada
Q

Canada Has Added More US Far-Right Extremists To Its List Of Banned Terrorists Included in the ban is the Three Percenters militant group, whose members have been charged in the Jan. 6 Capitol attack.

UQ
huajiachicat
党不屑和你解释
EvenOdd
Q
Taiwan Shuts Pro-China TV Channel in Battle over Press ... https://www.bloomberg.com › news › articles › taiwan-...
18 Nov 2020 — Taiwan's broadcast regulator has ordered the closure of one of the island's most ardently pro-China cable news networks following a ...

Taiwan to shut down China-friendly tycoon's news channel ... https://www.reuters.com › article › us-taiwan-media-chi...
18 Nov 2020 — Taiwan refused on Wednesday to renew the license of a news channel widely seen as pro-China, effectively shutting it down, citing evidence of ...

Taiwan's ban on books, TV shows 'the work of the thought ... https://www.scmp.com › News › China › Politics
3 Jan 2021 — “Banning a children's book, taking CTi news channel off the air and [planning to] censor Chinese publications are the work of the thought police ...


UQ
EvenOdd
Q
Public ‘seething’: UK health minister quits after breaching his own COVID rules Matt Hancock resigned after pictures and video emerged showing him flouting social distancing rules while conducting an affair with a senior aide. 2 hours ago UQ
stone336
英国外相拉布 (Dominic Raab) 也在一份声明中表示,“香港当局强行关闭《苹果日报》是他们压制所有反对声音行动的一个令人不寒而栗的打击。比以往任何时候都更清楚的是,国安法正被用来限制自由和惩罚异议人士。”拉布在英国外交部的声明中表示,“很明显,《国家安全法》规定的权力被用作限制自由和惩罚异议的工具,而不是维持公共秩序。”他说,“中国政府在《英中联合声明》中承诺,保护香港的新闻自由和言论自由。中国政府必须信守承诺,并坚持承担其对自由的承诺。”
WIBB 发表于 2021-06-24 17:14

主编自己作死,怨不得别人。
EvenOdd
However, there could be a technical factor in reality.
The western-style democratic system promotes opposition party, and the government often rotates to the opposition party in next election from a governing party. Therefore, it looks like the government as a whole can be never wrong, because the opposite policies promoted by opposition party.
Actually the CCP-style system would be more like a statesman approach. Accountability (even sometimes hard to understand or accept in hindsight) is clear since any policy mistakes can be much easily identified. A trial and error process could be the major way to reduce serious mistakes (including any dilemma ones). 
Q One of the dilemmas included in the trolley problem: should you pull the lever to divert the runaway trolley onto the side track?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem
Trolley problems have been used as a measure of utilitarianism, but their usefulness for such purposes has been widely criticized.[23][24][25] UQ
EvenOdd
However, there could be a technical factor in reality.
The western-style democratic system promotes opposition party, and the government often rotates to the opposition party in next election from a governing party. Therefore, it looks like the government as a whole can be never wrong, because the opposite policies promoted by opposition party.
Actually the CCP-style system would be more like a statesman approach. Accountability (even sometimes hard to understand or accept in hindsight) is clear since any policy mistakes can be much easily identified. A trial and error process could be the major way to reduce serious mistakes (including any dilemma ones). 
Q One of the dilemmas included in the trolley problem: should you pull the lever to divert the runaway trolley onto the side track?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem
Trolley problems have been used as a measure of utilitarianism, but their usefulness for such purposes has been widely criticized.[23][24][25] UQ
EvenOdd 发表于 2021-06-28 03:57

Q
2021年6月20日,央视播出政治宣传片《敢教日月换新天》,6月25日播出的第十一集《举旗定向》里说到“六四事件”。这在我印象中应该是三十年来第一次在他们官方的电视台第一次大篇幅提到,
UQ
EvenOdd
However, there could be a technical factor in reality.
The western-style democratic system promotes opposition party, and the government often rotates to the opposition party in next election from a governing party. Therefore, it looks like the government as a whole can be never wrong, because the opposite policies promoted by opposition party.
Actually the CCP-style system would be more like a statesman approach. Accountability (even sometimes hard to understand or accept in hindsight) is clear since any policy mistakes can be much easily identified. A trial and error process could be the major way to reduce serious mistakes (including any dilemma ones). 
Q One of the dilemmas included in the trolley problem: should you pull the lever to divert the runaway trolley onto the side track?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem
Trolley problems have been used as a measure of utilitarianism, but their usefulness for such purposes has been widely criticized.[23][24][25] UQ
EvenOdd 发表于 2021-06-28 03:57

< Accountability >
Doing good things is a must and responsibility. Doing anything bad is just one issue! Actually, not doing anything (in order to avoid doing anything wrong) can be another more important issue, perhaps!
A conventional western style democratic system could be not only relatively easy to escape accountability of policy making, but also the 2 major parties in a 2-party system could often care less about something critically important to the country for long term prosperity, due to budget and election cycles.

Q
Which makes sense: an election is around the corner and nobody in government wants a genuine debate about difficult things such as spending priorities, who should pay the necessary taxes, or structural reform.
Instead, we’re informed ... <our country> “remains very well placed to overcome these challenges and take advantage of opportunities in the future”.
UQ
EvenOdd
However, there could be a technical factor in reality.
The western-style democratic system promotes opposition party, and the government often rotates to the opposition party in next election from a governing party. Therefore, it looks like the government as a whole can be never wrong, because the opposite policies promoted by opposition party.
Actually the CCP-style system would be more like a statesman approach. Accountability (even sometimes hard to understand or accept in hindsight) is clear since any policy mistakes can be much easily identified. A trial and error process could be the major way to reduce serious mistakes (including any dilemma ones). 
Q One of the dilemmas included in the trolley problem: should you pull the lever to divert the runaway trolley onto the side track?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem
Trolley problems have been used as a measure of utilitarianism, but their usefulness for such purposes has been widely criticized.[23][24][25] UQ
EvenOdd 发表于 2021-06-28 03:57

< Opposition >
Q
‘Republicans are defunding the police’ Fox News anchor stumps congressman
Fox News anchor stumps congressman

Mon 28 Jun 2021

The Fox News anchor Chris Wallace made headlines of his own on Sunday, by pointing out to a senior Republican that he and the rest of his party recently voted against $350bn in funding for law enforcement.
UQ
EvenOdd
< Accountability >
Doing good things is a must and responsibility. Doing anything bad is just one issue! Actually, not doing anything (in order to avoid doing anything wrong) can be another more important issue, perhaps!
A conventional western style democratic system could be not only relatively easy to escape accountability of policy making, but also the 2 major parties in a 2-party system could often care less about something critically important to the country for long term prosperity, due to budget and election cycles.

Q
Which makes sense: an election is around the corner and nobody in government wants a genuine debate about difficult things such as spending priorities, who should pay the necessary taxes, or structural reform.
Instead, we’re informed ... <our country> “remains very well placed to overcome these challenges and take advantage of opportunities in the future”.
UQ

EvenOdd 发表于 2021-06-28 05:48

< 2-party system >
Q
Republicans can win the next elections through gerrymandering alone David Daley
Even if voting patterns remain the same, Republicans could still win more seats in Congress through redistricting

‘Republicans won’t have to win more votes next year to claim the US House.’
Mon 28 Jun 2021 UQ