拥枪的怎么就这么张嘴就来？来看看统计数据吧，会英文吧，不会用google 翻译一下。https://www.statista.com/statistics/476461/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-legality-of-shooters-weapons/ Number of mass shootings in the United States between 1982 and May 2021, by legality of shooter's weapons； 83 of the mass shootings in the United States between 1982 and April 2021 involved weapons which were obtained legally; a clear majority. Only 16 incidents involved guns that were obtained illegally.
拥枪的怎么就这么张嘴就来？来看看统计数据吧，会英文吧，不会用google 翻译一下。https://www.statista.com/statistics/476461/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-legality-of-shooters-weapons/ Number of mass shootings in the United States between 1982 and May 2021, by legality of shooter's weapons； 83 of the mass shootings in the United States between 1982 and April 2021 involved weapons which were obtained legally; a clear majority. Only 16 incidents involved guns that were obtained illegally.
难道用菜刀去挡罪犯的子弹么？他们的枪有几把是通过背景调查买的
拥枪的怎么就这么张嘴就来？来看看统计数据吧，会英文吧，不会用google 翻译一下。https://www.statista.com/statistics/476461/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-legality-of-shooters-weapons/ Number of mass shootings in the United States between 1982 and May 2021, by legality of shooter's weapons； 83 of the mass shootings in the United States between 1982 and April 2021 involved weapons which were obtained legally; a clear majority. Only 16 incidents involved guns that were obtained illegally.
请定义自我修复
希望大家在考虑问题是不要加太多限定。看要不要禁枪我觉得可以从以下几个方面看：
1：有多少人受益，受益多少？ 2：有多少人受害，害处多大？ 3：如有可能可以进一步细化分析，可能更有效的理解。
你这篇回复只说mass shooting，这个总量本来就不多。mass shooting大部分攻击人都死了。
请大家注意很多人不是简单的拥枪，大多数人是权衡利弊之后选择不那么坏的一个方案。
“In California, murder by knife occurs seven times more often than murder by rifle," he added.
谁需要assault rifle来自卫？
你认为坏的宪法，别人认为好的。谁的标准都不是真理。
多的是。BLM运动以来，枪支的购买量增长迅速。而且很多都是第一次拥枪的。也就是很多其实是民主党人。
其实你也不用ban，现在能买到把枪也不容易。不是很想买的，是买不到的。
至于已经散落在民间的枪，那就是另外一个问题了。
还有，目前没有任何一个数据可以支持，拥枪率和恶性犯罪率成正比。也就是美国人均拥枪最多的地方，并不是恶性犯罪率最高的地方，甚至far from it。
经常去靶场的表示，自卫效率最高的是shot gun
每次看到这种帖子就觉得有需要收智商税的必要。所谓的禁枪就是把听话的公民枪给禁了。有枪的AA们以后揍亚裔更是肆无忌惮了……
收AA们的枪？你们都是白人至上...华左们先把这个逻辑理清了，再来谈枪的问题吧