改了新冠检测标准降低感染数

e
esprit88
楼主 (北美华人网)
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/caught-red-handed-cdc-changes-test-thresholds-virtually-eliminate-new-covid-cases-among
“breakthrough infections” – that is people who are fully “vaccinated” against Sars-Cov-2 infection“  “From the CDC’s instructions for state health authorities on handling “possible breakthrough infections” (uploaded to their website in late April):
For cases with a known RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value, submit only specimens with Ct value ≤28 to CDC for sequencing. (Sequencing is not feasible with higher Ct values.)
Throughout the pandemic, CT values in excess of 35 have been the norm, with labs around the world going into the 40s. Essentially labs were running as many cycles as necessary to achieve a positive result, despite experts warning that this was pointless (even Fauci himself said anything over 35 cycles is meaningless). But NOW, and only for fully vaccinated people, the CDC will only accept samples achieved from 28 cycles or fewer. That can only be a deliberate decision in order to decrease the number of “breakthrough infections” being officially recorded. Secondly, asymptomatic or mild infections will no longer be recorded as “covid cases”.”
x
xindereila
Wow 作弊上来的政府,这是作弊上瘾了
t
tidewater
就是因为疫苗能防重症,并且疫苗能显著降低无症状和轻症的传染力。所以从公共卫生角度,无症状和轻症感染数据不再那么重要。
h
herbs
要ct<28才做详细测序是个很合理的规定,深度测序需要足够的病毒载量。CDC没权改阳性标准,各家厂商有自己的定义。
m
me3
不要乱喷,CT>28的话病毒copy太少,很难测序。所以要ct小于28才送去测序很合理。
w
westlake
这是明显看不懂英文吗?只是扩增数少于28才送去测序,并没有说扩增数大于28不算阳性啊! 扩增倍数越小,说明样品里核酸含量越高,如果打了疫苗还能有很大数量的感染,提示有严重的抗体逃逸,着重测序这些病人的样品,才能知道是什么样基因的变种最危险,疫苗效果受影响,以后才能针对性做新的booster
e
esprit88
From their website:
As of May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause. This shift will help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance. Previous case counts, which were last updated on April 26, 2021, are available for reference only and will not be updated moving forward.
Just like that, being asymptomatic – or having only minor symptoms – will no longer count as a “Covid case” but only if you’ve been vaccinated. The CDC has put new policies in place which effectively created a tiered system of diagnosis. Meaning, from now on, unvaccinated people will find it much easier to be diagnosed with Covid19 than vaccinated people.
Consider…
Person A has not been vaccinated. They test positive for Covid using a PCR test at 40 cycles and, despite having no symptoms, they are officially a “covid case”.
Person B has been vaccinated. They test positive at 28 cycles, and spend six weeks bedridden with a high fever. Because they never went into a hospital and didn’t die they are NOT a Covid case.
Person C, who was also vaccinated, did die. After weeks in hospital with a high fever and respiratory problems. Only their positive PCR test was 29 cycles, so they’re not officially a Covid case either.

C
Cytochrome
哪里改标准了? 阳性就是阳性,不过分子诊断的阳性和有感染性是不一样的,超过ct value 35,就没有感染性了。
r
riverside
From their website:
As of May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause. This shift will help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance. Previous case counts, which were last updated on April 26, 2021, are available for reference only and will not be updated moving forward.
Just like that, being asymptomatic – or having only minor symptoms – will no longer count as a “Covid case” but only if you’ve been vaccinated. The CDC has put new policies in place which effectively created a tiered system of diagnosis. Meaning, from now on, unvaccinated people will find it much easier to be diagnosed with Covid19 than vaccinated people.
Consider…
Person A has not been vaccinated. They test positive for Covid using a PCR test at 40 cycles and, despite having no symptoms, they are officially a “covid case”.
Person B has been vaccinated. They test positive at 28 cycles, and spend six weeks bedridden with a high fever. Because they never went into a hospital and didn’t die they are NOT a Covid case.
Person C, who was also vaccinated, did die. After weeks in hospital with a high fever and respiratory problems. Only their positive PCR test was 29 cycles, so they’re not officially a Covid case either.


esprit88 发表于 2021-05-22 19:38

这个标准我理解是没有打疫苗的只有轻症或无症状不能算Covid,打了疫苗才算。所以是打了疫苗更容易诊断为新冠
J
June6666
回复 1楼esprit88的帖子
楼主的英语需要提高啊,这样才能提高业务水平。
e
esprit88
回复 1楼esprit88的帖子
楼主的英语需要提高啊,这样才能提高业务水平。
June6666 发表于 2021-05-22 20:11

那你给翻译翻译,看看哪没理解对呗
e
esprit88
这个标准我理解是没有打疫苗的只有轻症或无症状不能算Covid,打了疫苗才算。所以是打了疫苗更容易诊断为新冠
riverside 发表于 2021-05-22 20:07

您确定,仔细说说
c
csliz
回复 6楼westlake的帖子
应该不是不懂,是 太专业了!全民参加 科学,就这效果,谁都觉得自己是科学家,比如 ADE 。。
普罗旺斯的淡紫
国内无症状感染者早就不算病例了。